Skip to content

WhatIfSports simulates the Browns season

The Browns Board
16 13 662
  • ConnerLangfordC ConnerLangford wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I was bored and thought it would be fun to simulate our 2015 season and here's what I got:

    @ Jets-Loss 16-14 (0-1)

    Titans-Win 17-7 (1-1)

    Raiders-Loss 16-3 (1-2)

    @ Chargers-Loss 15-3 (1-3)

    @ Ravens-Win 17-7 (2-3)

    Broncos-Win 12-10 (3-3)

    @ Rams-Loss 13-6 (3-4)

    Cardinals-Loss 26-0 (3-5)

    @ Bengals-Loss 24-16 (3-6)

    @ Steelers-Loss 13-3 (3-7)

    Ravens-Win 13-10 (4-7)

    Bengals-Loss 42-10 (4-8)

    49ers-Win 25-0 (5-8)

    @ Seahawks-Loss 15-13 (5-9)

    @ Chiefs-Loss 28-13 (5-10)

    Steelers-Win 17-13 (6-10)

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #2

    So 25 is the most points we score all year? And even that, we only do once, only scoring a max of 17 in every other game? Seems a little low.

  • Mike HM Mike H wrote on last edited by Mike H
    #3

    16-3 loss at home to Raiders? I'll take that spread....

    Also, I live in San Diego and no one is excited about their defense.

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

  • So 25 is the most points we score all year? And even that, we only do once, only scoring a max of 17 in every other game? Seems a little low.

    ConnerLangfordC ConnerLangford wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @wargograw said:

    So 25 is the most points we score all year? And even that, we only do once, only scoring a max of 17 in every other game? Seems a little low.

    I know, I noticed the same thing when I was doing it

  • 16-3 loss at home to Raiders? I'll take that spread....

    Also, I live in San Diego and no one is excited about their defense.

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @mike-h said:

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

    HA!!!

    well done squire!

  • 16-3 loss at home to Raiders? I'll take that spread....

    Also, I live in San Diego and no one is excited about their defense.

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @mike-h said:

    16-3 loss at home to Raiders? I'll take that spread....

    Also, I live in San Diego and no one is excited about their defense.

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

    I really don't know why, I'm sure it's completely irrational, but the Chargers scare the hell out of me.

  • @mike-h said:

    16-3 loss at home to Raiders? I'll take that spread....

    Also, I live in San Diego and no one is excited about their defense.

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

    I really don't know why, I'm sure it's completely irrational, but the Chargers scare the hell out of me.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @wargograw said:

    I really don't know why, I'm sure it's completely irrational, but the Chargers scare the hell out of me.

    I hear they have a couple of really great kickers...

  • nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Zzzzzz....

  • @wargograw said:

    I really don't know why, I'm sure it's completely irrational, but the Chargers scare the hell out of me.

    I hear they have a couple of really great kickers...

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @gftchris said:

    I hear they have a couple of really great kickers...

    Hahaha

  • @wargograw said:

    I really don't know why, I'm sure it's completely irrational, but the Chargers scare the hell out of me.

    I hear they have a couple of really great kickers...

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @gftchris said:

    I hear they have a couple of really great kickers...

    Who? 😄

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by
    #11

    I can't see this defense giving up 42 points at home against the Bungholes.

  • I was bored and thought it would be fun to simulate our 2015 season and here's what I got:

    @ Jets-Loss 16-14 (0-1)

    Titans-Win 17-7 (1-1)

    Raiders-Loss 16-3 (1-2)

    @ Chargers-Loss 15-3 (1-3)

    @ Ravens-Win 17-7 (2-3)

    Broncos-Win 12-10 (3-3)

    @ Rams-Loss 13-6 (3-4)

    Cardinals-Loss 26-0 (3-5)

    @ Bengals-Loss 24-16 (3-6)

    @ Steelers-Loss 13-3 (3-7)

    Ravens-Win 13-10 (4-7)

    Bengals-Loss 42-10 (4-8)

    49ers-Win 25-0 (5-8)

    @ Seahawks-Loss 15-13 (5-9)

    @ Chiefs-Loss 28-13 (5-10)

    Steelers-Win 17-13 (6-10)

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @connerlangford said:

    I was bored and thought it would be fun to simulate our 2015 season and here's what I got:

    @ Jets-Loss 16-14 (0-1)

    Titans-Win 17-7 (1-1)

    Raiders-Loss 16-3 (1-2)

    @ Chargers-Loss 15-3 (1-3)

    @ Ravens-Win 17-7 (2-3)

    Broncos-Win 12-10 (3-3)

    @ Rams-Loss 13-6 (3-4)

    Cardinals-Loss 26-0 (3-5)

    @ Bengals-Loss 24-16 (3-6)

    @ Steelers-Loss 13-3 (3-7)

    Ravens-Win 13-10 (4-7)

    Bengals-Loss 42-10 (4-8)

    49ers-Win 25-0 (5-8)

    @ Seahawks-Loss 15-13 (5-9)

    @ Chiefs-Loss 28-13 (5-10)

    Steelers-Win 17-13 (6-10)

    Useless, really useless

  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
    #13

    That simulator is awful. The Seahawks and Broncos must only use kickers in their simulator.

  • ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Very useless. If we really only score three points on the Raiders than we need to tank the season and go for a #1 overall QB

  • IbleedbrownI Ibleedbrown wrote on last edited by
    #15

    We always beat the Bengals once.

  • 16-3 loss at home to Raiders? I'll take that spread....

    Also, I live in San Diego and no one is excited about their defense.

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @mike-h said:

    16-3 loss at home to Raiders? I'll take that spread....

    Also, I live in San Diego and no one is excited about their defense.

    Whoever created this simulator, well, sucks.

    They're not very excited about their offensive line either and as good as Rivers is, he's not exactly mobile. I would think it would be a good matchup for our defense.