Skip to content

Joe Thomas on Deflategate

The Browns Board
102 23 2.9k
  • Don't mean he didn't cheat....just means he got away with it.

    Can we move on now? I propose a moratorium on any further Deflategate talk.

  • HA!! yes, please. just woke up with a hair all twisted (IYKWIM).

  • Okay Mik, you can beat off to your Brady poster in peace now.

  • no gip, on topic, this is a bout tom brady and deflategate.

    @miktoxic said:

    no gip, on topic, this is a bout tom brady and deflategate.

    I got it.....I guess I was wrong on both. My offer of appeasement stands. You got your passport?

  • TOM BRADY WINS AGAIN!

  • TOM BRADY WINS AGAIN!

    @mld-woody said:

    TOM BRADY WINS AGAIN!

    As long as he wins that first game next week, that is the only win/loss by him I care about at this point.

  • I'm just happy the judge used common sense and that this blew up in Goodells face

  • I'm just happy the judge used common sense and that this blew up in Goodells face

    @mld-woody said:

    I'm just happy the judge used common sense and that this blew up in Goodells face

    I think you just want to suck your boy's dick. And if you think this blew up in Goodell's face.....wait until the next disciplinary measure has to be taken......someone will feel the hammer.

  • No, I think this decision makes complete sense. If you and others on here can look passed your bias against Brady, and look at the facts of the situation, you can see the NFL was in the wrong.

    This was becoming more apparent to pro Brady and neutral observers. It made Goodell and the NFL look even worse.

  • Judge was tasked with determining the validity of the process that lead to the suspension. So the suspension was either going to be upheld or not. And it was "not".

    Bad news is an appeal is likely being filed as I type this...

    Good news is Brady vs. Steelers Week 1.

    @tour2ma said:

    Judge was tasked with determining the validity of the process that lead to the suspension. So the suspension was either going to be upheld or not. And it was "not".

    Bad news is an appeal is likely being filed as I type this...

    Good news is Brady vs. Steelers Week 1.

    Of course the NFL will appeal. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000520654/article/roger-goodell-nfl-will-appeal-tom-brady-ruling

    @mld-woody said:

    TOM BRADY WINS AGAIN!

    As long as he wins against the Steelers, I'm fine with it. Yeah, I think he got away with one. If it was a criminal matter- they could have busted him for tampering with evidence, I'd cut him more slack if he hadn't destroyed the cell phone.

  • Okay Mik, you can beat off to your Brady poster in peace now.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Okay Mik, you can beat off to your Brady poster in peace now.

    thanks donald!

    i'd rather wax poetic with your girl sarah palin though.

    how's the immigration thing coming along for you?

  • amazing how the right wing strict 'law-abiding' citizens' hate the pats and the northeast when it's the birthplace of our country.

    no dickheads it's not plymouth, missouri it's plymouth massachusetts. the pilgrims didn't fly in from england on a 747.

  • Considering the specific words used by the Federal Judge that were aimed at the NFL it makes me wonder if Josh Gordon has a right to appeal his year long suspension. Perhaps I am looking at this through homer goggles but a full season for weed in this day and age? Sounds overly zealous by the NFL and if I am Gordon now may be the time to strike and appeal due to this decision.

  • Considering the specific words used by the Federal Judge that were aimed at the NFL it makes me wonder if Josh Gordon has a right to appeal his year long suspension. Perhaps I am looking at this through homer goggles but a full season for weed in this day and age? Sounds overly zealous by the NFL and if I am Gordon now may be the time to strike and appeal due to this decision.

    @brownsfan11 said:

    Considering the specific words used by the Federal Judge that were aimed at the NFL it makes me wonder if Josh Gordon has a right to appeal his year long suspension. Perhaps I am looking at this through homer goggles but a full season for weed in this day and age? Sounds overly zealous by the NFL and if I am Gordon now may be the time to strike and appeal due to this decision.

    but it's gordon's multiple failed drug tests.... more than one.....that has doomed him

  • @MarcSesslerNFL: Destroy phone attached to league investigation = 0 games. Text sideline to say the Browns offense stinks = 4 games. Got it.

  • For those betting folks... I would not settle as yet.

    I'm no lawyer, but Article 46 of the CBA does not seem to prescribe actions in the areas where the judge "found" grounds for vacating the suspension. Seems akin to binding arbitration clauses we routinely agree to in the internet era, i.e. fairness doesn't enter into it...

    Gip?

    https://nfllabor.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/collective-bargaining-agreement-2011-2020.pdf

    Page 204...

  • Considering the specific words used by the Federal Judge that were aimed at the NFL it makes me wonder if Josh Gordon has a right to appeal his year long suspension. Perhaps I am looking at this through homer goggles but a full season for weed in this day and age? Sounds overly zealous by the NFL and if I am Gordon now may be the time to strike and appeal due to this decision.

    @brownsfan11 said:

    Considering the specific words used by the Federal Judge that were aimed at the NFL it makes me wonder if Josh Gordon has a right to appeal his year long suspension. Perhaps I am looking at this through homer goggles but a full season for weed in this day and age? Sounds overly zealous by the NFL and if I am Gordon now may be the time to strike and appeal due to this decision.

    and lets not forget that his final transgression.....the one that got him suspended for a year.....was to have a drink.....

  • amazing how the right wing strict 'law-abiding' citizens' hate the pats and the northeast when it's the birthplace of our country.

    no dickheads it's not plymouth, missouri it's plymouth massachusetts. the pilgrims didn't fly in from england on a 747.

    @miktoxic said:

    amazing how the right wing strict 'law-abiding' citizens' hate the pats and the northeast when it's the birthplace of our country.

    no dickheads it's not plymouth, missouri it's plymouth massachusetts. the pilgrims didn't fly in from england on a 747.

    Actually, it is Jamestown Virginia.....13 years earlier (if by "birthplace" you are saying...."where was the first English Colony established in America"

    Or perhaps if you are just asking where the first European colony was established, then you have to go to St. Augustine Fla.

    😛😁😆

  • For those betting folks... I would not settle as yet.

    I'm no lawyer, but Article 46 of the CBA does not seem to prescribe actions in the areas where the judge "found" grounds for vacating the suspension. Seems akin to binding arbitration clauses we routinely agree to in the internet era, i.e. fairness doesn't enter into it...

    Gip?

    https://nfllabor.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/collective-bargaining-agreement-2011-2020.pdf

    Page 204...

    @tour2ma said:

    For those betting folks... I would not settle as yet.

    I'm no lawyer, but Article 46 of the CBA does not seem to prescribe actions in the areas where the judge "found" grounds for vacating the suspension. Seems akin to binding arbitration clauses we routinely agree to in the internet era, i.e. fairness doesn't enter into it...

    Gip?

    https://nfllabor.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/collective-bargaining-agreement-2011-2020.pdf

    Page 204...

    The Judge seemed to imply that the NFL overstepped their bounds in his decision. The NFL may have just as valid an argument that the Judge overstepped his bounds.

  • My guess is, the judge should have resigned from the case, because

    of being an avid patriots fan.