Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. 2015 Player Cuts

2015 Player Cuts

The Browns Board
135 36 4.4k

  • Thanks Jesus we dropped that turd Thad Lewis.

  • JAFBFJ JAFBF

    Not a lot of talk about Players going to Practice Squad.

    I see Pullard, Lenz, and Mayle as likely, and I'd throw in Draughn, Jennings, and Wynn as possibles.

    With West on the Block there could be a little bit more shuffling - Coach Montgomery really likes Draughn as a Mentor to Duke Johnson (if he ever gets on the field).

    @jafbf said:

    I see Pullard, Lenz, and Mayle as likely, and I'd throw in Draughn, Jennings, and Wynn as possibles.

    Which Wynn? I like the pair of them.

    Speaking of Winns... a little surprised Billy made the 53. Glad, but surprised...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    JAFBFJ 1 Reply

  • I sincerely believe West will be traded & Housler may go with him. I'm interested to see what happens, but I think we'll come up with an OL & a vet RB.

    Mike

    IN DORSEY I TRUST

  • What are practice squad rules?

    Can any player at any point in a career be placed on one? Or doesn't it have to be a younger player?

    If a player is on your practice squad and another team wants him for active roster, do you get the right to promote him first to your roster to keep him or no?

  • hx214H hx214

    What are practice squad rules?

    Can any player at any point in a career be placed on one? Or doesn't it have to be a younger player?

    If a player is on your practice squad and another team wants him for active roster, do you get the right to promote him first to your roster to keep him or no?

    @hx214 said:

    What are practice squad rules?

    Can any player at any point in a career be placed on one? Or doesn't it have to be a younger player?

    If a player is on your practice squad and another team wants him for active roster, do you get the right to promote him first to your roster to keep him or no?

    Can be on practice squad for two years, but a third year is possible if team keeps 53 players on roster at all times. Lenz has accrued two years already, but could make it under that stipulation

  • http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/316734/browns-admit-defeat-on-fourth-rounder-mayle

    "The Browns are the worst team in the league at evaluating receiver talent."

    So when do we admit defeat on another and bring Lenz back in?

    The GipperT 1 Reply

  • F rotoworld. It's Browns football and with a great stay healthy OL it's still ground and pound football for us. Got pound with Crow and M. Johnson. Today is all about West still on the Grounds.

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends

  • anybody find it amazing that not one of our cuts have been claimed?

  • IbleedbrownI Ibleedbrown

    Is Lenz even eligible for the ps? Seemed like that guy could catch gonorrhea from a hooker screwing some other guy six hotel rooms down the hall.

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Is Lenz even eligible for the ps? Seemed like that guy could catch gonorrhea from a hooker screwing some other guy six hotel rooms down the hall.

    Unfortunately, he didn't make the PS. I was really hoping he would at least make it there. Especially considering that Jennings made it. In my opinion, Josh Lenz showed he can play several positions, but lets hope the Browns made the right decision on this one.

  • dawg2fanD dawg2fan

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Is Lenz even eligible for the ps? Seemed like that guy could catch gonorrhea from a hooker screwing some other guy six hotel rooms down the hall.

    Unfortunately, he didn't make the PS. I was really hoping he would at least make it there. Especially considering that Jennings made it. In my opinion, Josh Lenz showed he can play several positions, but lets hope the Browns made the right decision on this one.

    @dawg2fan said:

    Unfortunately, he didn't make the PS. I was really hoping he would at least make it there. Especially considering that Jennings made it. In my opinion, Josh Lenz showed he can play several positions, but lets hope the Browns made the right decision on this one.

    Jennings showed almost as much as Lenz in the passing game, and was pretty electric in the return game. That kid has a career as a returner at least.

    Mike HM 1 Reply
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @jafbf said:

    I see Pullard, Lenz, and Mayle as likely, and I'd throw in Draughn, Jennings, and Wynn as possibles.

    Which Wynn? I like the pair of them.

    Speaking of Winns... a little surprised Billy made the 53. Glad, but surprised...

    @tour2ma said:

    Which Wynn? I like the pair of them.

    Speaking of Winns... a little surprised Billy made the 53. Glad, but surprised...

    I was thinking the DT Wynn since the other is a WR and was released a day earlier (I think).

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @dawg2fan said:

    Unfortunately, he didn't make the PS. I was really hoping he would at least make it there. Especially considering that Jennings made it. In my opinion, Josh Lenz showed he can play several positions, but lets hope the Browns made the right decision on this one.

    Jennings showed almost as much as Lenz in the passing game, and was pretty electric in the return game. That kid has a career as a returner at least.

    @gftchris said:

    Jennings showed almost as much as Lenz in the passing game, and was pretty electric in the return game. That kid has a career as a returner at least.

    It's my belief he'll be a contributor at WR too in near future

  • So am I the only one here who is not at all excited about Terrelle Pryor?

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    IbleedbrownI Tour2maT 2 Replies
  • Opal312O Opal312

    I didn't see Bibbs name on the list. How about a trade for Mike Glennon, EJ Manuel, Garapollo.

    Terrell Pryor is horrible at QB so they better not be thinking that!

    @opal312 said:

    I didn't see Bibbs name on the list. How about a trade for Mike Glennon, EJ Manuel, Garapollo.

    Terrell Pryor is horrible at QB so they better not be thinking that!

    The Pats drafted Jimmy G to be the heir apparent. Pretty sure he's not on the block.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
  • W Westside Steve

    So am I the only one here who is not at all excited about Terrelle Pryor?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    So am I the only one here who is not at all excited about Terrelle Pryor?

    WSS

    I'm with you on that. I will admit it interests the hell outta me that we took him though. Almost like they are conceding a roster spot for experimental purposes, which is mildly depressing since it's a "building for the future" move.

    Not that that's so terrible, but it's so obvious l worry about the other 52 settling for a "building for the future" mentality.

  • W Westside Steve

    So am I the only one here who is not at all excited about Terrelle Pryor?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    So am I the only one here who is not at all excited about Terrelle Pryor?

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • T TexasAg1969

    http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/316734/browns-admit-defeat-on-fourth-rounder-mayle

    "The Browns are the worst team in the league at evaluating receiver talent."

    So when do we admit defeat on another and bring Lenz back in?

    @texasag1969 said:

    http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/316734/browns-admit-defeat-on-fourth-rounder-mayle

    "The Browns are the worst team in the league at evaluating receiver talent."

    So when do we admit defeat on another and bring Lenz back in?

    Stupid statement......the Browns never choose WRs in the draft.....so it is not matter of inability....it is a matter of choosing not to do so.

    I actually think the choice of Mayle in the draft was a throwaway by Farmer. He hates rookie receivers. He hates investing in rookie receivers. Mayle may have been on the chopping block from the moment his name was called.

    gftChrisG T 2 Replies
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @texasag1969 said:

    http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/316734/browns-admit-defeat-on-fourth-rounder-mayle

    "The Browns are the worst team in the league at evaluating receiver talent."

    So when do we admit defeat on another and bring Lenz back in?

    Stupid statement......the Browns never choose WRs in the draft.....so it is not matter of inability....it is a matter of choosing not to do so.

    I actually think the choice of Mayle in the draft was a throwaway by Farmer. He hates rookie receivers. He hates investing in rookie receivers. Mayle may have been on the chopping block from the moment his name was called.

    @the-gipper said:

    Stupid statement......the Browns never choose WRs in the draft.....so it is not matter of inability....it is a matter of choosing not to do so.

    I actually think the choice of Mayle in the draft was a throwaway by Farmer. He hates rookie receivers. He hates investing in rookie receivers. Mayle may have been on the chopping block from the moment his name was called.

    Except Gabriel?

    MudflyM The GipperT 2 Replies
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @texasag1969 said:

    http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/316734/browns-admit-defeat-on-fourth-rounder-mayle

    "The Browns are the worst team in the league at evaluating receiver talent."

    So when do we admit defeat on another and bring Lenz back in?

    Stupid statement......the Browns never choose WRs in the draft.....so it is not matter of inability....it is a matter of choosing not to do so.

    I actually think the choice of Mayle in the draft was a throwaway by Farmer. He hates rookie receivers. He hates investing in rookie receivers. Mayle may have been on the chopping block from the moment his name was called.

    @the-gipper said:

    Mayle may have been on the chopping block from the moment his name was called.

    Really? That makes no sense to me. If you don't want them then why waste a 4th rd. draft choice that could have been used to move up for someone you wanted more? That would be a move worth a firing IMHO.

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @the-gipper said:

    Stupid statement......the Browns never choose WRs in the draft.....so it is not matter of inability....it is a matter of choosing not to do so.

    I actually think the choice of Mayle in the draft was a throwaway by Farmer. He hates rookie receivers. He hates investing in rookie receivers. Mayle may have been on the chopping block from the moment his name was called.

    Except Gabriel?

    @gftchris said:

    Except Gabriel?

    he wasn't drafted......he was signed as a udfa.....and ended up outperforming most of the WR's who were drafted.....

Log in to reply