Skip to content

Looks like we should've waited for Dan Quinn

Locked The Browns Board
49 17 1.6k
  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #6

    well we do have the minny game on tonite.

    waiting for the walters of the world with the we shoulda coulda.

    yep sammy lit up the league yesterday, as did everyone else we never drafted..

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by wargograw
    #7

    They definitely looked really good. But as a coach he'd be an idiot to go to a team without a QB over one that has an above average one, don't care what the talent is on defense.

    But regardless, let's give Pettine more than one game. This attitude has GOT to be eradicated from this fan base.

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #8

    i think the fan base is behind pettine and farmer 100% even though they can just lay a metamucil crap that crawls outta da bowl sometimes.

    the browns opening day record is one of the worse ever and the way they marched down the field with mccown in the first yesterday had my hopes up that things would change...

    BUT

    does chris berman and the new HC of the niners have the same crack dealer? omg!

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #9

    can we trade for teddy now?

    god, what a fag. tried humping his own rb instead of taking a sack on the chin.

  • can we trade for teddy now?

    god, what a fag. tried humping his own rb instead of taking a sack on the chin.

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @miktoxic said:

    can we trade for teddy now?

    god, what a fag. tried humping his own rb instead of taking a sack on the chin.

    It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.

  • @miktoxic said:

    can we trade for teddy now?

    god, what a fag. tried humping his own rb instead of taking a sack on the chin.

    It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @wargograw said:

    Teddy looks really good.

    you are funny.

    i shoulda drafted kaep in fantasy.

  • @miktoxic said:

    can we trade for teddy now?

    god, what a fag. tried humping his own rb instead of taking a sack on the chin.

    It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.

    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @wargograw said:

    It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.

    eh...no.

    Teddy Twatwater (first half)

    Comp Att Yds Pct Y/A Sack YdsL TD Int QBRat FL 8 14 67 57.1 4.8 2 24 0 0 69.6 0
    Comp Att Yds Pct Y/A Sack YdsL TD Int QBRat FL 13 24 182 54.2 7.6 3 14 1 1 75.3 2

    Teddy Bildgewater. bleh. He wouldn't make any difference to the Browns

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #13

    His technique is solid. Receivers have dropped some balls. Running game hasn't been there, surprisingly enough. Stats don't tell the whole story.

  • @miktoxic said:

    can we trade for teddy now?

    god, what a fag. tried humping his own rb instead of taking a sack on the chin.

    It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @wargograw said:

    It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.

    LOL, 3 points?

    Not going to win too many games.

    Must have been the other 10 guys fault.

    Zombo

  • His technique is solid. Receivers have dropped some balls. Running game hasn't been there, surprisingly enough. Stats don't tell the whole story.

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @wargograw said:

    His technique is solid. Receivers have dropped some balls. Running game hasn't been there, surprisingly enough. Stats don't tell the whole story.

    Oh, well, as long as his technique is solid.

    Hope we get some solid technique this week.

    Zombo

  • hx214H hx214 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Owen Marecic > Julio Jones

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Teddy looked OK... controlled. Mangini's pressure D simply ate him up as it has many QBs, many much better QBs, before him. Especially late when MN was well behind.

    Agree with above that Kaep's play was surprisingly improved.

    Shocker of the nite was how long it took Philly's O to get on track.

    Totaled 35 yds in Q1.

    Totaled 399 for the game... not exactly an award winning D number...

  • Teddy looked OK... controlled. Mangini's pressure D simply ate him up as it has many QBs, many much better QBs, before him. Especially late when MN was well behind.

    Agree with above that Kaep's play was surprisingly improved.

    Shocker of the nite was how long it took Philly's O to get on track.

    Totaled 35 yds in Q1.

    Totaled 399 for the game... not exactly an award winning D number...

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by D Bone
    #18

    @tour2ma said:

    Agree with above that Kaep's play was surprisingly improved.

    I'll go a giant step above and say he looked - dare I say - phenomenal. Poised yet aggressive. Decisive. Smart. Athletic as hell....... Basically everything I want in a QB.

    He's still a douche though, and needs to pull his pants up and put his hat on straight. Once he grows into a man, those doucheizms should fade (or so I keep telling myself).

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Or draft a player like Julio Jones.

    dead-horse.gif

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @cvcanedy said:

    @texasag1969 said:

    Or draft a player like Julio Jones.

    dead-horse.gif

    omg the internets can be an awesome place sometime, holy shit lmfao

  • @wargograw said:

    It was an OT. One that should have been out of the way. Teddy looks really good.

    LOL, 3 points?

    Not going to win too many games.

    Must have been the other 10 guys fault.

    Zombo

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Zombo said:

    LOL, 3 points?

    Not going to win too many games.

    Must have been the other 10 guys fault.

    Zombo

    It was.

  • @wargograw said:

    His technique is solid. Receivers have dropped some balls. Running game hasn't been there, surprisingly enough. Stats don't tell the whole story.

    Oh, well, as long as his technique is solid.

    Hope we get some solid technique this week.

    Zombo

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Zombo said:

    Oh, well, as long as his technique is solid.

    Hope we get some solid technique this week.

    Zombo

    Yes, that would be good. Run along now.

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Teddy Twatwater looked awful and the Minnesota playcalling was suspect, at best.

    For the life of me, I can't figure why AP was taking shotgun/pistol sweep/read option/draw plays and McKinnon was taking singleback power and zone runs. That's ass-backwards.

  • Zombo said:

    Oh, well, as long as his technique is solid.

    Hope we get some solid technique this week.

    Zombo

    Yes, that would be good. Run along now.

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @wargograw said:

    Yes, that would be good. Run along now.

    How about you fucking say something intelligent for once in your life.

    I watched the game. I watched the offense struggle. Bridgewater is the play caller, he's responsible for them to get on the scoreboard.

    For you to say that he solely played well and it was the 10 ten guys fault is fully Retarded.

    You gotta score more than 3 to win in this league. They failed to do that. He is the leader of the offense, it's on him.

    I know you think it is a lot of points, because that is what Johnny got in his two starts last year ... but it's not.

    Bridgewater was horribly inaccurate on their first drive, where the offense was handed the ball in scoring position and failed to score. Never seized that opportunity, and then paid for it. Offense was bumbling all night.

    "Showed good technique" ... this isn't high school. He's a starting quarterback in the NFL, he better fucking show good technique.

    Zombo

  • @wargograw said:

    Yes, that would be good. Run along now.

    How about you fucking say something intelligent for once in your life.

    I watched the game. I watched the offense struggle. Bridgewater is the play caller, he's responsible for them to get on the scoreboard.

    For you to say that he solely played well and it was the 10 ten guys fault is fully Retarded.

    You gotta score more than 3 to win in this league. They failed to do that. He is the leader of the offense, it's on him.

    I know you think it is a lot of points, because that is what Johnny got in his two starts last year ... but it's not.

    Bridgewater was horribly inaccurate on their first drive, where the offense was handed the ball in scoring position and failed to score. Never seized that opportunity, and then paid for it. Offense was bumbling all night.

    "Showed good technique" ... this isn't high school. He's a starting quarterback in the NFL, he better fucking show good technique.

    Zombo

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by D Bone
    #24

    Zombo said:

    I know you think it is a lot of points, because that is what Johnny got in his two starts last year ... but it's not.

    BAZINGA-I%20GOTCHA%20HEAT%20TRANSFER_zps

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by wargograw
    #25

    Feel better now?

    By your logic if the offense doesn't score it's the quarterback's fault no matter what. So I guess once we find a good quarterback we should just get a bunch of rookie scrubs at the other 10 spots. I mean, hey, you don't need any performance from your surrounding players to win, right?