Skip to content

Matchups Browns v. Raiders

The Browns Board
35 15 1.2k
  • My only concern for us is the same as it was before game 1. Josh takes too many hits to stay healthy. The next one to the head may put him out of football. He has got to learn to slide well before the hit and no more head first dives regardless of what it might accomplish in the moment. So I give the nod at QB only because of that. If he stays upright he will be the key ingredient to winning this game IMO.

    @texasag1969 said:

    My only concern for us is the same as it was before game 1. Josh takes too many hits to stay healthy. The next one to the head may put him out of football. He has got to learn to slide well before the hit and no more head first dives regardless of what it might accomplish in the moment. So I give the nod at QB only because of that. If he stays upright he will be the key ingredient to winning this game IMO.

    How many years has he been in the league as a career backup? More then a decade. If he ain't learned yet, I reckon he ain't ever.

  • Ag & DH Johnny Fan-- We our Browns Fans, all of the players that wear orange helmets. Most true fans come to matchup topics to get away from your homo love for JM that you have 3 topics to whine on no matter what the point. Please stop with your never ending passion to whine up JM & Mc Cown that's not the matchup. I may speak for myself, but Pettine gets paid to make the choice, fans need to support it for guys like you and national media that know nothing about what's going on in that building. Go Browns!! Carr sacked 5-6 more times. Josh has a lot to prove to all of football. I will take the Under DAWG.. Both teams should run the ball with that line matchup. The Game goes to Who Stops It.

  • My only concern for us is the same as it was before game 1. Josh takes too many hits to stay healthy. The next one to the head may put him out of football. He has got to learn to slide well before the hit and no more head first dives regardless of what it might accomplish in the moment. So I give the nod at QB only because of that. If he stays upright he will be the key ingredient to winning this game IMO.

    @texasag1969 said:

    So I give the nod at QB only because of that.

    I hope you were nodding feet first...

  • Ag & DH Johnny Fan-- We our Browns Fans, all of the players that wear orange helmets. Most true fans come to matchup topics to get away from your homo love for JM that you have 3 topics to whine on no matter what the point. Please stop with your never ending passion to whine up JM & Mc Cown that's not the matchup. I may speak for myself, but Pettine gets paid to make the choice, fans need to support it for guys like you and national media that know nothing about what's going on in that building. Go Browns!! Carr sacked 5-6 more times. Josh has a lot to prove to all of football. I will take the Under DAWG.. Both teams should run the ball with that line matchup. The Game goes to Who Stops It.

    @gumby73 said:

    Ag & DH Johnny Fan-- We our Browns Fans, all of the players that wear orange helmets. Most true fans come to matchup topics to get away from your homo love for JM that you have 3 topics to whine on no matter what the point. Please stop with your never ending passion to whine up JM & Mc Cown that's not the matchup. I may speak for myself, but Pettine gets paid to make the choice, fans need to support it for guys like you and national media that know nothing about what's going on in that building. Go Browns!! Carr sacked 5-6 more times. Josh has a lot to prove to all of football. I will take the Under DAWG.. Both teams should run the ball with that line matchup. The Game goes to Who Stops It.

    Actually I was comparing their starting QB to our starting QB. That would be Josh. I stated that concern before the regular season started based on hits he was taking in pre-season. None of it has anything to do with JM. It has to do with Josh taking on too many unnecessary hits. I think he plays well and don't want to see us lose him to another avoidable injury.

    Sure I've had a little fun with JM's win, but I took a lot a shit this year in return. But I've been nothing but supportive of Pettine's more informed decision to start Josh this week. In fact I have stated on more than one occasion that it's JM's fumbles that are costing him the job. I wouldn't start him either for that reason alone.

  • I wouldn't call Oaklands front a 43 anymore than I'd call ours a 34.

  • I wouldn't call Oaklands front a 43 anymore than I'd call ours a 34.

    @tiamat63 said:

    I wouldn't call Oaklands front a 43 anymore than I'd call ours a 34.

    Well, yes, that is what I was wondering. Ourlads Depth Charts lists them as playing a 4-3 with Mack as a DE.....but maybe they too play the "hybrid" Mack can be DE or OLB...whatever the situation calls for.

  • I wouldn't call Oaklands front a 43 anymore than I'd call ours a 34.

    @tiamat63 said:

    I wouldn't call Oaklands front a 43 anymore than I'd call ours a 34.

    Don't disagree... very fluid, but against BLT Mack was down in a three-point quite a bit.

  • No one has yet given me an opinion on who has the edge with most of these units. Are you all as unfamiliar with the Raiders as I am?

    I basically look at it like: except for the WRs and kicker and maybe a wash at QB do not the Browns have the overall edge everywhere? While Oak has a couple of renown defensive players: Nip and Tuck....err Tuck and Mack, the Browns own the rest of the trenches/LB/DBs. Latavius Murray is not DeMarco Murray.

  • It'd be nice to beat up Carr in similar fashion as how we beat up Mariota last week.

    I expect Oakland to go run early and often though.

  • I'll give it a shot, Gip...

    I think we have significantly more talented lines on both sides of the ball.

    Ditto for secondaries...

    WR... Cooper will be best one on the field, but overall I like us...

    TE... push... at a fairly uninspired level... as long as Reese is used more as FB.

    RB... sight edge to us overall, but FB nod goes to OAK.

    QB... OAK... Carr's arm talent is undeniable, he's learning and it turns out he has legs, too. But he is not yet ready to carry the weight of a whole team... and that's the current QB job description in OAK.

    LB... I love Mack, but as with Cooper at WR, he's only one guy. Last year the balance of their LB Corps raised their games, but they are gone from their 2015 roster. So I see us having an edge.

    ST... Janikowski still has the thunderleg, but has never made a 48-yd extra point. Then we have Lee, but King is no dog (46+ ave.). While our STs are resurgent, even seems about right.

  • No one has yet given me an opinion on who has the edge with most of these units. Are you all as unfamiliar with the Raiders as I am?

    I basically look at it like: except for the WRs and kicker and maybe a wash at QB do not the Browns have the overall edge everywhere? While Oak has a couple of renown defensive players: Nip and Tuck....err Tuck and Mack, the Browns own the rest of the trenches/LB/DBs. Latavius Murray is not DeMarco Murray.

    @the-gipper said:

    No one has yet given me an opinion on who has the edge with most of these units. Are you all as unfamiliar with the Raiders as I am?

    I think its more that matching position for position isnt really the way to view how a game will go.....Id be more like

    Our OL vs their DL......Browns

    Our DL vs their OL......Browns

    Our Wr's vs their DB's.Browns

    Our DB's vs their WR's.Browns

    Special teams..............Browns

    etc....

    Personally, I give us the edge across the board....we get a solid win.....sayyy 28 -13 or so....

  • @the-gipper said:

    No one has yet given me an opinion on who has the edge with most of these units. Are you all as unfamiliar with the Raiders as I am?

    I think its more that matching position for position isnt really the way to view how a game will go.....Id be more like

    Our OL vs their DL......Browns

    Our DL vs their OL......Browns

    Our Wr's vs their DB's.Browns

    Our DB's vs their WR's.Browns

    Special teams..............Browns

    etc....

    Personally, I give us the edge across the board....we get a solid win.....sayyy 28 -13 or so....

    @mudfly said:

    I think its more that matching position for position isnt really the way to view how a game will go.....Id be more like

    Our OL vs their DL......Browns

    Our DL vs their OL......Browns

    Our Wr's vs their DB's.Browns

    Our DB's vs their WR's.Browns

    Special teams..............Browns

    etc....

    Personally, I give us the edge across the board....we get a solid win.....sayyy 28 -13 or so....

    Fair enough way to look at it. I was just doing position comparison.

  • Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

  • Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

    @wargograw said:

    Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

    K'wan is backup CB/Nickelback, .....so since this just compared starters which for CBs would be Haden and Tramon so I would think so.

  • Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

    @wargograw said:

    Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

    @PFF: Highest graded cornerbacks from Week 2:

    1. T. Williams +3.4

    2. C. Munnerlyn +3.4

    3. D. Revis +2.7

    4. A. Talib +2.6

    5. M. Peters +2.4

  • Hello,

    Visiting Raider fan here. Recent history suggests the Raiders will lose because they have been horrible on the road for several years. They also have rarely won back to back games in quite some time. Last but not least, Carr is 0-9 on the road. Having said all that, this is a new team and new staff. The hope is that Carr continues his growth as a franchise QB and we will see how he does after a very good game against BLT. As far as the match ups go that is difficult for me because the Raiders are still an unknown this year. I believe the talent is good on defense but they are still trying to gather chemistry with Ken Norton jrs scheme and with each other. They were horrendous in game 1 but a little less horrendous in game 2. I`m guessing they will get better each week but it will take most of the year until they really gel. I also noticed the OP forgot to list Aldon Smith, and we know what he is capable of. The offense is ahead of the defense. I expect a good to great year out of Murray however he hasn`t been asked to take a heavy load yet as the Raiders have thus far been very pass heavy. Will they go run heavy this week? Maybe.. Cooper is legit and Crabtree hash`t disappointed either. Carr likes to throw underneath a great deal but like last week showed, he can strike deep at any time and Cooper is the man able to do that. Our teams have a rich history and I look forward to a great game. Cheers!

  • @mudfly said:

    I think its more that matching position for position isnt really the way to view how a game will go.....Id be more like

    Our OL vs their DL......Browns

    Our DL vs their OL......Browns

    Our Wr's vs their DB's.Browns

    Our DB's vs their WR's.Browns

    Special teams..............Browns

    etc....

    Personally, I give us the edge across the board....we get a solid win.....sayyy 28 -13 or so....

    Fair enough way to look at it. I was just doing position comparison.

    @the-gipper said:

    Fair enough way to look at it. I was just doing position comparison.

    I hope you noted that I went out of my to not spoil the party... this week..

    You're welcome...

    @wargograw said:

    Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

    I don't see them being deep enough at WR to make K'Waun's status an issue...

    Faded said:

    Of course, even while I was typing that, someone posted two videos on another thread showing McCown doing just that. Still, I would't say that either of those two plays fit into the reckless category.

    Timing is everything...

  • Hello,

    Visiting Raider fan here. Recent history suggests the Raiders will lose because they have been horrible on the road for several years. They also have rarely won back to back games in quite some time. Last but not least, Carr is 0-9 on the road. Having said all that, this is a new team and new staff. The hope is that Carr continues his growth as a franchise QB and we will see how he does after a very good game against BLT. As far as the match ups go that is difficult for me because the Raiders are still an unknown this year. I believe the talent is good on defense but they are still trying to gather chemistry with Ken Norton jrs scheme and with each other. They were horrendous in game 1 but a little less horrendous in game 2. I`m guessing they will get better each week but it will take most of the year until they really gel. I also noticed the OP forgot to list Aldon Smith, and we know what he is capable of. The offense is ahead of the defense. I expect a good to great year out of Murray however he hasn`t been asked to take a heavy load yet as the Raiders have thus far been very pass heavy. Will they go run heavy this week? Maybe.. Cooper is legit and Crabtree hash`t disappointed either. Carr likes to throw underneath a great deal but like last week showed, he can strike deep at any time and Cooper is the man able to do that. Our teams have a rich history and I look forward to a great game. Cheers!

    @pog-mohan said:

    Hello,

    Visiting Raider fan here. Recent history suggests the Raiders will lose because they have been horrible on the road for several years. They also have rarely won back to back games in quite some time. Last but not least, Carr is 0-9 on the road. Having said all that, this is a new team and new staff. The hope is that Carr continues his growth as a franchise QB and we will see how he does after a very good game against BLT. As far as the match ups go that is difficult for me because the Raiders are still an unknown this year. I believe the talent is good on defense but they are still trying to gather chemistry with Ken Norton jrs scheme and with each other. They were horrendous in game 1 but a little less horrendous in game 2. I`m guessing they will get better each week but it will take most of the year until they really gel. I also noticed the OP forgot to list Aldon Smith, and we know what he is capable of. The offense is ahead of the defense. I expect a good to great year out of Murray however he hasn`t been asked to take a heavy load yet as the Raiders have thus far been very pass heavy. Will they go run heavy this week? Maybe.. Cooper is legit and Crabtree hash`t disappointed either. Carr likes to throw underneath a great deal but like last week showed, he can strike deep at any time and Cooper is the man able to do that. Our teams have a rich history and I look forward to a great game. Cheers!

    Back at you...

    Watched your Cinci game last Sunday and NFL Reply of it again this week. Was surprised to see so much 3-point from Khalil Mack. Was it the same story week 1?

    Mack's numbers seem down so far vs. his 2014 pace. Is it the new system?

    Agree on Carr. Especially taken by how obvious his leadership role was on the sideline last weekend.

  • @wargograw said:

    Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

    K'wan is backup CB/Nickelback, .....so since this just compared starters which for CBs would be Haden and Tramon so I would think so.

    @the-gipper said:

    K'wan is backup CB/Nickelback, .....so since this just compared starters which for CBs would be Haden and Tramon so I would think so.

    The slot corner is a starter though. They play a ton of snaps.

  • @wargograw said:

    Do our DBs still win with K'Waun our?

    @PFF: Highest graded cornerbacks from Week 2:

    1. T. Williams +3.4

    2. C. Munnerlyn +3.4

    3. D. Revis +2.7

    4. A. Talib +2.6

    5. M. Peters +2.4

    @canton-dawg said:

    @PFF: Highest graded cornerbacks from Week 2:

    1. T. Williams +3.4

    2. C. Munnerlyn +3.4

    3. D. Revis +2.7

    4. A. Talib +2.6

    5. M. Peters +2.4

    I know Tramon is solid. Of course Haden is too. But Oakland's third receiver is the Andre kid right? Wasn't he getting a ton of love last year?