Skip to content

Is Haden Washed Up?

The Browns Board
93 28 3.9k
  • @mudfly said:

    Like I already said....you can say whatever you want.....(but im allowed to counter, right?).....

    Though, Id point out that "good corner, not elite".... doesnt equal washed up.....

    And Im game to say he hasnt played well....hell, most of the team isnt playing well.....but Im not down with instantly declaring them shit because of it(and thats not adoration).....

    But, hey, maybe your right.....maybe Haden completely sucks all of a sudden....we should just cut chase and move on.....

    Washed up, to me, is when you're being paid more than your worth. Haden is currently being paid what some people would call "the fourth highest average contract for CB's" but is currently ranked what some would call "121st" in passes defended.

    Slow start? I'd say so. The NFL is a business, and when you're overpaid/underperforming, you're hurting the team in more ways than one. 3 games does not a trend make, but after 6 or 7, those talks should probably start gaining some traction.

    @calfoxwc said:

    EXACTLY what Mud said below. Mike H has been known to do that so much in the past - he screwed up the board

    with the arrogant knee jerk hate analysis crap of his. Joe Haden just so happens to be one of the very best cb's in

    the NFL, and the entire NFL knows it. And x-rays often don't show minute fractures - that's why he apparently is going to have an MRI.

    http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/09/28/cleveland-browns-joe-haden-rib-injury-undergo-mri?xid=si_nfl

    You were washed up around here once, Mike H. And Mike H. - you're no Joe Haden with a rib injury.

    I wouldn't say "very best in the NFL". Maybe one of the top 8, sometimes top 5. Currently top 121.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Support != relentless adoration.

    I can support Haden and still call him out when he's garbage. I can support a family member and still tell him he's an insufferable douchebag failure TCPO

    **************************************************

    well, isn't the obvious question - if your family member fell off a ladder, and broke ribs?...

    and tried to bowl that night, and was an excellent bowler...

    you dismiss them as a failure and garbage?

    Come on, man !

    If I were paying him $11 million this year and $50 million over the next 4 years after that, and there was another good bowler on my team who has consistently played just as good as him throughout his career and is currently playing better than him, and there were other good, young bowlers on my team that were sat because this guy HAD to bowl, and he was never necessarily "excellent" to begin with but just decently above average with some glimpses of excellence, and I could move him to another team in exchange for the chance to draft another good bowler for much cheaper...yeah, I would have to contemplate "dismiss"ing him.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Washed up, to me, is when you're being paid more than your worth. Haden is currently being paid what some people would call "the fourth highest average contract for CB's" but is currently ranked what some would call "121st" in passes defended.

    Slow start? I'd say so. The NFL is a business, and when you're overpaid/underperforming, you're hurting the team in more ways than one. 3 games does not a trend make, but after 6 or 7, those talks should probably start gaining some traction.

    Fair enough....though Id say most players get paid "after they perform".....had he left 2 years ago because we chose NOT to pay him, what would you have said then?

    My whole point was I simply felt this thread was too soon and a bit misguided.....and would agree that 6-7 games would have been more appropriate......

    So, now weve gone from washed up after 3 games... to....."good player, but not elite"....and 7 games is a fairer measure.....right?

  • Name a better CB than Haden that is currently on the roster?

    @canton-dawg said:

    Name a better CB than Haden that is currently on the roster?

    Right now? Based upon these 3 games only?......Traymon Williams......Kwaun Williams......

    But, if THEY played on another team....how many would trade Haden straight up for either right now?

  • @furious-styles said:

    Washed up would imply lacking skills and no longer useful. Haden would be picked up by any other NFL team and excel.

    Washed up ? GTFOHWTBS !

    You're right, he's a good player and can play in the NFL, but he hasn't lived up to his billing as an "elite" cornerback. "Shutdown" or "lockdown" never, save a game or two against AJ Green that his name is still living off to this day (don't forget that one game he shut down Calvin Johnson on one knee!).

    @mike-h said:

    You're right, he's a good player and can play in the NFL, but he hasn't lived up to his billing as an "elite" cornerback. "Shutdown" or "lockdown" never, save a game or two against AJ Green that his name is still living off to this day (don't forget that one game he shut down Calvin Johnson on one knee!).

    Ah... two or three anecdotal "elite" games are discountable, but one anecdotal, poor play vs. Cecil Shorts is valid in justifying a two-year position...

    MikeH!=irony

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Washed up, to me, is when you're being paid more than your worth. Haden is currently being paid what some people would call "the fourth highest average contract for CB's" but is currently ranked what some would call "121st" in passes defended.

    Slow start? I'd say so. The NFL is a business, and when you're overpaid/underperforming, you're hurting the team in more ways than one. 3 games does not a trend make, but after 6 or 7, those talks should probably start gaining some traction.

    Fair enough....though Id say most players get paid "after they perform".....had he left 2 years ago because we chose NOT to pay him, what would you have said then?

    My whole point was I simply felt this thread was too soon and a bit misguided.....and would agree that 6-7 games would have been more appropriate......

    So, now weve gone from washed up after 3 games... to....."good player, but not elite"....and 7 games is a fairer measure.....right?

    @mudfly said:

    Fair enough....though Id say most players get paid "after they perform".....had he left 2 years ago because we chose NOT to pay him, what would you have said then?

    Beat me to it...

    I'd only add that you pay to secure your top talent... and if you're signing that talent to be a building block in CLE, then you even have to pay a little more.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Name a better CB than Haden that is currently on the roster?

    Right now? Based upon these 3 games only?......Traymon Williams......Kwaun Williams......

    But, if THEY played on another team....how many would trade Haden straight up for either right now?

    @mudfly said:

    Right now? Based upon these 3 games only?......Traymon Williams......Kwaun Williams......

    But, if THEY played on another team....how many would trade Haden straight up for either right now?

    True, but just because a player has a good game doesn't necessarily make him a better player.

    How many #1 WR's will the Williams boys line up against this season?

  • @mudfly said:

    Right now? Based upon these 3 games only?......Traymon Williams......Kwaun Williams......

    But, if THEY played on another team....how many would trade Haden straight up for either right now?

    True, but just because a player has a good game doesn't necessarily make him a better player.

    How many #1 WR's will the Williams boys line up against this season?

    @canton-dawg said:

    True, but just because a player has a good game doesn't necessarily make him a better player.

    How many #1 WR's will the Williams boys line up against this season?

    Ha!....Im with ya 100% CD.....

    I get that Haden takes the Superstar WR every single game.....I understand he plays man coverage every time and gets no help.....and I also get that he is our #1 CB and, possibly, one of the top 2-3 players on this team.....

    And, I also get that he has played poorly the first 3 games(along with just about everyone else)......just dont think it means he's done, cause its happened before(like last year)........

    That was my one simple point.....that apparently I was wrong to put out there.....cause it's "enjoyable"(quote) to speculate about Joes demise, whilst it's uncool to offer history that he might just get it together(like last year)....

  • @vagitron said:

    What was the score of that game? Remind me. How many times did kaep go down? Then you can check how many tackles shazier had that game. If he's occupying lineman and freeing up the linebackers he's doing fine. Criticizing Heyward is hilarious. He's one of the top 34 ends in the nfl.

    Expect last week you played the Rams.... Two weeks ago you played kaep.....

    @columbusking said:

    Expect last week you played the Rams.... Two weeks ago you played kaep.....

    For me last week was the niners, this week at the time of your lost was the Rams. You do realize the steelers play a 34 right? You also realize Heyward gets doubled a lot as well right? Typically in a 34 the defensive end occupies blockers to get the linebackers free. The Steelers just switched to a one gal which allows defensive ends to rush the qb more specifically. Heyward is being doubled, tuitt is doing the damage. Pretty soon Heyward won't be able to be doubled because Tuitt is tearing it up. Either way Heyward is a terrific 34 end and the Steelers extended him as a result. If you are going to pick on a steeler at least target a player open for legit critique.

  • @columbusking said:

    Expect last week you played the Rams.... Two weeks ago you played kaep.....

    For me last week was the niners, this week at the time of your lost was the Rams. You do realize the steelers play a 34 right? You also realize Heyward gets doubled a lot as well right? Typically in a 34 the defensive end occupies blockers to get the linebackers free. The Steelers just switched to a one gal which allows defensive ends to rush the qb more specifically. Heyward is being doubled, tuitt is doing the damage. Pretty soon Heyward won't be able to be doubled because Tuitt is tearing it up. Either way Heyward is a terrific 34 end and the Steelers extended him as a result. If you are going to pick on a steeler at least target a player open for legit critique.

    @vagitron said:

    For me last week was the niners, this week at the time of your lost was the Rams. You do realize the steelers play a 34 right? You also realize Heyward gets doubled a lot as well right? Typically in a 34 the defensive end occupies blockers to get the linebackers free. The Steelers just switched to a one gal which allows defensive ends to rush the qb more specifically. Heyward is being doubled, tuitt is doing the damage. Pretty soon Heyward won't be able to be doubled because Tuitt is tearing it up. Either way Heyward is a terrific 34 end and the Steelers extended him as a result. If you are going to pick on a steeler at least target a player open for legit critique.

    Stooler Trolls......so stupid they cant even reply to the right thread.....

  • Name a better CB than Haden that is currently on the roster?

    @canton-dawg said:

    Name a better CB than Haden that is currently on the roster?

    Tramon Williams, K'Wuan Williams.

    There's two.

    Interestingly enough - I found a tool last week that compared physical aspects and career performance - and Haden's closest match was Tramon. Let me see if I can find it later.

    @mudfly said:

    Fair enough....though Id say most players get paid "after they perform".....had he left 2 years ago because we chose NOT to pay him, what would you have said then?

    My whole point was I simply felt this thread was too soon and a bit misguided.....and would agree that 6-7 games would have been more appropriate......

    So, now weve gone from washed up after 3 games... to....."good player, but not elite"....and 7 games is a fairer measure.....right?

    Absolutely. I just wanted to create the thread so that, in 4 weeks, I may be able to say "I told you so." 😛

    @mudfly said:

    Right now? Based upon these 3 games only?......Traymon Williams......Kwaun Williams......

    But, if THEY played on another team....how many would trade Haden straight up for either right now?

    I'd probably make the Tramon/Haden trade if only for cap purposes. It's a business, man.

  • @vagitron said:

    For me last week was the niners, this week at the time of your lost was the Rams. You do realize the steelers play a 34 right? You also realize Heyward gets doubled a lot as well right? Typically in a 34 the defensive end occupies blockers to get the linebackers free. The Steelers just switched to a one gal which allows defensive ends to rush the qb more specifically. Heyward is being doubled, tuitt is doing the damage. Pretty soon Heyward won't be able to be doubled because Tuitt is tearing it up. Either way Heyward is a terrific 34 end and the Steelers extended him as a result. If you are going to pick on a steeler at least target a player open for legit critique.

    Stooler Trolls......so stupid they cant even reply to the right thread.....

    @mudfly said:

    Stooler Trolls......so stupid they cant even reply to the right thread.....

    Um I've had a back and forth with Columbus king in THIS thread. It's not hard to follow.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Name a better CB than Haden that is currently on the roster?

    Tramon Williams, K'Wuan Williams.

    There's two.

    Interestingly enough - I found a tool last week that compared physical aspects and career performance - and Haden's closest match was Tramon. Let me see if I can find it later.

    @mudfly said:

    Fair enough....though Id say most players get paid "after they perform".....had he left 2 years ago because we chose NOT to pay him, what would you have said then?

    My whole point was I simply felt this thread was too soon and a bit misguided.....and would agree that 6-7 games would have been more appropriate......

    So, now weve gone from washed up after 3 games... to....."good player, but not elite"....and 7 games is a fairer measure.....right?

    Absolutely. I just wanted to create the thread so that, in 4 weeks, I may be able to say "I told you so." 😛

    @mudfly said:

    Right now? Based upon these 3 games only?......Traymon Williams......Kwaun Williams......

    But, if THEY played on another team....how many would trade Haden straight up for either right now?

    I'd probably make the Tramon/Haden trade if only for cap purposes. It's a business, man.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Absolutely. I just wanted to create the thread so that, in 4 weeks, I may be able to say "I told you so." 😛

    Ha!....Ill give you that one.... 😉....(and, of course, I now have that same option)

    @vagitron said:

    Um I've had a back and forth with Columbus king in THIS thread. It's not hard to follow.

    And Ill give you that one too....(have you trolls blocked so it's pretty easy to miss your posts)........

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Sorry rational thinking is not allowed here. 😁

    Says the old fart 😉

    @canton-dawg said:

    Says the old fart 😉

    Correction-the rational thinking old fart. 😆

  • Saying a paquetes is washed up after 3 games. Haha. Pathetic. Haden is still out best corner stop being delusional

  • Saying a paquetes is washed up after 3 games. Haha. Pathetic. Haden is still out best corner stop being delusional

    @alkid3 said:

    Saying a paquetes is washed up after 3 games. Haha. Pathetic. Haden is still out best corner stop being delusional

    He's actually our third best this year...if that.

  • Some sarcasm doesn't need the salmon pink font...

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Says the old fart 😉

    Correction-the rational thinking old fart. 😆

    @texasag1969 said:

    Correction-the rational thinking old fart. 😆

    Amen brother!

  • Faded said:

    This team doesn't look good and the defense doesn't look good. But, you know, I'll bet if you could get rid of that Joe Haden guy, then things would definitely get better quickly. Yeah, I think that's where I would start....

    and better yet lets ship him off to the siberia of another AFC North team so his washed up butt can downgrade their defenses.He's ranked 100 and something. Maybe get a few 4th and 5th round picks for hin. Money ball baby !

  • Faded said:

    This team doesn't look good and the defense doesn't look good. But, you know, I'll bet if you could get rid of that Joe Haden guy, then things would definitely get better quickly. Yeah, I think that's where I would start....

    With the way Haden has been playing, you could slap Desir out there and get the same results but for $10.5 million less.

  • Some of the threads on here...

    Nothing new though. One guy plays off from our expectations and then he's terrible and the sky is falling.

    He'll be fine.

  • For those critics of Haden, who do you compare him to? I can't think of one CB who plays as much press-man against the opposing #1 (probably the most physically demanding job in the NFL), sans Revis who is an all-time great talent.

    In our man coverage scheme, it is ESSENTIAL to get pressure on the QB... Haden makes the mistake of allowing the deep route bc he's expecting QB pressure. This works when you force a QB into throwing too soon, but it doesnt work when the QB has all day...

    CB is one of the most thankless jobs in the game. When you're invisible (not letting guys get open) nobody notices. and when you're seen (giving up catches) you're the skapegoat...