Philip Rivers knew what defense the Browns were in
-
But WTF does "Omaha" mean?
Looking forward to us having a QB that calls out Defenses someday. Even if it is only "zone" without specifying what kind of zone.
McC was routinely pointing out the Mike and made several play option calls Sunday (runs to passes and vice versa), but our line adjustments stank early on. I had to quit for the day after two series... the line calls were that bad.
-
you know what would solve this? A front 7 that just lined up like normal and beat their man. I mean seriously, the reason we're doing all this stupid convoluted shit is to try to get our less than mediocre pass rushers into the backfield. Sign/draft guys that put their hands in the ground and get past their man with even just avg to slightly better than avg consistency and we have a secondary that can at least cover guys long enough for the pressure to make an impact. There's no excuse not to have edges on this team that force the QB to step up into our interior push.
you know what would solve this? A front 7 that just lined up like normal and beat their man. I mean seriously, the reason we're doing all this stupid convoluted shit is to try to get our less than mediocre pass rushers into the backfield. Sign/draft guys that put their hands in the ground and get past their man with even just avg to slightly better than avg consistency and we have a secondary that can at least cover guys long enough for the pressure to make an impact. There's no excuse not to have edges on this team that force the QB to step up into our interior push.
I'm no expert, but I would appreciate going back to a 4-3 defense.
-
I agree we rotate the DL too much. We want fresh legs, you get that from rotating possession to possession, not running them on play to play. Plus a vet QB like Rivers is easily going to see that certain guys are on the field it's going to be this package.
I wasn't a guge Ray Horton fan, but he did come from that Lebeau tree where it wasn't who was on the field but where there were going to come from that mattered.
Z
Zombo said:
I wasn't a guge Ray Horton fan, but he did come from that Lebeau tree where it wasn't who was on the field but where there were going to come from that mattered.
Z
True.
-
you know what would solve this? A front 7 that just lined up like normal and beat their man. I mean seriously, the reason we're doing all this stupid convoluted shit is to try to get our less than mediocre pass rushers into the backfield. Sign/draft guys that put their hands in the ground and get past their man...........
Exactly. We need to stop drafting work out warriors, with "freakish physical abilities and tons of potential" and start drafting football players.......... What do I mean? I mean stop prioritizing the combine numbers, and instead look at the players' years of game tape.
Start drafting the guys who stand out when watching the game tape, and forget the guys who suddenly ran a 4.29 in shorts and a tank top, or ran around cones really, really fast. Then, maybe we'll have far less Mingos, Gilberts and Wimbleys, and more Woodheads.
Exactly. We need to stop drafting work out warriors, with "freakish physical abilities and tons of potential" and start drafting football players.......... What do I mean? I mean stop prioritizing the combine numbers, and instead look at the players' years of game tape.
Start drafting the guys who stand out when watching the game tape, and forget the guys who suddenly ran a 4.29 in shorts and a tank top, or ran around cones really, really fast. Then, maybe we'll have far less Mingos, Gilberts and Wimbleys, and more Woodheads.
To an extent I agree with you except that I want "freaks"...but freaks that prove it on the field. Some guy benching 225 50 times but has gator arms, well that guy probably isn't going to be a good pass rusher cause good pass rushers need at least decent arm lengths to get into their guy before he gets his hands on them. He who gets his hands on his guy first almost always wins on the field.
I mean Dansby was supposed to be one of those "football players"...and i'm sorry but he's just not that good. You have to find guys with god given physical abilities AND some smarts so they're coachable. Clowney was one of those guys people said had raw freakish talent but there's a good chance he flames out cause he doesn't have the drive and the football smarts, it's still early in his career but that may turn out to be a dead nuts assessment on him.
Mack on the other hand, he had "all of the above". In the gym, on the field...has brains...that was a guy we simply should not have passed on maybe moreso than any of the other superstars we've whiffed on. That guy can be moved all over the front 7 save as an interior lineman.....that kind of freak we have to have.
-
-
you know what would solve this? A front 7 that just lined up like normal and beat their man. I mean seriously, the reason we're doing all this stupid convoluted shit is to try to get our less than mediocre pass rushers into the backfield. Sign/draft guys that put their hands in the ground and get past their man with even just avg to slightly better than avg consistency and we have a secondary that can at least cover guys long enough for the pressure to make an impact. There's no excuse not to have edges on this team that force the QB to step up into our interior push.
I'm no expert, but I would appreciate going back to a 4-3 defense.
I'm no expert, but I would appreciate going back to a 4-3 defense.
I thought so to but now that we're 4 games in i'm not sure if that would help much cause it's apparent to me now we've got bigger talent issues than I thought. 4-3 or 3-4, you still gotta beat your man. If you beat your man but are still consistently out of place, than it's scheme.
-
You have a point but We paid Kruger pretty well and has he touched a QB jersey all year? Chicago's defense was terrible last year and they had Carr running for his life all game..
Kruger has been a monumental failure this year. He was also a Lombardi acquisition, so not really on Farmer. He did have 11 sacks last year.
Kruger has been a monumental failure this year. He was also a Lombardi acquisition, so not really on Farmer. He did have 11 sacks last year.
Kruger excelled when he has put in his right position. This year he's been put in pass coverage even though he doesn't have the hips for it, another dumb move by the coaching staff.
-
You have a point but We paid Kruger pretty well and has he touched a QB jersey all year? Chicago's defense was terrible last year and they had Carr running for his life all game..
Kruger has been a monumental failure this year. He was also a Lombardi acquisition, so not really on Farmer. He did have 11 sacks last year.
Kruger has been a monumental failure this year. He was also a Lombardi acquisition, so not really on Farmer. He did have 11 sacks last year.
Of those 11 sacks though I bunch were from the QB spilling out away from Kruger because of an interior blitz or push by the lineman. Honestly I can say in his three years he has only legitimately beaten a tackle less than a handful of times for a sack. His outside leverage is atrocious, especially for strapping young lad such as he....fucking Clay Matthews digs in like a pack mule going around the edge and he gives up 20 lbs to Kruger. Unacceptable.
-
Did anybody else notice how fired up Rivers got when they didn't convert on 3rd down or do something wrong? That is what we need in a QB. Josh just jogs off the field like he is going to hang out with his boys. We need a coach and QB and leaders that can light a fire under our guys and play hard. Our D is a joke and our O only wants to play in the forth quarter. We should have won last week and it should not have been close.
-
Did anybody else notice how fired up Rivers got when they didn't convert on 3rd down or do something wrong? That is what we need in a QB. Josh just jogs off the field like he is going to hang out with his boys. We need a coach and QB and leaders that can light a fire under our guys and play hard. Our D is a joke and our O only wants to play in the forth quarter. We should have won last week and it should not have been close.
Did anybody else notice how fired up Rivers got when they didn't convert on 3rd down or do something wrong? That is what we need in a QB. Josh just jogs off the field like he is going to hang out with his boys. We need a coach and QB and leaders that can light a fire under our guys and play hard. Our D is a joke and our O only wants to play in the forth quarter. We should have won last week and it should not have been close.
Josh has thrown for 700 yards, 4 TD and 1 INT through two games.
We don't need any sort of change at QB.
-
Kruger has been a monumental failure this year. He was also a Lombardi acquisition, so not really on Farmer. He did have 11 sacks last year.
Of those 11 sacks though I bunch were from the QB spilling out away from Kruger because of an interior blitz or push by the lineman. Honestly I can say in his three years he has only legitimately beaten a tackle less than a handful of times for a sack. His outside leverage is atrocious, especially for strapping young lad such as he....fucking Clay Matthews digs in like a pack mule going around the edge and he gives up 20 lbs to Kruger. Unacceptable.
Of those 11 sacks though I bunch were from the QB spilling out away from Kruger because of an interior blitz or push by the lineman. Honestly I can say in his three years he has only legitimately beaten a tackle less than a handful of times for a sack. His outside leverage is atrocious, especially for strapping young lad such as he....fucking Clay Matthews digs in like a pack mule going around the edge and he gives up 20 lbs to Kruger. Unacceptable.
Couldn't tell you. I know he's been bad. He's playing out of position and the rest of our LB corps is also playing like shit, as well...so it's not just Kruger. He's just the most expensive mistake right now.
-
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/gamelog/_/id/12437/year/2014/paul-kruger
The above link is Kruger's stats from 2014 by each game. He had 3 sacks against Oakland and 2 against Atlanta. His longest drought of sacks was four games in 2014, so here's to hoping his drought of the season is over
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login