Liberty Counsel and Judges fight perverted redefinition of real, natural Marriage
-
Really now? As a biologist, you have piqued my interest. Jblu
**************************************
Well, Emily jblu latella......
You see.... you take two magnets. Now, watch how, always, that N repels N, and S repels S when you try to put them together.
It's science. Now,try doing N-S, and S-N. See?
Sure, with biology, human beings' sexuality isn't as concretely true as that, but it's still unnatural, per natural law -
it's a grotesque anomaly. Like a two-headed snake. Not normal. Kinda makes most people puke kind of not normal.
So, there ya go. You can't argue with simple science, ya know. Perverted definition of REAL MARRIAGE supporters
just get hosed, because they are science deniers, and sciencephobes.
-
He's 100% serious too. That's the funny thing.
-
baloney. There are a lot of reasons people abhor sick perverted garbage,
and what the Bible says is often not one of them.
Of course it has a lot of affect on a lot of people. Hundreds of millions of people believe
that marriage is between a MAN and a WOMAN.
It's science.
baloney. There are a lot of reasons people abhor sick perverted garbage,
and what the Bible says is often not one of them.
Of course it has a lot of affect on a lot of people. Hundreds of millions of people believe
that marriage is between a MAN and a WOMAN.
It's science.
no it's always something from the bible. Let it go Cal. We've moved on.
-
It's the procreation thing that's getting Cal tripped up. He doesn't understand that most of us now consider marriage as the union between two people who love each other, procreation is secondary to that. Cal is still living 2000 years ago.
-
like I could personally give a shit that two guys or two girls can't technically procreate with each other. If they love each other and want to spend the rest of their lives with each other and create a stable union which imo is more important to society than simple procreation....than so be it. It's none of my business.
-
@westside-steve said:
Cal has been more honest than most around here. He and I don't particularly agree on this one area but I've never heard him say that he believes that homosexuality is a sin and is against the Bible and blah blah blah. He's been pretty straightforward about the fact that homosexuality creeps him out.
(No different than sadomasochism. It's kind of fucked up and not natural even though it exists. Personally if two people want to do it it's up to them but it is fucked up)
I think most people who want to prove him wrong feel the same way but are being a little hypocritical about it.
WSS
-
Props to cal for being honest about his dumbass reasoning I guess...
-
Really now? As a biologist, you have piqued my interest. Jblu
**************************************
Well, Emily jblu latella......
You see.... you take two magnets. Now, watch how, always, that N repels N, and S repels S when you try to put them together.
It's science. Now,try doing N-S, and S-N. See?
Sure, with biology, human beings' sexuality isn't as concretely true as that, but it's still unnatural, per natural law -
it's a grotesque anomaly. Like a two-headed snake. Not normal. Kinda makes most people puke kind of not normal.
So, there ya go. You can't argue with simple science, ya know. Perverted definition of REAL MARRIAGE supporters
just get hosed, because they are science deniers, and sciencephobes.
Really now? As a biologist, you have piqued my interest. Jblu
**************************************
Well, Emily jblu latella......
You see.... you take two magnets. Now, watch how, always, that N repels N, and S repels S when you try to put them together.
It's science. Now,try doing N-S, and S-N. See?
I'm sorry, but I fail to see what the polarity of magnets have to do with whether or not homosexual marriage should be legitimate. Electromagnetism is more in Physics' domain. Perhaps you're using it as an analogy? If so, I can do the same thing. Polar substances like water and non-polar substances like oils and fats are (literally) polar opposites of each other and yet they repel one another. In this case, trying to put opposites together ends up repelling both. So, using you're hare-brained logic, since polar molecules are attracted to polar molecules, and repel non-similar, non-polar molecules, homosexual marriage should be legalized. If that train of thought sounds foolish, that is because it is, and yet that is exactly the same logic you are using.
Sure, with biology, human beings' sexuality isn't as concretely true as that, but it's still unnatural, per natural law -
it's a grotesque anomaly. Like a two-headed snake. Not normal. Kinda makes most people puke kind of not normal.
You criticized me earlier for what you believe was my misinterpretation of "natural law" vs "law of nature", but I don't believe you seem to know the differences yourself. Natural laws are derived from logical and reasonable observations of nature and the universe itself. But even that is rather nebulous; you can observe the differing opinions of natural law philosophers such as Aristotle, Hobbes, Aquinas and Locke to confirm that. So its rather ambitious to claim that something "violates" a natural law when nobody seems to have a unified and concrete definition of what it is. And since you're magnet analogy is derived from nature, I guess that means appeal to nature is perfectly legit for your arguments, but not for anyone else...
So, there ya go. You can't argue with simple science, ya know. Perverted definition of REAL MARRIAGE supporters
just get hosed, because they are science deniers, and sciencephobes.
Ok, so let us use scientific reasoning for your argument. Shaving it down with Occam's potent Gillette, it boils down to something along the lines of:
A is Natural, therefore A is good.
B is Unnatural, therefore B is bad.
Sounds a tad "petitio principii" to me... you're defending institutionalized heterosexual marriage, which others on this board and I have repeatedly told you is not natural in itself, it is a solely human institution. But we can apply your logic many ways. In vitro fertilization for sterile couples would be bad, since the natural way to have children is by intercourse. Or how about life saving surgery? That would be unnatural to, since invasive surgery is not natural, so I guess thats bad too...and on and on we go.
Its like Steve said: just because something isn't "natural", doesn't mean that, by extension, it is perverse or wrong.
Yet since marriage is a contract basically for procreation and family then there can be a distinct difference between natural and unnatural. That doesn't mean right or wrong. That means that a mock apple pie made with Ritz crackers is not the same as an apple pie made with Macintosh apples
WSS
like I could personally give a shit that two guys or two girls can't technically procreate with each other. If they love each other and want to spend the rest of their lives with each other and create a stable union which imo is more important to society than simple procreation....than so be it. It's none of my business.
Exactly.
-
if it's none of our business, why are our businesses being sued
to be forced to accept perversion?
Leave America's businesses and churches out of it, stfu, and mind YOUR own business.
I do support that.
and emily jblue latella and cleavage are proof that what I say about libs is true...
they have no sense of humor, and they go all postal when other people refuse to
go along with their emoting.
-
if it's none of our business, why are our businesses being sued
to be forced to accept perversion?
Leave America's businesses and churches out of it, stfu, and mind YOUR own business.
I do support that.
and emily jblue latella and cleavage are proof that what I say about libs is true...
they have no sense of humor, and they go all postal when other people refuse to
go along with their emoting.
if it's none of our business, why are our businesses being sued
to be forced to accept perversion?
Leave America's businesses and churches out of it, stfu, and mind YOUR own business.
I do support that.
and emily jblue latella and cleavage are proof that what I say about libs is true...
they have no sense of humor, and they go all postal when other people refuse to
go along with their emoting.
how am I going postal? how am I "emoting"? I'm saying I don't give a shit about who wants to get married, my only skin in the game is that people form "true" and "stable" bonds. Stable bonds are what lead to a more decent stable society. Procreation be damned. The world of simplistic overprocreation is why this world is where it's at. We've out grown our resources and because of that, have had to engage in some pretty distorted practices.
-
if it's none of our business, why are our businesses being sued
to be forced to accept perversion?
Leave America's businesses and churches out of it, stfu, and mind YOUR own business.
I do support that.
and emily jblue latella and cleavage are proof that what I say about libs is true...
they have no sense of humor, and they go all postal when other people refuse to
go along with their emoting.
how am I going postal? how am I "emoting"? I'm saying I don't give a shit about who wants to get married, my only skin in the game is that people form "true" and "stable" bonds. Stable bonds are what lead to a more decent stable society. Procreation be damned. The world of simplistic overprocreation is why this world is where it's at. We've out grown our resources and because of that, have had to engage in some pretty distorted practices.
how am I going postal? how am I "emoting"? I'm saying I don't give a shit about who wants to get married, my only skin in the game is that people form "true" and "stable" bonds. Stable bonds are what lead to a more decent stable society. Procreation be damned. The world of simplistic overprocreation is why this world is where it's at. We've out grown our resources and because of that, have had to engage in some pretty distorted practices.
including......
WSS
-
if it's none of our business, why are our businesses being sued
to be forced to accept perversion?
Leave America's businesses and churches out of it, stfu, and mind YOUR own business.
I do support that.
and emily jblue latella and cleavage are proof that what I say about libs is true...
they have no sense of humor, and they go all postal when other people refuse to
go along with their emoting.
if it's none of our business, why are our businesses being sued
to be forced to accept perversion?
Leave America's businesses and churches out of it, stfu, and mind YOUR own business.
I do support that.
and emily jblue latella and cleavage are proof that what I say about libs is true...
they have no sense of humor, and they go all postal when other people refuse to
go along with their emoting.
Sure, then let gays get married. It won't affect you at all.
And no one is saying churches need to allow gay marriage. And private businesses just can't break the law. Simple enough
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
so the law is forcing businesses to be affected. So STFU.
ignorant woodpecker:
Gay Group Demands Christian Churches Be SHUT DOWN ...joemiller.us/.../gay-group-demands-christian-churches-be-shut-down-for...Apr 3, 2015 - A gay group is demanding that Christian churches be shut down for opposing ... a Christian family has closed its doors after being terrorized by pro-homosexual .... The Supreme Court will rule on same sex marriage in June where I .....They may pass all the laws they wish, by intimidating the Politicians who ...
Churches targeted by 'gay' intimidation campaignwww.wnd.com/2009/11/115834/WorldNetDailyNov 12, 2009 - Christian churches in Maine whose leaders encouraged support for a referendum that repealed a law allowing same-sex marriage are being ...
Threat to burn down local Catholic church over traditional ...massresistance.com/docs/gen2/12b/acushnet_church/index.htmlMay 22, 2012 - Activists attempt to intimidate church during Sunday Mass ... Doyle is determined not to allow this to go unchallenged by the law and the legal ... The concept of "two men being friends, not married" has been universally ...
-
Assuming the posts in your Google search are legitimate, I would say those people are wrong. I see no grounds for forcing churches to hold gay weddings.
Holding an unpopular opinion and dealing with the public blowback from that is something they will have to des with though (arson threats aside).
Let's start like, why do you think gays should not be allowed to get married?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Assuming the posts in your Google search are legitimate, I would say those people are wrong. I see no grounds for forcing churches to hold gay weddings.
Holding an unpopular opinion and dealing with the public blowback from that is something they will have to des with though (arson threats aside).
Let's start like, why do you think gays should not be allowed to get married?
Let's start like, why do you think gays should not be allowed to get married?
Science.
-
Assuming the posts in your Google search are legitimate, I would say those people are wrong. I see no grounds for forcing churches to hold gay weddings.
Holding an unpopular opinion and dealing with the public blowback from that is something they will have to des with though (arson threats aside).
Let's start like, why do you think gays should not be allowed to get married?
Let's start like, why do you think gays should not be allowed to get married?
They've always been allowed to get married.
FYI
WSS
-
if it's none of our business, why are our businesses being sued
to be forced to accept perversion?
Leave America's businesses and churches out of it, stfu, and mind YOUR own business.
I do support that.
and emily jblue latella and cleavage are proof that what I say about libs is true...
they have no sense of humor, and they go all postal when other people refuse to
go along with their emoting.
Sure, then let gays get married. It won't affect you at all.
And no one is saying churches need to allow gay marriage. And private businesses just can't break the law. Simple enough
Sure, then let gays get married. It won't affect you at all.
And no one is saying churches need to allow gay marriage. And private businesses just can't break the law. Simple enough
Gay marriage is an abomination.
-
baloney. There are a lot of reasons people abhor sick perverted garbage,
and what the Bible says is often not one of them.
Of course it has a lot of affect on a lot of people. Hundreds of millions of people believe
that marriage is between a MAN and a WOMAN.
It's science.
Really now? As a biologist, you have piqued my interest. This is the 2nd post of yours that i've noticed that you mentioned that homosexual marriage goes against science, so i'm assuming that is your hypothesis. Which discipline of science are you referring to? Please post your peer-reviewed research that supports your theory.
Really now? As a biologist, you have piqued my interest. This is the 2nd post of yours that i've noticed that you mentioned that homosexual marriage goes against science, so i'm assuming that is your hypothesis. Which discipline of science are you referring to? Please post your peer-reviewed research that supports your theory.
I've not read the rest of the thread, and I just got to this point and was like "oh fuck, here come the magnets again"
Edit: yep, magnets. How do they work?
-
Really now? As a biologist, you have piqued my interest. This is the 2nd post of yours that i've noticed that you mentioned that homosexual marriage goes against science, so i'm assuming that is your hypothesis. Which discipline of science are you referring to? Please post your peer-reviewed research that supports your theory.
I've not read the rest of the thread, and I just got to this point and was like "oh fuck, here come the magnets again"
Edit: yep, magnets. How do they work?
I've not read the rest of the thread, and I just got to this point and was like "oh fuck, here come the magnets again"
Edit: yep, magnets. How do they work?
Well, when you resort to supporting your argument with ICP-logic, you know the well is starting to get mighty dry.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/fucking-magnets-how-do-they-work
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login