Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Connor "holy crap!" Barwin

Connor "holy crap!" Barwin

The Browns Board
29 11 1.8k

  • According to one report, Barwin ran a 4.49 40 at his pro day. Not sure how fast a track they have in Cinci, but that's an impressive time on any surface.

    At Georgia's pro day, Knowshon Moreno ran his 40 in the high 4.5's - low 4.6's. WR Mohammed Massaquoi timed between 4.47-4.52, significantly better than the 4.6 he ran at the combine.

    Also, Matt Stafford supposedly was excellent at the beginning of his workout but then struggled with his accuracy on deep outs. Sounds like he may have done some damage to his draft stock.

  • ? Guest

    According to one report, Barwin ran a 4.49 40 at his pro day. Not sure how fast a track they have in Cinci, but that's an impressive time on any surface.

    At Georgia's pro day, Knowshon Moreno ran his 40 in the high 4.5's - low 4.6's. WR Mohammed Massaquoi timed between 4.47-4.52, significantly better than the 4.6 he ran at the combine.

    Also, Matt Stafford supposedly was excellent at the beginning of his workout but then struggled with his accuracy on deep outs. Sounds like he may have done some damage to his draft stock.

    Aloysius said:

    According to one report, Barwin ran a 4.49 40 at his pro day. Not sure how fast a track they have in Cinci, but that's an impressive time on any surface.

    At Georgia's pro day, Knowshon Moreno ran his 40 in the high 4.5's - low 4.6's. WR Mohammed Massaquoi timed between 4.47-4.52, significantly better than the 4.6 he ran at the combine.

    Also, Matt Stafford supposedly was excellent at the beginning of his workout but then struggled with his accuracy on deep outs. Sounds like he may have done some damage to his draft stock.

    I'm really starting to like Barwin. I hope we can get him in the second round.

  • I have been wanting this guy. I would take him over Clay. Getting him and Maualuga would be great.

    Y 1 Reply

  • Figured I would add this link on Florida Pro Day results...Harvin keeps looking better and better.

    Kind of wish we were in a position to select him.

    http://www.truveo.com/Florida-Pro-Day-recap/id/550224005

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
  • ballpeenB ballpeen

    Figured I would add this link on Florida Pro Day results...Harvin keeps looking better and better.

    Kind of wish we were in a position to select him.

    http://www.truveo.com/Florida-Pro-Day-recap/id/550224005

    @ballpeen said:

    Figured I would add this link on Florida Pro Day results...Harvin keeps looking better and better.

    Kind of wish we were in a position to select him.

    http://www.truveo.com/Florida-Pro-Day-recap/id/550224005

    Me too. If Crabtree is unavailable??

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula

  • Not at 5....now if there is something to all the Jets/Cutler talk, and we ended up with the Jets pick at #17 and whatever else for Quinn...then Harvin starts to make real sense.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    Legacy FanL 1 Reply

  • Our defense has been suspect ever since we came back, we seriously have a chance to upgrade the talent on defense to get the ball rolling for the long term. I wouldn't pick offense in the top part of the draft unless it was a tackle,guard or center.

    ? Cardiac KidC 2 Replies
  • ? Guest

    Our defense has been suspect ever since we came back, we seriously have a chance to upgrade the talent on defense to get the ball rolling for the long term. I wouldn't pick offense in the top part of the draft unless it was a tackle,guard or center.

    John McClane said:

    Our defense has been suspect ever since we came back, we seriously have a chance to upgrade the talent on defense to get the ball rolling for the long term. I wouldn't pick offense in the top part of the draft unless it was a tackle,guard or center.

    I like how the defense got better from 99 to 05 until RAC, then it started regressing each year. And he was supposed to be a defensive guru 🙄

  • ? Guest

    Our defense has been suspect ever since we came back, we seriously have a chance to upgrade the talent on defense to get the ball rolling for the long term. I wouldn't pick offense in the top part of the draft unless it was a tackle,guard or center.

    John McClane said:

    Our defense has been suspect ever since we came back, we seriously have a chance to upgrade the talent on defense to get the ball rolling for the long term. I wouldn't pick offense in the top part of the draft unless it was a tackle,guard or center.

    And if we loose Stallworth then what? Would you go WR at #5 or #36?

    Y 1 Reply

  • We can draft Barwin to play LB and if he doesnt work out we could put him back to his natural position TE 😉

    1st Ezekiel Ansah, DE, BYU 3rd Darius Slay, CB, Mississippi State4th Landry Jones, QB, Oklahoma5th Earl Wolff, S, N.C. State6th Lucas Reed, TE, New Mexico
    ? 1 Reply

  • whatdaya mean IF we lose stallworth?

    and still, no.

  • chocoC choco

    whatdaya mean IF we lose stallworth?

    and still, no.

    @choco said:

    whatdaya mean IF we lose stallworth?

    and still, no.

    So are you comfortable with Edwards at #1 and I'm assuming Cribbs or Hubbard at #2??? With who Steptoe at Slot?

  • C CLEVELandMILIDH

    We can draft Barwin to play LB and if he doesnt work out we could put him back to his natural position TE 😉

    nmills said:

    We can draft Barwin to play LB and if he doesnt work out we could put him back to his natural position TE 😉

    Barwin has Vrable written all over him. DRAFT THIS GUY!!!

  • absolutely....

    furthermore, im even more comfortable to trade edwards......

    edwards is a mental with a case of the dropsies, and stallworth barely made the field (and didn't do squat when he did).

    so, i see no practical difference between 2 overpaid players that are ineffective and 2 average players that may or may not be effective.

    im not so disillusioned to think edwards is a #1......thats laughable.

  • Cardiac KidC Cardiac Kid

    John McClane said:

    Our defense has been suspect ever since we came back, we seriously have a chance to upgrade the talent on defense to get the ball rolling for the long term. I wouldn't pick offense in the top part of the draft unless it was a tackle,guard or center.

    And if we loose Stallworth then what? Would you go WR at #5 or #36?

    @cardiac-kid said:

    And if we loose Stallworth then what? Would you go WR at #5 or #36?

    If you want to take the best player available and draft an impact player with that high draft pick then you take Crabtree. You can get Barwin at #36. And, how much more of an impact would Orakpo be over Barwin. If Barwin is gone there will be simular OLBs available at #36.

    My first option would be to trade down, but as we stand now, I would take the best player available if I had to pick at #5. There isn't a defensive player that would be available at #5 that would have the impact of Crabtree.

  • Y YtownBrownsBacker

    @cardiac-kid said:

    And if we loose Stallworth then what? Would you go WR at #5 or #36?

    If you want to take the best player available and draft an impact player with that high draft pick then you take Crabtree. You can get Barwin at #36. And, how much more of an impact would Orakpo be over Barwin. If Barwin is gone there will be simular OLBs available at #36.

    My first option would be to trade down, but as we stand now, I would take the best player available if I had to pick at #5. There isn't a defensive player that would be available at #5 that would have the impact of Crabtree.

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    If you want to take the best player available and draft an impact player with that high draft pick then you take Crabtree. You can get Barwin at #36. And, how much more of an impact would Orakpo be over Barwin. If Barwin is gone there will be simular OLBs available at #36.

    My first option would be to trade down, but as we stand now, I would take the best player available if I had to pick at #5. There isn't a defensive player that would be available at #5 that would have the impact of Crabtree.

    The only thing I am saying is that I don't think Crabtree will have a huge impact on our offense if we draft him. Instead we can load up on defense that way the new guys will have a full year playing together . Next year when we go offense in the draft we will have a defense to back up the new offensive guys.

    Y 1 Reply

  • According to this board I think we "must" draft about 23 players, all of whom are going to be gone in the top 50.

  • H heckofajobbrownie

    According to this board I think we "must" draft about 23 players, all of whom are going to be gone in the top 50.

    @heckofajobbrownie said:

    According to this board I think we "must" draft about 23 players, all of whom are going to be gone in the top 50.

    Maualuga and Barwin are must haves IMO. If we can trade down and pick up an extra pick it would be great.

    1st Maualuga

    2nd Barwin

    2nd Chung or Moore @SS

  • Can we please not forget we scored 1 td in last six games..... 😕

  • ballpeenB ballpeen

    Not at 5....now if there is something to all the Jets/Cutler talk, and we ended up with the Jets pick at #17 and whatever else for Quinn...then Harvin starts to make real sense.

    @ballpeen said:

    Not at 5....now if there is something to all the Jets/Cutler talk, and we ended up with the Jets pick at #17 and whatever else for Quinn...then Harvin starts to make real sense.

    I understand your point here was to say that Harvin isn't a #5 pick, but how does drafting a kid who made his career off of turning 5yd screens & sweeps into big plays (with the occasional post & corner route) fit with keeping a QB that can't make those throws?

    He's Wes Welker, but probably faster.

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
Log in to reply