Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. So much for 'Oversight'

So much for 'Oversight'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
10 Posts 5 Posters 803 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
    • 3k Posts
    • 197 Reputation
    Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Here we are at point in the history of mankind where humans actually have the attention span of a labrador/jack russell puppy and you fcuks couldn't wait a little longer before handing out these bonuses?

    AIG pays $450mil to staff

    Hey fellas, you actually own 80% of AIG and this kind of shit only gets an angry phone call from Geithner?

    I seem to recall torches & pitchforks everytime AF1 touched down in Crawford.

    This is actually my favorite part:

    Meanwhile, AIG revealed last night that since receiving a government bailout in September, it has been obliged to pay more than $90bn to a list of clients and counterparties dominated by European banks. The institutions were on the other side of credit default swaps and other instruments provided by AIG to hedge against liabilities which exploded once the credit crunch set in.

    Ha! This is almost like a Disney movie.

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • mz. ?
      • Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      ? mz. wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Criminals, every single one of them.

      @inspecta said:

      WTF is this world coming to? Seriously? I'm waiting for the rapture any day now,

      Left-Behind-DVD-Front-Cover.jpg

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
        • 3k Posts
        • 197 Reputation
        Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @inspecta said:

        Terrible movie, but a great book series, even if you're not a Christian it's a great thriller/suspense series.....

        Agree. Although I didn't think the film was completely terrible. B-ish, but not terrible.

        But any movie that has Clarence "Sundown" Gilyard in it gets a pass from me. I'll never forget how uncomfortable he looks in every episode of Walker: Texas Ranger (which is odd, because the dude is actually plays cowboy in real life).

        Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • choco chocoC
          • 4k Posts
          • 352 Reputation
          chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
          #4

          "but we must help the banks....."

          xxxxing ijiots.....

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • osusev O
            • 1k Posts
            • 4 Reputation
            O osusev wrote on last edited by
            #5

            It seems admin tried to block out disbursements and forced future payment concessions. Without a total takeover (which republicans would talk about government overstepping private boundries) what exactly can they do about former legal agreements?

            This is outrageous but it is extremely complicated.

            Legacy FanL 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • O osusev

              It seems admin tried to block out disbursements and forced future payment concessions. Without a total takeover (which republicans would talk about government overstepping private boundries) what exactly can they do about former legal agreements?

              This is outrageous but it is extremely complicated.

              Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
              • 3k Posts
              • 197 Reputation
              Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @osusev said:

              It seems admin tried to block out disbursements and forced future payment concessions. Without a total takeover (which republicans would talk about government overstepping private boundries) what exactly can they do about former legal agreements?

              This is outrageous but it is extremely complicated.

              Sev. The federal government owns 80% of AIG. They have a bit of leverage. Republicans were too spineless to step in on the 80% buyout, so they're hardly but a stepping stone. Contracts are broken renegotiated all the time. Particularly when there are performance failures on the table. The chump changes who just got their pay-day were in the the financial products division. The same division who the head of AIG said were responsible for the current nightmare.

              Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Mr. T Mr. TM
                • 7k Posts
                • 184 Reputation
                Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
                #7

                WOW!!! Now Obamas idiots want to propose 100% taxes on those who will be receiving bonuses.

                Will this effect all of those outside of AIG who get bonus checks? If so why bust your ass to get ahead.

                Head or Gut?
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 197 Reputation
                  Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  p.s. Congress knew about this bonus back on Feb 11. They are only now feigning outrage now that we know about it.

                  I read that & specifically remember the date. When I find the link verifying it I'll post.

                  It didn't say anything specifically about Obama knowing back then, but I have a hard time believing he found out when the public did if Congress knew a month ago.

                  Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                  Legacy FanL 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Mr. T Mr. TM
                    • 7k Posts
                    • 184 Reputation
                    Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    And Obama plays possum on it, then pretends to play angry.

                    What would happen if all thos who had to return their bonuses simply got up and walked off the job?

                    Then Piglosi Reid & Obammy wouldn't know what to do. They would want to pass a law making them return to work or face debtors prison. ๐Ÿ˜†

                    The inmates are running the asylum. ๐Ÿ˜†

                    Head or Gut?
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Legacy FanL Legacy Fan

                      p.s. Congress knew about this bonus back on Feb 11. They are only now feigning outrage now that we know about it.

                      I read that & specifically remember the date. When I find the link verifying it I'll post.

                      It didn't say anything specifically about Obama knowing back then, but I have a hard time believing he found out when the public did if Congress knew a month ago.

                      Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                      • 3k Posts
                      • 197 Reputation
                      Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by Legacy Fan
                      #10

                      @legacy-fan said:

                      p.s. Congress knew about this bonus back on Feb 11. They are only now feigning outrage now that we know about it.

                      I read that & specifically remember the date. When I find the link verifying it I'll post.

                      It didn't say anything specifically about Obama knowing back then, but I have a hard time believing he found out when the public did if Congress knew a month ago.

                      p.s. Here it is: Chris Dodd knew about the bonus. He's the one who added the clause.

                      Here's where I got the Feb 11th date: Not the actual article, but references Feb. 11 as d-day (or perhaps VE day ๐Ÿ˜› ).

                      While the Senate constructed the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd unexpectedly added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an โ€œexception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009,โ€ which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are seeking to tax. The amendment is in the final version and is law.

                      Also, Sen. Dodd was AIGโ€™s largest single recipient of campaign donations during the 2008 election cycle with $103,100, according to opensecrets.org.

                      Oops.

                      Obama doesn't know about it? His "intellectual curiosity" has dipped to the Steve Martin version of Inspecter Clouseau.

                      Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better ๐Ÿ’—

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Theme
                      • System
                      • Light
                      • Dark
                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Forums
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Donate