Steeler Week
-
Thanks zombo. I try to be and I too enjoy some of the people on this board, you included. I wouldn't have stuck around this long if I didn't.Zombo said:
Sure ... but I will kinda miss ya. Of all the Steeler trolls you at least try and be respectful of where you are sometimes.
Z
Edit: and you won't be missing me. They are going to go 4-0 over that stretch. Are you gonna miss columbusking? Lol
Thanks zombo. I try to be and I too enjoy some of the people on this board, you included. I wouldn't have stuck around this long if I didn't.
Edit: and you won't be missing me. They are going to go 4-0 over that stretch.
Just being totally objective ... they have about a 12% chance of doing that.
But I will let you make one last post after the loss, which is probably a week from Sunday.
Zombo
--I'd rather ban DoucheNozzle and Stinkhole .... but, then again, I guess I can do that anyway.
-
Thanks zombo. I try to be and I too enjoy some of the people on this board, you included. I wouldn't have stuck around this long if I didn't.
Edit: and you won't be missing me. They are going to go 4-0 over that stretch.
Just being totally objective ... they have about a 12% chance of doing that.
But I will let you make one last post after the loss, which is probably a week from Sunday.
Zombo
--I'd rather ban DoucheNozzle and Stinkhole .... but, then again, I guess I can do that anyway.
No luck, no manning and Seattle isn't the same and we should have beat the bungles the last time.Zombo said:
Just being totally objective ... they have about a 12% chance of doing that.
But I will let you make one last post after the loss, which is probably a week from Sunday.
Zombo
--I'd rather ban DoucheNozzle and Stinkhole .... but, then again, I guess I can do that anyway.
-
The same stipulation applies to me as well.
So at about 7-7:30 on the 29th we won't have to hear from you ever again???
How would the stipulation apply to you? We are talking about the Steelers no? I bet they go 4-0 assuming health isn't an issue and if I'm right you leave. No new names, no anything. IP banned. If I'm wrong I leave. IP ban.
The same stipulation applies if fucking Russell Wilson gets hurts, or some one of similar value on any of the teams the steelers play gets hurt.How would the stipulation apply to you? We are talking about the Steelers no? I bet they go 4-0 assuming health isn't an issue and if I'm right you leave. No new names, no anything. IP banned. If I'm wrong I leave. IP ban.
Can't have your cake and eat it too, Vag.
-
But yeah I'm fine with the straight up rules.
Steelers lose any of the 4, I win.
Steelers win all 4, I lose.
Seems easy enough for me.
-
Luck and Manning weren't exactly tearing up the league.
Seattle is going to start rolling soon, same as last year minus Jimmy Graham, no?
And if you pass that gauntlet, the more-talented Bungles will be fired the hell up for that game, could be their essentual clincher.
It'll be fun.
If you win I will let you go back to your original name.
For a week or so.
Z
-
Luck and Manning weren't exactly tearing up the league.
Seattle is going to start rolling soon, same as last year minus Jimmy Graham, no?
And if you pass that gauntlet, the more-talented Bungles will be fired the hell up for that game, could be their essentual clincher.
It'll be fun.
If you win I will let you go back to your original name.
For a week or so.
Z
Zombo said:
Luck and Manning weren't exactly tearing up the league.
Seattle is going to start rolling soon, same as last year minus Jimmy Graham, no?
And if you pass that gauntlet, the more-talented Bungles will be fired the hell up for that game, could be their essentual clincher.
It'll be fun.
If you win I will let you go back to your original name.
For a week or so.
Z
Lol @ original name.
I agree on Manning and Luck. Seattles defense just isn't the same and their offense is far from good. As far as the Bengals are concerned why wouldn't the steelers be up for that game themselves? I also don't believe the Bengals are better but instead the Steelers have been decimated by injuries.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
"Bobaluga, got a bet here!"
One rule-no throwing up.
-
Gosh I predict 0-4 for the next Steeler games and peeps are bettin' and shit. Lol
-
http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/11/18/nfl-power-rankings-week-11-chiefs-steelers
4-0 is gonna be tough BUT I'm pretty clearly not the only person that thinks the team is good.
-
Zombo said:
Luck and Manning weren't exactly tearing up the league.
Seattle is going to start rolling soon, same as last year minus Jimmy Graham, no?
And if you pass that gauntlet, the more-talented Bungles will be fired the hell up for that game, could be their essentual clincher.
It'll be fun.
If you win I will let you go back to your original name.
For a week or so.
Z
Lol @ original name.
I agree on Manning and Luck. Seattles defense just isn't the same and their offense is far from good. As far as the Bengals are concerned why wouldn't the steelers be up for that game themselves? I also don't believe the Bengals are better but instead the Steelers have been decimated by injuries.
Lol @ original name.
I agree on Manning and Luck. Seattles defense just isn't the same and their offense is far from good. As far as the Bengals are concerned why wouldn't the steelers be up for that game themselves? I also don't believe the Bengals are better but instead the Steelers have been decimated by injuries.
The Bengals were overall better than the Steelers even with BR healthy....not that I am claiming that Dalton is better than BR....just the whole Bengal team is better.
-
I don't see Pittsburg winning at Seatlle.
-
"One said:
I don't see Pittsburg winning at Seatlle.
Because they have beaten who this season? Seattle hasn't beaten a team over .500 all season.
-
"One said:
I don't see Pittsburg winning at Seatlle.
Because they have beaten who this season? Seattle hasn't beaten a team over .500 all season.
-
Zombo said:
And you lost to the Ravens and Chiefs.
Z
--even we neat the Ravens
We did, with Vick under center
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
Zombo said:
And you lost to the Ravens and Chiefs.
Z
--even we neat the Ravens
We did, with Vick under center
We did, with Vick under center
Fair point.
Though, as I have said elsewhere......no other team will play the poor defensive scheme against BR and Brown that the Browns played. No attempt to put any pressure up the middle at all against a gimpy QB. Covering your best WR with a 2d Safety.
No other opponent you face (except the Browns again at the end of the year) will be as poorly coached defensively as you just faced.
-
We did, with Vick under center
Fair point.
Though, as I have said elsewhere......no other team will play the poor defensive scheme against BR and Brown that the Browns played. No attempt to put any pressure up the middle at all against a gimpy QB. Covering your best WR with a 2d Safety.
No other opponent you face (except the Browns again at the end of the year) will be as poorly coached defensively as you just faced.
You were outmatched in your defensive secondary and that was the difference. Our offensive line is also pretty damn good. Let's be honest if the Browns sold out with the blitz the score likely would have been worse. Ben is probably the best qb gimpy or not under pressure. He also climbed the pocket a couple times without issue. Brown is one of the recievers you don't want to face when sending the farm as well. The tandem of Bryant and Brown could end up being he best in the league. I read an article that the two of them are the fastest tandem in the nfl based on measured speed. Bryant at 6'4 is running at almost 22 mph. They are a match up nightmare. You then have Miller, Williams, throw in the other guys. It's a ridiculous offensive all made more cumbersome when you were without both Haden and Whitner. What defensive secondary WITH Ben has slowed them down?Fair point.
Though, as I have said elsewhere......no other team will play the poor defensive scheme against BR and Brown that the Browns played. No attempt to put any pressure up the middle at all against a gimpy QB. Covering your best WR with a 2d Safety.
No other opponent you face (except the Browns again at the end of the year) will be as poorly coached defensively as you just faced.
-
You were outmatched in your defensive secondary and that was the difference. Our offensive line is also pretty damn good. Let's be honest if the Browns sold out with the blitz the score likely would have been worse. Ben is probably the best qb gimpy or not under pressure. He also climbed the pocket a couple times without issue. Brown is one of the recievers you don't want to face when sending the farm as well. The tandem of Bryant and Brown could end up being he best in the league. I read an article that the two of them are the fastest tandem in the nfl based on measured speed. Bryant at 6'4 is running at almost 22 mph. They are a match up nightmare. You then have Miller, Williams, throw in the other guys. It's a ridiculous offensive all made more cumbersome when you were without both Haden and Whitner. What defensive secondary WITH Ben has slowed them down?Fair point.
Though, as I have said elsewhere......no other team will play the poor defensive scheme against BR and Brown that the Browns played. No attempt to put any pressure up the middle at all against a gimpy QB. Covering your best WR with a 2d Safety.
No other opponent you face (except the Browns again at the end of the year) will be as poorly coached defensively as you just faced.
You were outmatched in your defensive secondary and that was the difference.
Well, we had our two best players on the sideline.....so that helped.
Our offensive line is also pretty damn good.
They are well coached beyond their talent level.
Let's be honest if the Browns sold out with the blitz the score likely would have been worse. Ben is probably the best qb gimpy or not under pressure.
No, that is foolish. Any QB that is being pressured straight up in his face will not perform as well as if he is left alone. The teams that have beaten the Pats have put pressure up the middle on Brady. Same deal here. You put no pressure on BR and he will kill you. Will these guys have some success beating the blitz? Sure.....but they will have more success when you don't pressure them at all.
He also climbed the pocket a couple times without issue. Brown is one of the recievers you don't want to face when sending the farm as well. The tandem of Bryant and Brown could end up being he best in the league. I read an article that the two of them are the fastest tandem in the nfl based on measured speed. Bryant at 6'4 is running at almost 22 mph. They are a match up nightmare. You then have Miller, Williams, throw in the other guys. It's a ridiculous offensive all made more cumbersome when you were without both Haden and Whitner. What defensive secondary WITH Ben has slowed them down?
The Cleveland Browns......last year. 31-10, remember?
Why there was such an incredible difference between that game and this is the quandary.
-
You were outmatched in your defensive secondary and that was the difference.
Well, we had our two best players on the sideline.....so that helped.
Our offensive line is also pretty damn good.
They are well coached beyond their talent level.
Let's be honest if the Browns sold out with the blitz the score likely would have been worse. Ben is probably the best qb gimpy or not under pressure.
No, that is foolish. Any QB that is being pressured straight up in his face will not perform as well as if he is left alone. The teams that have beaten the Pats have put pressure up the middle on Brady. Same deal here. You put no pressure on BR and he will kill you. Will these guys have some success beating the blitz? Sure.....but they will have more success when you don't pressure them at all.
He also climbed the pocket a couple times without issue. Brown is one of the recievers you don't want to face when sending the farm as well. The tandem of Bryant and Brown could end up being he best in the league. I read an article that the two of them are the fastest tandem in the nfl based on measured speed. Bryant at 6'4 is running at almost 22 mph. They are a match up nightmare. You then have Miller, Williams, throw in the other guys. It's a ridiculous offensive all made more cumbersome when you were without both Haden and Whitner. What defensive secondary WITH Ben has slowed them down?
The Cleveland Browns......last year. 31-10, remember?
Why there was such an incredible difference between that game and this is the quandary.
The line is good. It helps that we have an awesome coach but there are a lot of high draft picks on that line especially when healthy (Pouncey). The 31-10 game was before the offense explosion that took place last season and really that all started when Bryant saw the field. Look at the Steelers offensive numbers for the back half of last season. Bryant didn't play in either of the Browns games.You were outmatched in your defensive secondary and that was the difference.
Well, we had our two best players on the sideline.....so that helped.
Our offensive line is also pretty damn good.
They are well coached beyond their talent level.
Let's be honest if the Browns sold out with the blitz the score likely would have been worse. Ben is probably the best qb gimpy or not under pressure.
No, that is foolish. Any QB that is being pressured straight up in his face will not perform as well as if he is left alone. The teams that have beaten the Pats have put pressure up the middle on Brady. Same deal here. You put no pressure on BR and he will kill you. Will these guys have some success beating the blitz? Sure.....but they will have more success when you don't pressure them at all.
He also climbed the pocket a couple times without issue. Brown is one of the recievers you don't want to face when sending the farm as well. The tandem of Bryant and Brown could end up being he best in the league. I read an article that the two of them are the fastest tandem in the nfl based on measured speed. Bryant at 6'4 is running at almost 22 mph. They are a match up nightmare. You then have Miller, Williams, throw in the other guys. It's a ridiculous offensive all made more cumbersome when you were without both Haden and Whitner. What defensive secondary WITH Ben has slowed them down?
The Cleveland Browns......last year. 31-10, remember?
Why there was such an incredible difference between that game and this is the quandary.
Ben is fantastic against pressure BUT I agree you are better off send some pressure. Fact is the Browns were forced to drop more in coverage because the defensive secondary was getting eaten alive and our line was picking up the blitz.
All of which brings me to my bet. what defense is slowing the Steeler offense down when healthy? The line is doing its job, Williams has been awesome in Bell's absence. brown is proving to be uncoverable, especially with Ben under center. Bryant is a freak of nature. You then throw in Miller, Wheaton and DHB after the top two and a line that is playing well. It's a tall order for any d in the league AND our defense is vastly improved.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login