Liberal black Avis employee refuses to rent a car to an Israeli
-
It is ironic. Glad to see you have switched positions.
WSS
I haven't switched any positions, I think it's bullshit. Shamoura or whatever can get fired, and then come to my place I make it all better. But in all seriousness, welcome to the new world. No complaining either, this is what y'all wanted.
I haven't switched any positions, I think it's bullshit. Shamoura or whatever can get fired, and then come to my place I make it all better. But in all seriousness, welcome to the new world. No complaining either, this is what y'all wanted.
Fired? Golly I assumed you would want Avis put out of business like the bakery.
WSS
-
Bullshit that's minimum a flat 8. She look like she suck the chrome off a trailer hitch too.
BFD.
Woody can do that.
WSS
BFD.
Woody can do that.
WSS
ok that got a laugh out me well done
-
I haven't switched any positions, I think it's bullshit. Shamoura or whatever can get fired, and then come to my place I make it all better. But in all seriousness, welcome to the new world. No complaining either, this is what y'all wanted.
Fired? Golly I assumed you would want Avis put out of business like the bakery.
WSS
Fired? Golly I assumed you would want Avis put out of business like the bakery.
WSS
was it an avis corporate memo that came down saying no service for heebs? or was it these individuals choice to refuse him service? If avis abides by their behavior than they are supporting the practice by proxy and should be boycotted, no? If they don't relent than yes they should be put out of business if they support employees refusing a customer service based solely on their perceived ethnicity/religion and not their behavior. If they were rude ass jews at the counter than yeah I don't mind they got no service, but not because their last name started with gold or rosen something or other.
-
She was only wrong to refuse the Israeli because he isn't muslim - amiright?
But aside from that, it's obviously wrong and illegal to refuse anybody service based on race, religion, etc. But it seems like these particular employees were under the impression that Israeli documents were not acceptable, rather than refusing him because he's Israeli.
I'm not sure what the case was, but I don't like that everything like this has to be turned into a racial issue. Could just be that he didn't have the correct documents - maybe previous rentals were all handled by his company or whatever.
-
She was only wrong to refuse the Israeli because he isn't muslim - amiright?
But aside from that, it's obviously wrong and illegal to refuse anybody service based on race, religion, etc. But it seems like these particular employees were under the impression that Israeli documents were not acceptable, rather than refusing him because he's Israeli.
I'm not sure what the case was, but I don't like that everything like this has to be turned into a racial issue. Could just be that he didn't have the correct documents - maybe previous rentals were all handled by his company or whatever.
She was only wrong to refuse the Israeli because he isn't muslim - amiright?
But aside from that, it's obviously wrong and illegal to refuse anybody service based on race, religion, etc. But it seems like these particular employees were under the impression that Israeli documents were not acceptable, rather than refusing him because he's Israeli.
I'm not sure what the case was, but I don't like that everything like this has to be turned into a racial issue. Could just be that he didn't have the correct documents - maybe previous rentals were all handled by his company or whatever.
LESS RATIONAL MORE KNEE JERKY OUT OF YOU EDWARD!!!
-
Fired? Golly I assumed you would want Avis put out of business like the bakery.
WSS
was it an avis corporate memo that came down saying no service for heebs? or was it these individuals choice to refuse him service? If avis abides by their behavior than they are supporting the practice by proxy and should be boycotted, no? If they don't relent than yes they should be put out of business if they support employees refusing a customer service based solely on their perceived ethnicity/religion and not their behavior. If they were rude ass jews at the counter than yeah I don't mind they got no service, but not because their last name started with gold or rosen something or other.
was it an avis corporate memo that came down saying no service for heebs? or was it these individuals choice to refuse him service? If avis abides by their behavior than they are supporting the practice by proxy and should be boycotted, no? If they don't relent than yes they should be put out of business if they support employees refusing a customer service based solely on their perceived ethnicity/religion and not their behavior. If they were rude ass jews at the counter than yeah I don't mind they got no service, but not because their last name started with gold or rosen something or other.
So a $130,000 fine is in order?
WSS
-
was it an avis corporate memo that came down saying no service for heebs? or was it these individuals choice to refuse him service? If avis abides by their behavior than they are supporting the practice by proxy and should be boycotted, no? If they don't relent than yes they should be put out of business if they support employees refusing a customer service based solely on their perceived ethnicity/religion and not their behavior. If they were rude ass jews at the counter than yeah I don't mind they got no service, but not because their last name started with gold or rosen something or other.
So a $130,000 fine is in order?
WSS
So a $130,000 fine is in order?
WS
If this is all infact because they were jewish and not something else, which it likely is because all of Cals cool story's end up like that, than fuck yeah Avis has some splaining to do. And if they don't remedy the situation, like by firing Shamwow and sending her to my place
, than yeah they need to fined. It's called principle. -
Let's not blur the issue of refusing service because of
a normal, healthy, human aversion to perversion...
with discriminating against someone who happens to be a different
color of skin, different religion, culture...
-
Let's not blur the issue of refusing service because of
a normal, healthy, human aversion to perversion...
with discriminating against someone who happens to be a different
color of skin, different religion, culture...
-
Most certainly is not the same.
Perversion is a behavior.
Color of skin, being Jewish or Hindu, Christian, etc....
is not a behavior.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/perversion
any of various means of obtaining sexualgratification that are generally regarded as being abnormal.5.Pathology. a change to what is unnatural orabnormal:Liberals use misuse words intentionally, to emotionally knee jerk, albeit withfalse "justification". -
Let's not blur the issue of refusing service because of
a normal, healthy, human aversion to perversion...
with discriminating against someone who happens to be a different
color of skin, different religion, culture...
-
well, you emotionally knee jerked, woodypeckerhead.
You missed the definition of perversion, which proves
my point completely.
-
Hahahahahaha
-
being "jewish" is most certainly a behavior you numbskull. I agree being black or white or Asian isn't something you can control, but being of a certain religion most certainly is. And depending on who you talk to, being jewish is most certainly "abnormal". Talk to some Christians at certain points in history and they would most def agree, to the point they persecuted jews much like jews at one point persecuted Christians. It's all a vicious circlejerk of bullshit with you abrahamists.
-
Let's just not discredit the possibility that the guy may have had invalid paperwork?
-
Most certainly is not the same.
Perversion is a behavior.
Color of skin, being Jewish or Hindu, Christian, etc....
is not a behavior.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/perversion
any of various means of obtaining sexualgratification that are generally regarded as being abnormal.5.Pathology. a change to what is unnatural orabnormal:Liberals use misuse words intentionally, to emotionally knee jerk, albeit withfalse "justification".Most certainly is not the same.
Perversion is a behavior.
Color of skin, being Jewish or Hindu, Christian, etc....
is not a behavior.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/perversion
any of various means of obtaining sexualgratification that are generally regarded as being abnormal.5.Pathology. a change to what is unnatural orabnormal:Liberals use misuse words intentionally, to emotionally knee jerk, albeit withfalse "justification".Choosing a religion is not a behavior?
-
-
What if she refused service to a Muslim?
is it ok then?
-
What if she refused service to a Muslim?
is it ok then?
The Justice Department would already be there.
WSS
-
So now we get to pick and choose who is allowed to be discriminated against?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login