The new Tom Brady rule
-
The NFL is getting ridiculous with protecting the QB. They have revised the rule concerning hitting a QB at his knees.
Now if a defensive player is knocked down to the ground, he cannot reach out or dive for the QB's legs while in the down position. This is what happened to Brady last year against the chiefs.
I guess if a D-lineman gets knocked down at the QB's feet, he has to stand back up on his feet before he can touch the QB.
Absolutely ridiculous.
It became even more ridiculous for me after hearing the Patriots owner try and justify it. He said the NFL simply can't afford to have their star QB's go down. It hurts the game.
The owners have stopped looking at this as a sport and are now looking at it purely as a business.
The NFL is a business....What goes on out on the field is sport!
Man, did Golic rave against this yesterday on the radio! I know he's biased because of the postion he played. But he was still right on the mark with his diatribe.
This is stupid. Brady is soft.
This is stupid. Brady is soft.
Agreed. (with the stupidness of the rule)
Adding the weight of forever being associated to this flag-football/ red-jersey rule to all of that finger hardware Brady is sporting and the weight of that supermodel wife (who, with the wrong lighting/angle sometimes has a severe case of tranny-face, imo) dangling from his junk must be horrifyingly soul crushing.
Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula -
The NFL Qb in 2012
-
This is stupid. Brady is soft.
Agreed. (with the stupidness of the rule)
Adding the weight of forever being associated to this flag-football/ red-jersey rule to all of that finger hardware Brady is sporting and the weight of that supermodel wife (who, with the wrong lighting/angle sometimes has a severe case of tranny-face, imo) dangling from his junk must be horrifyingly soul crushing.
and the weight of that supermodel wife (who, with the wrong lighting/angle sometimes has a severe case of tranny-face, imo)
LMAO!!!!!!
-
this rule is ridiculous. they might as well put dresses on them so that they can kiss. before you know it they are going to have the quarterbacks wearing red practice jerseys and all you have to do is touch the qb to sack him. what a bunch of babies.
-
and the weight of that supermodel wife (who, with the wrong lighting/angle sometimes has a severe case of tranny-face, imo)
LMAO!!!!!!
LMAO!!!!!!
Crow I think we just need to wait till the head ref explains this later today.
I take the rule as:
A defender may not initially contact a QB on or below the knee if the QB has one or both feet on the ground.
A defender who is on the ground and then attempts to tackle said QB may only swipe at or below the knee, lunging is prohibited.
A defender who runs and drives full force through the lower thigh area or above is completely safe as long as he does not lead with the helmet.
Obviously, "above the knee" is going to be a call it as you see it situation. I don't know if they will allow replay to determine the area of contact but I can definitely see this spurring a bottle-fest repeat if a bad call is made at a crucial time.
-
I agree, it's getting very skewed towards the O.
You might as well not rush anybody and institute a rule the qb has to throw the ball in 4 seconds of less from the time he sets up.....just cover with 11....that would make a pretty tight zone.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
LMAO!!!!!!
Crow I think we just need to wait till the head ref explains this later today.
I take the rule as:
A defender may not initially contact a QB on or below the knee if the QB has one or both feet on the ground.
A defender who is on the ground and then attempts to tackle said QB may only swipe at or below the knee, lunging is prohibited.
A defender who runs and drives full force through the lower thigh area or above is completely safe as long as he does not lead with the helmet.
Obviously, "above the knee" is going to be a call it as you see it situation. I don't know if they will allow replay to determine the area of contact but I can definitely see this spurring a bottle-fest repeat if a bad call is made at a crucial time.
AdaM said:
Crow I think we just need to wait till the head ref explains this later today.I take the rule as:
A defender may not initially contact a QB on or below the knee if the QB has one or both feet on the ground.
A defender who is on the ground and then attempts to tackle said QB may only swipe at or below the knee, lunging is prohibited.
A defender who runs and drives full force through the lower thigh area or above is completely safe as long as he does not lead with the helmet.
Obviously, "above the knee" is going to be a call it as you see it situation. I don't know if they will allow replay to determine the area of contact but I can definitely see this spurring a bottle-fest repeat if a bad call is made at a crucial time.
Agreed.
The last thing you said is the problem I have with it and the refs are going to hate it too. I was an Ohio High school official for years (Baseball and sotball) and we HATED anything that we had to interpret.
-
I agree, it's getting very skewed towards the O.
You might as well not rush anybody and institute a rule the qb has to throw the ball in 4 seconds of less from the time he sets up.....just cover with 11....that would make a pretty tight zone.
-
The NFL is getting ridiculous with protecting the QB. They have revised the rule concerning hitting a QB at his knees.
Now if a defensive player is knocked down to the ground, he cannot reach out or dive for the QB's legs while in the down position. This is what happened to Brady last year against the chiefs.
I guess if a D-lineman gets knocked down at the QB's feet, he has to stand back up on his feet before he can touch the QB.
Absolutely ridiculous.
It became even more ridiculous for me after hearing the Patriots owner try and justify it. He said the NFL simply can't afford to have their star QB's go down. It hurts the game.
The owners have stopped looking at this as a sport and are now looking at it purely as a business.
The NFL is a business....What goes on out on the field is sport!
Man, did Golic rave against this yesterday on the radio! I know he's biased because of the postion he played. But he was still right on the mark with his diatribe.
Edit: You can swipe at the QB from the ground. But if you are going to hit him you can't even hit him above the knee area. I would imagine the refs will blow the whistle unless it's the waist or above. Thus, the Lineman is basically going to have to get up on his feet before he can do anything but take a swipe. No more lunging from the ground...period.
The NFL is getting ridiculous with protecting the QB. They have revised the rule concerning hitting a QB at his knees.
Now if a defensive player is knocked down to the ground, he cannot reach out or dive for the QB's legs while in the down position. This is what happened to Brady last year against the chiefs.
I guess if a D-lineman gets knocked down at the QB's feet, he has to stand back up on his feet before he can touch the QB.
Absolutely ridiculous.
It became even more ridiculous for me after hearing the Patriots owner try and justify it. He said the NFL simply can't afford to have their star QB's go down. It hurts the game.
The owners have stopped looking at this as a sport and are now looking at it purely as a business.
The NFL is a business....What goes on out on the field is sport!
Man, did Golic rave against this yesterday on the radio! I know he's biased because of the postion he played. But he was still right on the mark with his diatribe.
Edit: You can swipe at the QB from the ground. But if you are going to hit him you can't even hit him above the knee area. I would imagine the refs will blow the whistle unless it's the waist or above. Thus, the Lineman is basically going to have to get up on his feet before he can do anything but take a swipe. No more lunging from the ground...period.
I think its a GREAT RULE, people that are season ticket holders pay top money for tickets and don't want to have to watch some guy play quarterback like we did watching Ken Dorsey this past season because some defensive player takes out the most important player on a team.
The NFL is all out $$$$$$ and they don't want quarterbacks dropping because of overzealous defensive players
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login