Skip to content

Donald Trump says ban all Muslims traveling to US

Political Discussion
82 15 2.0k
  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    The economy is already in dire need of a full overhaul. But as I think I said in my original statement that isolationism is impossible and isn't going to happen

    It's also a ridiculous idea that would fall flat on its face.

    @gftchris said:

    It's also a ridiculous idea that would fall flat on its face.

    Stuart

    From 1924 to 1965 the US shut down all immigration. It can be done.

    Your democrat idol FDR rounded up all the Japs. It can be done.

    Most troubling is that we are about to accept 9000 Muslim refugees but have no room for Syrian Christians.

    What do you make of that you silly ass liberal?

    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/228670-no-room-in-america-for-christian-refugees

  • @gftchris said:

    By calling out your stupidity?

    by being a bitch. If you say you'd like something theoretically to happen but it's impossible how is that stupid. I'd like to fuck Megan Fox too but it's probably impossible. Want to pick that apart?

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    by being a bitch. If you say you'd like something theoretically to happen but it's impossible how is that stupid. I'd like to fuck Megan Fox too but it's probably impossible. Want to pick that apart?

    It's not the impossibility of it happening that's stupid, I get it's a hypothetical. The idea itself is what I was criticising. I'm sorry if I inadvertently was a bit of a dick about it, it wasn't my intention (yesterday was a shitty day, this is a shitty week).

    The idea of completely isolating the US from the entire outside world is ridiculous - not the logistics, the actual outcome of it. The logistics are pretty trivial, really.

  • I wasn't actually directing that at you although it was in response to your post.

    I apologize to chris as well. I've had a rough day.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    I wasn't actually directing that at you although it was in response to your post.

    I apologize to chris as well. I've had a rough day.

    No worries.

  • I know it's tough but can't you guys read the next line where he says until this administration knows what's going on?

    WSS

  • I know it's tough but can't you guys read the next line where he says until this administration knows what's going on?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    I know it's tough but can't you guys read the next line where he says until this administration knows what's going on?

    WSS

    Does that make banning a group of people based on their religion any better?

  • @westside-steve said:

    I know it's tough but can't you guys read the next line where he says until this administration knows what's going on?

    WSS

    Does that make banning a group of people based on their religion any better?

    @mld-woody said:

    Does that make banning a group of people based on their religion any better?

    Yes.

    WSS

  • Leftists go on and on and on about context when it's something that behooves them but they're known to ignore context when something out of context would benefit them. Such as right now.

  • why would anyone disagree with protecting our nation?

  • Because bigots and safe spaces and microaggressions

  • why would anyone disagree with protecting our nation?

    @hammertime said:

    why would anyone disagree with protecting our nation?

    Good point.

    I'll need access to all of your phone calls, emails, anything through the mail, pictures, etc. We'll monitor your from now on as well.

    Just to be safe

  • Leftists go on and on and on about context when it's something that behooves them but they're known to ignore context when something out of context would benefit them. Such as right now.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Leftists go on and on and on about context when it's something that behooves them but they're known to ignore context when something out of context would benefit them. Such as right now.

    That context being...?

    (I'll give you the opportunity to word it how you see fit)

  • "Until this administration figures it out"

  • I don't need to word it any way. It's already worded. You're just choosing to focus on some words more than others

  • if I were of the religion or race that was declaring war on the USA then yes, id have to accept the ramifications.

    You think that's wrong?

  • if I were of the religion or race that was declaring war on the USA then yes, id have to accept the ramifications.

    You think that's wrong?

    @hammertime said:

    if I were of the religion or race that was declaring war on the USA then yes, id have to accept the ramifications.

    You think that's wrong?

    It's not a race or religion declaring war on the US though.

  • if I were of the religion or race that was declaring war on the USA then yes, id have to accept the ramifications.

    You think that's wrong?

    @hammertime said:

    if I were of the religion or race that was declaring war on the USA then yes, id have to accept the ramifications.

    You think that's wrong?

    A religion or race can not declare war, only nations and political organizations can do that.

  • @hammertime said:

    if I were of the religion or race that was declaring war on the USA then yes, id have to accept the ramifications.

    You think that's wrong?

    A religion or race can not declare war, only nations and political organizations can do that.

    @osiris said:

    A religion or race can not declare war, only nations and political organizations can do that.

    That's not necessarily true though is it? What nations did the abassid caliphate represent? It represented islam. And only islam constantly at war to spread islam, like a virus. And this was during the so called "golden age" of islam.

  • Obama wants to bring 10,000 Syrian refugees into this country when there is no way to vet these people. I think many reasonable people would agree to put on pause this idea because we have no idea of who we are bringing in to this country.

    What Trump said is way over the line about not allowing Muslims in to this country just because they are Muslim. I thought Trump had a silly answer when he was asked how we would know if people were Muslims or not and he said we would ask them (as if someone could not lie about it). Obviously to me Trump has not thought through on this idea however every time he says something like this and the talking heads say he has really doomed his campaign he only rises in the polls.

  • @osiris said:

    A religion or race can not declare war, only nations and political organizations can do that.

    That's not necessarily true though is it? What nations did the abassid caliphate represent? It represented islam. And only islam constantly at war to spread islam, like a virus. And this was during the so called "golden age" of islam.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    That's not necessarily true though is it? What nations did the abassid caliphate represent? It represented islam. And only islam constantly at war to spread islam, like a virus. And this was during the so called "golden age" of islam.

    So can I bring up the Crusades now? 🙂