Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Fill in the blanks.

Fill in the blanks.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
14 Posts 6 Posters 1.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Mr. T Mr. TM
    • 7k Posts
    • 184 Reputation
    Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Discussing social issues on a football message board is like talking to people who have a common intrest not only in sports but in what is going on within society.

    My hats off to all the Joe 6 packs and all those self proclaimed scholars.

    😁

    Head or Gut?
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
      • 64k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
      #4

      I have no comment, and I won't read mz the pussy's initial post.

      Paybacks on you, and that's no Haiku.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • ? Guest

        Discussing social issues on a football message board is like __________.

        Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
        • 3k Posts
        • 197 Reputation
        Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
        #5

        mz. said:

        Discussing social issues on a football message board is like __________.

        Having the girl you're trying to end a relationship with pull the goalie on you.

        Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • C calfoxwc

          I have no comment, and I won't read mz the pussy's initial post.

          Paybacks on you, and that's no Haiku.

          mz. ?
          • Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          ? mz. wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @calfoxwc said:

          I have no comment, and I won't read mz the pussy's initial post.

          Paybacks on you, and that's no Haiku.

          Suit yourself, but this is a fun game.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Empty Suit Obama is the name of the game.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • mz. ?
              • Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              ? mz. wrote on last edited by
              #8

              You could not possibly be lamer.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                • 64k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                #9

                But Obama is no Hall of Famer. Looking more like a Hall of SHAMER.

                Is that lamer? Or a bit tamer? @@

                Kosar_For_PresidentK 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • C calfoxwc

                  But Obama is no Hall of Famer. Looking more like a Hall of SHAMER.

                  Is that lamer? Or a bit tamer? @@

                  Kosar_For_President Kosar_For_PresidentK
                  • 6k Posts
                  • 221 Reputation
                  Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by Kosar_For_President
                  #10

                  @calfoxwc said:

                  But Obama is no Hall of Famer. Looking more like a Hall of SHAMER.

                  Is that lamer? Or a bit tamer? @@

                  "Why is it that every time something is posted you don't like, everything you do turns into diversionary smart-arse meaningless jibes? Do I have to repeat the post? Perhaps repost it in another thread for SERIOUS DISCUSSION?"

                  Pot meet kettle....

                  Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                    • 64k Posts
                    • 8k Reputation
                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Don't smoke pot, NoKlueszar, I already SAID IT WAS A PAYBACK.

                    Can you count to 2 in order? First it's "ONE". THEN it's FREAKIN "TWO".

                    Therefore, if I had mz the pussy goof off in my thread FIRST,.. let's consider that "ONE",

                    which comes BEFORE "TWO".

                    Then, when I jokingly do the same to mz the pussy, THAT is "TWO".

                    Now, consider that we are not talking about counting backwards - that would be

                    in inverse order.

                    Therefore, just say no to trying to be what you think you are because you're not. @@

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • C calfoxwc

                      Don't smoke pot, NoKlueszar, I already SAID IT WAS A PAYBACK.

                      Can you count to 2 in order? First it's "ONE". THEN it's FREAKIN "TWO".

                      Therefore, if I had mz the pussy goof off in my thread FIRST,.. let's consider that "ONE",

                      which comes BEFORE "TWO".

                      Then, when I jokingly do the same to mz the pussy, THAT is "TWO".

                      Now, consider that we are not talking about counting backwards - that would be

                      in inverse order.

                      Therefore, just say no to trying to be what you think you are because you're not. @@

                      Pumpkin Eater P
                      • 4k Posts
                      • 297 Reputation
                      P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @calfoxwc said:

                      Don't smoke pot, NoKlueszar, I already SAID IT WAS A PAYBACK.

                      Can you count to 2 in order? First it's "ONE". THEN it's FREAKIN "TWO".

                      Therefore, if I had mz the pussy goof off in my thread FIRST,.. let's consider that "ONE",

                      which comes BEFORE "TWO".

                      Then, when I jokingly do the same to mz the pussy, THAT is "TWO".

                      Now, consider that we are not talking about counting backwards - that would be

                      in inverse order.

                      Therefore, just say no to trying to be what you think you are because you're not. @@

                      jibberish

                      :neutral_face:
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                        • 64k Posts
                        • 8k Reputation
                        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Exactly what it is - an attempt to reason with an unreasonable person, on what could be considered "their level

                        of comprehension)

                        Kosar_For_PresidentK 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • C calfoxwc

                          Exactly what it is - an attempt to reason with an unreasonable person, on what could be considered "their level

                          of comprehension)

                          Kosar_For_President Kosar_For_PresidentK
                          • 6k Posts
                          • 221 Reputation
                          Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @calfoxwc said:

                          Exactly what it is - an attempt to reason with an unreasonable person, on what could be considered "their level

                          of comprehension)

                          ")unreasonable("?%$

                          Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Theme
                          • System
                          • Light
                          • Dark
                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Forums
                          • Recent
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Donate