The left can finally drop the big lie - of course it's all about gun CONFISCATION
-
Cal- amendments add no rights.
They are there to remind the government we are born with those rights.
Cal- amendments add no rights.
They are there to remind the government we are born with those rights.
18th?
-
Cal- amendments add no rights.
They are there to remind the government we are born with those rights.
18th?
18th?
Repealed?
-
But did it "remind the govt we are born with those rights"?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
But did it "remind the govt we are born with those rights"?
No, but you could probably argue that that factored in to its repealing.
-
ammoland.com
That's funny.
-
But did it "remind the govt we are born with those rights"?
Meant the Bill of Rights or the 1st -10th.
-
"It's this! Liberals!"
It's not that
"Well you're a dumb liberal!"
Rinse and repeat
Stuart
Liberals are dumb goes without saying but what you gave was also an example of liberals heads buried in the sand.
Take your pick:
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=liberals+want+gun+confiscation
-
Cal- amendments add no rights.
They are there to remind the government we are born with those rights. Leg**************************************
I stand corrected. ya.
-
I posted a thread earlier about Hillary Clinton saying we should look to Australia's gun control as a model for our country. As usual if the woman isn't flat out lying she is leaving out important facts. In this case Australia did not have gun control they had gun confiscation. Clinton talked about Australia's government buying back guns from citizens and compared it to Obama's cash for clunkers (failed) program. She left out the part about the citizens in Australia being forced to surrender their guns or they would go to jail. Obama too has floated the idea of looking at Australia's gun confiscation as a model for the United States. Interestingly Australia got a national gun registry from people who owned semi automatic firearms for the purpose of grandfathering those guns however that list was only used to know who had the guns and where those who owned them lived to go after them. There was no grandfathering.
Court decision paves the way for Australian-style gun ban
On Monday, the Court of Appeals for the Second U.S. Circuit issued a long awaited decision on the constitutionality of the most drastic gun control law in U.S. history, the New York SAFE Act of 2013. The Second Circuit ruled that nearly all of the law does not violate the Second Amendment.
The SAFE ("Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement") Act was presented to the New York State Senate and passed into law in 15 minutes. No debate was allowed, and senators did not have time to read the bill before voting it into law.
The SAFE Act is a complete ban on the sale or transfer of all military-style semi-automatic rifles manufactured within the past several decades. It is a total ban on the AR-15, AK-47, M-14/M-1a, HK G3, Steyr AUG, and many other civilian copies of military firearms. Prior to the passage of the law, Gov. Cuomo publicly stated that he was considering "confiscation" of existing rifles, but the final version of the law allowed existing owners to keep their rifles as long as they registered them with the State. Upon the death of the owner, the rifle will be confiscated; it cannot be transferred to an heir within New York State.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/10/court_decision_paves_the_way_for_australianstyle_gun_ban.html#ixzz3u7APc2Hx
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook -
Stuart
And the more gibberish about gun control/confiscation spewing from Obama and the left, the higher the gun sales....even on the left coast.
Good strategy there liberal Retards.
http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci_29238575/californias-gun-sales-break-records
-
From the article I posted...don't think it cannot happen here:
Now that the Second Circuit has upheld the law, residents within the court's jurisdiction have no recourse except to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court – where there will be a guaranteed four votes against the Second Amendment. As I wrote last year, Gov. Cuomo and former Mayor Bloomberg, the backers of the SAFE Act, were betting that the law will be upheld by the Supreme Court, thus paving the way for a national version of the law (which has already been introduced in the Senate by Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.). Indeed, Cuomo immediately called for a national SAFE Act as soon as the Second Circuit issued its ruling Monday.
The Second Circuit's decision comes only one week after both President Obama and Hillary Clinton publicly praised the Australian and British mass gun confiscations of the 1990s.
If the SAFE Act is upheld by the Supreme Court, nothing prevents Congress from summarily outlawing tens of millions of firearms overnight. Once those firearms become contraband, the government may confiscate and destroy them without compensating the owner (just as the government confiscates and destroys illegal drugs).
The Second Circuit's decision leaves the Second Amendment in its gravest peril ever. Second Amendment rights are now hanging by a one-vote margin in the same Supreme Court that upheld Obamacare and declared a national right to gay marriage. Constitutional conservatives and Second Amendment supporters ought to be terrified over the prospect of Justice Scalia having a heart attack during a Hillary Clinton presidency.
The Second Circuit's decision places the hands of the Second Amendment doomsday clock at two minutes to midnight. If you think "it can't happen here," you're wrong.
It already is happening here.
-
if a corrupt court were to overrule the existence of
the second amendment somehow...
it will never actually work to take away our freedoms and our rights.
All activist judges, even on the supreme court, need to be disbarred by
the U.S. States Congress by a simple majority vote.
Australia never had that legal guarantee. That is part of the excellent wisdom
of the Founding Fathers.
Let em try and arrest a hundred million gun owners. Who knows what the number is,
and the gov doesn't have a right to know. Because that would take a registration,
and that leads to confiscation.
-
If it weren't for guns the colonies probably would have never been a thing. Unless you're sending some men across the ocean on ships to sword fight all of the native americans...
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
If it weren't for guns the colonies probably would have never been a thing. Unless you're sending some men across the ocean on ships to sword fight all of the native americans...
If it weren't for guns the colonies probably would have never been a thing. Unless you're sending some men across the ocean on ships to sword fight all of the native americans...
-
If it weren't for guns the colonies probably would have never been a thing. Unless you're sending some men across the ocean on ships to sword fight all of the native americans...
If it weren't for guns the colonies probably would have never been a thing. Unless you're sending some men across the ocean on ships to sword fight all of the native americans...
So guns are a good thing, right?
WSS
-
Indians, not native americans.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login