Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. 2016 #1 DRAFT PICK ?

2016 #1 DRAFT PICK ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
25 Posts 18 Posters 896 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Browns149B Browns149

    If Farmer stays it won't matter who he picks in the 1st round, they will suck

    He's proven he can't make a decent 1st round pick

    Canton Dawg Canton DawgC Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
    • 12k Posts
    • 7k Reputation
    Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @browns149 said:

    If Farmer stays it won't matter who he picks in the 1st round, they will suck

    He's proven he can't make a decent 1st round pick

    You said it!
    Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • M MedinaDawg

      I think it definitely matters. Drafting the "best available" is, in my mind, a fantasy. You have to draft for needs and therefore, you first draft pick may not be the best available.

      Comeonman ComeonmanC Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
      • 2k Posts
      • 359 Reputation
      ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @medinadawg said:

      I think it definitely matters. Drafting the "best available" is, in my mind, a fantasy. You have to draft for needs and therefore, you first draft pick may not be the best available.

      To a certain extent. I also think there are teams out there (the really good ones) that can draft BPA
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • BrownsfaninPaB BrownsfaninPa

        Being the Browns could still end up with the #1 spot in the 2016 draft, is it really that big of a deal if we don't get the 1st pick and still get 3 or 4th spot?

        ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 9k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by ballpeen
        #10

        @brownsfaninpa said:

        Being the Browns could still end up with the #1 spot in the 2016 draft, is it really that big of a deal if we don't get the 1st pick and still get 3 or 4th spot?

        I see it as the elite eight picks.

        If you have one of those, you can have the best player at any of the main positions...

        OL

        DL

        LB

        CB

        S

        QB

        RB

        WR

        You could probably increase that by seven...

        Interior or outside lineman on both sides of the ball and inside and outside backer, and possibly TE.

        I would never consider a kicker or fullback in round one.

        If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
          • 30k Posts
          • 6k Reputation
          Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
          #11

          But is the Best Player at every position "elite"?

          "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
          ballpeenB 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • beare B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 585 Posts
            • 60 Reputation
            B beare wrote on last edited by
            #12

            At 4 they would still get a impact player that is if farmer is fired if farmer is here he prob will trade the pick for bowes cousin or something.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 4k Posts
              • 918 Reputation
              L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
              #13

              I don't like drafting for need, QB aside. The whole thing is a crapshoot so if you're taking someone in a position of need and he sucks, the need doesn't go away. Then there's injuries etc in other positions you supposedly don't need, Take your top talent on the board every time.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                • 30k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Way too early for draft debates.... but....

                "The list" is not a rigid, in-this-order thing. They're groups of objectively similarly talented prospects. It's OK to order a given group based upon need.

                "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • DeputyDawg DeputyDawgD
                  • 150 Posts
                  • 2 Reputation
                  DeputyDawgD DeputyDawg wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  I agree London which is why Cam was picked way too high last year.

                  Loyaultie me Lie. If I hadn't seen such riches I could live with being poor!
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • gftChris gftChrisG
                    • 13k Posts
                    • 428 Reputation
                    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    If you're drafting top 5, you have so many holes that you should just add good football players, so BPA.

                    If you're already stacked like the bengals/panthers, you don't have needs, so you should just add good football players.

                    If you believe you're one guy away, then maybe you can draft for need. But there aren't too many teams in that position.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                      But is the Best Player at every position "elite"?

                      ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 9k Posts
                      • 2k Reputation
                      ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @tour2ma said:

                      But is the Best Player at every position "elite"?

                      Who knows? Generally in any given year, you only have a few elite players.

                      If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Bob806 Bob806B Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 5k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by Bob806
                        #18

                        Jaylon Smith, OLB.

                        I hate draft talk, but we need a LB who can make a difference. Get this guy.

                        No O- linemen until round 4 or 5.

                        Karlis Missed
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                          • 24k Posts
                          • 1k Reputation
                          C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          we have to start looking at drafting BPA's and signing FA's for need. It just so happens that this year a lot of the BPA's are defensive players which is also our most pressing need. I don't know anymore who we go with since Bosa has kind of made it clear he thinks Cleveland is a shithole. I don't want a player on the team that thinks Cleveland is Shiite. He's gonna be just another dick collecting a check from jimmy. On the other hand, lets be honest...probably all of them to some extent feel that way about Cleveland. Sucks cause I do like the city. But young cunts want that south beach atmosphere to play in. So there's an argument to just take Bosa, let him play up for his 2nd contract and if he's really that miserable ship him off.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 5k Posts
                            • 1k Reputation
                            jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            It's a good question, and the short answer is "no", I don't think it matters. In fact, I could argue that NOT having the #1 pick is actually somewhat better in some cases. Not as much pressure, and no need to jam a square peg in a round hole. Of course, it always depends on WHO is available in the draft, and if someone like Winston is available, then you take a guy like that instantly. This draft, however, has NOTHING like that. There is no Clowney, no Winston, or no Luck.

                            Bosa fits a pretty big need, but I'm not so sure he's the best all around fit for us. Doesn't he prefer to play with a hand in the dirt? Isn't he more of a 4-3 DE? I'm sure he could LEARN to be an OLB, but the last thing we need is some kind of project. If we can't trade down a bit, I say we take Laquon Treadwill.

                            T 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • gftChris gftChrisG
                              • 13k Posts
                              • 428 Reputation
                              gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Treadwell is a reach and a half at #1, and drafting for need. Unfortunately, there's nobody at the top that fills a position of need for us. Bosa is close, as is ramsay and maybe hargreaves, but are they worthy of a #1 pick (in our system)?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                                It's a good question, and the short answer is "no", I don't think it matters. In fact, I could argue that NOT having the #1 pick is actually somewhat better in some cases. Not as much pressure, and no need to jam a square peg in a round hole. Of course, it always depends on WHO is available in the draft, and if someone like Winston is available, then you take a guy like that instantly. This draft, however, has NOTHING like that. There is no Clowney, no Winston, or no Luck.

                                Bosa fits a pretty big need, but I'm not so sure he's the best all around fit for us. Doesn't he prefer to play with a hand in the dirt? Isn't he more of a 4-3 DE? I'm sure he could LEARN to be an OLB, but the last thing we need is some kind of project. If we can't trade down a bit, I say we take Laquon Treadwill.

                                TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 23k Posts
                                • 6k Reputation
                                T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
                                #22

                                @jiggins7919 said:

                                It's a good question, and the short answer is "no", I don't think it matters. In fact, I could argue that NOT having the #1 pick is actually somewhat better in some cases. Not as much pressure, and no need to jam a square peg in a round hole. Of course, it always depends on WHO is available in the draft, and if someone like Winston is available, then you take a guy like that instantly. This draft, however, has NOTHING like that. There is no Clowney, no Winston, or no Luck.

                                Bosa fits a pretty big need, but I'm not so sure he's the best all around fit for us. Doesn't he prefer to play with a hand in the dirt? Isn't he more of a 4-3 DE? I'm sure he could LEARN to be an OLB, but the last thing we need is some kind of project. If we can't trade down a bit, I say we take Laquon Treadwill.

                                I'd love to get Treadwell in a trade down. I'd also like to get Elliot or Henry in a similar fashion. But then how do we fill our defensive needs? So many holes so few high draft choices.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 7k Posts
                                  • 1k Reputation
                                  MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  I agree that we can probably do as well(this year) with the #3 as we would with the #1....cause there is no monster talent just sitting there as the obvious guy.....

                                  Though....in a trade down situation.....#1 will get you more......

                                  Personally.....Id like to trade down from #1 to bout #4-5....and still get another pick......

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • gftChris gftChrisG
                                    • 13k Posts
                                    • 428 Reputation
                                    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Trouble is, who's going to trade up? Who has the 'ammunition' to trade up to #1? From #6, say, it'll cost probably another first rounder, and which team will give that up for Laremy Tunsil? From #3 to #6, we can probably get a high second rounder this year, which is basically another first round pick.

                                    MudflyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • gftChrisG gftChris

                                      Trouble is, who's going to trade up? Who has the 'ammunition' to trade up to #1? From #6, say, it'll cost probably another first rounder, and which team will give that up for Laremy Tunsil? From #3 to #6, we can probably get a high second rounder this year, which is basically another first round pick.

                                      Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 7k Posts
                                      • 1k Reputation
                                      MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @gftchris said:

                                      Trouble is, who's going to trade up? Who has the 'ammunition' to trade up to #1? From #6, say, it'll cost probably another first rounder, and which team will give that up for Laremy Tunsil? From #3 to #6, we can probably get a high second rounder this year, which is basically another first round pick.

                                      Yeah....I dont know....

                                      But, Im guessing the media will build up a few guys to "god status" by draft time and someone will want one of em.....maybe Bosa? or whatever QB becomes all the rage?..

                                      Then we gotta just hope that some GM is dumb enough to mortgage it all.....they do it all the time.....names like RGIII, Watkins, Richardson and Williams have all drawn some pretty ridiculous prices from desperate teams....

                                      So.....fingers crossed that Farmer(or whomever) can make lemonade in a questionable draft year....

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply

                                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                      Register Login
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      Theme
                                      • System
                                      • Light
                                      • Dark
                                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Forums
                                      • Recent
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Donate