Skip to content

In the second round, the Cleveland Browns select...

The Browns Board
81 28 2.8k
  • Goff will be gone by the second round. Have to watch the Senior Bowl then combine. I still want Bosa and CARDALE

  • Goff will be gone by the second round. Have to watch the Senior Bowl then combine. I still want Bosa and CARDALE

    @opal312 said:

    Goff will be gone by the second round. Have to watch the Senior Bowl then combine. I still want Bosa and CARDALE

    Goff won't get past San Fran. Maybe not past Dallas

    And he is the most pro ready QB to come out since Luck

  • @htownbrown said:

    No one has been pro ready since Luck and this guy is no Luck.

    This is where I point out the usage of the word as in his post.

    He's not Luck - but he may be the most pro-ready QB since Luck. There's a difference.

    (And I'm also not 100% sure I agree with that...yet. But he's growing on me.)

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    This is where I point out the usage of the word as in his post.

    He's not Luck - but he may be the most pro-ready QB since Luck. There's a difference.

    (And I'm also not 100% sure I agree with that...yet. But he's growing on me.)

    I know what he said......what I'm saying is if he is not around the same level as Luck, which he is not, then he is a reach a #2. There are guys at the top of this draft that are completely pro ready, opposed to as pro ready as anyone at said position since so and so.

  • It is very reasonable to think we don't go QB at #2. We have no idea who is leaving this team (Thomas, Haden, etc). I could see us continuing to start McCown and take a QB in the 2nd or 3rd.

  • Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.

    @medicineman said:

    Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.

    if we draft a QB with the 2nd pick he starts day one.

    no more let's see what happens when guys have a year or two to try and develop them. bortles, mariota, winston, luck........put that fucker in. hopefully he has a better line than tim couch had.

  • @medicineman said:

    Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.

    if we draft a QB with the 2nd pick he starts day one.

    no more let's see what happens when guys have a year or two to try and develop them. bortles, mariota, winston, luck........put that fucker in. hopefully he has a better line than tim couch had.

    @miktoxic said:

    if we draft a QB with the 2nd pick he starts day one.

    no more let's see what happens when guys have a year or two to try and develop them. bortles, mariota, winston, luck........put that fucker in. hopefully he has a better line than tim couch had.

    I agree...unless he's a dipshit and holds out during camp...but I think the new rookie pay scale and all that kindof prevents that from happening.

  • No no no, you draft QBs with the 1st-5th pick when they can contribute day 1. No more top 5 projects, for this team anyway. At pick 15 sure, at pick 2 hell no.

    @htownbrown said:

    No no no, you draft QBs with the 1st-5th pick when they can contribute day 1. No more top 5 projects, for this team anyway. At pick 15 sure, at pick 2 hell no.

    Goff at #2 is the pick. He broke all Lucks and Mariota Pac 12 records along with all Aaron Rodgers cal records. Plus he fits the mold. Open competition with mccown. If it's remotely close you go with the future plain and simple.

  • @htownbrown said:

    No no no, you draft QBs with the 1st-5th pick when they can contribute day 1. No more top 5 projects, for this team anyway. At pick 15 sure, at pick 2 hell no.

    Goff at #2 is the pick. He broke all Lucks and Mariota Pac 12 records along with all Aaron Rodgers cal records. Plus he fits the mold. Open competition with mccown. If it's remotely close you go with the future plain and simple.

    @cdl15 said:

    Goff at #2 is the pick. He broke all Lucks and Mariota Pac 12 records along with all Aaron Rodgers cal records. Plus he fits the mold. Open competition with mccown. If it's remotely close you go with the future plain and simple.

    Exactly. And if you watch him you see how effortless he looks moving in the pocket, throwing in the face of defenders, and all the other good stuff.

    He'd go #1 overall if the Titans needed a QB

  • But what kind of team will be left around him?

  • @htownbrown said:

    No no no, you draft QBs with the 1st-5th pick when they can contribute day 1. No more top 5 projects, for this team anyway. At pick 15 sure, at pick 2 hell no.

    Goff at #2 is the pick. He broke all Lucks and Mariota Pac 12 records along with all Aaron Rodgers cal records. Plus he fits the mold. Open competition with mccown. If it's remotely close you go with the future plain and simple.

    @cdl15 said:

    Goff at #2 is the pick. He broke all Lucks and Mariota Pac 12 records along with all Aaron Rodgers cal records. Plus he fits the mold. Open competition with mccown. If it's remotely close you go with the future plain and simple.

    I hope you don't stand by that statement.
  • But what kind of team will be left around him?

    @mld-woody said:

    But what kind of team will be left around him?

    No shit. McCown played beyond my expectations by far this year, yet only 1 win when he started. We have no defensive depth anywhere and no weapons on offense for a QB to succeed besides Gordon if he's sober. Sounds like the same song and dance to me. Goff was inconsistent all year and even McShay says he should stay in school because he's NOT ready for the NFL. But we're going to take him at #2. Okay.

  • Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.

    @medicineman said:

    Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.

    If they guy you are referring to wasnt stoned and / or drunk continually he may have played more too.

  • @bbedward said:

    #2 Jared Goff, QB, Cal

    #32 Shilque Calhoun, DE, MSU

    Not sure where Calhoun is projected exactly or if he'll fall that far. Too early to really tell anyway probably.

    Probably this ^

    If we go Goff, Calhoun is probably the guy I'd want in the second, as well.

    But if we go Bosa, I'd like to see us go Wentz in the second.

    I'm also intrigued by what will happen to Jaylon Smith.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If we go Goff, Calhoun is probably the guy I'd want in the second, as well.

    Told you someone would pop...

    @htownbrown said:

    I know what he said......what I'm saying is if he is not around the same level as Luck, which he is not, then he is a reach a #2. There are guys at the top of this draft that are completely pro ready, opposed to as pro ready as anyone at said position since so and so.

    Forget Luck... if the likes of Luck and P. Manning are your measuring stick there would be about one QB taken #1 or #2 overall every 10 years or so.

    The question to ask is: Is Goff as good as Jameis or Marcus?

    If the answer is yes, and looks more and more to me that is the right answer, then you pick Goff and don't look back. No guarantees, but pretty good odds.

  • Goff looks better to me than jameis and marcus, just sayin'

    I do agree if Luck and Manning is our measuring stick we may be waiting another 30 years

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If we go Goff, Calhoun is probably the guy I'd want in the second, as well.

    Told you someone would pop...

    @htownbrown said:

    I know what he said......what I'm saying is if he is not around the same level as Luck, which he is not, then he is a reach a #2. There are guys at the top of this draft that are completely pro ready, opposed to as pro ready as anyone at said position since so and so.

    Forget Luck... if the likes of Luck and P. Manning are your measuring stick there would be about one QB taken #1 or #2 overall every 10 years or so.

    The question to ask is: Is Goff as good as Jameis or Marcus?

    If the answer is yes, and looks more and more to me that is the right answer, then you pick Goff and don't look back. No guarantees, but pretty good odds.

    @tour2ma said:

    Told you someone would pop...

    Forget Luck... if the likes of Luck and P. Manning are your measuring stick there would be about one QB taken #1 or #2 overall every 10 years or so.

    The question to ask is: Is Goff as good as Jameis or Marcus?

    If the answer is yes, and looks more and more to me that is the right answer, then you pick Goff and don't look back. No guarantees, but pretty good odds.

    Not so much of a pop as he's just likely the best that might be available.

    Maybe it's just me, but I'm not overall impressed with the defensive depth so far. There are some guys at the top I like, but I haven't seen much from the mid-1st on that has been overly impressive.

  • OK... not a pop... But at least a name to balance the equation.

    As for depth... still early. Still a lot of underclassmen weighing their options.

    Some new names will likely surface for late Day 1 and early Day 2, but in some drafts they don't. In some drafts the term "value pick" comes out earlier than others. Personally I think DBs are going to supply a few, but may be more OL and WR, which would not be any surprise.

    The scarcity of high value LBs is most distressing, but who knows what D our new HC will favor?

  • "bust no. 156"

  • Switch to a 43 defense and get leonard floyd 32 pick

  • Switch to a 43 defense and get leonard floyd 32 pick

    @ameer said:

    Switch to a 43 defense and get leonard floyd 32 pick

    And where do you play a 6'4, 220# OLB?

  • @cdl15 said:

    Goff at #2 is the pick. He broke all Lucks and Mariota Pac 12 records along with all Aaron Rodgers cal records. Plus he fits the mold. Open competition with mccown. If it's remotely close you go with the future plain and simple.

    I hope you don't stand by that statement.

    @richiswhere said:

    I hope you don't stand by that statement.

    he holds his team record in passing yards per game touchdowns in a game passing touchdowns in a season total offense in a season and he also holds the pac-12 record in passing yards in a season and passing touchdowns in a season. why exactly would I not stand behind those stats?