Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. It's time for NH to change the rep nominee direction

It's time for NH to change the rep nominee direction

Political Discussion
78 11 1.3k

  • you inferred it, though, by singling out Cruz for getting $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs...

    and ignoring Higgardly getting a lot of $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs.

    I'm pointing out your political bigotry and contradiction there.

    ManzierM bbedwardB 2 Replies
  • C calfoxwc

    you inferred it, though, by singling out Cruz for getting $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs...

    and ignoring Higgardly getting a lot of $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs.

    I'm pointing out your political bigotry and contradiction there.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I'm pointing out your political bigotry and contradiction there.

    Because you're so balanced and unbiased. Funniest shit Ive ever read. Your hatred and ignorance leaves you blind to the truth, which is that your beloved GOP fucks you every way they can. Dems do the same. But you are the little robotic gop sheep soldier that they count on to do there dirty work. Good job soldier. Keep it up.

  • Lets keep fighting about the $34 a year we pay to feed the free loading poor people, but ignore the $3600 a year we pay for corporate incentives and tax abatements. And we can fight forever about the guns they will NEVER take from us, but ignore the trillions theyll be spending on guns next year. And we can fight about libratards and republitards, because was long as we do that, we will NEVER stand up for our own rights and demand change. Easier just to point a finger at your fellow citizens, then at the fucking paid politcos who are screwing you daily. Ignorance has no bounds.

  • U stupid dumb ass idiots.

  • hypocrite.

    YOU are the one who only wanted to crap on Cruz for Goldman-Sachs money.

    But all so conveniently, you won't crap on higgardly for the exact same thing.

    Obviously, it's a politically-oriented complaint. You would love to give

    higgardly great big smoochies because she will give you free stuff.

    Don't change the subject.

  • C calfoxwc

    you inferred it, though, by singling out Cruz for getting $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs...

    and ignoring Higgardly getting a lot of $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs.

    I'm pointing out your political bigotry and contradiction there.

    @calfoxwc said:

    you inferred it, though, by singling out Cruz for getting $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs...

    and ignoring Higgardly getting a lot of $$$$ from Goldman-Sachs.

    I'm pointing out your political bigotry and contradiction there.

    @bbedward said:

    Who said anything about Hillary? I'll write in my cat before I vote for Hillary. I won't vote for Cruz, Bush, Rubio either - to me they're all the same.

    Phil the Cat 2016 - Make America Purrfect Again

    When you assume you make an ass of u and me.

    I just thought it was widely known Hillary is corrupt so I see no reason to point it out - especially on this board.

  • excuses, excuses. Not buyin em.

  • I think we can all agree that whoever gets elected will be there with lots of Goldman Sachs money in their pocket. That is how it is has been since as long as I can remember. There is a reason why the top five donors are the same for either party after the numbers come out. The banks are betting on both horses.

  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

    I think we can all agree that whoever gets elected will be there with lots of Goldman Sachs money in their pocket. That is how it is has been since as long as I can remember. There is a reason why the top five donors are the same for either party after the numbers come out. The banks are betting on both horses.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I think we can all agree that whoever gets elected will be there with lots of Goldman Sachs money in their pocket. That is how it is has been since as long as I can remember. There is a reason why the top five donors are the same for either party after the numbers come out. The banks are betting on both horses.

    Unless that person is Trump or Sanders. But everybody's in both sides pockets - banks, insurance companies, real estate, cable, oil. They spend millions on lobbyists for a reason.

    "I can spend 100million on improving our infrastructure and service, or I could spend 50 million and lobby to maintain a monopoly"

  • I will give that to Trump and Sanders. They aren't on the take so they will never sniff the presidency.

Log in to reply