FBI investigating Clinton's private email server
-
Dear Ms. McLeod:
I am writing to update my September 21, 2015, response to your letter dated September 2, 2015, regarding Judicial Watch v Department of Sate, 13-cv-1363(D.D.C), and your request for information pursuant to the COurt’s Order of August 20, 2015. At that time, I informed you that the FBI could neither confirm nor deny the existence of any on-going investigation. Since that time, in public statements and testimony, the Bureau has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server. The FBI has not, however, publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope, or potential targets of any such proceedings. This, while the FBI’s response to you has change to some degree due to these intervening events, we remain unable provide the requested information without adversely affection on-going law enforcement efforts.
-
Michael Bloomberg (anti-gun mongaloid) is "considering running".
Sounds like he's the Dem-stablishments back-up plan.
-
Is he not a bit late? As in, needed to register months ago?
-
I think it's a math issue. Can still get on some ballots in some states but it may not be enough delegates to ultimately get the nomination.
Could also run as an independent.
-
Or a write in, I guess? Can you do that in party-nomination debates?
-
If she gets hammered with this email thing (establishment dems are spending truckloads to see that doesn't happen), I think that money spigot gets aimed at whatever it takes to get a guy like Bloomberg in the WH.
-
If she gets hammered with this email thing (establishment dems are spending truckloads to see that doesn't happen), I think that money spigot gets aimed at whatever it takes to get a guy like Bloomberg in the WH.
If she gets hammered with this email thing (establishment dems are spending truckloads to see that doesn't happen), I think that money spigot gets aimed at whatever it takes to get a guy like Bloomberg in the WH.
Think you're right.
-
Biden 2016
-
Can't look at his teeth for 4 minutes much less 4-8 years.Biden 2016
-
I'm going to err on the side that Clinton's lawyers and advisors have a better handle on the situation than the population and the media.
-
You do that
-
I'm going to err on the side that Clinton's lawyers and advisors have a better handle on the situation than the population and the media.
I'm going to err on the side that Clinton's lawyers and advisors have a better handle on the situation than the population and the media.
They do, for sure. But that just means they know the truth, not that the truth is innocent.
-
I'm going to err on the side that Clinton's lawyers and advisors have a better handle on the situation than the population and the media.
They do, for sure. But that just means they know the truth, not that the truth is innocent.
They do, for sure. But that just means they know the truth, not that the truth is innocent.
The truth is that it's very unlikely that Obama's Justice Department or FBI will allow Queen Hillary to hit a speed bump. I don't think Obama likes Hillary but I think he would be even more loathe to throw the Republicans a bone.
WSS
-
They do, for sure. But that just means they know the truth, not that the truth is innocent.
The truth is that it's very unlikely that Obama's Justice Department or FBI will allow Queen Hillary to hit a speed bump. I don't think Obama likes Hillary but I think he would be even more loathe to throw the Republicans a bone.
WSS
The truth is that it's very unlikely that Obama's Justice Department or FBI will allow Queen Hillary to hit a speed bump. I don't think Obama likes Hillary but I think he would be even more loathe to throw the Republicans a bone.
WSS
I get that impression too, strangely.
-
Bloomberg is wall street's backup plan. They gotta have somebody in the race if we have a Trump/Sanders general election.
-
Bloomberg is wall street's backup plan. They gotta have somebody in the race if we have a Trump/Sanders general election.
Bloomberg is wall street's backup plan. They gotta have somebody in the race if we have a Trump/Sanders general election.
Probably right but I just don't see any way a third party candidate wins the presidency.
-
Probably right but I just don't see any way a third party candidate wins the presidency.
He might get 5% at most. I think he'd probably have little impact because he'd probably get votes from both sides, but still a big name for wall street to throw money at.
I think the probable general election is Clinton/Trump, I can see Bloomberg being a threat for Trump there because he'll probably steal the Sanders supporters who would otherwise vote for Trump (there's a lot in the "anybody but clinton" crowd - and they like his health care stance and such). If it's a Trump/Sanders general then I think that Bloomberg will have virtually no effect on the outcome - will get some votes from both sides.
-
Wall Street doesn't have to throw money at Bernie Sanders.
Bernie Sanders has to get Congress to vote for and write his pie in the sky platform into law. Good luck folks. "Where be my free shit?"
Don't worry kids it's in the mail.
WSS
-
-
she's ugly. and nasty.
edit:
I forgot "mentally warped"
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login