Skip to content

When feigned offense is just a political weapon of the left

Political Discussion
31 10 1.3k
  • No, I did not. I gave separate examples of the duplicity of liberal cowards like you

    who never did put me on ignore, but said they did.

    you and woody can't let other people simply have their opinions, and just disagree.

    Ya just have to personally insult them every time. And you do it on the other board, too.

    Personal UNWARRANTED attacks are the ignorant fools' port in any storm.

    and our country is headed for a storm. The examples aren't the same, but just similar

    enough to show hypocrisy of liberals.

    Comparing them would fail, but the basic similarities show hypocrisy. idiot.

    Are you working on eventually being clevepeckerhead to steal attention from woodpecker?

    It isn't about me. It isn't about you....it's about our country and where we are dangerously headed,

    and why.

  • No, I did not. I gave separate examples of the duplicity of liberal cowards like you

    who never did put me on ignore, but said they did.

    you and woody can't let other people simply have their opinions, and just disagree.

    Ya just have to personally insult them every time. And you do it on the other board, too.

    Personal UNWARRANTED attacks are the ignorant fools' port in any storm.

    and our country is headed for a storm. The examples aren't the same, but just similar

    enough to show hypocrisy of liberals.

    Comparing them would fail, but the basic similarities show hypocrisy. idiot.

    Are you working on eventually being clevepeckerhead to steal attention from woodpecker?

    It isn't about me. It isn't about you....it's about our country and where we are dangerously headed,

    and why.

    @calfoxwc said:

    No, I did not. I gave separate examples of the duplicity of liberal cowards

    So you're comparing and contrasting said examples. This isn't hard dude.

  • comparing would be analyzing the similarities and differences

    between the two.

    I did not do that.

  • ... and "coward" is not an insult?

  • The fundamental problem here (apart from cal's admitted aversion to critical thinking), is the idea among some americans that freedom of speech, as enshrined in the first (?) amendment, means freedom to be a dick. I feel like that should be the first amendment. Don't be a dick. Don't go around offering to rape people. Don't hurl abuse at people whose lifestyles you don't like. Just stop being a dick, and hiding behind the free speech strawman.

  • The fundamental problem here (apart from cal's admitted aversion to critical thinking), is the idea among some americans that freedom of speech, as enshrined in the first (?) amendment, means freedom to be a dick. I feel like that should be the first amendment. Don't be a dick. Don't go around offering to rape people. Don't hurl abuse at people whose lifestyles you don't like. Just stop being a dick, and hiding behind the free speech strawman.

    @gftchris said:

    The fundamental problem here (apart from cal's admitted aversion to critical thinking), is the idea among some americans that freedom of speech, as enshrined in the first (?) amendment, means freedom to be a dick. I feel like that should be the first amendment. Don't be a dick. Don't go around offering to rape people. Don't hurl abuse at people whose lifestyles you don't like. Just stop being a dick, and hiding behind the free speech strawman.

    Well I think dummies don't consider that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence. They think they are being persecuted if everyone else decides to use their freedom of speech to call the dummies out and likely damage any income they are getting from the public.

  • The fundamental problem here (apart from cal's admitted aversion to critical thinking), is the idea among some americans that freedom of speech, as enshrined in the first (?) amendment, means freedom to be a dick. I feel like that should be the first amendment. Don't be a dick. Don't go around offering to rape people. Don't hurl abuse at people whose lifestyles you don't like. Just stop being a dick, and hiding behind the free speech strawman.

    @gftchris said:

    The fundamental problem here (apart from cal's admitted aversion to critical thinking), is the idea among some americans that freedom of speech, as enshrined in the first (?) amendment, means freedom to be a dick. I feel like that should be the first amendment. Don't be a dick. Don't go around offering to rape people. Don't hurl abuse at people whose lifestyles you don't like. Just stop being a dick, and hiding behind the free speech strawman.

    Of course you are correct Chris.

    Frankly I don't believe we were ever meant to have freedom of speech. I understand the reason they wrote the amendment, during revolutionary times those speaking out against the king would likely windup behind bars or worse.

    But today speaking out in many ways against the sacred cows of the power structure will still get you in hot water even if there is no specific jail time.

    As with most freedoms we love to talk about them unless they somehow offend us.

    WSS

  • Posted Today, 04:37 AM


    ... and "coward" is not an insult? Tour

    *********************************************

    Not unwarranted in "self-defense" verbally speaking.


    If someone punches you, and you punch back to stop them from hitting you again,

    who is at fault for starting it? Do you think it's you, or the other guy?


    Libs don't understand self-defense is okay, unless it's THEM that needs defending.

  • He does this a lot.

    No matter the context, YOU always insult HIM first. Everything he says is justified, its just self defense. Everything YOU say is hate speech, personal insults, etc.

    Same song and dance.

    Every time.

  • I'm consistent - it's principle. There are all sorts of folks

    who surely are justified in disagreeing with me, and they

    don't go with the insult retorts - in fits of emotional knee jerky

    like you do.

    When I see a pattern of personal attacking/insulting, instead of

    replying to the op at all...

    which is what you nearly always? do.... you end up a woodpecker.

    Yes, you are a liberal extremist that has no idea about letting other people

    have opinions different from yours, and you have no inkling of accountability

    for your own actions, woody. You do it to yourself.

  • Hahahahaha

    Liberal extremist?

    "no idea about letting other people have opinions different from yours

    "

    Hahahaha

  • yes I think you are a liberal extremist, but it's tough to have much evidence

    that is concrete, since as steve mentioned elsewhere...

    you usual comment on a subject is:

    "ur a idiot"

  • He does this a lot.

    No matter the context, YOU always insult HIM first. Everything he says is justified, its just self defense. Everything YOU say is hate speech, personal insults, etc.

    Same song and dance.

    Every time.

    @mld-woody said:

    He does this a lot.

    Well... when your mere presence is itself an insult...