Skip to content

Rams cut Laurinaitis and Long.....i'd take em in a heartbeat.

The Browns Board
66 18 2.0k
  • @jrb12711 said:

    I'm not directly comparing them, but I think Bosa's fair ceiling is JJ watt who is a cornerstone defensive player I'm sure we agree.

    Yeah....I cant agree with that either....."fair ceiling"???......more like "extremely unlikely" ceiling.....

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @mudfly said:

    Yeah....I cant agree with that either....."fair ceiling"???......more like "extremely unlikely" ceiling.....

    Okay, the use of the word "fair" was perhaps the wrong way to say it. Honestly, I actually hate comparisons but all I'm trying to say is Bosa has potential to be a cornerstone defensive type of talent just like any top 5 defensive talent is. Is that really some huge leap or am I going crazy?

  • @mudfly said:

    Yeah....I cant agree with that either....."fair ceiling"???......more like "extremely unlikely" ceiling.....

    Okay, the use of the word "fair" was perhaps the wrong way to say it. Honestly, I actually hate comparisons but all I'm trying to say is Bosa has potential to be a cornerstone defensive type of talent just like any top 5 defensive talent is. Is that really some huge leap or am I going crazy?

    andeftwA andeftw wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @jrb12711 said:

    Okay, the use of the word "fair" was perhaps the wrong way to say it. Honestly, I actually hate comparisons but all I'm trying to say is Bosa has potential to be a cornerstone defensive type of talent just like any top 5 defensive talent is. Is that really some huge leap or am I going crazy?

    I just don't see it. Good player? Yes. 15+ sacks a season? No

  • @andeftw said:

    Who's the cornerstore edge rusher in this draft? There's no player in this class that is as good as Miller coming out of TA&M, or even Clowney as a pass rusher.

    Bosa is a solid player but he'd be a poor fit in a 3-4.

    The premier edge rusher in 2016 may well be Spence.

    Bosa certainly is a better 4-3 fit.

    The Watt comparisons continue to amuse...

    andeftwA andeftw wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @tour2ma said:

    The premier edge rusher in 2016 may well be Spence.

    Bosa certainly is a better 4-3 fit.

    The Watt comparisons continue to amuse...

    By all accounts, Spence is the best edge rusher in this draft. But character concerns aside, is he a "cornerstone" edge rusher like Von Miller? I haven't heard anyone say he's on the same level as Khalil Mack coming out college. To me, Mack will be the benchmark for edge rushers for the next couple of drafts.

    I kind of went off on my own tangent there, but I just don't see any defensive players who will in the top 5 at their position in a few years other than Ramsey at safety. If you ask me, Tunsil is clearly the best prospect at any premium position.

  • Why do we think Bosa is the answer to all our problems? Just curious because good pass rushers are a dime a dozen (compared to say, QBs) and Bosa doesn't fit the mold many think he does.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @bbedward said:

    Why do we think Bosa is the answer to all our problems? Just curious because good pass rushers are a dime a dozen (compared to say, QBs) and Bosa doesn't fit the mold many think he does.

    Horton's base D is the 34 which means the alleged football messiah would mostly work out of a 5 technique as a 2nd overall pick. Not for nothing, but how much of a difference has Des Bryant made since he got his dream contract to play the 5 technique here. Interestingly enough, some of his biggest plays have come when we've moved him around or up over Center on occasion. Best case scenario, we hope he plays as well as Brett Keisel used to and what round was he available in?

    I don't really care about Bosa's heroics against his crappy competition. I wanted to see this guy dominate Michigan State the way Bama's front line did. If we surveyed Sparty's Offensive line - which 1st round defensive line prospects would they tell us are more overrated - Bosa or Bama's?

    I remembered a promise of hybrid fronts in 2013 but I don't recall seeing a lot of varied fronts or maybe there was but there was just very little reason to remember the difference or impact of such.

  • @bbedward said:

    Why do we think Bosa is the answer to all our problems? Just curious because good pass rushers are a dime a dozen (compared to say, QBs) and Bosa doesn't fit the mold many think he does.

    Horton's base D is the 34 which means the alleged football messiah would mostly work out of a 5 technique as a 2nd overall pick. Not for nothing, but how much of a difference has Des Bryant made since he got his dream contract to play the 5 technique here. Interestingly enough, some of his biggest plays have come when we've moved him around or up over Center on occasion. Best case scenario, we hope he plays as well as Brett Keisel used to and what round was he available in?

    I don't really care about Bosa's heroics against his crappy competition. I wanted to see this guy dominate Michigan State the way Bama's front line did. If we surveyed Sparty's Offensive line - which 1st round defensive line prospects would they tell us are more overrated - Bosa or Bama's?

    I remembered a promise of hybrid fronts in 2013 but I don't recall seeing a lot of varied fronts or maybe there was but there was just very little reason to remember the difference or impact of such.

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @flugel said:

    how much of a difference has Des Bryant made since he got his dream contract to play the 5 technique here. Interestingly enough, some of his biggest plays have come when we've moved him around or up over Center on occasion. Best case scenario, we hope he plays as well as Brett Keisel used to and what round was he available in?

    As not good as he's been(and over paid), he has been our best DL for a few years now.....sad to say.....and in fairness, he was undrafted, so the comparison to Keisel(7th) is a fair one....

  • @mudfly said:

    Yeah....I cant agree with that either....."fair ceiling"???......more like "extremely unlikely" ceiling.....

    Okay, the use of the word "fair" was perhaps the wrong way to say it. Honestly, I actually hate comparisons but all I'm trying to say is Bosa has potential to be a cornerstone defensive type of talent just like any top 5 defensive talent is. Is that really some huge leap or am I going crazy?

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #37

    @jrb12711 said:

    Okay, the use of the word "fair" was perhaps the wrong way to say it. Honestly, I actually hate comparisons but all I'm trying to say is Bosa has potential to be a cornerstone defensive type of talent just like any top 5 defensive talent is. Is that really some huge leap or am I going crazy?

    yeah...he could be a great player....I dont doubt that. I have grown weary of the Watt comparisons, because to me, Watt is a generational player and I dont see Bosa being anything even close to that.....pro bowler?....sure.....Watt?....no way....

  • @tour2ma said:

    The premier edge rusher in 2016 may well be Spence.

    Bosa certainly is a better 4-3 fit.

    The Watt comparisons continue to amuse...

    By all accounts, Spence is the best edge rusher in this draft. But character concerns aside, is he a "cornerstone" edge rusher like Von Miller? I haven't heard anyone say he's on the same level as Khalil Mack coming out college. To me, Mack will be the benchmark for edge rushers for the next couple of drafts.

    I kind of went off on my own tangent there, but I just don't see any defensive players who will in the top 5 at their position in a few years other than Ramsey at safety. If you ask me, Tunsil is clearly the best prospect at any premium position.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @andeftw said:

    By all accounts, Spence is the best edge rusher in this draft. But character concerns aside, is he a "cornerstone" edge rusher like Von Miller? I haven't heard anyone say he's on the same level as Khalil Mack coming out college. To me, Mack will be the benchmark for edge rushers for the next couple of drafts.

    I kind of went off on my own tangent there, but I just don't see any defensive players who will in the top 5 at their position in a few years other than Ramsey at safety. If you ask me, Tunsil is clearly the best prospect at any premium position.

    Point taken and agree that Tunsil is the clear "Best in Show" for 2016... (Yes, I watched Westminster with the wife....)

    Is Spence the equal of either Mack or Miller? Not positive, but I like his odds of being mentionable in the same sentence with them.

    When I caught sight of Spence going into Sr. Bowl week, he was a mid to late-2nd rounder. Mid to late 2nd rounders are not talked about a great deal. Now he's top half of the 1st and poised to crack the top ten, where I think he'll end up after the Combine.

  • @andeftw said:

    By all accounts, Spence is the best edge rusher in this draft. But character concerns aside, is he a "cornerstone" edge rusher like Von Miller? I haven't heard anyone say he's on the same level as Khalil Mack coming out college. To me, Mack will be the benchmark for edge rushers for the next couple of drafts.

    I kind of went off on my own tangent there, but I just don't see any defensive players who will in the top 5 at their position in a few years other than Ramsey at safety. If you ask me, Tunsil is clearly the best prospect at any premium position.

    Point taken and agree that Tunsil is the clear "Best in Show" for 2016... (Yes, I watched Westminster with the wife....)

    Is Spence the equal of either Mack or Miller? Not positive, but I like his odds of being mentionable in the same sentence with them.

    When I caught sight of Spence going into Sr. Bowl week, he was a mid to late-2nd rounder. Mid to late 2nd rounders are not talked about a great deal. Now he's top half of the 1st and poised to crack the top ten, where I think he'll end up after the Combine.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @tour2ma said:

    Point taken and agree that Tunsil is the clear "Best in Show" for 2016... (Yes, I watched Westminster with the wife....)

    HA!!!!

    and i thought i was the only one. it's a tradition now. she buys the mezcal, she gives the dog a pinch or 2 of her medicinal ___ and we all get to bark at the tv while judges measure dog dicks and assholes and then little poofs run around with them in a circle. GREAT!!

    god i hope our FO is as good as finding talent as those uppity upper east side snob cunts that decide to give best in show to a labradoodle over a siberian huskie.

  • @flugel said:

    how much of a difference has Des Bryant made since he got his dream contract to play the 5 technique here. Interestingly enough, some of his biggest plays have come when we've moved him around or up over Center on occasion. Best case scenario, we hope he plays as well as Brett Keisel used to and what round was he available in?

    As not good as he's been(and over paid), he has been our best DL for a few years now.....sad to say.....and in fairness, he was undrafted, so the comparison to Keisel(7th) is a fair one....

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
    #40

    @mudfly said:

    As not good as he's been(and over paid), he has been our best DL for a few years now.....sad to say.....and in fairness, he was undrafted, so the comparison to Keisel(7th) is a fair one....

    All true - thanks Mud! But, if Bosa came here hoping for a best case scenario of performing like Brett Keisel from a 5 tech after the learning curve - have we landed our dream at #2 overall? Ohio State homers say yes - I say no. And I love Ohio State. I'm just keeping it real from all the over-hype setting Bosa up to be the next Big Daddy Wilkinson. The length of Wilkinson's career said reliable football player. The draft slot thrusting him into unrealistic expectations said he was a bad draft choice at the priority/investment level made.

    I fully understand we need front 7 and offensive help but the last time we won a playoff game in Cleveland in the 90s - we had 1 undrafted tackle named Tony (T-Bone) Jones who was easily our best lineman, a first round Center (Everitt), a converted defensive Linemen OG Bob Dahl), a 5th round tackle Gene Williams and a 33 year old Doug Dawson that the Cardinals drafted in round 2 about 11 years prior. Our teams from 86-90, didn't have any first round guys starting on the offensive line (unless we want to count TE Ozzie Newsome - who played WR at Alabama). Cody Risien was a 2 time Pro Bowl performer at OT and he was a 7th round draft pick. Paul Farren was a 12th round pick that started at 4 different positions. We also got Dan Fike from the USFL. Earlier in the 80s, the one former 1st round guy came over from the Buffalo Bills (Joe D). In 86, we had the #1 defense against the run without any first round draft picks starting on the d-line: Sam Clancy, Bob Golic (sub was David Puzzuoli), Reggie Camp. We had a couple 1st round backers from USC (Clay Matthews and Chip Banks) from round 1 while the USFL helped to load us up with ILB Mike Johnson and CB Frank Minnifield.

    Why all that? Because when you have a good front office - you don't always have to lean so heavily on round 1 for Oline and Defensive Line. For example, there had to have been better offensive linemen than Erving after round 1 but we had a Jeff Foxworthy punchline in charge so we reached. We had 3 first round picks, 2 second round picks plus Greco coming off his best season heading into 2015; and we looked way too limited where we could run the football and who we could do that against perpetuating predictable passing situations. Pass pro wasn't bad considering IMO. I'm just excited our front office now has people on speaking terms, 2 former Harvard intellects (that also played DI football) plus a willingness to work w/ a HC that not only carried Dalton to playoffs in Cincy a few times but was in the process of tapping the best football I had ever seen from Dalton.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Physically speaking, Bosa and Watt are similar molds. I don't believe Joey's first step is quite as elite as JJ's, but it sure as hell isn't that far off either.

    That said, if there is any one player I think Bosa's game reminds me of (and I believe he will be better than) is Michael Bennett.

    Your traditional LDE in a 4 man front that will slide around and inside to the 3 on passing downs should you choose.

    There is certainly nothing to snarl at as Bennett has been one of the best and most versatile dlineman in the NFL for a few years now.

  • Physically speaking, Bosa and Watt are similar molds. I don't believe Joey's first step is quite as elite as JJ's, but it sure as hell isn't that far off either.

    That said, if there is any one player I think Bosa's game reminds me of (and I believe he will be better than) is Michael Bennett.

    Your traditional LDE in a 4 man front that will slide around and inside to the 3 on passing downs should you choose.

    There is certainly nothing to snarl at as Bennett has been one of the best and most versatile dlineman in the NFL for a few years now.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @tiamat63 said:

    Physically speaking, Bosa and Watt are similar molds. I don't believe Joey's first step is quite as elite as JJ's, but it sure as hell isn't that far off either.

    That said, if there is any one player I think Bosa's game reminds me of (and I believe he will be better than) is Michael Bennett.

    Your traditional LDE in a 4 man front that will slide around and inside to the 3 on passing downs should you choose.

    There is certainly nothing to snarl at as Bennett has been one of the best and most versatile dlineman in the NFL for a few years now.

    Interesting! Good to see you back Tia. Where do you stand with Bosa as a #2 overall pick possibility?

  • @andeftw said:

    By all accounts, Spence is the best edge rusher in this draft. But character concerns aside, is he a "cornerstone" edge rusher like Von Miller? I haven't heard anyone say he's on the same level as Khalil Mack coming out college. To me, Mack will be the benchmark for edge rushers for the next couple of drafts.

    I kind of went off on my own tangent there, but I just don't see any defensive players who will in the top 5 at their position in a few years other than Ramsey at safety. If you ask me, Tunsil is clearly the best prospect at any premium position.

    Point taken and agree that Tunsil is the clear "Best in Show" for 2016... (Yes, I watched Westminster with the wife....)

    Is Spence the equal of either Mack or Miller? Not positive, but I like his odds of being mentionable in the same sentence with them.

    When I caught sight of Spence going into Sr. Bowl week, he was a mid to late-2nd rounder. Mid to late 2nd rounders are not talked about a great deal. Now he's top half of the 1st and poised to crack the top ten, where I think he'll end up after the Combine.

    andeftwA andeftw wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @tour2ma said:

    Point taken and agree that Tunsil is the clear "Best in Show" for 2016... (Yes, I watched Westminster with the wife....)

    Is Spence the equal of either Mack or Miller? Not positive, but I like his odds of being mentionable in the same sentence with them.

    When I caught sight of Spence going into Sr. Bowl week, he was a mid to late-2nd rounder. Mid to late 2nd rounders are not talked about a great deal. Now he's top half of the 1st and poised to crack the top ten, where I think he'll end up after the Combine.

    Certainly has all the physical tools to compare. If I'm not mistaken the criticism for Spence is the lack of a counter move and that he struggles against the run. Definitely two things that can be fixed with NFL coaching and strength training.

    I think the lack of 1st round buzz prior to the Senior Bowl was due to playing at Eastern Kentucky. If he was still playing at Ohio State, Bosa would be playing second fiddle to Spence.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Physically speaking, Bosa and Watt are similar molds. I don't believe Joey's first step is quite as elite as JJ's, but it sure as hell isn't that far off either.

    That said, if there is any one player I think Bosa's game reminds me of (and I believe he will be better than) is Michael Bennett.

    Your traditional LDE in a 4 man front that will slide around and inside to the 3 on passing downs should you choose.

    There is certainly nothing to snarl at as Bennett has been one of the best and most versatile dlineman in the NFL for a few years now.

    Interesting! Good to see you back Tia. Where do you stand with Bosa as a #2 overall pick possibility?

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @flugel said:

    Interesting! Good to see you back Tia. Where do you stand with Bosa as a #2 overall pick possibility?

    Thanks, bud. Busy and only getting worse now that the weather is breaking. I'm trying to watch more of Spence today.

    As for Joey - if the front office (and Tour) are rather adamant that Goff is our guy, then its a moot point. Would I be upset with Bosa as our #2 pick? No. Part of me is bias, though I do my best to fight it and stay level headed. The other part of me recognizes talent when I see it. Especially for a team that's had trouble in recent years with lineman stacking, shedding, tackling and holding their perimeter assignments; Joey would be an immediate upgrade right there alone. I wouldn't have an issue with us taking him.

  • @flugel said:

    Interesting! Good to see you back Tia. Where do you stand with Bosa as a #2 overall pick possibility?

    Thanks, bud. Busy and only getting worse now that the weather is breaking. I'm trying to watch more of Spence today.

    As for Joey - if the front office (and Tour) are rather adamant that Goff is our guy, then its a moot point. Would I be upset with Bosa as our #2 pick? No. Part of me is bias, though I do my best to fight it and stay level headed. The other part of me recognizes talent when I see it. Especially for a team that's had trouble in recent years with lineman stacking, shedding, tackling and holding their perimeter assignments; Joey would be an immediate upgrade right there alone. I wouldn't have an issue with us taking him.

    andeftwA andeftw wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @tiamat63 said:

    Thanks, bud. Busy and only getting worse now that the weather is breaking. I'm trying to watch more of Spence today.

    As for Joey - if the front office (and Tour) are rather adamant that Goff is our guy, then its a moot point. Would I be upset with Bosa as our #2 pick? No. Part of me is bias, though I do my best to fight it and stay level headed. The other part of me recognizes talent when I see it. Especially for a team that's had trouble in recent years with lineman stacking, shedding, tackling and holding their perimeter assignments; Joey would be an immediate upgrade right there alone. I wouldn't have an issue with us taking him.

    Out of curiosity, what's his best fit in the Browns' scheme? 5 technique or at OLB?

  • @tour2ma said:

    Point taken and agree that Tunsil is the clear "Best in Show" for 2016... (Yes, I watched Westminster with the wife....)

    HA!!!!

    and i thought i was the only one. it's a tradition now. she buys the mezcal, she gives the dog a pinch or 2 of her medicinal ___ and we all get to bark at the tv while judges measure dog dicks and assholes and then little poofs run around with them in a circle. GREAT!!

    god i hope our FO is as good as finding talent as those uppity upper east side snob cunts that decide to give best in show to a labradoodle over a siberian huskie.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @miktoxic said:

    HA!!!!

    and i thought i was the only one. it's a tradition now. she buys the mezcal, she gives the dog a pinch or 2 of her medicinal ___ and we all get to bark at the tv while judges measure dog dicks and assholes and then little poofs run around with them in a circle. GREAT!!

    god i hope our FO is as good as finding talent as those uppity upper east side snob cunts that decide to give best in show to a labradoodle over a siberian huskie.

    LOL! Most of those little yappy dogs qualify for my "moving" target range a.k.a 9mm catch me if you can.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Thanks, bud. Busy and only getting worse now that the weather is breaking. I'm trying to watch more of Spence today.

    As for Joey - if the front office (and Tour) are rather adamant that Goff is our guy, then its a moot point. Would I be upset with Bosa as our #2 pick? No. Part of me is bias, though I do my best to fight it and stay level headed. The other part of me recognizes talent when I see it. Especially for a team that's had trouble in recent years with lineman stacking, shedding, tackling and holding their perimeter assignments; Joey would be an immediate upgrade right there alone. I wouldn't have an issue with us taking him.

    Out of curiosity, what's his best fit in the Browns' scheme? 5 technique or at OLB?

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @andeftw said:

    Out of curiosity, what's his best fit in the Browns' scheme? 5 technique or at OLB?

    3-5 without question.

  • @mudfly said:

    As not good as he's been(and over paid), he has been our best DL for a few years now.....sad to say.....and in fairness, he was undrafted, so the comparison to Keisel(7th) is a fair one....

    All true - thanks Mud! But, if Bosa came here hoping for a best case scenario of performing like Brett Keisel from a 5 tech after the learning curve - have we landed our dream at #2 overall? Ohio State homers say yes - I say no. And I love Ohio State. I'm just keeping it real from all the over-hype setting Bosa up to be the next Big Daddy Wilkinson. The length of Wilkinson's career said reliable football player. The draft slot thrusting him into unrealistic expectations said he was a bad draft choice at the priority/investment level made.

    I fully understand we need front 7 and offensive help but the last time we won a playoff game in Cleveland in the 90s - we had 1 undrafted tackle named Tony (T-Bone) Jones who was easily our best lineman, a first round Center (Everitt), a converted defensive Linemen OG Bob Dahl), a 5th round tackle Gene Williams and a 33 year old Doug Dawson that the Cardinals drafted in round 2 about 11 years prior. Our teams from 86-90, didn't have any first round guys starting on the offensive line (unless we want to count TE Ozzie Newsome - who played WR at Alabama). Cody Risien was a 2 time Pro Bowl performer at OT and he was a 7th round draft pick. Paul Farren was a 12th round pick that started at 4 different positions. We also got Dan Fike from the USFL. Earlier in the 80s, the one former 1st round guy came over from the Buffalo Bills (Joe D). In 86, we had the #1 defense against the run without any first round draft picks starting on the d-line: Sam Clancy, Bob Golic (sub was David Puzzuoli), Reggie Camp. We had a couple 1st round backers from USC (Clay Matthews and Chip Banks) from round 1 while the USFL helped to load us up with ILB Mike Johnson and CB Frank Minnifield.

    Why all that? Because when you have a good front office - you don't always have to lean so heavily on round 1 for Oline and Defensive Line. For example, there had to have been better offensive linemen than Erving after round 1 but we had a Jeff Foxworthy punchline in charge so we reached. We had 3 first round picks, 2 second round picks plus Greco coming off his best season heading into 2015; and we looked way too limited where we could run the football and who we could do that against perpetuating predictable passing situations. Pass pro wasn't bad considering IMO. I'm just excited our front office now has people on speaking terms, 2 former Harvard intellects (that also played DI football) plus a willingness to work w/ a HC that not only carried Dalton to playoffs in Cincy a few times but was in the process of tapping the best football I had ever seen from Dalton.

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #48

    @flugel said:

    All true - thanks Mud! But, if Bosa came here hoping for a best case scenario of performing like Brett Keisel from a 5 tech after the learning curve - have we landed our dream at #2 overall? Ohio State homers say yes - I say no. And I love Ohio State. I'm just keeping it real from all the over-hype setting Bosa up to be the next Big Daddy Wilkinson. The length of Wilkinson's career said reliable football player. The draft slot thrusting him into unrealistic expectations said he was a bad draft choice at the priority/investment level made.

    Im with you 100% Fluges.......I love Ohio State too, but am not on the Bosa band wagon for the Browns at #2.....

  • @mudfly said:

    As not good as he's been(and over paid), he has been our best DL for a few years now.....sad to say.....and in fairness, he was undrafted, so the comparison to Keisel(7th) is a fair one....

    All true - thanks Mud! But, if Bosa came here hoping for a best case scenario of performing like Brett Keisel from a 5 tech after the learning curve - have we landed our dream at #2 overall? Ohio State homers say yes - I say no. And I love Ohio State. I'm just keeping it real from all the over-hype setting Bosa up to be the next Big Daddy Wilkinson. The length of Wilkinson's career said reliable football player. The draft slot thrusting him into unrealistic expectations said he was a bad draft choice at the priority/investment level made.

    I fully understand we need front 7 and offensive help but the last time we won a playoff game in Cleveland in the 90s - we had 1 undrafted tackle named Tony (T-Bone) Jones who was easily our best lineman, a first round Center (Everitt), a converted defensive Linemen OG Bob Dahl), a 5th round tackle Gene Williams and a 33 year old Doug Dawson that the Cardinals drafted in round 2 about 11 years prior. Our teams from 86-90, didn't have any first round guys starting on the offensive line (unless we want to count TE Ozzie Newsome - who played WR at Alabama). Cody Risien was a 2 time Pro Bowl performer at OT and he was a 7th round draft pick. Paul Farren was a 12th round pick that started at 4 different positions. We also got Dan Fike from the USFL. Earlier in the 80s, the one former 1st round guy came over from the Buffalo Bills (Joe D). In 86, we had the #1 defense against the run without any first round draft picks starting on the d-line: Sam Clancy, Bob Golic (sub was David Puzzuoli), Reggie Camp. We had a couple 1st round backers from USC (Clay Matthews and Chip Banks) from round 1 while the USFL helped to load us up with ILB Mike Johnson and CB Frank Minnifield.

    Why all that? Because when you have a good front office - you don't always have to lean so heavily on round 1 for Oline and Defensive Line. For example, there had to have been better offensive linemen than Erving after round 1 but we had a Jeff Foxworthy punchline in charge so we reached. We had 3 first round picks, 2 second round picks plus Greco coming off his best season heading into 2015; and we looked way too limited where we could run the football and who we could do that against perpetuating predictable passing situations. Pass pro wasn't bad considering IMO. I'm just excited our front office now has people on speaking terms, 2 former Harvard intellects (that also played DI football) plus a willingness to work w/ a HC that not only carried Dalton to playoffs in Cincy a few times but was in the process of tapping the best football I had ever seen from Dalton.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by hoorta
    #49

    @flugel said:

    All true - thanks Mud! But, if Bosa came here hoping for a best case scenario of performing like Brett Keisel from a 5 tech after the learning curve - have we landed our dream at #2 overall? Ohio State homers say yes - I say no. And I love Ohio State. I'm just keeping it real from all the over-hype setting Bosa up to be the next Big Daddy Wilkinson. The length of Wilkinson's career said reliable football player. The draft slot thrusting him into unrealistic expectations said he was a bad draft choice at the priority/investment level made.

    I fully understand we need front 7 and offensive help but the last time we won a playoff game in Cleveland in the 90s - we had 1 undrafted tackle named Tony (T-Bone) Jones who was easily our best lineman, a first round Center (Everitt), a converted defensive Linemen OG Bob Dahl), a 5th round tackle Gene Williams and a 33 year old Doug Dawson that the Cardinals drafted in round 2 about 11 years prior. Our teams from 86-90, didn't have any first round guys starting on the offensive line (unless we want to count TE Ozzie Newsome - who played WR at Alabama). Cody Risien was a 2 time Pro Bowl performer at OT and he was a 7th round draft pick. Paul Farren was a 12th round pick that started at 4 different positions. We also got Dan Fike from the USFL. Earlier in the 80s, the one former 1st round guy came over from the Buffalo Bills (Joe D). In 86, we had the #1 defense against the run without any first round draft picks starting on the d-line: Sam Clancy, Bob Golic (sub was David Puzzuoli), Reggie Camp. We had a couple 1st round backers from USC (Clay Matthews and Chip Banks) from round 1 while the USFL helped to load us up with ILB Mike Johnson and CB Frank Minnifield.

    Why all that? Because when you have a good front office - you don't always have to lean so heavily on round 1 for Oline and Defensive Line. For example, there had to have been better offensive linemen than Erving after round 1 but we had a Jeff Foxworthy punchline in charge so we reached. We had 3 first round picks, 2 second round picks plus Greco coming off his best season heading into 2015; and we looked way too limited where we could run the football and who we could do that against perpetuating predictable passing situations. Pass pro wasn't bad considering IMO. I'm just excited our front office now has people on speaking terms, 2 former Harvard intellects (that also played DI football) plus a willingness to work w/ a HC that not only carried Dalton to playoffs in Cincy a few times but was in the process of tapping the best football I had ever seen from Dalton.

    Dang Flugs, Ghoolie may run over and kiss you for that post. He does have a point sometimes those low round offensive linemen turn into Pro Bowl talent on occasion.

    @texasag1969 said:

    LOL! Most of those little yappy dogs qualify for my "moving" target range a.k.a 9mm catch me if you can.

    Har Ag, it's why I don't have dogs. My wife says I've been bitten (most of the time) by friends dogs more than anyone else she knows. Started back in third grade when one of my lifelong friends (unknown to me that he had one) rescue Springer Spaniel latched onto my arm when I walked into his house, and wouldn't let go. If I had $5 bucks for every time a dog has chased me when I've been out on my bike rides, I could buy myself a custom Lance Armstrong Trek Madone with the money. There's been plenty of times I wish I was packing a 9mm when someone's German Shepherd chased me for around a mile, trying to take my legs off.

    For some reason, dogs just don't like me. I can read my neighbor's Jack Russell's mutt's feeble mind when I look over the fence. "If I was a Rottweiler, I'd kill you."

    EDIT: PS- Sophie did manage to jump the fence once and tried (partial success) to take a chunk out of my thigh. If I didn't like Scott & Jill so much- I would have busted the mutt's neck right then and there..... I have no problems with well trained and well behaved dogs- my pal up in Alaska has a few dogs that I love, but if you live out in the country and have dogs that are "chasers" be it bikes or cars- keep 'em restrained- because sooner or later, they're going to wind up as road kill.

  • @flugel said:

    All true - thanks Mud! But, if Bosa came here hoping for a best case scenario of performing like Brett Keisel from a 5 tech after the learning curve - have we landed our dream at #2 overall? Ohio State homers say yes - I say no. And I love Ohio State. I'm just keeping it real from all the over-hype setting Bosa up to be the next Big Daddy Wilkinson. The length of Wilkinson's career said reliable football player. The draft slot thrusting him into unrealistic expectations said he was a bad draft choice at the priority/investment level made.

    I fully understand we need front 7 and offensive help but the last time we won a playoff game in Cleveland in the 90s - we had 1 undrafted tackle named Tony (T-Bone) Jones who was easily our best lineman, a first round Center (Everitt), a converted defensive Linemen OG Bob Dahl), a 5th round tackle Gene Williams and a 33 year old Doug Dawson that the Cardinals drafted in round 2 about 11 years prior. Our teams from 86-90, didn't have any first round guys starting on the offensive line (unless we want to count TE Ozzie Newsome - who played WR at Alabama). Cody Risien was a 2 time Pro Bowl performer at OT and he was a 7th round draft pick. Paul Farren was a 12th round pick that started at 4 different positions. We also got Dan Fike from the USFL. Earlier in the 80s, the one former 1st round guy came over from the Buffalo Bills (Joe D). In 86, we had the #1 defense against the run without any first round draft picks starting on the d-line: Sam Clancy, Bob Golic (sub was David Puzzuoli), Reggie Camp. We had a couple 1st round backers from USC (Clay Matthews and Chip Banks) from round 1 while the USFL helped to load us up with ILB Mike Johnson and CB Frank Minnifield.

    Why all that? Because when you have a good front office - you don't always have to lean so heavily on round 1 for Oline and Defensive Line. For example, there had to have been better offensive linemen than Erving after round 1 but we had a Jeff Foxworthy punchline in charge so we reached. We had 3 first round picks, 2 second round picks plus Greco coming off his best season heading into 2015; and we looked way too limited where we could run the football and who we could do that against perpetuating predictable passing situations. Pass pro wasn't bad considering IMO. I'm just excited our front office now has people on speaking terms, 2 former Harvard intellects (that also played DI football) plus a willingness to work w/ a HC that not only carried Dalton to playoffs in Cincy a few times but was in the process of tapping the best football I had ever seen from Dalton.

    Dang Flugs, Ghoolie may run over and kiss you for that post. He does have a point sometimes those low round offensive linemen turn into Pro Bowl talent on occasion.

    @texasag1969 said:

    LOL! Most of those little yappy dogs qualify for my "moving" target range a.k.a 9mm catch me if you can.

    Har Ag, it's why I don't have dogs. My wife says I've been bitten (most of the time) by friends dogs more than anyone else she knows. Started back in third grade when one of my lifelong friends (unknown to me that he had one) rescue Springer Spaniel latched onto my arm when I walked into his house, and wouldn't let go. If I had $5 bucks for every time a dog has chased me when I've been out on my bike rides, I could buy myself a custom Lance Armstrong Trek Madone with the money. There's been plenty of times I wish I was packing a 9mm when someone's German Shepherd chased me for around a mile, trying to take my legs off.

    For some reason, dogs just don't like me. I can read my neighbor's Jack Russell's mutt's feeble mind when I look over the fence. "If I was a Rottweiler, I'd kill you."

    EDIT: PS- Sophie did manage to jump the fence once and tried (partial success) to take a chunk out of my thigh. If I didn't like Scott & Jill so much- I would have busted the mutt's neck right then and there..... I have no problems with well trained and well behaved dogs- my pal up in Alaska has a few dogs that I love, but if you live out in the country and have dogs that are "chasers" be it bikes or cars- keep 'em restrained- because sooner or later, they're going to wind up as road kill.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @hoorta said:

    Har Ag, it's why I don't have dogs. My wife says I've been bitten (most of the time) by friends dogs more than anyone else she knows. Started back in third grade when one of my lifelong friends (unknown to me that he had one) rescue Springer Spaniel latched onto my arm when I walked into his house, and wouldn't let go. If I had $5 bucks for every time a dog has chased me when I've been out on my bike rides, I could buy myself a custom Lance Armstrong Trek Madone with the money. There's been plenty of times I wish I was packing a 9mm when someone's German Shepherd chased me for around a mile, trying to take my legs off.

    For some reason, dogs just don't like me. I can read my neighbor's Jack Russell's mutt's feeble mind when I look over the fence. "If I was a Rottweiler, I'd kill you."

    I have 14 year old Ragdoll cat sisters. They never yap, never bite and follow me everywhere in the house or the fenced back yard. One used to fetch wadded up paper balls for me and drop it at my feet to toss again. Now she takes a swat and just watches it. Too old for that game anymore.

  • MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #51

    I was just reading Hoortas post and my dog started growling.....