Skip to content

Why in god's name would you vote for Hillary?

Political Discussion
115 15 2.1k
  • The dems are a weird clusterfook, despite the problems that the reps are having - they are not.

    It's time for the pendulum to swing back the other direction, anyways. By my pendulum theory,

    the reps will win the WH. America is sailing way off course.

  • One step forward, two steps back.

    WSS

  • The dems are a weird clusterfook, despite the problems that the reps are having - they are not.

    It's time for the pendulum to swing back the other direction, anyways. By my pendulum theory,

    the reps will win the WH. America is sailing way off course.

    @calfoxwc said:

    The dems are a weird clusterfook, despite the problems that the reps are having - they are not.

    It's time for the pendulum to swing back the other direction, anyways. By my pendulum theory,

    the reps will win the WH. America is sailing way off course.

    So you've looked at both of these two parties over the last months, and you've determined the Dems are the clusterfuck? lol

    Not that they're perfect by any means, but the guy leading the Rep field (that was once almost 20 people) just let us all know he has a big dick...

  • So Woody how'd I do?

    WSS

  • The reps have their problems, woody, but it isn't a clusterfook.

    The dems are lost as a respected party on both sides of the isle. They

    are something very different, and not really a political party at all.

    The dems are more like the Sandanistas back in the leftwing Nicaraguan days.

    The reps seem to have the good guys unwilling to step forward and face the evil

    demwitted land of Mordor......

    sorry, I forgot.... you just look that stuff up, okay?

  • @baconhound said:

    Not Trump

    So if it were one of the other Republican candidates you would not vote for Hillary? Or you would no matter what?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    So if it were one of the other Republican candidates you would not vote for Hillary? Or you would no matter what?

    WSS

    Rubio absolutely

  • The reps have their problems, woody, but it isn't a clusterfook.

    The dems are lost as a respected party on both sides of the isle. They

    are something very different, and not really a political party at all.

    The dems are more like the Sandanistas back in the leftwing Nicaraguan days.

    The reps seem to have the good guys unwilling to step forward and face the evil

    demwitted land of Mordor......

    sorry, I forgot.... you just look that stuff up, okay?

    @calfoxwc said:

    The reps have their problems, woody, but it isn't a clusterfook.

    The dems are lost as a respected party on both sides of the isle. They

    are something very different, and not really a political party at all.

    The dems are more like the Sandanistas back in the leftwing Nicaraguan days.

    The reps seem to have the good guys unwilling to step forward and face the evil

    demwitted land of Mordor......

    sorry, I forgot.... you just look that stuff up, okay?

    *aisle

    *Sandinistas




  • Isle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isle



    Isle may refer to: An island, land surrounded by water; Isle, Haute-Vienne, a commune of the Haute-Vienne département in France; Isle, Minnesota, a small city in the ...



  • Sandanista | political and military organization,...
    www.britannica.com/topic/Sandanista

    Sandinista, member of Sandinista National Liberation Front, Spanish Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional ... The Sandinistas governed Nicaragua from 1979 to 1990.

    LOL....dammit....

  • Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself.

  • Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself.

    @gftchris said:

    Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself.

    Agreed. I'd say the only time its called for is in response to somebody who's calling you a moron and obviously (not a typo) uses the incorrect spelling or version of a word.

    "It's apparent that you're lack of education has made you a looser"

    WSS

    🙂

  • @gftchris said:

    Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself.

    Agreed. I'd say the only time its called for is in response to somebody who's calling you a moron and obviously (not a typo) uses the incorrect spelling or version of a word.

    "It's apparent that you're lack of education has made you a looser"

    WSS

    🙂

    @westside-steve said:

    Agreed. I'd say the only time its called for is in response to somebody who's calling you a moron and obviously (not a typo) uses the incorrect spelling or version of a word.

    "It's apparent that you're lack of education has made you a looser"

    WSS

    🙂

    Yep. Everyone makes spelling mistakes from time to time, it's not a huge deal.

  • TWATsmall.jpg

  • Posted Today, 11:07 AM

    Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself. Chris

    ***************************

    Woody makes spelling mistakes a LOT. I rarely do. Btw, knucklehead, you just made a spelling mistake yourself.

    It's "criticiZe". Not s. Look it up, I'm pretty sure I'm correct. So, if you are going to catch me on it.then you'd better post

    a damn perfect post yourself. LOL

  • Posted Today, 11:07 AM

    Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself. Chris

    ***************************

    Woody makes spelling mistakes a LOT. I rarely do. Btw, knucklehead, you just made a spelling mistake yourself.

    It's "criticiZe". Not s. Look it up, I'm pretty sure I'm correct. So, if you are going to catch me on it.then you'd better post

    a damn perfect post yourself. LOL

    @calfoxwc said:

    Posted Today, 11:07 AM

    Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself. Chris

    ***************************

    Woody makes spelling mistakes a LOT. I rarely do. Btw, knucklehead, you just made a spelling mistake yourself.

    It's "criticiZe". Not s. Look it up, I'm pretty sure I'm correct. So, if you are going to catch me on it.then you'd better post

    a damn perfect post yourself. LOL

    Brits spell words incorrectly.

  • Posted Today, 11:07 AM

    Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself. Chris

    ***************************

    Woody makes spelling mistakes a LOT. I rarely do. Btw, knucklehead, you just made a spelling mistake yourself.

    It's "criticiZe". Not s. Look it up, I'm pretty sure I'm correct. So, if you are going to catch me on it.then you'd better post

    a damn perfect post yourself. LOL

    @calfoxwc said:

    Posted Today, 11:07 AM

    Just saying, if you're going to criticise people for spelling mistakes (or "the woody spelling") then you'd better be damn perfect yourself. Chris

    ***************************

    Woody makes spelling mistakes a LOT. I rarely do. Btw, knucklehead, you just made a spelling mistake yourself.

    It's "criticiZe". Not s. Look it up, I'm pretty sure I'm correct. So, if you are going to catch me on it.then you'd better post

    a damn perfect post yourself. LOL

    Technically speaking, you are both right on the spelling of "criticize/criticise". Chris just used the British variant of the word: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/criticise It's similar to how "color" and "colour" are both used.

    Also, you are supposed to use a comma after the word "it" in your sentence, not a period. You are also missing a period after the word "LOL" as well.

    😁

  • grammar <> spelling errors.

    I don't worry about grammar all that much...

    I type very fast, sometimes too fast...

    but I always go back and spell the words correctly...ahem...

    with few exceptions.

  • grammar <> spelling errors.

    I don't worry about grammar all that much...

    I type very fast, sometimes too fast...

    but I always go back and spell the words correctly...ahem...

    with few exceptions.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I type very fast, sometimes too fast...

    Before you've even had a chance to engage your brain, usually 😉

    And seriously, if the only straw you can clutch at is that I use the british spelling, then you essentially have no straws.

    (FWIW, I use lower case on pronouns out of laziness, such as 'british' above, except in cases of acronyms, generally)

  • and, seriously, you're British reading comprehension reflects

    a lack of diligence.

    it was Diehard that said:

    "Brits spell words incorrectly."

    HA. Besides, you Brits drive on th wrong side of the road. 😎