Skip to content

Obama picks SCOTUS nominee

Political Discussion
68 10 1.8k
  • If Hatch, the biggest idiot in the Senate, is okay with Garland, then I can't see why he would be blocked.

  • because hatch hasn't looked into Garland's pro-gun control stance.

    It's a win-lose for obamao. Hell with Garland if he will ignore our 2nd Amendment

    because of his own prejudices.

    That makes him not qualified for the court. And, we don't know his views on gay marriage,

    and abortion.

    But you can bet obaMao does. Just vote NO. Garland is a trojan horse, to tilt

    the Court into at least one glaring anti-Constitution position.

  • But wasnt it republicans who suggested garland to the white house months ago?

  • but did they know he was on obamao's side of the pro gun control, anti-2nd Amendment biz?

    He may very well be pro abortion, too. and pro gay falsemarriage. we don't know.

    The pro gun control crap is worrisome. Forget him - wait and get a pro-Constitutionalist

    during the next rep president era. Let the people decide

    what kind of Justice replaces Scalia.

    That is exactly what obamao demanded back in the day.

  • Not only is he anti-2nd Amendment...

    planned parenthood loves him.

    They know he has been tested for being a liberal by Obamao.

    No vote, hell with this obamao trojan horse nominee.

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/03/16/planned-parenthood-ceo-applauds-obamas-supreme-court-nominee/

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/03/16/obama-set-to-nominate-merrick-garland-to-supreme-court-red-flags-raised-over-second-amendment-record/

  • He's a generally moderate, neutral choice. Not sure about his record on gun issues I'd have to look into it.

  • he is not neutral. go look up ...no, just read the links I posted.

    He's "neutral" only because you libs will have a libtard justice

    to tip the balance against the 2nd Amendment, and be proabortion.

    and don't give us the "well, even if he were totally against abortion,

    planned parenthood would still love him".

  • So you'd basically only accept a very conservative judge.

    Surprise there

    If Republicans shoot this down, then Cliton wins, watch her just nominate super liberals

  • So you'd basically only accept a very conservative judge.

    Surprise there

    If Republicans shoot this down, then Cliton wins, watch her just nominate super liberals

    @mld-woody said:

    So you'd basically only accept a very conservative judge.

    Surprise there

    If Republicans shoot this down, then Cliton wins, watch her just nominate super liberals

    Actually even though I could live with this guy I prefer a very conservative Justice. I think its to balance out the Supreme Court it's necessary. It's not like we're replacing Sotomayor or Kagan.

    WSS

  • I do prefer a conservative justice, woody. A conservative reveres our Constitution, and our rights.

    Like, our 2nd and 1st Amendment. And the right of born and unborn children to life, liberty and the

    pursuit of happiness. Freedom.

    This leftwing nominee is a liberal trojan horse that would prefer to sneak and and help

    obaMao ruin those rights.

    You prefer that, from sckewl.

  • You don't want a moderate. You'd view an actual moderate as a liberal. You want a full blown conservative.

  • Woody, any "moderate" that wants to take down the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans,

    and wants to pander to the left over unlimited abortion...

    is a freaking liberal. If the Constitution isn't sacred to the nominee, they must not

    ever be a Justice. Plain and simple.

  • The republicans are better off rolling the dice on this one. This *moderate* is only a moderate in comparison to the ultra left justices Obama has already put on the court. He is not a moderate in comparison the the justice he is replacing Anthony Scalia. The republicans may lose the senate anyway and no guarantees even if they confirm this justice it will give them a win as a republican in a blue state.

    I would recommend however a change of heart in November if Clinton wins and that a lame duck senate confirm the guy ASAP before she takes office. It would be a goodwill gesture. 😁

  • This is exactly what I said obama should do. It's a smart nomination that nobody should be able to object to too greatly. If the republicans go out of their way to block it they look like big bags of douche.

  • Here's what the supreme court can't do: actually come and take your guns away. It's utterly impossible. And if they tried I'd bury mine somewhere in the vast expanse of my back field and Gee whiz, they got lost when my canoe flipped over in the river or some other such story.

  • I've even got a couple that were so cheap that I could sacrifice them in the name of appeasement. Hi-point, I'm looking at you.

  • Woody, any "moderate" that wants to take down the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans,

    and wants to pander to the left over unlimited abortion...

    is a freaking liberal. If the Constitution isn't sacred to the nominee, they must not

    ever be a Justice. Plain and simple.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Woody, any "moderate" that wants to take down the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans,

    and wants to pander to the left over unlimited abortion...

    is a freaking liberal. If the Constitution isn't sacred to the nominee, they must not

    ever be a Justice. Plain and simple.

    Where did he say he was coming for your guns?

    Cal, you're so far right you don't know what a moderate is

  • nobody said anything about him coming after guns, you idiot.

    This justice easily makes the other 4 pro-gun control justices

    automatically dangerous to the rights of all gun owners.

  • Oh, I'm sorry.

    You said "take down the 2nd amendment rights of Americans".

    Completely different.

  • not at all. This Obamao nominee would cinch the rule of the extreme left justices that

    enjoy pandering to the left by ignoring the Constitution as a basis of decisions, and instead,

    using their own social mores as law.

    Obamao wants to tip the court to the left. The guy is a good guy, except he will tip the court

    to the left, on the major issues of abortion and gun rights, and probably gay marriage decisions

    in the future, too.

    Arguing that it won't happen is nonsense.