From the Sporting News on the Quinn move
-
\ said:
Dude you are now on ignore; you are not a gentleman or a scholarIf you can't take message boards then I suggest you join a knitting club.
Also the correct words in your sentence would have been 'neither' and 'nor', oh scholarly one.
-
Cumbergh, you still alive? That is unfortunate.
-
\ said:
\ said:
Of course you focus on that instead of all the great points he makes. Or where he sets things straight on DAs contract.
Obviously he completely dismissed the GUARANTEED portion of the contract, as any good BQ lover would. http://www.rotoworld.com/content/player ... fl&id=3233
No biggie to me. That 14.5 mil guarantee is gonna hit all you BQ lovers like a ton of bricks next spring. But I've decided to stop warning you and instead will just watch the bricks come down on ya.
He already got 8M of that Lums (signing bonus and salary). Another 1M was in bonuses for performance. Once again you continue to not read what has already been shown. The hit for letting him walk will be 4.67M next year, just as this guy showed. You don't take a cap hit for money you already paid out.
The same thing Peter King reported in October
"I think we need to get one thing straight about the future of the Cleveland Browns (and I know they're on their bye week, but this just has to be clarified because people keep getting it wrong), and that's the contract impact of quarterback Derek Anderson. You'll recall Anderson signed a three-year, $23.85-million contract. The report is true, but the way the contract was structured makes it much less onerous than the money figure seems -- and much less dangerous if the Browns decide to part ways with the struggling Anderson after this year.
The Browns gave Anderson a $7 million signing bonus this year, plus a salary of $950,000 in 2008. In 2009, he's due a roster bonus of $5 million if he makes the team, with a salary of $1.45 million. In 2010, he's due a roster bonus of $2 million if he makes the team, plus $7.45 million in salary. So Anderson makes $7.95 million this year, and if the Browns cut him after the season, the contract will be null and void and the team won't owe him anything. The only remnant of the deal with be a $4.67-million salary-cap charge on the Browns' 2009 cap, the amount of the pro-rated signing bonus assigned to the last two years of the contract for accounting purposes. "
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/w ... ek5/4.html
But you keep trying to change reality, and maybe it will happen.
In a nut shell, CLE gave DA a deal like the Cowboys gave TO his first year with them. A contract with an escape incase he didn't pan out.
-
\ said:
The hit for letting him walk will be 4.67M next year, just as this guy showed. You don't take a cap hit for money you already paid out.Or in other words, the amount of teardrops Lum has shed after having to pull his lips off DA's wanker since he got demoted.
-
I don't think u will get one....or he's feverishly digging for some sort of information to throw back at everyone here that I'm assuming really wants the browns to win and succeed. I'm thinking Lum could care less about the browns, it really is a love thing with DA.
-
\ said:
I don't think u will get one....or he's feverishly digging for some sort of information to throw back at everyone here that I'm assuming really wants the browns to win and succeed. I'm thinking Lum could care less about the browns, it really is a love thing with DA.Oh I am sure you are right. Didn't want this to sink to the bottom yet. Not just for DA, but because the article from Sporting News was really good.
-
\ said:
I don't think u will get one....or he's feverishly digging for some sort of information to throw back at everyone here that I'm assuming really wants the browns to win and succeed. I'm thinking Lum could care less about the browns, it really is a love thing with DA.no response necessary. it's the same old shit, this time from some college kid in his first job.
-
\ said:
\ said:
I don't think u will get one....or he's feverishly digging for some sort of information to throw back at everyone here that I'm assuming really wants the browns to win and succeed. I'm thinking Lum could care less about the browns, it really is a love thing with DA.no response necessary. it's the same old shit, this time from some college kid in his first job.
Who is the college kid? The sporting news guy or Peter King? Both of which show the FACTs that cutting DA at year end would only cost CLE 4.67M against the cap next year and nothing past (plus owe DA no more money). Which would be contrary to the make believe details you have tried to portray over and over.
-
I was contemplating feeding a roll of toilet paper into my printer, but then it occurred to me, NOTHING Lumms has ever posted is worth wiping my ass with.
I'm going to keep laughing as he latches on to believing it was an injustice to bench one of the WORST performing qbs in the league.
-
\ said:
\ said:
\ said:
I don't think u will get one....or he's feverishly digging for some sort of information to throw back at everyone here that I'm assuming really wants the browns to win and succeed. I'm thinking Lum could care less about the browns, it really is a love thing with DA.no response necessary. it's the same old shit, this time from some college kid in his first job.
Who is the college kid? The sporting news guy or Peter King? Both of which show the FACTs that cutting DA at year end would only cost CLE 4.67M against the cap next year and nothing past (plus owe DA no more money). Which would be contrary to the make believe details you have tried to portray over and over.
Lummy..... still waiting. Oh wait, your too busy trying to find something to make DA look like the victim. He's not a victim. He's the lowest rated QB in the NFL and can't complete half his passes.
-
\ said:
\ said:
\ said:
I don't think u will get one....or he's feverishly digging for some sort of information to throw back at everyone here that I'm assuming really wants the browns to win and succeed. I'm thinking Lum could care less about the browns, it really is a love thing with DA.no response necessary. it's the same old shit, this time from some college kid in his first job.
Who is the college kid? The sporting news guy or Peter King? Both of which show the FACTs that cutting DA at year end would only cost CLE 4.67M against the cap next year and nothing past (plus owe DA no more money). Which would be contrary to the make believe details you have tried to portray over and over.
Ah, the silence....
-
\ said:
\ said:
\ said:
I don't think u will get one....or he's feverishly digging for some sort of information to throw back at everyone here that I'm assuming really wants the browns to win and succeed. I'm thinking Lum could care less about the browns, it really is a love thing with DA.no response necessary. it's the same old shit, this time from some college kid in his first job.
Who is the college kid? The sporting news guy or Peter King? Both of which show the FACTs that cutting DA at year end would only cost CLE 4.67M against the cap next year and nothing past (plus owe DA no more money). Which would be contrary to the make believe details you have tried to portray over and over.
Ah, the silence....
-
\ said:
Who is the college kid? The sporting news guy or Peter King? Both of which show the FACTs that cutting DA at year end would only cost CLE 4.67M against the cap next year and nothing past (plus owe DA no more money). Which would be contrary to the make believe details you have tried to portray over and over.Hey milkmaid, what's schefter say here about guaranteed money?
-
\ said:
Moron...What he is talking about is what money would be owed if he stayed on the team. your girl DA will never see that 5 million dollars in march.
ROTFLMFAO........ Once again Lum posts video links and doesn't pay attention to what they say...Just like with the Phil presser Riffer schooled him on....lol.
-
\ said:
It's exchanges like these that make me really think lumby is somebody's puppet.Nobody would take an ass beating like this. Or at least not so easily.
It's almost as if he accepts the fact that we are superior to him, and he flails his arms out every once in a while as some feeble attempt to combat us.
LMAO at your dumbassery Lumby
I don't know. Jack would keep coming back for more beatings.
-
Lumfreddy is 100% real guys, just a straight up crazy in love ass Oregonian.
Stan and I played around a few weeks back when Lum took a sabbatical that it was us, but trust me, this dude is the real deal.
One thing I do know, and that is if I ever go to Oregon, I'm covering my ass, and I mean that literally.
-
\ said:
Lumfreddy is 100% real guys, just a straight up crazy in love ass Oregonian.Stan and I played around a few weeks back when Lum took a sabbatical that it was us, but trust me, this dude is the real deal.
One thing I do know, and that is if I ever go to Oregon, I'm covering my ass, and I mean that literally.
Well you know how they like there
logging up there
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login