Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. What two players dont you want in rd 1?

What two players dont you want in rd 1?

The Browns Board
53 29 2.0k
  • Mike HM Mike H wrote on
    #42

    I'm upgrading to 3. Darron Lee joins Jack and Lynch.

    I'd be most happy with Buckner, Bosa, Ramsey or trade down for an OT or WR.+

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @westside-steve said:

    Wait until the end of next season then I can prognosticate in hindsight. That's always a sure way to look smart.

    WSS

    Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year.

    W Westside Steve wrote on
    #43

    @the-gipper said:

    Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year.

    Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board?

    😁

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    gftChrisG 1 Reply
  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on
    #44

    I don't want a RB from Bama and I damn sure don't want pick 22

  • hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #45

    Treadwell in a trade down, or Jack.

  • W wargograw

    @tiamat63 said:

    After finding time to watch tape late last night, I'll still maintain that I don't want Ramsey - but I'll switch out Buckner for Lynch now.

    A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most?

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #46

    @wargograw said:

    A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most?

    Slow step, plays high, very inconsistent hand usage, too often he hand fights with the lineman and doesn't try to get skinny in the gap, motor and burst question, too often because of playing high he loses his feet from under him...

    How far did you want me to go here?

    C 1 Reply
  • W Westside Steve

    @the-gipper said:

    Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year.

    Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board?

    😁

    WSS

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on
    #47

    @westside-steve said:

    Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board?

    😁

    WSS

    Ha! Excellent.

  • J joedawg69 wrote on
    #48

    Bosa because he is a 4-3 player and Lynch because I don't think he is worth a first round pick but would not hate it if we got him in a later round.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #49

    Had no idea why Tour said no to Conklin in the first. Then I saw him across from Buckner this past season. Dialed up more film...

    I might have to say no to Lynch and Conklin now.

    Tour2maT 1 Reply
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @wargograw said:

    A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most?

    Slow step, plays high, very inconsistent hand usage, too often he hand fights with the lineman and doesn't try to get skinny in the gap, motor and burst question, too often because of playing high he loses his feet from under him...

    How far did you want me to go here?

    C Clevfan4life wrote on
    #50

    @tiamat63 said:

    Slow step, plays high?

    This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that

  • C Clevfan4life

    @tiamat63 said:

    Slow step, plays high?

    This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on
    #51

    @clevfan4life said:

    This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that

    I think he's being projected inside in the 4-3 and at 5-tech in the 3-4.

    Side note - say that to 99% of my friends here, even the ones that follow the game, and they have no idea, it's like I'm talking a different language.

    tiamat63T 1 Reply
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    Had no idea why Tour said no to Conklin in the first. Then I saw him across from Buckner this past season. Dialed up more film...

    I might have to say no to Lynch and Conklin now.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #52

    @tiamat63 said:

    Had no idea why Tour said no to Conklin in the first. Then I saw him across from Buckner this past season. Dialed up more film...

    I might have to say no to Lynch and Conklin now.

    Took your good old time didn't ya?

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @clevfan4life said:

    This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that

    I think he's being projected inside in the 4-3 and at 5-tech in the 3-4.

    Side note - say that to 99% of my friends here, even the ones that follow the game, and they have no idea, it's like I'm talking a different language.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #53

    @gftchris said:

    I think he's being projected inside in the 4-3 and at 5-tech in the 3-4.

    Side note - say that to 99% of my friends here, even the ones that follow the game, and they have no idea, it's like I'm talking a different language.

    No team would put him at the 3spot in four down looks unless it's absolutely an obvious passing situation. Buckner would be abused on the interior.

Log in to reply