Skip to content

So we gave up the chance to draft Wentz, Zeke, Ramsey, etc

The Browns Board
84 32 3.5k
  • Knowing that we have an analytics driven front office and after reading, over the past week, what pro football focus had to say about this guy, not to mention the analytics comparison done on WR from Dawgs by Nature, I am more than happy with this pick. A young, fast, productive WR who has shown gradual production all 3 years in school. Most productive WR in collage football last year. 5'10 but closer to 200 pounds. People keep comparing him to Travis. Travis was more like 5'9 175 at best. Guy is bigger, stronger, and just as fast. We can grab a big body in round 3-4 to help fill out the WR group.

  • I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

  • @tour2ma said:

    With you most of the way, but to be fair I have seen Coleman at the top of more than a few WR lists... especially since the Combine. But my question is: is he a #1 WR? Not seeing that...

    Losing Mitch has over complicated this draft, but in the end I don't think he wanted to be here.

    Of course that's possible, that's the feeling I got about Mack all along. But Mitch? It just seemed to me that as a free agent it wasn't an outrageous move to test the waters.

    And In fairness for that second pick we could have only gotten one of the players I wanted.

    WSS

    We're keeping our ears warm....

    But enough about us... How's Steelerland liking their reach for a man coverage CB? Better than PFF I trust...

    @westside-steve said:

    Of course that's possible, that's the feeling I got about Mack all along. But Mitch? It just seemed to me that as a free agent it wasn't an outrageous move to test the waters.

    I've no issue with testing and am on record with thinking Schwartz being worth more than KC paid him... a good bit more. But the way Mitch was planning to use our bumped offer as leverage with KC and his comments about being on a "winner" add up to him wanting out in my book.

  • We're keeping our ears warm....

    But enough about us... How's Steelerland liking their reach for a man coverage CB? Better than PFF I trust...

    @westside-steve said:

    Of course that's possible, that's the feeling I got about Mack all along. But Mitch? It just seemed to me that as a free agent it wasn't an outrageous move to test the waters.

    I've no issue with testing and am on record with thinking Schwartz being worth more than KC paid him... a good bit more. But the way Mitch was planning to use our bumped offer as leverage with KC and his comments about being on a "winner" add up to him wanting out in my book.

    @tour2ma said:

    We're keeping our ears warm....

    But enough about us... How's Steelerland liking their reach for a man coverage CB? Better than PFF I trust...

    I've no issue with testing and am on record with thinking Schwartz being worth more than KC paid him... a good bit more. But the way Mitch was planning to use our bumped offer as leverage with KC and his comments about being on a "winner" add up to him wanting out in my book.

    I reacted the same way I did when we drafted shazier. I knew of shazier but I never expected him at 15. Now I'm elated that he's on our team as health permitting he has the ability to be one of the best in the nfl. Freak athlete with a nose for the ball. Charlie Casserly and Jeremiah (I don't really care for either) mocked him to us so it's not completely out of left field.

    Two sport athlete so he couldn't focus solely on football. Elite speed, huge hands and he can catch. He's raw but unlike William Jackson III who I wanted he's only 21. Jackson is about to be 24 and the Steelers made the pick almost immediately. I'm not paid to analyze the draft and the guys that are love the guy. Tremendously high character as well, lost his mom last year and he's taking care of his 19mo old and his two younger brothers. The steelers don't really miss in the first, so I trust in the team. Mike mayock said some people have a third round grade on him, others believe he could be the best in the draft. Most had him going somewhere in the first. I saw him mocked to the cards a bunch.

  • Late riser...

    But we agreed on Jackson III. My wife is a UH alum, so saw a good bit of him. I thought he was the best pure CB in the draft.

  • Speaking of CBs, interesting that Eli Apple went ahead of Vernon Hargreaves?

  • Speaking of CBs, interesting that Eli Apple went ahead of Vernon Hargreaves?

    @gftchris said:

    Speaking of CBs, interesting that Eli Apple went ahead of Vernon Hargreaves?

    I didn't read much about the guys. Apple may have been a better fit for the Giants defense.

  • Surprising... first pure CB off the board...

  • So much for "Money Ball Analytics" We passed on Taylor Decker, Paxton Lynch, for a shrimp like Benjamin! We could have had Michael Thomas at 32!

    @opal312 said:

    So much for "Money Ball Analytics" We passed on Taylor Decker, Paxton Lynch, for a shrimp like Benjamin! We could have had Michael Thomas at 32!

    What makes you think that this choice was not dictated by "Money Ball Analytics". I would say that it likely was.

  • @opal312 said:

    There were other wide receivers we could get in round two who are bigger and better. I thought at least we'd get Noah Spence out of the draft. Man oh man it's going to be a long 24 hours waiting for round 2.

    Do you actually know any players outside of Ohio State?

    @gftchris said:

    Do you actually know any players outside of Ohio State?

    Whether she does or she doesn't, Spence....who is from Eastern KY, is one of the top rated players left at a position of need for the Browns. So your question is irrelevent, and jumping in Opals shit was unwarranted.

  • So the Browns traded their #2 Overall and gained:

    Corey Coleman

    #76 overall 2016

    #77 overall 2016

    #100 overall 2016

    The Eagles' First Round Pick 2017

    The Titans' Second Round Pick 2017

    The Eagles' Second Round Pick 2018

    Or an entire extra draft worth of picks over the next three seasons.

    That seems like a pretty good haul to me.

    @mr.-make-believe said:

    So the Browns traded their #2 Overall and gained:

    Corey Coleman

    #76 overall 2016

    #77 overall 2016

    #100 overall 2016

    The Eagles' First Round Pick 2017

    The Titans' Second Round Pick 2017

    The Eagles' Second Round Pick 2018

    Or an entire extra draft worth of picks over the next three seasons.

    That seems like a pretty good haul to me.

    Weren't there also some third round and below picks involved there? But yes, I agree, a pretty damned good haul.....as long as they don't blow all those picks. Former regimes would have done just that.

  • @gftchris said:

    Do you actually know any players outside of Ohio State?

    Whether she does or she doesn't, Spence....who is from Eastern KY, is one of the top rated players left at a position of need for the Browns. So your question is irrelevent, and jumping in Opals shit was unwarranted.

    @the-gipper said:

    Whether she does or she doesn't, Spence....who is from Eastern KY, is one of the top rated players left at a position of need for the Browns. So your question is irrelevent, and jumping in Opals shit was unwarranted.

    Didn't Spence start off at Ohio St?

  • I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

    @vagitron said:

    I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

    Fair enough. But just one point: the reason we are not over the moon is because we have been here before with trade downs, trade ups....and they all have not seemed to work out. Trade down for Phil Taylor, up for TR, down for Gilbert, up for JMZ, up for Erving etc etc. We will jump over that moon when some of these guys make the Pro Bowl....or get us into the playoffs. Until then we must temper our enthusiasm. Disappointment makes one suspicious.

    Even lower round stuff......yinzers take WR in round 6 that becomes an all pro, we take a guy in round 4 that can 't make it out of training camp. You get the picture?

  • @the-gipper said:

    Whether she does or she doesn't, Spence....who is from Eastern KY, is one of the top rated players left at a position of need for the Browns. So your question is irrelevent, and jumping in Opals shit was unwarranted.

    Didn't Spence start off at Ohio St?

    @taco918 said:

    Didn't Spence start off at Ohio St?

    Yes, but I don't know if whoever does this thing will count him as an OSU product.

  • I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

    @vagitron said:

    I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60) I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition. They parlayed that #2 pick into a boatload, both this year- and even better next. The Browns will control the 2017 draft with two picks in each of the first three rounds- and maybe an extra compensatory 3rd. If we suck (as I suspect) they will have their pick of any qb they fancy. I'll curb my enthusiasm until I see how today and tomorrow unfold.

    Yeah- I would have liked Wentz on the Browns, but when we went down to #8, and Bosa, Buckner, and Elliott were off the board- that was a royal fleecing of the Titans.

  • @vagitron said:

    I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60) I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition. They parlayed that #2 pick into a boatload, both this year- and even better next. The Browns will control the 2017 draft with two picks in each of the first three rounds- and maybe an extra compensatory 3rd. If we suck (as I suspect) they will have their pick of any qb they fancy. I'll curb my enthusiasm until I see how today and tomorrow unfold.

    Yeah- I would have liked Wentz on the Browns, but when we went down to #8, and Bosa, Buckner, and Elliott were off the board- that was a royal fleecing of the Titans.

    @hoorta said:

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60)I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition.

    Personally I am banking on proper wine consumption...

  • @vagitron said:

    I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60) I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition. They parlayed that #2 pick into a boatload, both this year- and even better next. The Browns will control the 2017 draft with two picks in each of the first three rounds- and maybe an extra compensatory 3rd. If we suck (as I suspect) they will have their pick of any qb they fancy. I'll curb my enthusiasm until I see how today and tomorrow unfold.

    Yeah- I would have liked Wentz on the Browns, but when we went down to #8, and Bosa, Buckner, and Elliott were off the board- that was a royal fleecing of the Titans.

    @hoorta said:

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60)I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition. They parlayed that #2 pick into a boatload, both this year- and even better next. The Browns will control the 2017 draft with two picks in each of the first three rounds- and maybe an extra compensatory 3rd. If we suck (as I suspect) they will have their pick of any qb they fancy. I'll curb my enthusiasm until I see how today and tomorrow unfold.

    Yeah- I would have liked Wentz on the Browns, but when we went down to #8, and Bosa, Buckner, and Elliott were off the board- that was a royal fleecing of the Titans.

    Was it? The Titans still have 3 second round picks this year. We should have gotten one of those in the trade instead of a third this year and a 2 next year. It should have been the other way around imo.

  • @hoorta said:

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60)I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition.

    Personally I am banking on proper wine consumption...

    @tour2ma said:

    Personally I am banking on proper wine consumption...

    I'm enjoying a glass as I type, getting primed for another evening of the draft.

  • @hoorta said:

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60)I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition. They parlayed that #2 pick into a boatload, both this year- and even better next. The Browns will control the 2017 draft with two picks in each of the first three rounds- and maybe an extra compensatory 3rd. If we suck (as I suspect) they will have their pick of any qb they fancy. I'll curb my enthusiasm until I see how today and tomorrow unfold.

    Yeah- I would have liked Wentz on the Browns, but when we went down to #8, and Bosa, Buckner, and Elliott were off the board- that was a royal fleecing of the Titans.

    Was it? The Titans still have 3 second round picks this year. We should have gotten one of those in the trade instead of a third this year and a 2 next year. It should have been the other way around imo.

    @the-gipper said:

    Was it? The Titans still have 3 second round picks this year. We should have gotten one of those in the trade instead of a third this year and a 2 next year. It should have been the other way around imo.

    Yes it was a fleecing, especially if the browns still want a qb early as there are a ton still at their disposal. Swapping the picks around may not have net the browns as much either. It's about BUILDING a team, not winning right now in the upcoming season.

  • @vagitron said:

    I can't believe some of you guys aren't over the moon about these trade downs. Coleman was for a lot of people that best receiver in the draft. No one knows how he will turn out for sure BUT his comparison that I've seen most is Steve Smith (SR). Beyond that though and more importantly the Browns have more holes than just what pick 8 or pick 2 would have rectified and your team is now LOADED with draft picks. Hue seems to know what he's doing. The complainers need to get their heads out of their asses.

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60) I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition. They parlayed that #2 pick into a boatload, both this year- and even better next. The Browns will control the 2017 draft with two picks in each of the first three rounds- and maybe an extra compensatory 3rd. If we suck (as I suspect) they will have their pick of any qb they fancy. I'll curb my enthusiasm until I see how today and tomorrow unfold.

    Yeah- I would have liked Wentz on the Browns, but when we went down to #8, and Bosa, Buckner, and Elliott were off the board- that was a royal fleecing of the Titans.

    @hoorta said:

    No kidding- the only thing I don't like- is at my age (high side of 60) I might not live long enough to see this come to fruition. They parlayed that #2 pick into a boatload, both this year- and even better next. The Browns will control the 2017 draft with two picks in each of the first three rounds- and maybe an extra compensatory 3rd. If we suck (as I suspect) they will have their pick of any qb they fancy. I'll curb my enthusiasm until I see how today and tomorrow unfold.

    Yeah- I would have liked Wentz on the Browns, but when we went down to #8, and Bosa, Buckner, and Elliott were off the board- that was a royal fleecing of the Titans.

    I agree and high side of 60 is only old if you let it be my good man.