Skip to content

Coleman to wear #19

The Browns Board
18 10 853
  • @tour2ma said:

    Point was Warfield's number was not in the 80's...

    And I believe Gary Collins was the flankerback.

    Warfield wore 42. Again, that was before the 1973 numbers mandate. In the 1964 roster both Warfield and Collins were listed as "Flankers". In fact there was no such thing as a "Wide Receiver" listed.

    No. Name Pos. Ht. Wt.

    11 Jim Ninowski QB 6-1 207

    13 Frank Ryan QB 6-3 200

    20 Ross Fichtner DB 6-0 185

    22 Loweli Caylor DB 6-3 205

    23 Larry Benz DB 5-11 185

    24 Bob Franklin DB 5-11 182

    27 Walter Roberts FL 5-10 175

    30 Bernie Parrish DB 5-11 195

    32 Jim Brown FB 6-2 228

    35 Galen Fiss LB 6-0 227

    36 Charley Scales FB 5-11 215

    38 Stan Sczurek LB 5-11 230

    42 Paul Warfield FL 6-0 188

    44 Leroy Kelly HB 6-0 195

    48 Ernie Green HB 6-2 205

    49 Walter Beach DB 6-0 185

    50 Vince Costello LB 6-0 228

    52 Mike Lucci LB 6-2 223

    56 John Morrow C 6-3 248

    60 John Wooten G 6-3 250

    62 Dale Memmelaar G 6-2 248

    64 Ed Bettridge LB 6-1 235

    66 Gene Hickerson G 6-3 248

    67 Sidney Williams DE 6-2 235

    69 Jim Kanicki DT 6-4 270

    70 John Brown T 6-2 248

    72 Mike Bundra DT 6-4 260

    73 Monte Clark T/C 6-6 265

    74 Dick Modzelewski DT 6-0 260

    75 Roger Shoals T-G 6-4 255

    76 Lou Groza K 6-3 250

    77 Dick Schafrath T 6-3 255

    78 Frank Parker DT 6-5 255

    80 Bill Glass DE 6-5 255

    82 Jim Houston LB 6-3 240

    83 Johnny Brewer E 6-4 235

    84 Paul Wiggin DE 6-3 245

    85 Clifton McNeil FL 6-2 185

    86 Gary Collins FL 6-4 208

    87 Tom Hutchinson E 6-1 190

    Source: 1964 Cleveland Browns game program

    All the WRs were FL's (Flankers) The TEs were just Es (Ends) There is no RB. You were either a FB (Fullback) or HB(Halfback).

    Is it fair to say that the terms Flanker and Halfback are really no longer used? Here they do not distinguish between an OLB or MLB, it is just LB. Nor between a Safety or a Corner...it is just DB

    @the-gipper said:

    In fact there was no such thing as a "Wide Receiver" listed.

    They were called "End" in that day and age... sometimes "Offensive End"...

    post-2853-0-62435800-1462376525_thumb.jpg

  • I still prefer that WRs wear numbers in the 80s.

    @the-gipper said:

    I still prefer that WRs wear numbers in the 80s.

    I agree..

  • Holy shit, they were called offensive ends. I just had a flash back.

  • Holy shit, they were called offensive ends. I just had a flash back.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Holy shit, they were called offensive ends. I just had a flash back.

    ... and "flanker" was the shortened version of flankerback...

    Keep on flashing...

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Holy shit, they were called offensive ends. I just had a flash back.

    ... and "flanker" was the shortened version of flankerback...

    Keep on flashing...

    @tour2ma said:

    ... and "flanker" was the shortened version of flankerback...

    Keep on flashing...

    Right on Homey.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Holy shit, they were called offensive ends. I just had a flash back.

    ... and "flanker" was the shortened version of flankerback...

    Keep on flashing...

    @tour2ma said:

    ... and "flanker" was the shortened version of flankerback...

    Keep on flashing...

    Split ends?

  • The Browns used to have a great "halfback" in Bobby Mitchell, traded to the Redskins where he became a HOF "flanker"/WR.

    At the same time, our "fullback" (before they became primarily blockers) was the great Jim Brown. We all know he's in the Hall.

    You can name all the other backfields, but watch some film...I have NEVER seen 2 more exciting backs in one backfield. Plum would throw a "flare pass" to either one & the race was on!

    Great memories.

    Mike

  • @tour2ma said:

    ... and "flanker" was the shortened version of flankerback...

    Keep on flashing...

    Split ends?

    But Ernie Green was a better blocker... as a halfback.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Split ends?

    Nope... use conditioner...

  • VesnaKociper said:

    Is Coleman a drunk?

    Hey, all kidding aside, 19 is a cool number for a Quarterback. Some great ones wore it. Y.A. Tittie, Frank Tarkington, and I believe Joe Heisman.

    I know for sure Walter Ostenak wore #19.

    Johnny Unitas wore #19...undoubtedly the best to wear that number. Other HOF to wear 19: Lance Alworth.

    Theisman wore #7 with the Redskins. Y.A. Tittle wore #14 with the Giants. Tarkenton wore #10.

    Just FYI.

  • VesnaKociper said:

    Is Coleman a drunk?

    Hey, all kidding aside, 19 is a cool number for a Quarterback. Some great ones wore it. Y.A. Tittie, Frank Tarkington, and I believe Joe Heisman.

    I know for sure Walter Ostenak wore #19.

    Walter Ostanek Lol?

    Must be a player in the Canadian league lol.

  • VesnaKociper said:

    Is Coleman a drunk?

    Hey, all kidding aside, 19 is a cool number for a Quarterback. Some great ones wore it. Y.A. Tittie, Frank Tarkington, and I believe Joe Heisman.

    I know for sure Walter Ostenak wore #19.

    Walter Ostanek Lol?

    Must be a player in the Canadian league lol.

    @stinkhole said:

    Walter Ostanek Lol?Must be a player in the Canadian league lol.

    Shut the fuck up Louis Lipps.