Second Amendment to be or not to be
-
I think holding a 200+ plus year old document like it is written in stone is idiotic. Could the authors of the constitution even have imagined the fire power we have today? It's not a living document if with never at least review changing it.
So you think these laws and rules don't and shouldn't apply today?
So you think these laws and rules don't and shouldn't apply today?
Thinking we shouldn't act likes it's written in stone and thinking that none of it should apply are very different.
-
I think holding a 200+ plus year old document like it is written in stone is idiotic. Could the authors of the constitution even have imagined the fire power we have today? It's not a living document if with never at least review changing it.
The founding fathers could never have imagined email, Twitter, and cell phones either. Time to toss out the first amendment?
The founding fathers could never have imagined email, Twitter, and cell phones either. Time to toss out the first amendment?
Toss out? No. But the point I'm making is that they all be up for debate and review.
-
"Some animals are more equal than others"
-
Animal farm?
-
Animal farm?
Animal farm?
Yep.
I remember reading it early in college and the discussion was that it was about the Russian Revolution which made sense until you started thinking about it like the American Revolution and it still made sense.
WSS
-
I think holding a 200+ plus year old document like it is written in stone is idiotic. Could the authors of the constitution even have imagined the fire power we have today? It's not a living document if with never at least review changing it.
The founding fathers could never have imagined email, Twitter, and cell phones either. Time to toss out the first amendment?
The founding fathers could never have imagined email, Twitter, and cell phones either. Time to toss out the first amendment?
And that is one of the best replies possible.
-
it's incredulous that the demoquacks, liberals/progressives/socialists..
are so arrogant bordering on mental illness, that they completely think
only THEY are allowed to take parts of the Constitution out that THEY don't like.
Meaning - it keeps them from getting and keeping power permanently.
Obamao hates that.
-
That's not what I'm saying.
Saying that the constitution should be open for change, reviewed, etc doesn't mean I want to just throw parts of it away.
Times have changed in the last couple of centuries. Crazy I know.
-
times change - truth and freedom, and peoples' innate desire for them, do not.
that "but things are different now" is just an excuse to take power for the liberal side.
Trust me - sheply used to be "frightened" by Bush and Cheney and how they
would enslave all of us because of the patriot act, and nullifying our precious
Constitution rights.
but now? screw the conservatives Constitutional rights..."times have changed".
yeah. their leftist is in the WH.
Our Constitution is our absolute guarantor of our rights. You can add em, can't take em.
Or, you don't really have a Constitution anymore.
-
It looks like you basically posted that same thing in two threads. We'll keep the discussion in the other one, about Obama being a pervert or whatever.
-
It looks like you are wrong in both.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login