This explains the left's antagonism towards Israel
-
And also never waste an opportunity to call the other side a "crime syndicate" for doing exactly as you've done for decades
-
The Bush family practically fanned the Saudis and fed them grapes.
-
We must continue to provide aid to Israel, and increase it drastically after Barrack Hussein Obama leaves office.
-
try posting a link about the conservatives. See, the clintons are running for president again.
The Bush's are not. John Mccain, who I detest, got 1 million for his non-profit.
They are not running for office. Now, How much did the Clintons get ? Read the article, and
tell me the difference between that, and Mccain's one million.
No link? It stink.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/03/31/how-many-american-politicians-do-the-saudis-own/
-
Coleman - republican. Not running for pres.
Chuck Hagle - not running for pres.
-
higgardly the nasty got $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ from four arabic countries.
-
so, post a link about the Bush family getting millions for their foundation.
back it up.
Meanwhile:
http://www.nysun.com/national/saudis-arabs-funneled-millions-to-president/5137/
Democrats spent much of the presidential campaign this year accusing President Bush of improperly close ties to Saudi Arabia. The case was made in Michael Moore's film "Fahrenheit 9/11," in a bestselling book by Craig Unger titled "House of Bush, House of Saud," and by the Democratic presidential candidate, Senator Kerry."This administration delayed pressuring the Saudis," Mr. Kerry said on October 20. "I will insist that the Saudis crack down on charities that funnel funds to terrorists... and on anti-American and anti-Israel hate speech."The Media Fund, a Democratic group whose president is a former Clinton White House aide, Harold Ickes, spent millions airing television commercials in swing states with scripts such as, "The Saudi royal family...wealthy...powerful...corrupt. And close Bush family friends."
Perhaps as a result, the Saudi donations to the Clinton library are raising some eyebrows. Mr. Unger said he suspects that the Saudi support may have something to do with a possible presidential bid by Senator Clinton in 2008.
-
Therefore, it is safe to say, that responses to the op in defense of the clintons...
is liberal emotional knee-jerkie.
-
furthermore, the subject is the antagonism towards Israel.
The Bush's were NEVER antagonistic towards Israel.
You, you libs just knee-jerked so quicly, you missed the point.
-
Therefore, it is safe to say, that responses to the op in defense of the clintons...
is liberal emotional knee-jerkie.
-
And I have said several times that I am not for giving money to the welfare queen of the Middle East. We shouldn't be giving money to other countries when we are deep in a debt hole.
-
Yup, israel needs cut off just like all the other dirty fucking countries in that shit hole that take our money but have zero problem subverting our interests when they see fit
-
This is old news. Anyway, cal why do you think its ok for politicians to take money from the saudis unless their running for president? The distinction makes no sense.
-
furthermore, the subject is the antagonism towards Israel.
The Bush's were NEVER antagonistic towards Israel.
You, you libs just knee-jerked so quicly, you missed the point.
furthermore, the subject is the antagonism towards Israel.
The Bush's were NEVER antagonistic towards Israel.
You, you libs just knee-jerked so quicly, you missed the point.
You know theres a "very" significant liberal voting bloc made up of jews right? You know jon stewarts a joo right? And he's been very critical of israel for very legit reasons.
-
Even netanyahu's defense minister from his own party has had enough of him
-
A. The subject is antagonism towards Israel over getting Saudi payoff money.
That is the clinton way, etc.
B. The Bush family dealings with the Saudis stinks. But they never were
antagonistic to Israel over it.
C. I raised the subject of the dirty clinton foundation getting $$$$$$$$$$$, and being
very antagonistic to Israel. You come back with dirt on the Bush family, etc etc etc,
that doesn't reflect any kind of selling our Israel at all. With Carter, there sure as hell\
was that antagonism. With the Clintons, there sure as hell is. With Obamao, sure the hell is.
With the Bushes, there most certainly was not.
D. So, I'm still waiting on a lib response about the subject at hand. Selling out Israel over huge millions
to the Clintons. You are defending the Clintons, by attacking the Bush family on another subject.
Mega-lib emotional knee-jerk.
-
Didnt clinton preside over major peace talks?
-
You are changing subjects again. Jewish Americans in AMERICA? really?
Come on, stop changing subjects.
Besides, Jewish Americans don't live much in Israel - they can afford to
be critical of Israel.
The point is, Dems have favored the "Palestinians" in peace talks. Israel
kept giving, and giving, and giving, and the "Palestinians", who never really existed in
the first place.. would refuse the peace deal. Even Bill Clinton finally admitted he killed himself
to get a deal, and the leaders of the "palestinians" rejected it. And they weren't giving up anything
besides recognitiion of Israel and war. and they refused to even do that.
Hillary Clinton's History: Muslim Connections Stem Back To 1990s ...www.breitbart.com/.../hillarys-history-dangerous...Breitbart News NetworkJan 22, 2016 - Hillary Clinton's History: Muslim Connections Stem Back To 1990s. ... While Croatia is not part of the Schengen area – a 26 country zone of the ...Hillary Clinton Is No Friend of Israel - Haaretz - Israel News Haaretz.comwww.haaretz.com › OpinionHaaretzNov 8, 2015 - Hillary Clinton's election as U.S. president would ensure Israel's continued decline and degeneration. And so she is not a friend, but an enemy.and hillary gets mega millions...85 of them...from the Saudis.
See the point now? Come on, open your eyes.
-
Jewish people are the chosen ones.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login