Newt?
-
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2015/10/kelly-ayotte-clean-power-plan-climate-change
Oh young calfox, how little u understand of our modern insta fact checking world
Right, clearly she's not a republican. Republicans must follow the party line in every way. She's now labelled RINO for life.
-
No, she doesn't believe in mmgw. She did, however, agree with the
pollution cutback on factories, etc. Everybody is against pollution.
mmgw is a different biz.
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2015/10/kelly-ayotte-clean-power-plan-climate-change
Oh young calfox, how little u understand of our modern insta fact checking world
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2015/10/kelly-ayotte-clean-power-plan-climate-change
Oh young calfox, how little u understand of our modern insta fact checking world
ah. Good find.
She sucks.
-
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2015/10/kelly-ayotte-clean-power-plan-climate-change
Oh young calfox, how little u understand of our modern insta fact checking world
ah. Good find.
She sucks.
-
Yes Woody that's true. At least for the sake of this discussion.
Do you think I'm mistaken or is this just your, and pardon the expression, knee jerk objection to whatever I post?
WSS
I disagree with something you said so it must indicate a knee jerk reaction to everything you post? .....
... Don't go full Steve on this already
I disagree with something you said so it must indicate a knee jerk reaction to everything you post? .....
... Don't go full Steve on this already
All right then tell me where you think I'm wrong.
WSS
-
They're both kind of similar, brash and blunt speakers.
Stuart
What??? Not even close. Newt is extremely articulate and witty. He destroys any libtard he debates.
Trump is buffoonish, and has a limited vocabulary.
Here's how you debate. Newt starts off blunt then expands.
Trump starts off blunt and remains there.
Stuart
What??? Not even close. Newt is extremely articulate and witty. He destroys any libtard he debates.
Trump is buffoonish, and has a limited vocabulary.
Here's how you debate. Newt starts off blunt then expands.
Trump starts off blunt and remains there.
absolutely right - I like him as Trumps Vice Pres. too
makes the trump choice easier for me...
-
"She also was one of only five Republicans senators who voted yes on a resolution that said human activity is driving climate change."
Sounds strictly pollution oriented to me. Maybe instead of just spamming google links you should take the time to read some of them****************************************
I did read some - each one was about how she supported the EPA over a pollution bill.
The dems in NH agree with me. So she softened her stance - over peer pressure, I suppose.
- You are here: Home > Ayotte Fact Check VIDEO: Kelly Ayotte Said She Did Not Believe That Man-Made Global Warming Has Been Proven Without A Doubt
Ayotte Fact Check VIDEO: Kelly Ayotte Said She Did Not Believe That Man-Made Global Warming Has Been Proven Without A DoubtConcord, N.H. â Todayâs Ayotte Fact Check focuses on Kelly Ayotteâs attempt to rewrite her record of undermining New Hampshireâs environment and natural resources.Despite Ayotteâs recent attempts to âgreenwashâ her dismal environmental record â she canât change the facts. In a 2010 Republican Senatorial primary debate, each candidate was asked if he or she believed that man-made global warming has been proven without a doubt. To which Ayotte replied simply, â
.ââFrom denying that man-made climate change is a fact to voting to block the EPA from ever having the ability to reduce greenhouse gases, itâs easy to see why Kelly Ayotte has a 23% lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters,â said New Hampshire Democratic Party Chair Ray Buckley. âNo matter how hard Ayotte tries to âgreenwashâ her record of protecting tax breaks for big oil while New Hampshireâs environment pays the price, she wonât be able to change the fact that her environmental record is even worse than Scott Brownâs.â
See AyotteFactCheck.com for more information on Ayotteâs real Washington record of undermining the environment.
-
on this one issue, I wouldn't pick her unless I knew her fudging was simply to
undermine the dems attack machine in election year fighting.
I don't like it though, if I can't trust her stances...
-
same with Nikki Haley SC ^
-
Condi Rice... but she has ties to the Bush admin still...
I know.
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.),
That's it.
-
Well we'll know in about a month, I don't expect it to be somebody who hasn't been on the Trump train though - which means no Haley
-
Condi's a browns fan sooo,....
-
Well I think most people believe that Humanity has at least some effect on the climate. More people disagree on the extent or severity or whether or not it can be changed through higher taxes.
So I don't necessarily have a problem with a politician unless they vow to put the hammer down on us industry.
WSS
-
Well I think most people believe that Humanity has at least some effect on the climate. More people disagree on the extent or severity or whether or not it can be changed through higher taxes.
So I don't necessarily have a problem with a politician unless they vow to put the hammer down on us industry.
WSS
Well I think most people believe that Humanity has at least some effect on the climate. More people disagree on the extent or severity or whether or not it can be changed through higher taxes.
So I don't necessarily have a problem with a politician unless they vow to put the hammer down on us industry.
WSS
She basically has said that she thinks man is involved but doesn't want to do anything that will drastically effect industry. Pretty reasoned.
-
Librals are reesponsable for glbal wrming with all the hot air they breath out from their rank guts.
-
Wait tilla couple billion hindus start using air conditioning, y'all gonna have a front row seat for the mmgw primer
-
Wait tilla couple billion hindus start using air conditioning, y'all gonna have a front row seat for the mmgw primer
Wait tilla couple billion hindus start using air conditioning, y'all gonna have a front row seat for the mmgw primer
That is part of why I believe that mmgw exists but think there is fuck all that can be done about it. The third world countries are going to want to have what we have. That involves way more cars, AC units, coal burning power plants, etc. China and India could give a fuck about emissions.
-
Wait tilla couple billion hindus start using air conditioning, y'all gonna have a front row seat for the mmgw primer
That is part of why I believe that mmgw exists but think there is fuck all that can be done about it. The third world countries are going to want to have what we have. That involves way more cars, AC units, coal burning power plants, etc. China and India could give a fuck about emissions.
That is part of why I believe that mmgw exists but think there is fuck all that can be done about it. The third world countries are going to want to have what we have. That involves way more cars, AC units, coal burning power plants, etc. China and India could give a fuck about emissions.
Right which is kind of why its imperative to lead by example. But we wont cause we're pussies. Conservatives think we're pussies cause we hand kids participation trophies, but any talk of curtailing our over indulgent lifestyles "even slightly" is herecy. Waddya mean i cant meat 4 erryday all day long? Revolt!!!!!
-
That is part of why I believe that mmgw exists but think there is fuck all that can be done about it. The third world countries are going to want to have what we have. That involves way more cars, AC units, coal burning power plants, etc. China and India could give a fuck about emissions.
Right which is kind of why its imperative to lead by example. But we wont cause we're pussies. Conservatives think we're pussies cause we hand kids participation trophies, but any talk of curtailing our over indulgent lifestyles "even slightly" is herecy. Waddya mean i cant meat 4 erryday all day long? Revolt!!!!!
Right which is kind of why its imperative to lead by example. But we wont cause we're pussies. Conservatives think we're pussies cause we hand kids participation trophies, but any talk of curtailing our over indulgent lifestyles "even slightly" is herecy. Waddya mean i cant meat 4 erryday all day long? Revolt!!!!!
When has India or China given a shit about the U.S.' example. They want our luxuries but they aren't going to saddle themselves with our inconveniences. Especially if they are newly minted transitioning countries.
-
Right which is kind of why its imperative to lead by example. But we wont cause we're pussies. Conservatives think we're pussies cause we hand kids participation trophies, but any talk of curtailing our over indulgent lifestyles "even slightly" is herecy. Waddya mean i cant meat 4 erryday all day long? Revolt!!!!!
When has India or China given a shit about the U.S.' example. They want our luxuries but they aren't going to saddle themselves with our inconveniences. Especially if they are newly minted transitioning countries.
When has India or China given a shit about the U.S.' example. They want our luxuries but they aren't going to saddle themselves with our inconveniences. Especially if they are newly minted transitioning countries.
They're saying the same shit over there..."we'd rather not choke on smog erryday but you know those crafty sneaky round eyes are just trying to get us to nerf our own industry while they do all the same shit as us and then some"
-
At some point someone has to say ok that might be enough of that
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better đ
Register Login