Slippery slope getting steeper
-
Canada Supreme Court rules that forms of beastiality are legal.
-
It's a mental illness. We have it in our WH, our state dept,
higgardly, it's a serius mess
but canada is going into the toilet.
Liberals never quit. It isn't the goal to just get gay marriage, tranpervs whatever.
It's upended who we are, turning our country unpsde down, inside out and bass-ackwards.
-
The apocalypse is coming. No doubt about it. I'm serious.
-
So if no one gets penetrated, animal included, no harm no foul in Canada? Kid diddlers will rejoice in the land of maple syrup.
-
I do wonder how it works without penetration...
Maybe smear tuna fish on your dick and call the cat over?
Then again like I said before and got a big raft of shit for as soon as one taboo Falls somebody wants to take on the next one.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
liberals are enough to make normal, decent, healthy people puke.
-
I do wonder how it works without penetration...
Maybe smear tuna fish on your dick and call the cat over?
Then again like I said before and got a big raft of shit for as soon as one taboo Falls somebody wants to take on the next one.
WSS
I do wonder how it works without penetration...
Maybe smear tuna fish on your dick and call the cat over?
Then again like I said before and got a big raft of shit for as soon as one taboo Falls somebody wants to take on the next one.
WSS
Have you seen a cat's tongue?
Yikes
-
First off, the animal rights activists (who are liberals btw) wont allow this ever. Infact they're protesting in columbus now because ohio is like the only state without beastiality laws. Second......its fucking canada. Srsly, canada.
-
Only canadians would say well legislature technically you didnt allow the peanut butter trick sooooo have at it boys!!
-
Justin Trudeau is the ultimate cuck
-
"How aboot we think about the dogs, aye? I mean they like peanut butter. Do we want to deprive them of Jiff just because it is on a pair of balls?"
-
Justin Trudeau is the ultimate cuck
Do you take a shot of beam every time you get to use that word?
-
Do you take a shot of beam every time you get to use that word?
I like gin, I'm chugging on some now before the cavs
-
Well now, this certainly does open up some rather interesting advertising avenues for Jif, Skippy and Peter Pan
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
Well now, this certainly does open up some rather interesting advertising avenues for Jif, Skippy and Peter Pan
-
Do you take a shot of beam every time you get to use that word?
I like gin, I'm chugging on some now before the cavs
-
http://www.snopes.com/canada-legalizes-beastiality/
Claim: Canada legalized oral sex with animals.
mostly false
WHAT'S TRUE: Canada's Supreme Court ruled that the current definition of bestiality only included penetrative acts.
WHAT'S FALSE: Canada passed a new law legalizing oral sex with animals.
Example: [Collected via e-mail, June 2016]:
"Canada's courts supposedly legalized sex acts between humans and animals? I assume it is not true, but haven't seen anything to dispute the article that my friend posted on FB."
Origin: On 9 June 2016, Canada's Supreme Court ruled that the country's current bestiality laws only banned sexual acts that involved penetration:
Supreme Court judges ruled 6-1 in favor of a man from British Columbia in western Canada convicted for sexual assault and bestiality after he involved the family dog in the abuse of his two stepdaughters.
The man, known only by the initials "D.L.W." to protect his stepdaughters' identity, successfully appealed his bestiality conviction in a provincial court, arguing that according to the law, the offense of bestiality requires penetration, which his actions did not involve.
Justice Thomas Cromwell, writing for all concurring judges, said in the decision that penetration has always been required to secure bestiality convictions and courts do not have the power to rule otherwise.
Shortly after the ruling was issued, several web sites reported that Canada had legalized oral sex with animals. The country, however, did not issue any new laws regarding bestiality, nor did they change any existing laws. The Supreme Court based its ruling on the legal definition of bestiality already in its criminal code:
Applying the principles that guide statutory interpretation leads to the conclusion in this case that the term bestiality has a well‑established legal meaning and refers to sexual intercourse between a human and an animal. Penetration has always been understood to be an essential element of bestiality. Parliament adopted that term without adding a definition of it and the legislative history and evolution of the relevant provisions show no intent to depart from the well‑understood legal meaning of the term. Moreover, the courts should not, by development of the common law, broaden the scope of liability for the offence of bestiality. Any expansion of criminal liability for this offence is within Parliament’s exclusive domain.
In this case, the term bestiality did have a clear legal meaning when Parliament used that term without further definition in the English version of the 1955 Criminal Code . Bestiality meant buggery with an animal and required penetration. It was clear that to secure a conviction, the prosecution had to prove that penetration of an animal, or, in the case of women, penetration by an animal, had occurred. This was the state of the law when the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861 was enacted in England. The offence in substantially the same form was carried over into the first English version of the Canadian Criminal Code in 1892 and continued to be in force until the offence called bestiality was introduced into the English version of the Code in the 1955 revisions.
However, this bill may not stand for much longer. Legislation that would redefine bestiality to include all inter-species sexual activity was introduced to Parliament, but as of June 2016, remains in its early stages. Camille Labchuk, executive director of the Animal Justice group, urged lawmakers to quickly pass the bill:
"People who sexually abuse animals are sometimes linked to sexually abusing children as well, as the accused did in this case," she said. "That's a really good reason parliament needs to act."
Whether or not the bill passes, bestiality has not been legalized in Canada, and it's extremely unlikely that it will ever be.
liberals are enough to make normal, decent, healthy people puke.
So, from the article, it seems like Canada's beastiality, as it currently is, has been on the books since the 1950's - 60+ years. Tell me, how many "normal, decent, healthy" conservatives, when they were the Canadian Prime Ministers and controlled the majority of their Parliment, did absolutely nothing to correct this law either?
-
- Snopes, “Liberal Bias,” and Trusting the Internetblog.skepticallibertarian.com/2013/04/27/snopes-li...Snopes, “Liberal Bias,” and Trusting the Internet. by Eric Hall. A few weeks ago, ... Snopes’Liberal Bias. One claim made both on my post a few weeks ago, ...SNOPES.COM IS Liberal Biased - Facebookwww.facebook.com/pages/SNOPESCOM-IS-Libera...SNOPES.COM IS Liberal Biased. 119 likes · 2 talking about this. FYI please don't useSnopes.com anymore for fact checkingIs snopes.com biased?www.snopes.com › Fact Check › NotesI will never trust your fact-checking site in the future. Your blatant liberal bias is and your disingenuous answers are a travesty to anyone looking for information ...
Liberals love snopes - snopes ARE liberals.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login