Shooting in Orlando Nightclub
-
Yep, read that early. Pretty fucking stupid
About 1 in 5 gay men have HIV and are unaware they have it, sampled in 21 cities.Yep, read that early. Pretty fucking stupid
-
One Post From the Truth said:
It's called..."that's just the way it is." You don't like it go with them.
Let's try again. How would banning Muslims have stopped a bunch of elementary kids from being slaughtered? How would banning Muslims have stopped people being massacred while practicing their faith? Please learn to read.
I'm talking about the war on terrorism silly. There are mass shootings besides Muslim attacks that's not what I'm talking about. Now before you act like I'm dodging a question stay on the topic asshole.Let's try again. How would banning Muslims have stopped a bunch of elementary kids from being slaughtered? How would banning Muslims have stopped people being massacred while practicing their faith? Please learn to read.
-
That dudes a buzz killer man. Good nite
-
One Post From the Truth said:
It's called..."that's just the way it is." You don't like it go with them.
Let's try again. How would banning Muslims have stopped a bunch of elementary kids from being slaughtered? How would banning Muslims have stopped people being massacred while practicing their faith? Please learn to read.
Let's try again. How would banning Muslims have stopped a bunch of elementary kids from being slaughtered? How would banning Muslims have stopped people being massacred while practicing their faith? Please learn to read.
Stop treating this as if it's solely a gun control/mental health issue. You're too intelligent for that.
-
it's really thoughtless. Just really pitiful emotional knee jerkie.
-
Let's try again. How would banning Muslims have stopped a bunch of elementary kids from being slaughtered? How would banning Muslims have stopped people being massacred while practicing their faith? Please learn to read.
Stop treating this as if it's solely a gun control/mental health issue. You're too intelligent for that.
Stop treating this as if it's solely a gun control/mental health issue. You're too intelligent for that.
This goes back my original question though VT, what is the answer? Terrorism exists but so does the stuff I'm talking about. Banning Muslims isn't solving the problem.
One Post From the Truth said:
I'm talking about the war on terrorism silly. There are mass shootings besides Muslim attacks that's not what I'm talking about. Now before you act like I'm dodging a question stay on the topic asshole.
I wasn't and you still dodging my question I've plainly stated twice. You must call a lot of people buzz killers when you can't follow along.
-
About 1 in 5 gay men have HIV and are unaware they have it, sampled in 21 cities.Yep, read that early. Pretty fucking stupid
About 1 in 5 gay men have HIV and are unaware they have it, sampled in 21 cities.
I'll hold you to the same standards I would anyone else... do you have a source?
Not flat out disagreeing, just looking for your source.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
One Post From the Truth said:
It's called..."that's just the way it is." You don't like it go with them.
Let's try again. How would banning Muslims have stopped a bunch of elementary kids from being slaughtered? How would banning Muslims have stopped people being massacred while practicing their faith? Please learn to read.
Let's try again. How would banning Muslims have stopped a bunch of elementary kids from being slaughtered? How would banning Muslims have stopped people being massacred while practicing their faith? Please learn to read.
Let me counter with this question: Would that have occured if the internet weren't providing instant notoriety and fame to the perpetrator? Was his fragile psyche egged on by the information he received that treated people like Harris and Klebold as sort of punisher-like antiheroes?
-
Are guns the whole issue or is part of the issue the attention seeking? After all Mass shootings and killings happened before the internet but they were incredibly rare as opposed to now.
-
God's wrath on the homo's has begun.
God's wrath on the homo's has begun.
Apparently, ISIL agrees with you.
-
Islam has always been a brutal religion filled with murders and killings for all sorts of infractions. But since they embraced the internet during the iraq war the whole thing has amped up to an incredible degree. Why? Because they know they have a captive audience. The whole world is watching their videos and so they are compelled to amp up the savagery
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
From a CDC report in 2010I'll hold you to the same standards I would anyone else... do you have a source?
Not flat out disagreeing, just looking for your source.
http://www.m.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/news/20100923/1-in-5-gay-bi-men-have-hiv-nearly-half-dont-know
To be fair, from the 21 cities where HIV is supposedly at its worst
But they don't deny blood just because they're gay, it's because of the HIV (and hepatitis) risk. Iirc it was a federal regulation until fairly recently
-
That's the link I assumed you were looking at when you first posted (first thing I found while googling).
Three notes:
- It says "1/5 gay men have HIV and nearly half (44%) don't know". Your post implied 1/5 gay men had HIV and didnt know. Really it would be 1/10 have it and don't know
- True, it is where this is at its worst. I wonder how it would change over the entire population (obviously it would go down some)
- I wonder if this has improved at all since 2010
You could also make the case to ban young blacks from donating blood
Is this blood not tested though? I didn't realize they just take my word for it when I go to donate blood. I mean, how hard would it be to lie? I'd have to think there is some additional testing going on.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Islam has always been a brutal religion filled with murders and killings for all sorts of infractions. But since they embraced the internet during the iraq war the whole thing has amped up to an incredible degree. Why? Because they know they have a captive audience. The whole world is watching their videos and so they are compelled to amp up the savagery
Islam has always been a brutal religion filled with murders and killings for all sorts of infractions. But since they embraced the internet during the iraq war the whole thing has amped up to an incredible degree. Why? Because they know they have a captive audience. The whole world is watching their videos and so they are compelled to amp up the savagery
It also gives them a means to incite crazy lone wolves across the world. Some that might snap on there own, but ISIS may be able to push them over the edge and claim credit. Win / win for them really.
-
That's the link I assumed you were looking at when you first posted (first thing I found while googling).
Three notes:
- It says "1/5 gay men have HIV and nearly half (44%) don't know". Your post implied 1/5 gay men had HIV and didnt know. Really it would be 1/10 have it and don't know
- True, it is where this is at its worst. I wonder how it would change over the entire population (obviously it would go down some)
- I wonder if this has improved at all since 2010
You could also make the case to ban young blacks from donating blood
Is this blood not tested though? I didn't realize they just take my word for it when I go to donate blood. I mean, how hard would it be to lie? I'd have to think there is some additional testing going on.
That's the link I assumed you were looking at when you first posted (first thing I found while googling).
Three notes:
- It says "1/5 gay men have HIV and nearly half (44%) don't know". Your post implied 1/5 gay men had HIV and didnt know. Really it would be 1/10 have it and don't know
- True, it is where this is at its worst. I wonder how it would change over the entire population (obviously it would go down some)
- I wonder if this has improved at all since 2010
You could also make the case to ban young blacks from donating blood
Is this blood not tested though? I didn't realize they just take my word for it when I go to donate blood. I mean, how hard would it be to lie? I'd have to think there is some additional testing going on.
That's what I meant, many don't even know.
And they do test all donated blood, but more time and effort to double test false positives and take the time to receive donations from HIV positive people - I guess that's portion of it.
In this case they need blood in a hurry, take it from the lowest risk people possible.
-
Stop treating this as if it's solely a gun control/mental health issue. You're too intelligent for that.
This goes back my original question though VT, what is the answer? Terrorism exists but so does the stuff I'm talking about. Banning Muslims isn't solving the problem.
One Post From the Truth said:
I'm talking about the war on terrorism silly. There are mass shootings besides Muslim attacks that's not what I'm talking about. Now before you act like I'm dodging a question stay on the topic asshole.
I wasn't and you still dodging my question I've plainly stated twice. You must call a lot of people buzz killers when you can't follow along.
This goes back my original question though VT, what is the answer? Terrorism exists but so does the stuff I'm talking about. Banning Muslims isn't solving the problem.
this situation is kind of like condom use. The condom will irritate and inconvenience a bunch of people. The condom won't protect you against herpes or genital warts, but the condom will protect you from syphilis and gonorrhea (which can kill you). Banning Muslims won't solve terrorism, but that will pose a significant barrier for terrorists abroad who would like to come here and kill Americans. I'd much rather force them to try and turn American citizens than to worry about weeding out the good ones from the bad. Why fight a war on two fronts when you have the means to fight it on a single front?
-
-
That's the link I assumed you were looking at when you first posted (first thing I found while googling).
Three notes:
- It says "1/5 gay men have HIV and nearly half (44%) don't know". Your post implied 1/5 gay men had HIV and didnt know. Really it would be 1/10 have it and don't know
- True, it is where this is at its worst. I wonder how it would change over the entire population (obviously it would go down some)
- I wonder if this has improved at all since 2010
You could also make the case to ban young blacks from donating blood
Is this blood not tested though? I didn't realize they just take my word for it when I go to donate blood. I mean, how hard would it be to lie? I'd have to think there is some additional testing going on.
That's what I meant, many don't even know.
And they do test all donated blood, but more time and effort to double test false positives and take the time to receive donations from HIV positive people - I guess that's portion of it.
In this case they need blood in a hurry, take it from the lowest risk people possible.
That's what I meant, many don't even know.
And they do test all donated blood, but more time and effort to double test false positives and take the time to receive donations from HIV positive people - I guess that's portion of it.
In this case they need blood in a hurry, take it from the lowest risk people possible.
So if I'm considered low risk, they don't test it at all? That seems pretty sketchy. I just don't see the point in banning gays from donating. That means they don't test the blood at all, which is an awful idea. If someone wants to donate blood and help out, why turn them away if the blood needs to be tested anyway?
-
That's what I meant, many don't even know.
And they do test all donated blood, but more time and effort to double test false positives and take the time to receive donations from HIV positive people - I guess that's portion of it.
In this case they need blood in a hurry, take it from the lowest risk people possible.
So if I'm considered low risk, they don't test it at all? That seems pretty sketchy. I just don't see the point in banning gays from donating. That means they don't test the blood at all, which is an awful idea. If someone wants to donate blood and help out, why turn them away if the blood needs to be tested anyway?
So if I'm considered low risk, they don't test it at all? That seems pretty sketchy. I just don't see the point in banning gays from donating. That means they don't test the blood at all, which is an awful idea. If someone wants to donate blood and help out, why turn them away if the blood needs to be tested anyway?
No they test, but perhaps they don't test every little sample but they test larger samples.
Maybe taking in a higher risk person (like a gay man) gives you a higher risk of contaminating a larger sample.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login