The Benghazi report
-
Trey Gowdy in some tv news interviews says to read it for ourselves - (800 page report)
and make of it what you will....
well, how Justice John Roberts of you, Mr Gowdy!
effectively telling us like the chief justice did in 2012 on ACA being a tax...
that the Benghazi incident is done - you decide what to do....
-
what I want to read is the 2 hour white house meeting with ALL the players ( during attack)
and how come they dont lift a finger?
Panetta says to deploy troops and gets squashed!
game plan turns into a video instead of the truth, and its totally ignored by the MSM
thug president is campaigning instead of reacting
wont answer questions and now - its just supposed to go away?
-
dont really care that clinton is not the "sole" focus
its more than that -
If Nixon gets the treatment in 73 for far less - what does this say about the current times we live in?
-
I personally treat occupy democrats, the other 98%, slate etc. in the same way as breitbart, blaze and the like. Fact check everything, and if possible, click through to the original source. Usually it's 'this outrageous thing happened, as first reported by WKYNCXZ-Kansas' and you can follow through there to get the original story, minus the overbearing spin.
-
I personally treat occupy democrats, the other 98%, slate etc. in the same way as breitbart, blaze and the like. Fact check everything, and if possible, click through to the original source. Usually it's 'this outrageous thing happened, as first reported by WKYNCXZ-Kansas' and you can follow through there to get the original story, minus the overbearing spin.
I personally treat occupy democrats, the other 98%, slate etc. in the same way as breitbart, blaze and the like. Fact check everything, and if possible, click through to the original source. Usually it's 'this outrageous thing happened, as first reported by WKYNCXZ-Kansas' and you can follow through there to get the original story, minus the overbearing spin.
I do the same thing. I usually follow the rabbit hole back to the original source if possible.
-
It doesn't seem to me that Breitbart is as far outside as Salon or The Blaze but... Just saying that the hard left or hard right Outlets seem to be carrying this story more than what passes for the mainstream.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
It doesn't seem to me that Breitbart is as far outside as Salon or The Blaze but... Just saying that the hard left or hard right Outlets seem to be carrying this story more than what passes for the mainstream.
WSS
It doesn't seem to me that Breitbart is as far outside as Salon or The Blaze but... Just saying that the hard left or hard right Outlets seem to be carrying this story more than what passes for the mainstream.
WSS
Perhaps, but it definitely has a distinctive spin to it that isn't exactly lock-step with occupy democrats or whoever.
It comes down to being intelligent enough to get your news from multiple sources, cross check - if something you read in one of those articles seems outrageous, you're probably being played to some degree.
-
and yet, Chris never reads the news from sources who dare to criticize the bitchy arrogant and dangerous left.
-
and yet, Chris never reads the news from sources who dare to criticize the bitchy arrogant and dangerous left.
-
just giving you my opinion of how you operate as a lefty.
-
So what's with the arbitrary third person?
Regardless. There comes a time when you realise that a 'news' outlet just isn't worth reading any more because they're incapable of presenting the facts in anything remotely close to an unbiased way. The blaze is there, yes, but it's not the only one, and contrary to what you might think, it doesn't just apply to right wing media.
-
-
-
Rep. Peter Roskam (IL-06) released the following statement regarding these findings:
βIn the days and weeks after the attacks, the White House worked to pin all of the blame for their misleading and incorrect statements on officials within the intelligence community, but in reality, political operatives like Ben Rhodes and David Plouffe were spinning the false narrative and prepping Susan Rice for her interviews.β
from the highlights of the new revelations
-
anything gonna happen from this? NO
Because.....
-
lol.
nailed it.
So, Chris, what ARE these totally non-biased news reporting sites you DO read.
(this should be interesting...)
-
-
lol.
nailed it.
So, Chris, what ARE these totally non-biased news reporting sites you DO read.
(this should be interesting...)
lol.
nailed it.
So, Chris, what ARE these totally non-biased news reporting sites you DO read.
(this should be interesting...)
There aren't really any. AP is about as non-spin as it gets but you get very little information. So, as I say, use multiple sources and try and figure it out.
-
Thanks, and it's true. AP isn't biased, and IS very biased, depending
on who is doing the reporting.
Everytime I read or watch anything liberal - it's in full attack mode if it's a rep, and full
support mode when it's a dem.
At least Fox News has hard core liberals on the show for balance.
I despise alan colmes, the ultra kiss ass liberal sissy moron, and several other libs
who auto-defend the dems.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login