Science proves mmgw is a farce
-
http://constitution.com/rigorous-science-proven-man-fossil-fuels-not-cause-climate-change/
Science Proves That Man & Fossil Fuels Are NOT the Cause of Climate ChangeBy Byron Claghorn July 3, 2016The Man-Made Climate Change and Global Warming hypothesis does not even qualify as a theory since these Global Warming Alarmists (GWA) have not been able to prove their case with actual scientific observations following accepted scientific method. Instead the GWA rely on their own man-made computer models based on the shaky Premise and Assumptions that Man’s use of Fossil Fuels produces atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2) that is now causing unlimited and catastrophic warming that will as a result devastate the Earth and its population later in this 21st Century when the CO2 concentration-level reaches or exceeds 600 ppm (parts-per- million).
-
to continue reading the article:
http://constitution.com/rigorous-science-proven-man-fossil-fuels-not-cause-climate-change/
-
A "scientific", incredibly biased article from Constitution.com that doesn't contain a single source for everything they are claiming. Trying to make their readers believe the virtual consensus of experts in the field across the globe missed some things that the author of this article found. That nearly every reputable scientific organization in the world is incorrect about their climate change beliefs.
Post an article that sources something for what it is claiming. One that wouldn't fail a research paper assignment in high school.
-
cal doesnt even beleive this shit anymore woody, its just bait at this point
-
My kingdom to be afflicted with blindness.
-
Woody is talking crap. He didn't find this, how typical.
********************************************
Don’t just take my word for this, you should use the link below to view an excellent and scientifically-based Video by the actual professional Climate & Solar Scientists that analyzed many of the Ice-Core Samples and who have received NASA awards of Excellent for their work on Satellite and Global Temperature measurement as well as other related Climate Research:
&feature=youtu.be" rel="external nofollow">CLICK ON THIS LINK to have expert and honest Climate Scientists amplify and verify the above points!
-
-
ironic - al gores movie didn't have any links in it either...
and the iceberg melting was actually fake, a lot of it was crap.
but you mmgw liberal wonks ate it up.
In other words, Cleve and woody - if you can refute it in any way,
ignore the content and bitch sassy little bitchies about anything
you can find to distract from the content you can't refute.
It's what hard core liberals do.
-
here's a phd telling you, woody, what I've been saying.
Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. Lecture Deconstructs Global Warming Hysteria (High Quality Version)
-
now, watch that video, and go ahead and admit you are willingly being duped by dishonest people
with ulterior motives for trying to convince you of mmgw.
it ....is....bs.
you lose.
-
-
DOUBLE BINGO
-
ironic - al gores movie didn't have any links in it either...
and the iceberg melting was actually fake, a lot of it was crap.
but you mmgw liberal wonks ate it up.
In other words, Cleve and woody - if you can refute it in any way,
ignore the content and bitch sassy little bitchies about anything
you can find to distract from the content you can't refute.
It's what hard core liberals do.
ironic - al gores movie didn't have any links in it either...
and the iceberg melting was actually fake, a lot of it was crap.
but you mmgw liberal wonks ate it up.
In other words, Cleve and woody - if you can refute it in any way,
ignore the content and bitch sassy little bitchies about anything
you can find to distract from the content you can't refute.
It's what hard core liberals do.
I feel like I've said this about 3 dozen times... but I don't give a fuck about Al Gore's movie. Don't base an opinion off of that. Base an opinion off of the mountain of scientific evidence and the virtual consensus of climate scientists that say man made climate change is real...
-
and you did the thing again where you throw shit at the wall and hope something sticks. You follow the science denial playbook to a tee. Now if I don't look at every single post you made and tell you why you're wrong, you'll act like you're right.
Just once, try to only post one thing at a time. Not 14 posts to youtube videos. Not your google search results for "global warming fake". Just one. fucking. thing.
-
Woody is talking crap. He didn't find this, how typical.
********************************************
Don’t just take my word for this, you should use the link below to view an excellent and scientifically-based Video by the actual professional Climate & Solar Scientists that analyzed many of the Ice-Core Samples and who have received NASA awards of Excellent for their work on Satellite and Global Temperature measurement as well as other related Climate Research:
&feature=youtu.be" rel="external nofollow">CLICK ON THIS LINK to have expert and honest Climate Scientists amplify and verify the above points!
Woody is talking crap. He didn't find this, how typical.
********************************************
Don’t just take my word for this, you should use the link below to view an excellent and scientifically-based Video by the actual professional Climate & Solar Scientists that analyzed many of the Ice-Core Samples and who have received NASA awards of Excellent for their work on Satellite and Global Temperature measurement as well as other related Climate Research:
&feature=youtu.be" rel="external nofollow">CLICK ON THIS LINK to have expert and honest Climate Scientists amplify and verify the above points!I'm not watching an hour and 15 minute video called "The Great Global Warming Swindle". From the title alone it looks like it has an agenda to push. Give me a clear, concise, supported with documentation point for why climate change is not real. Not some video that a right wing website of yours told you to watch. Maybe pick something out from the movie.
-
no, woodypeckerhead, you should just tuck your tail feathers between your beak,
and waddle away.
I only posted five, birdbrain. You can't refute one of them. They are experts telling you
that you are wrong.
You've been wrong all along, and if you can't watch five videos I've posted, then
you really are a nasty little bitch, whatever it was Steve mentioned you were.
You are all soaked in Egypt, you are on the wrong side of the issue, and your lies and bitches don't help your case.
You seem to be paranoid that someone else will be watching the videos of EXPERTS, and agree with the EXPERTS.
-
now, watch that video, and go ahead and admit you are willingly being duped by dishonest people
with ulterior motives for trying to convince you of mmgw.
it ....is....bs.
you lose.
now, watch that video, and go ahead and admit you are willingly being duped by dishonest people
with ulterior motives for trying to convince you of mmgw.
it ....is....bs.
you lose.
I'm pretty sure you haven't even watched that video all of the way through Cal. I don't really want to watch an hour long lecture right now. Would you like to pull out a point or two being made, provide some support for them, and then I can respond?
-
bingo.
DOUBLE BINGO
Only to follow it up with a 1.5 hour and 2 hour video. And I know you haven't watch either of these.
Again, give me a point or two here. What is the best point you think is being made in these videos? Post some documentation about it and I'll look it over.
-
no, woodypeckerhead, you should just tuck your tail feathers between your beak,
and waddle away.
I only posted five, birdbrain. You can't refute one of them. They are experts telling you
that you are wrong.
You've been wrong all along, and if you can't watch five videos I've posted, then
you really are a nasty little bitch, whatever it was Steve mentioned you were.
You are all soaked in Egypt, you are on the wrong side of the issue, and your lies and bitches don't help your case.
You seem to be paranoid that someone else will be watching the videos of EXPERTS, and agree with the EXPERTS.
no, woodypeckerhead, you should just tuck your tail feathers between your beak,
and waddle away.
I only posted five, birdbrain. You can't refute one of them. They are experts telling you
that you are wrong.
You've been wrong all along, and if you can't watch five videos I've posted, then
you really are a nasty little bitch, whatever it was Steve mentioned you were.
You are all soaked in Egypt, you are on the wrong side of the issue, and your lies and bitches don't help your case.
You seem to be paranoid that someone else will be watching the videos of EXPERTS, and agree with the EXPERTS.
Cal, you posted about 6 hours of video.... you haven't even watched them yourself.
You seem to have yelled the word experts a lot. Does it not matter then that the vast, vast majority of experts are on the other side of this issue? Does that mean I win? I mean, I can yell "expert" more than you. I'm very certain I could produce more reputable, legitimate scientific organizations that believe man is affecting the climate than you could find that think the opposite.
Hey, thanks for insulting me again. Good to see you've completely failed on that truce. (Go ahead and claim some twisted view of self defense now).
I get it, I am completely wasting my time. You would stop breathing if the right sources told you the liberals wanted you to. You've lost almost all ability to think for yourself and are just a political pawn. I realize nothing I say here will convince your mind. I could try telling you the earth orbits the sun and if The Blaze said otherwise you'd argue with me about it. At the end of the day I guess it is just concerning that there are a lot of people like you, and they all can vote on issues like this. A scientific issue that have become politicized.
So now, I invite you again, post a key point or two from these videos, provide legitimate supporting documentation, and I'll look them over. Not a google search result list. Not 6 hours of video that you haven't even watched.
I assume you won't, and that you'll continue to act like you've won.
-
yes, I watched them. you don't want to, and if you do, you won't admit it.
anything to excuse yourself from being wrong and admitting it.
"too short, too long, not a phd, not a climate scientist, I don't have time, too many
links, I son't read the Blaze, I won't read the Constitution, I won't admit mmgw
is a farce to my last peck on wood."
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login