Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Rule change idea to reward aggressive offense.

Rule change idea to reward aggressive offense.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
59 Posts 23 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hoortaH hoorta

    @d-bone said:

    Shit, just change the rules to 15 on offense and 8 on defense...... That should provide plenty of points and make the game "more exciting" lmao

    In all seriousness- the defenses are hamstrung enough already. Can't hardly touch a quarterback anymore without drawing a flag. Ditto the corners trying to guard receivers.

    If you want to make it harder on the kickers- the next move would be to raise the crossbar up from 10 feet to 12.

    gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 11k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @hoorta said:

    If you want to make it harder on the kickers- the next move would be to raise the crossbar up from 10 feet to 12.

    Karlis would have still missed & Phil Dawson now hates you πŸ˜›

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • SkippinTurtles S Conversation Starter Dedicated First Post Collaborator One Year In Week One Done One Month Later
      • 436 Posts
      • 49 Reputation
      S SkippinTurtles wrote on last edited by
      #17

      What's the point of the "extra point"? Making it harder just created a few more misses. As soon as they line up for the extra point, everyone gets up to take a piss.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

        I just wish they would leave all distances (including PATs) as they have been since my childhood, including widening of current hash marks & then narrow the goalposts. There is no need to play with the basic scoring system. I have seen enough compromising of the basic game. STOP!

        Mike

        BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 5k Posts
        • 306 Reputation
        B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
        #18

        @canton-mike said:

        I just wish they would leave all distances (including PATs) as they have been since my childhood, including widening of current hash marks & then narrow the goalposts. There is no need to play with the basic scoring system. I have seen enough compromising of the basic game. STOP!

        Mike

        The current college standard hash mark distance was the NFL distance until it was changed in 1971. So if you were born in 1965 or earlier those were the hash marks of your childhood.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • miktoxic miktoxicM
          • 13k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
          #19

          make the kickers pick it off the ground and kick/punt it like in australian rules football. lose the holder position and put in a gymnast who has to time a trampoline jump to catch it dive through the goal posts.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

            I just wish they would leave all distances (including PATs) as they have been since my childhood, including widening of current hash marks & then narrow the goalposts. There is no need to play with the basic scoring system. I have seen enough compromising of the basic game. STOP!

            Mike

            Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 9k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
            #20

            @canton-mike said:

            I just wish they would leave all distances (including PATs) as they have been since my childhood, including widening of current hash marks & then narrow the goalposts. There is no need to play with the basic scoring system. I have seen enough compromising of the basic game. STOP!

            Mike

            Agree 100%.

            Perhaps just narrowing the goal posts would've accomplished the objective but I'm not opposed to slapping the kicker again with wider hash's. πŸ™‚

            It might bring the 2 point conversion into play...and the fake extra point.

            BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • One Post One PostO
              • 4k Posts
              • 284 Reputation
              One PostO One Post wrote on last edited by
              #21

              They should make it mandatory that ALL NFL teams have cheerleaders.

              https://www.facebook.com/Mike-Black-Sunday-Stories-1780988822148720/?ref=bookmarks
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • SkippinTurtles S Conversation Starter Dedicated First Post Collaborator One Year In Week One Done One Month Later
                • 436 Posts
                • 49 Reputation
                S SkippinTurtles wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                D BoneD C hoortaH 3 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • S SkippinTurtles

                  Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                  D Bone D BoneD Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 8k Posts
                  • 3k Reputation
                  D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  @skippinturtles said:

                  Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                  Because change isn't needed, and it's almost always not a good thing....... Ask the Vikings if extra points/super short FGs are important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • S SkippinTurtles

                    Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                    calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                    • 64k Posts
                    • 8k Reputation
                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    @skippinturtles said:

                    Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                    it isn't taboo, it's just boring. The football people will tweak the rules when they need tweaked.

                    Change for changes sake is stupid, pointless, and a blight on football.

                    MudflyM 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • C calfoxwc

                      @skippinturtles said:

                      Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                      it isn't taboo, it's just boring. The football people will tweak the rules when they need tweaked.

                      Change for changes sake is stupid, pointless, and a blight on football.

                      Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 7k Posts
                      • 1k Reputation
                      MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      @calfoxwc said:

                      it isn't taboo, it's just boring. The football people will tweak the rules when they need tweaked.

                      Change for changes sake is stupid, pointless, and a blight on football.

                      no doubt.....bent all the rules to increase scoring....created the "passing" era....eliminated the excitement of the kick returns.....and completely pussified the game.....I say enough too.......Id rather have less points and still be allowed to maul the QB and Wr's.....for me, THAT was much more fun to watch than some more passes from pretty QB's to their diva WR's.......

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 7k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        One rule change I would consider.......is trading 2 regular season games for 2 preseason games, giving us a longer reg season and earlier start on meaningful football.....and add 5 men to the roster....

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        πŸ‘
                        Quote Reply
                        • S SkippinTurtles

                          @gftchris said:

                          Another winner.

                          At least name a flaw in my carefully considered proposal. Douche.

                          Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                          • 39k Posts
                          • 9k Reputation
                          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          @skippinturtles said:

                          At least name a flaw in my carefully considered proposal. Douche.

                          Just the part between the words make and checks.

                          WSS

                          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          πŸ‘
                          Quote Reply
                          • MudflyM Mudfly

                            @calfoxwc said:

                            it isn't taboo, it's just boring. The football people will tweak the rules when they need tweaked.

                            Change for changes sake is stupid, pointless, and a blight on football.

                            no doubt.....bent all the rules to increase scoring....created the "passing" era....eliminated the excitement of the kick returns.....and completely pussified the game.....I say enough too.......Id rather have less points and still be allowed to maul the QB and Wr's.....for me, THAT was much more fun to watch than some more passes from pretty QB's to their diva WR's.......

                            BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 5k Posts
                            • 306 Reputation
                            B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            @mudfly said:

                            no doubt.....bent all the rules to increase scoring....created the "passing" era....eliminated the excitement of the kick returns.....and completely pussified the game.....I say enough too.......Id rather have less points and still be allowed to maul the QB and Wr's.....for me, THAT was much more fun to watch than some more passes from pretty QB's to their diva WR's.......

                            Great so now 2nd & 3rd string QBs would be the leaders. That Pitt vs Cincy game was so great last season 😎

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • S SkippinTurtles

                              Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                              hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 20k Posts
                              • 5k Reputation
                              hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              @skippinturtles said:

                              Why is discussing rule changes so taboo to you hicks? They happen every year. Extra points are boring. Period. 3 point conversions would kill the extra point. Can we at least agree the extra point kinda sucks? Do something different.

                              Regarding the extra points- been part of the game forever. They're not going to be boring the end of the year in a snowstorm. If it's not broken, don't try and fix it.

                              With my NBA analogy- should they eliminate free throws? Boring. Make it a dunk competition and have judges award points on artistic merit. You get 10 points if you make a free throw from mid court.

                              @mudfly said:

                              One rule change I would consider.......is trading 2 regular season games for 2 preseason games, giving us a longer reg season and earlier start on meaningful football.....and add 5 men to the roster....

                              Nah Mud- no longer regular season, there's enough injuries as it is. Do you really want guys playing regular season games the end of August in places like Tampa and Miami? BUT- for sure that 4th preseason game is sort of a joke. At least the Browns cut the price on that game we season ticket holders have to buy.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • SkippinTurtles S Conversation Starter Dedicated First Post Collaborator One Year In Week One Done One Month Later
                                • 436 Posts
                                • 49 Reputation
                                S SkippinTurtles wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                The extra point is properly executed 99% of the time. How is that even remotely interesting? If free-throws went in 99% of the time they would get rid of the free-throw line. Every play should at least involve some element of risk. 99%.

                                Canton MikeC hoortaH 2 Replies Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • S SkippinTurtles

                                  The extra point is properly executed 99% of the time. How is that even remotely interesting? If free-throws went in 99% of the time they would get rid of the free-throw line. Every play should at least involve some element of risk. 99%.

                                  Canton Mike Canton MikeC
                                  • 4k Posts
                                  • 2k Reputation
                                  Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @skippinturtles said:

                                  The extra point is properly executed 99% of the time. How is that even remotely interesting? If free-throws went in 99% of the time they would get rid of the free-throw line. Every play should at least involve some element of risk. 99%.

                                  That's exactly why I suggested narrowing the goalposts. That & the high % of long field goals being made. Simply narrow the goal posts & you achieve the desired result WITHOUT compromising the game, which has been done far too often already.

                                  Mike

                                  INΒ DORSEY I TRUST
                                  OrionO 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • SkippinTurtles S Conversation Starter Dedicated First Post Collaborator One Year In Week One Done One Month Later
                                    • 436 Posts
                                    • 49 Reputation
                                    S SkippinTurtles wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    Football is a contact sport. You can't hit kickers. It seems like these china dolls decide 90% of an otherwise awesome sport.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

                                      @skippinturtles said:

                                      The extra point is properly executed 99% of the time. How is that even remotely interesting? If free-throws went in 99% of the time they would get rid of the free-throw line. Every play should at least involve some element of risk. 99%.

                                      That's exactly why I suggested narrowing the goalposts. That & the high % of long field goals being made. Simply narrow the goal posts & you achieve the desired result WITHOUT compromising the game, which has been done far too often already.

                                      Mike

                                      Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 9k Posts
                                      • 4k Reputation
                                      OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @canton-mike said:

                                      That's exactly why I suggested narrowing the goalposts. That & the high % of long field goals being made. Simply narrow the goal posts & you achieve the desired result WITHOUT compromising the game, which has been done far too often already.

                                      Mike

                                      I'll second that. (again)

                                      BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • S SkippinTurtles

                                        The extra point is properly executed 99% of the time. How is that even remotely interesting? If free-throws went in 99% of the time they would get rid of the free-throw line. Every play should at least involve some element of risk. 99%.

                                        hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 20k Posts
                                        • 5k Reputation
                                        hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @skippinturtles said:

                                        The extra point is properly executed 99% of the time. How is that even remotely interesting? If free-throws went in 99% of the time they would get rid of the free-throw line. Every play should at least involve some element of risk. 99%.

                                        Wrong. Last year it was around 95%- and the NFL may make it harder yet. As Mike suggested, narrow the goalposts- and move 'em back another 5 yards.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • hoortaH hoorta

                                          @kvozel said:

                                          I like that hoorta. Maybe even narrow the posts.

                                          πŸ™‚ They've been narrowed once already Keith. Make 'em like Arena League goalposts. (Not just yet)

                                          That's my one complaint about the NBA- they've never raised the baskets. Fans love those power dunks. It's just gotten too easy for the pros. Mutumbo could about dunk not even jumping. We used to play in a grade school gym where you could crank the baskets down to 8'. It's no challenge dribbling till you fake your defender out for an easy slam.

                                          Taco918 T
                                          • 1k Posts
                                          • 94 Reputation
                                          T Taco918 wrote on last edited by
                                          #35

                                          @hoorta said:

                                          πŸ™‚ They've been narrowed once already Keith. Make 'em like Arena League goalposts. (Not just yet)

                                          That's my one complaint about the NBA- they've never raised the baskets. Fans love those power dunks. It's just gotten too easy for the pros. Mutumbo could about dunk not even jumping. We used to play in a grade school gym where you could crank the baskets down to 8'. It's no challenge dribbling till you fake your defender out for an easy slam.

                                          The reason they aren't raising the basket, is both entertainment and records wise. If you don't want to see dunks and are only concerned with solid fundamentals, go watch the WNBA. I heard tickets are real cheap. As far as records go, you have decades of records which would basically be nullified due to changing that rule, much like changing the scoring in the NFL, switching to metal bats in baseball, or removing the goalie in hockey or soccer.

                                          Wilt scored 100? Nope that doesn't mean shit anymore because the hoop was only 10 foot. Peyton threw 55 TDs? Who cares, Andy Douche Bag only had to throw 5 TD'S to equal Peyton's scoring output.

                                          If y'all dumb dumbs want to change the scoring or any other nonsense go right ahead. I'm going to spend my time watching Westbrook try to tear the fucking rim off the backboard 15 times a night while working on making Oscar Roberson's 61-62 season seem like child's play.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate