More tyranny by ObaMao's fascist left/liberal brownshirt subculture
-
I am guessing there are either some very serious speech to text problems going on here or that English is not Howard's first language.
WSS
-
I suspect google translate.
-
I don't deny that Hillary and Obama are fucked up, and that the left has always exploited minority voters by promising them stuff (Azealia Banks said it perfect, when someone asked her "What will Trump do for blacks?" and she responded "The question should be - what are we going to do for ourselves under Donald Trump?")
Not that the right is innocent either - they rape working class Americans in plenty of different ways like driving to bust unions and drive wages down, cut benefits for the corporate fat cats who offer employees health care - while simultaneously cutting the social programs that offer such services.
But my main point here is I think you should expand your horizons a bit - it seems like you only get your news from The Blaze and from Ammoland, I think you should broaden your perspective a bit.
I would not click a link... weirdest spam I've seen this side of a typical post by cal...
Reported for removal by mods... the HowardKi post... not cal...
I'd miss my lil bitch too much.
But my main point here is I think you should expand your horizons a bit - it seems like you only get your news from The Blaze and from Ammoland, I think you should broaden your perspective a bit.
Almost made a dent, bb... good effort...
-
What howard link? Maybe I included a bad one and it's deleted, but I checked the links
I posted, they work fine....
?
-
I see, you ran to the mods. But if I posted a spam post, it was by accident.
not intentional.
-
-
cal... please read carefully...
Unless you created an alt account under the name "HowardK" and made a few posts of the same stuff with some copy/paste rambling about the Ukraine with three links to chinese wives you have nothing to worry about...
Then again the posting style if not the content was similar to yours...
Was there an ad or a link?
Three, Steve... all embedded under some variation of "chinese wives" inserted in random spots of completely unrelated text.
-
cal... please read carefully...
Unless you created an alt account under the name "HowardK" and made a few posts of the same stuff with some copy/paste rambling about the Ukraine with three links to chinese wives you have nothing to worry about...
Then again the posting style if not the content was similar to yours...
Was there an ad or a link?
Three, Steve... all embedded under some variation of "chinese wives" inserted in random spots of completely unrelated text.
cal... please read carefully...
Unless you created an alt account under the name "HowardK" and made a few posts of the same stuff with some copy/paste rambling about the Ukraine with three links to chinese wives you have nothing to worry about...
Then again the posting style if not the content was similar to yours...
Three, Steve... all embedded under some variation of "chinese wives" inserted in random spots of completely unrelated text.
Well damn sorry I missed that! Were they cute?
WSS
-
I saw it ..it was just rambling spam nonsense.
-
cal... please read carefully...
Unless you created an alt account under the name "HowardK" and made a few posts of the same stuff with some copy/paste rambling about the Ukraine with three links to chinese wives you have nothing to worry about...
Then again the posting style if not the content was similar to yours...
Three, Steve... all embedded under some variation of "chinese wives" inserted in random spots of completely unrelated text.
Well damn sorry I missed that! Were they cute?
WSS
Well damn sorry I missed that! Were they cute?
I'll never know... went nowhere near the links.
-
ah. I thought it was in reference to my post, and maybe I pasted something bad into it.
"never mind"
-
you should try it. That mistake was real, not like the conjured up non-existent "offense" you conjured up.
-
I still think you're just po'd that you were proven completely wrong on some subject.
You've gone all heckish. That's not good.
-
In short, the Carter defense budget rejects the most important premise about the character of the military threat facing the United States adopting instead a military posture which reflects the hope that some early agreement can be found that would elim inate the need to improve the capability of U.S. forces to the point where they would offset the increments added to Soviet military power since the late 1960s. To date, there is no evidence that such a posture would be successful Commitments made by Inde e d, because the Soviet Union's leadership does not share the world view of the American leadership, there is a possibility that the cuts in American defense capability initiated by the Carter Administration 7 could be misinterpreted by the Soviet Union as a lack of resolve.Should the Soviet leadership assimilate such a perspective, the pros peetsZ for increased tension and clashes of interest with the Soviet U1iio.n become greater rather than less, a result directly opposed to the one sought by the Carter defense posture in the first place.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login