Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Lord help us

Lord help us

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
37 Posts 8 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • choco chocoC
    • 4k Posts
    • 352 Reputation
    chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
    #27

    this global warming shyte is getting kinda funny now......

    do you even have jobs? i have to wonder.....

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
      • 64k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
      #28

      I suppose that Obama's "civilain defense corps" would be in charge of monitoring energy use.

      You won't believe the people wanting to hoard firewood and food and bottled water...

      I take it that Heck wants to be in Obama's cdc. Informants on who turns their lights on after

      lights off curfew, who drives too big a car,...

      but that's silly.

      Till something like it happens. Meanwhile, Heck will be trying to act like Mr. Objective Know-it-all.

      Which means, full of cowpie.

      Moo.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • H heckofajobbrownie

        How do you know? You don't even know what it is.

        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
        • 39k Posts
        • 9k Reputation
        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
        #29

        @heckofajobbrownie said:

        How do you know? You don't even know what it is.

        Is that really all you've got Heck?

        You're too big a puss to sxeriously contradict my admittely bullshit solutions but cripe.

        And all you give in defense of YOUR bullshit is a sneering "Well you just aren't smart enough to know how it will save the world. I, sir, am a personal friend of Barbara Boxer!!"

        OK tell me the big difference between your panacea and MY plan to issue every drive a certain amount of mileage credits needed for work and basics and perhaps a limited amount of leisure.

        Lets say some rich asshole wants to drive his Lexus SUV to a global warming soiree in Asoen.

        No sweat he can buy more miles from the poor bastard across the tracks thgat can't afford to go to Aspen anyway.

        He goes over the amount he can strongarm people out of?

        Big deal.

        He can still pay the fine. Or hey!! I bet some lefty senator can sell me some huh!!

        (which anyone with a brain can see is a tax)

        But he ain't riding a bike.

        WSS

        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • heckofajobbrownie H
          • 6k Posts
          • 47 Reputation
          H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by
          #30

          "You're too big a puss to sxeriously contradict my admittely bullshit solutions but cripe."

          This is bizarre. You're admitting that your solution isn't serious, then attacking me as a "puss" for ignoring it? And by ignoring it, you mean engaging you for months on end, much to my own dismay. Got it.

          And then you're surprised and stunned that I find your dismissals of cap and trade plans to be meaningless since you haven't yet (over the course of two years) shown any evidence that you know anything about them. Or as you might put it, Generally, people should know what they're talking about when discussing an issue, no? Yes or no?

          Here's a small problem with your admittedly stupid plan - emissions from cars only count for something like 35%-40% of greenhouse gas emissions.

          Here's another small problem - while you gripe about burdening people with taxes, your system is essentially a poorly designed tax on gasoline consumption that requires lots of government monitoring of how much an individual travels.

          But again, you did get to make a crack about me, Barbara Boxer, rich liberals, and lefty senators. And isn't that what it's all about?

          W 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • H heckofajobbrownie

            "You're too big a puss to sxeriously contradict my admittely bullshit solutions but cripe."

            This is bizarre. You're admitting that your solution isn't serious, then attacking me as a "puss" for ignoring it? And by ignoring it, you mean engaging you for months on end, much to my own dismay. Got it.

            And then you're surprised and stunned that I find your dismissals of cap and trade plans to be meaningless since you haven't yet (over the course of two years) shown any evidence that you know anything about them. Or as you might put it, Generally, people should know what they're talking about when discussing an issue, no? Yes or no?

            Here's a small problem with your admittedly stupid plan - emissions from cars only count for something like 35%-40% of greenhouse gas emissions.

            Here's another small problem - while you gripe about burdening people with taxes, your system is essentially a poorly designed tax on gasoline consumption that requires lots of government monitoring of how much an individual travels.

            But again, you did get to make a crack about me, Barbara Boxer, rich liberals, and lefty senators. And isn't that what it's all about?

            Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
            • 39k Posts
            • 9k Reputation
            W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
            #31

            @heckofajobbrownie said:

            "You're too big a puss to sxeriously contradict my admittely bullshit solutions but cripe."

            This is bizarre. You're admitting that your solution isn't serious, then attacking me as a "puss" for ignoring it? And by ignoring it, you mean engaging you for months on end, much to my own dismay. Got it.

            Oh honey c'mon don't weasel out.

            Sure my proposals are bullshit.

            But they would do more toward the problem (the problem you state) than yours.

            They're bullshit because nobody really gives a rats ass about global warming.

            They just want the issue to cry about for months on end.

            And then you're surprised and stunned that I find your dismissals of cap and trade plans to be meaningless since you haven't yet (over the course of two years) shown any evidence that you know anything about them. Or as you might put it, Generally, people should know what they're talking about when discussing an issue, no? Yes or no?

            Uh so weren't you gonna tell me the huge difference between my stupid plan to sell mileage credits? Looks exactly like Cap and Trade doesn't it? Yes or No? Hey what if I call 'em CARBON credits?

            Did you read it or just barking at me? {as I siuspect} BTW it's called cap and trade because it's real name, energy tax sounds too honest

            Here's a small problem with your admittedly stupid plan - emissions from cars only count for something like 35%-40% of greenhouse gas emissions.

            Oh well, 40 % is hardly worth bothering with. And remember it's part of my comprehensive "save the world" plan.

            Here's another small problem - while you gripe about burdening people with taxes, your system is essentially a poorly designed tax on gasoline consumption that requires lots of government monitoring of how much an individual travels.

            But again, you did get to make a crack about me, Barbara Boxer, rich liberals, and lefty senators. And isn't that what it's all about?

            Partially.

            Part of it is about you not being able to defend a policy even stupider than my facetious ones.

            And as you dodge the truth you got in some "well you're stupid" retorts.

            We should sell you snotty insult credits.

            WSS

            www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • heckofajobbrownie H
              • 6k Posts
              • 47 Reputation
              H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by heckofajobbrownie
              #32

              Steve, if you wanted to put a tax on gasoline, why would you devise some massive scheme to monitor how far people drive and then devise some system that allows them to buy credits to drive further than the government allows? Why not just ...tax gasoline?

              Also, it doesn't matter how far you drive; it's how much gasoline you use. If two cars go 50 miles, and one uses one gallon while another uses three gallons, why would you tax them the same?

              As for defending cap and trade and carbon taxes, give me a break. I've probably written 100 pages worth in here over the years, usually in conversations with Tupa. And you think global warming is a hoax anyway, so why would you care? Obviously someone like you has the ability to sort through all the science and determine that the science is bunk. So why are we even having this discussion?

              As for snotty insults, how would you like me to tell you that you don't know what you're talking about? Sorry I'm not sweeter. It's not my thing.

              W 2 Replies Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • H heckofajobbrownie

                Steve, if you wanted to put a tax on gasoline, why would you devise some massive scheme to monitor how far people drive and then devise some system that allows them to buy credits to drive further than the government allows? Why not just ...tax gasoline?

                Also, it doesn't matter how far you drive; it's how much gasoline you use. If two cars go 50 miles, and one uses one gallon while another uses three gallons, why would you tax them the same?

                As for defending cap and trade and carbon taxes, give me a break. I've probably written 100 pages worth in here over the years, usually in conversations with Tupa. And you think global warming is a hoax anyway, so why would you care? Obviously someone like you has the ability to sort through all the science and determine that the science is bunk. So why are we even having this discussion?

                As for snotty insults, how would you like me to tell you that you don't know what you're talking about? Sorry I'm not sweeter. It's not my thing.

                Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                • 39k Posts
                • 9k Reputation
                W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
                #33

                @heckofajobbrownie said:

                Steve, if you wanted to put a tax on gasoline, why would you devise some massive scheme to monitor how far people drive and then devise some system that allows them to buy credits to drive further than the government allows? Why not just ...tax gasoline?

                Also, it doesn't matter how far you drive; it's how much gasoline you use. If two cars go 50 miles, and one uses one gallon while another uses three gallons, why would you tax them the same?

                As for defending cap and trade and carbon taxes, give me a break. I've probably written 100 pages worth in here over the years, usually in conversations with Tupa. And you think global warming is a hoax anyway, so why would you care? Obviously someone like you has the ability to sort through all the science and determine that the science is bunk. So why are we even having this discussion?

                As for snotty insults, how would you like me to tell you that you don't know what you're talking about? Sorry I'm not sweeter. It's not my thing.

                Quit dancing around the issue.

                I said issue mileage credits.

                You need more you must buy them from someone who uses less OR the government.

                Call 'em carbon credits and say US businesses instead of drivers.

                Same fu*ing thing.

                Matter of fact I used your dipshit cap and trade boondoggle as a framework just to hear you yap.

                Post the same bullshit until hell freezes over and it doesn't make it a good or even a workable plan.

                And I say you're stupid if you think China or India are gonna cripple their economies with it.

                No matter how much the world loves Obama.

                Seriously. They'll praise the empty suit UNTIL it's time for them to put up.

                See worldwide cap and trade hurts the US and benefits them. No wonder Europe is up for it.

                And I don't think it will have any effect on global warming or at least a tiny bit compared to the damage it causes.

                And I think society will move better toward the natural change to different and new sources of energy without the whitehouse's tax.

                I own a flat screen TV, cell phone, a CD and MP3 player , a GPS and digital recording software.

                Why?

                Because they work beter than the old shit.

                Not because Obammy forced me to at gunpoint.

                WSS

                www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • heckofajobbrownie H
                  • 6k Posts
                  • 47 Reputation
                  H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  Okay, Steve.

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • H heckofajobbrownie

                    Okay, Steve.

                    Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                    • 39k Posts
                    • 9k Reputation
                    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    @heckofajobbrownie said:

                    Okay, Steve.

                    IOW

                    Nothing I can see as actually wrong but I hate you.

                    Thanks Heck.

                    WSS

                    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                      • 64k Posts
                      • 8k Reputation
                      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      Don't worry about it, Steve - Heck hates everybody who isn't... him. 😠

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • H heckofajobbrownie

                        Steve, if you wanted to put a tax on gasoline, why would you devise some massive scheme to monitor how far people drive and then devise some system that allows them to buy credits to drive further than the government allows? Why not just ...tax gasoline?

                        Also, it doesn't matter how far you drive; it's how much gasoline you use. If two cars go 50 miles, and one uses one gallon while another uses three gallons, why would you tax them the same?

                        As for defending cap and trade and carbon taxes, give me a break. I've probably written 100 pages worth in here over the years, usually in conversations with Tupa. And you think global warming is a hoax anyway, so why would you care? Obviously someone like you has the ability to sort through all the science and determine that the science is bunk. So why are we even having this discussion?

                        As for snotty insults, how would you like me to tell you that you don't know what you're talking about? Sorry I'm not sweeter. It's not my thing.

                        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                        • 39k Posts
                        • 9k Reputation
                        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
                        #37

                        @heckofajobbrownie said:

                        Steve, if you wanted to put a tax on gasoline, why would you devise some massive scheme to monitor how far people drive and then devise some system that allows them to buy credits to drive further than the government allows? Why not just ...tax gasoline?

                        I'll pretend that's serious.

                        Because Heck, it only targets those who drive wastefully not those who just use what they need.

                        and so frugal drivers can profit from selling their unused credits.

                        Plus it encourages the Lexus SUV owner to switch to a more fuel efficient car. Doubling the price of gas won't slow down a fellow making 100k but one pulling down 30?

                        Plus you take a bite out of unemployment hiring people to man the monitorint stations.

                        What's the downside?

                        WSS

                        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate