Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. FBI: Hillary didn’t just delete her emails, she BLEACHED them

FBI: Hillary didn’t just delete her emails, she BLEACHED them

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
17 Posts 6 Posters 754 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
    • 11k Posts
    • 3k Reputation
    OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
    #2

    Company Hillary Used To Wipe Servers Brags About Stifling Investigation

    BleachBit, the service that House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy said Hillary Clinton used to delete emails from her personal server, bragged Friday about its success.

    The open source cleaning software published a post titled “BleachBit stifles investigation of Hillary Clinton.”

    “She and her lawyers had those emails deleted. And they didn’t just push the delete button; they had them deleted where even God can’t read them. They were using something called BleachBit. You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails or bridesmaids emails. When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see,” Gowdy said on Fox News.

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/26/company-hillary-used-to-wipe-servers-brags-about-stifling-investigation/

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 9k Posts
      • 1k Reputation
      bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by bbedward
      #3

      Like, with Clorox or something?

      OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • bbedwardB bbedward

        Like, with Clorox or something?

        OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
        • 11k Posts
        • 3k Reputation
        OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
        #4

        @bbedward said:

        Like, with Clorox or something?

        Yeah she acted so clueless about wiping out those emails but the lengths she went to to make sure they were never recovered was this extreme and yet the FBI director said "there was no intent" on Clinton's part to hide evidence ...unbelievable

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
          • 64k Posts
          • 8k Reputation
          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
          #5

          obamao has put his cronies into every aspect of control over all depts.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
            • 39k Posts
            • 9k Reputation
            W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Is there anyone here, even the lefties even Hillary supporters, that truly believes there is no quid pro quo among the missing emails and that they weren't destroyed to cover that up? Anybody? Really?

            WSS

            www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
            bbedwardB 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • W Westside Steve

              Is there anyone here, even the lefties even Hillary supporters, that truly believes there is no quid pro quo among the missing emails and that they weren't destroyed to cover that up? Anybody? Really?

              WSS

              bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 9k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @westside-steve said:

              Is there anyone here, even the lefties even Hillary supporters, that truly believes there is no quid pro quo among the missing emails and that they weren't destroyed to cover that up? Anybody? Really?

              WSS

              9Fa2dP.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                • 64k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                #8

                jblu wishes he was the blue ball in the pics.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 9k Posts
                  • 1k Reputation
                  bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by bbedward
                  #9

                  Can somebody please give me the Clinton defense for this one.

                  http://time.com/4472874/hillary-clinton-email-server-benghazi/?xid=tcoshare

                  Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta Tuesday that an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton to the State Department.

                  --

                  I'm just wondering, she deleted emails regarding a terrorist attack on a US embassy (Who knows what else she deleted TBH fam). But didn't just delete, used professional software that prevents any form of recovery (writing all bits as random 1s and 0s). No intent? We have 100% proof that all of the e-mails she deleted were NOT related to yoga and Chelsea's wedding - despite that's what she said (I mean, every other word she says is a lie so what amiright)

                  So many questions, I need Tour to come and answer them.

                  I mean I'd consider stuff related to Benghazi work-related.

                  IANAL either but let me pose a question

                  Say a child-porno horder freak is being investigated by the FBI. The FBI obtains a warrant for said freak's computer.

                  What happens if the freak uses commercial software to randomly write every bit of the entire hard drive (erase everything in a way that makes forensic recovery impossible) or maybe doesn't wipe the whole thing but only wipes the illegal shit and writes random bits after the EOFs and over free space - before they have a chance to serve the warrant and recover his computer (in Clintons case, she had plenty of time before turning the servers over to the FBI of course)

                  I mean, is that just ok or what's the deal with that? Seems like that's the same thing the Clintons did.

                  Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                    • 64k Posts
                    • 8k Reputation
                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Tour translation:

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • bbedwardB bbedward

                      Can somebody please give me the Clinton defense for this one.

                      http://time.com/4472874/hillary-clinton-email-server-benghazi/?xid=tcoshare

                      Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta Tuesday that an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton to the State Department.

                      --

                      I'm just wondering, she deleted emails regarding a terrorist attack on a US embassy (Who knows what else she deleted TBH fam). But didn't just delete, used professional software that prevents any form of recovery (writing all bits as random 1s and 0s). No intent? We have 100% proof that all of the e-mails she deleted were NOT related to yoga and Chelsea's wedding - despite that's what she said (I mean, every other word she says is a lie so what amiright)

                      So many questions, I need Tour to come and answer them.

                      I mean I'd consider stuff related to Benghazi work-related.

                      IANAL either but let me pose a question

                      Say a child-porno horder freak is being investigated by the FBI. The FBI obtains a warrant for said freak's computer.

                      What happens if the freak uses commercial software to randomly write every bit of the entire hard drive (erase everything in a way that makes forensic recovery impossible) or maybe doesn't wipe the whole thing but only wipes the illegal shit and writes random bits after the EOFs and over free space - before they have a chance to serve the warrant and recover his computer (in Clintons case, she had plenty of time before turning the servers over to the FBI of course)

                      I mean, is that just ok or what's the deal with that? Seems like that's the same thing the Clintons did.

                      Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                      • 30k Posts
                      • 6k Reputation
                      Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Gotta love The Donald's naiveté... dumping "chemicals" on her e-mails... lol...

                      @bbedward said:

                      So many questions, I need Tour to come and answer them.

                      You rang?

                      First... Time is apparently going to have to turn in their MSM credentials.

                      Second... how do "These emails were not previously provided by Clinton to the State Department" and "an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton," fit in the same article?

                      Third... best I understand it, so far the thing tying these emails to "Bengazi" is the date stamp on them.

                      Sorry, bb... can't do any better right now due to lack of data. A restraint cal and others are not subject to...

                      "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                        • 64k Posts
                        • 8k Reputation
                        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
                        #12
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 9k Posts
                          • 1k Reputation
                          bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          http://nypost.com/2016/08/31/clinton-emailed-classified-information-after-leaving-state-dept/

                          Hillary emailed classified information after leaving the state department

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                            • 30k Posts
                            • 6k Reputation
                            Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Retroactively classified...

                            Was the case with some earlier emails as well...

                            "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 9k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by bbedward
                              #15

                              The latest classified email disclosure is a joke. The document is so chockablock with classified information — meaning it is so thoroughly redacted — that the State Department might just as well have issued a blank page.

                              Officials with security clearances know the categories of information that are classified pursuant to an executive order — whether they’re “marked” as such or not. Clinton not only knew the rules, she was in charge of enforcing them throughout her department.

                              But it was retroactively marked! She's too stupid to understand what material is sensitive and isn't sensitive! Why can't you just understand !?!?!?!

                              It's her turn dammit!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 9k Posts
                                • 1k Reputation
                                bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Hillary ready to go to war with Russia because they hacked the DNC

                                p6ub7biyxzix.png

                                LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • bbedwardB bbedward

                                  Hillary ready to go to war with Russia because they hacked the DNC

                                  p6ub7biyxzix.png

                                  LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 10k Posts
                                  • 2k Reputation
                                  LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @bbedward said:

                                  Hillary ready to go to war with Russia because they hacked the DNC

                                  p6ub7biyxzix.png

                                  She is a hawk of the dumbest kind.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  Theme
                                  • System
                                  • Light
                                  • Dark
                                  The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                  The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Forums
                                  • Recent
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Donate