Worst Election Ever
-
Interesting that no one ever had any complaints about Trump until now.
:neutral_face: -
Corrupt Media:
Michael Issikoff says NBC is sitting on devastating tape of Juanita Broaddrick
The NBC subsidiary of Comcast is reportedly combing its archives for material damaging to Donald Trump but ignoring requests to air the full interview with Juanita Broaddrick by Lisa Myers 17 years ago.
According to Brent Schur of the Free Beacon:
The reporter that first learned about Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky said on Thursday that NBC is sitting on the full tape of its initial interview with Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick and should release it before the election.Michael Isikoff, who was a leading reporter during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, said in a Thursday discussion that NBC should release a 17-year-old tape of an interview that it conducted with Broaddrick. Broaddrick has long claimed that the interview that NBC aired edited out her claim that Hillary Clinton was involved in quashing Broaddrick’s rape claims.“NBC has the full tape of the original Lisa Myers interview,” Isikoff said during an online discussion on. “NBC ought to check its archive and run the full interview. (AS long as they’re now culling their archives!)”The network previously ran the tape but edited out material that was damaging to Hillary. This conspiracy has some history to it.
“Folks have made much of the fact that her claim about the conversation she had with Hillary wasn’t in the interview that run,” Isikoff said. “Broaddrick said it got cut out; Lisa Myers has since agreed Broaddrick said this then—and NBC chose to cut it out.”NBC has never released an unedited version of its interview with Broaddrick.Both NBC and theWashington Post “closely vetted” Broaddrick’s claims at the time and chose to run with stories on her claims, Isikoff said.If we believe that the cover-up is always worse than the crime (which has been media gospel since Watergate, regarded as the high point of American journalism by most journalists themselves), then Hillary’s suspected intimidation of a woman raped by her husband in order to keep her silent surely outweighs any of the accusations of boorishness lobbed at Donald Trump.
This time, there is tape. Tape is what made the difference in focusing public attention on Trump's alleged misbehavior.
Maybe it is time for the torches and pitchforks to start parading in front of 30 Rock.
-
-
People have come out and said the groping stories are false. And the airplane one is bullshit.
Frankly it's the biggest most clintonian smear campaign ever, but it's working unfortunately.
-
-
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
If Trump loses the worst part is that the Ted Cruz 2.0 could actually beat Hillary in 2020
-
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
Trump ran one of the worst presidential campaigns I have seen. He never really sought out to get a ground game which is a must. He constantly was attacking other republicans instead of Clinton. He did dumb things on twitter with unnecessary fights nobody cared about but made Trump look more like the reality tv star he was versus a serious presidential candidate. Newt Gingrich had the best perspective on Trump when he said there was a little Trump and a big Trump....there is too much little Trump which can only be controlled when he is reading a prepared speech from a teleprompter.
Forget 2020... Cruz would have won in 2016. Trump might have been the only candidate Clinton could beat. The democrats were praying for Trump to win the nomination. Any republican candidate would be up against a biased liberal media but Trump gave them an over abundance of ammunition.
-
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
Not really. We will blame it on a few things. First of all like Cysko said he's been something of a loose cannon. Nothing that should disqualify him from office but sex cells and the idiots on the left realize that period number two is that the stunningly dishonest behavior of Hillary Clinton gets almost no mention. The Wikileaks stories get fifteen or twenty seconds while the fake stories about grouping somebody get two minutes on the news.The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
You and I probably agree that America is not all that conservative especially in the area of social issues and some of the candidates cling to those a little too strongly in my opinion. One reason I actually like Donald Trump. Fiscally conservative lower taxes smaller government and not giving a fuck where your dick goes is fine with me.
WSS
-
Blaming the media instead of the guy that lofted them bp balls every week. Sounds about right coming from republicans. I dont know how many times it has to be said but trump could have sealed this election months ago by shutting his pie hole and/or acting like a normal human being you'd be confortable letting your young daughters be around him. I just cant help but think.....http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/09/09-donald-trump-bill-clinton-6.w710.h473.2x.jpg
-
Some real bff's right there
-
Btw is that melanoma without makeup in that last pic??
-
Trump had a stretch of about 2 weeks in this campaign where he stayed on polices, read from a teleprompter and seemed to be listening to his advisers and staying off twitter. He made a rise in the polls when he did. His problem has always been lack of discipline and not listening to his advisers which continues to present:
Trump in NC: I Don’t Grope Ugly Chicks
We’re less than a month away from the general election and Donald Trump (little Trump) is still blowing off the advice of his advisers to do and say whatever he wants.
In Greensboro, North Carolina on Friday, Trump did the typical Trump thing: Acted like a jackass and suggested that the women who have come forward recently to say he’d touched them inappropriately were too unattractive for him to molest.
Yes. When you're charged with something this serious, the best thing to do is further insult the women as proof of your innocence.
Trump admitted during the rally that his advisers wanted him to ignore his accusers and focus on policy, but of course, taking sound advice and giving the impression that he’s anything more than a novelty candidate who somehow made it further than anybody ever expected him to would not be who he is.
He's right about one thing. The media has given Hillary Clinton and the leaked emails an almost complete pass. That, however, is not a new thing. For many years, an admittedly left-leaning media has favored liberals and has acted as cover for them during some pretty heavy scandals.
A more seasoned politician would know this, which highlights the reason for Republicans to keep their backgrounds as scandal-free as possible.
In the past, you could count on Republican voters to nominate candidates who, at least outwardly, adhered to relatively up-and-up standards, and lived a life that reflected a responsible citizen, with good values.
This year, they nominated a scandal-machine with no experience, no decency, no common sense, and no ability to even fake it.
Great job, America.
http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/10/15/trump-nc-dont-grope-ugly-chicks/
-
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
If Trump loses the worst part is that the Ted Cruz 2.0 could actually beat Hillary in 2020
If Trump loses the worst part is that the Ted Cruz 2.0 could actually beat Hillary in 2020
God I'd hope they'd have someone else ready to go for the Dems in 2020
...oh... uh... I mean I love Hillary! I hope she's the president forever! Or whatever the fuck half of you idiots think I said.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Interesting that no one ever had any complaints about Trump until now.
Interesting that no one ever had any complaints about Trump until now.
Does that include the 1996 lawsuit Trump settled stemming from an alleged groping encounter in '92?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/04/16/trump/P6jVWXAzaG12Ou5dPXYCDL/story.html
This passage from Trump's '96 deposition refuting testimony about comments he was said to have made during a limo ride caught my eye:
“I never made that statement, I never would make that statement,” Trump said. “Why would I make a statement like that? I have more respect for women than anybody.”
Twenty years and counting and the same claim...
-
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
Trump ran one of the worst presidential campaigns I have seen. He never really sought out to get a ground game which is a must. He constantly was attacking other republicans instead of Clinton. He did dumb things on twitter with unnecessary fights nobody cared about but made Trump look more like the reality tv star he was versus a serious presidential candidate. Newt Gingrich had the best perspective on Trump when he said there was a little Trump and a big Trump....there is too much little Trump which can only be controlled when he is reading a prepared speech from a teleprompter.
Forget 2020... Cruz would have won in 2016. Trump might have been the only candidate Clinton could beat. The democrats were praying for Trump to win the nomination. Any republican candidate would be up against a biased liberal media but Trump gave them an over abundance of ammunition.
Trump ran one of the worst presidential campaigns I have seen. He never really sought out to get a ground game which is a must. He constantly was attacking other republicans instead of Clinton. He did dumb things on twitter with unnecessary fights nobody cared about but made Trump look more like the reality tv star he was versus a serious presidential candidate. Newt Gingrich had the best perspective on Trump when he said there was a little Trump and a big Trump....there is too much little Trump which can only be controlled when he is reading a prepared speech from a teleprompter.
Forget 2020... Cruz would have won in 2016. Trump might have been the only candidate Clinton could beat. The democrats were praying for Trump to win the nomination. Any republican candidate would be up against a biased liberal media but Trump gave them an over abundance of ammunition.
I don't know if Cruz could have won. I know you won't get this, be the heavy Jesus vibes turn a lot of people off. A lot of the supporters Trump have now are there for him, not conservatism. But Clinton would still be the opponent and she would still be trash, so who knows.
-
I love "scandal machine", so well done. Not as much as malignant clown though, that one came from a republican senator
-
Blaming the media instead of the guy that lofted them bp balls every week. Sounds about right coming from republicans. I dont know how many times it has to be said but trump could have sealed this election months ago by shutting his pie hole and/or acting like a normal human being you'd be confortable letting your young daughters be around him. I just cant help but think.....http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/09/09-donald-trump-bill-clinton-6.w710.h473.2x.jpg
Blaming the media instead of the guy that lofted them bp balls every week. Sounds about right coming from republicans. I dont know how many times it has to be said but trump could have sealed this election months ago by shutting his pie hole and/or acting like a normal human being you'd be confortable letting your young daughters be around him. I just cant help but think.....http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/09/09-donald-trump-bill-clinton-6.w710.h473.2x.jpg
Take the time to embed your pictures please
-
Im not sure cruz could have won but it would be close. I abs think kadich or paul would be destroying her right now. Paul especially would have tore her up on econ. Not just "gyyynnnaa's beating us". Fucking assclown i could bury that muppet in a debate
-
Bush would be destroying her too
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login