Worst Election Ever
-
Arent u taking up precious VA funds that would be better served going to guys that actually saw rounds come their way?
Civilians should be seen and not heard fat boy.
Civilians should be seen and not heard fat boy.
Dude, you're not that different from a civilian at all: the only difference between you and a civilian worker is that after scrubbing shitters for years, you got VA benefits...
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Trump needs to push the issue next debate.
Is being against marijuana legalization cool?,
Trump could win so easily if he actually debates correctly. Hillary is a fucked up cunt who will tell half truths and not get challenged
-
Headlines? Where? Silly websites that only silly people read or the New York Times Washington Post ABC NBC etc etc.
And who exactly made those claims? If those claims were ever made?
WSS
I'm kinda curious myself on how headlines about Ted Cruz's wife being ugly, Cruz's father killing Kennedy, Hillary having Parkinson's, Bill Clinton paying that Flowers lady $200 for an abortion, etc...have to do with government policy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'd say FoxNews and Breitbart, two of the top conservative news sources, aren't exactly "fringe" (or at least to their readers, I guess.)
Sorry I thought you said Trump accused Ted's father of Killing Kennedy? He pointed out that he was hanging out with LHO in the same room which he was right?I'm kinda curious myself on how headlines about Ted Cruz's wife being ugly, Cruz's father killing Kennedy, Hillary having Parkinson's, Bill Clinton paying that Flowers lady $200 for an abortion, etc...have to do with government policy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'd say FoxNews and Breitbart, two of the top conservative news sources, aren't exactly "fringe" (or at least to their readers, I guess.)
And did he call his wife ugly after Ted's Super PAC ran a shitty about his wife just compare the two?
Sounds like you're making this shit up to me amigo.
WSS
-
Sorry I thought you said Trump accused Ted's father of Killing Kennedy? He pointed out that he was hanging out with LHO in the same room which he was right?I'm kinda curious myself on how headlines about Ted Cruz's wife being ugly, Cruz's father killing Kennedy, Hillary having Parkinson's, Bill Clinton paying that Flowers lady $200 for an abortion, etc...have to do with government policy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'd say FoxNews and Breitbart, two of the top conservative news sources, aren't exactly "fringe" (or at least to their readers, I guess.)
And did he call his wife ugly after Ted's Super PAC ran a shitty about his wife just compare the two?
Sounds like you're making this shit up to me amigo.
WSS
Sorry I thought you said Trump accused Ted's father of Killing Kennedy? He pointed out that he was hanging out with same room which she was right?...
I think you're probably playing semantics at this point, but allow me to clarify. Here is what Trump said:
"His father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald being, you know, shot. I mean the whole thing is ridiculous. What is this, right, prior to his being shot? And nobody even brings it up...What was he doing — what was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before the death? Before the shooting? It’s horrible."
So, did he outright say that Raphael Cruz killed Kennedy? No. But, he was insinuating such, and I believe the vast majority of people interpreted him as saying such. Perhaps I would have been better served to have written "insinuated" instead, but I think that you understood the jist to begin with. Regardless, the conservative media ran with it, and it became a big talking point during the run up to the Indiana primary, instead of Trump and Cruz's actual polices.
...And did he call his wife ugly after Ted's Super PAC ran a shitty about his wife just compare the two? Sounds like you're making this shit up to me amigo.
WSS
True, but that isn't what we were originally arguing about. You originally stated, if I read you correctly, your disappointment that "not one of the news cycle eruptions from the Democrats and their Partners in the MSM have had anything to do with policies qualifications positions..." - a point that I have no problem conceding, since I too am disappointed in the same thing. But, I then pointed out that Trump pretty much does the same thing - making outlandish claims and vitriolic attacks against his Republican opponents and Clinton - and spends almost zero time on actual policy; and the conservative media runs with it.
So, I don't really understand your obstinacy on this issue - you're usually pretty level headed and rational, even when you don't agree with other poster's point's of view. But I don't think you can deny that the game of attack politics over actual policy is being played extensively by both Trump and Clinton, and that both liberal and conservative media outlets are running with it. They're in it for the click-bait at this point.
-
Civilians should be seen and not heard fat boy.
Dude, you're not that different from a civilian at all: the only difference between you and a civilian worker is that after scrubbing shitters for years, you got VA benefits...
Dude, you're not that different from a civilian at all: the only difference between you and a civilian worker is that after scrubbing shitters for years, you got VA benefits...
Shut up maggot. You couldn't walk in the shadow of someone who serves, now get back to your little cube pussy.
-
Dude, you're not that different from a civilian at all: the only difference between you and a civilian worker is that after scrubbing shitters for years, you got VA benefits...
Shut up maggot. You couldn't walk in the shadow of someone who serves, now get back to your little cube pussy.
Most veterans engender respect, not just because of their service, but because the military gave them the discipline to carry themselves in an intelligent and rational manner. They are deserving of respect in that regard.Shut up maggot. You couldn't walk in the shadow of someone who serves, now get back to your little cube pussy.
You, on the other hand, constantly comport yourself on here with nothing but an obnoxious, harassing and feeble minded attitude. You contribute nothing of meaning to debates on here, and then try to hide your blatant, child-like stupidity behind military service when others call you on your bullshit. So, frankly, your opinion means dick to me, and you can go fuck yourself.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Sorry I thought you said Trump accused Ted's father of Killing Kennedy? He pointed out that he was hanging out with same room which she was right?...
I think you're probably playing semantics at this point, but allow me to clarify. Here is what Trump said:
"His father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald being, you know, shot. I mean the whole thing is ridiculous. What is this, right, prior to his being shot? And nobody even brings it up...What was he doing — what was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before the death? Before the shooting? It’s horrible."
So, did he outright say that Raphael Cruz killed Kennedy? No. But, he was insinuating such, and I believe the vast majority of people interpreted him as saying such. Perhaps I would have been better served to have written "insinuated" instead, but I think that you understood the jist to begin with. Regardless, the conservative media ran with it, and it became a big talking point during the run up to the Indiana primary, instead of Trump and Cruz's actual polices.
...And did he call his wife ugly after Ted's Super PAC ran a shitty about his wife just compare the two? Sounds like you're making this shit up to me amigo.
WSS
True, but that isn't what we were originally arguing about. You originally stated, if I read you correctly, your disappointment that "not one of the news cycle eruptions from the Democrats and their Partners in the MSM have had anything to do with policies qualifications positions..." - a point that I have no problem conceding, since I too am disappointed in the same thing. But, I then pointed out that Trump pretty much does the same thing - making outlandish claims and vitriolic attacks against his Republican opponents and Clinton - and spends almost zero time on actual policy; and the conservative media runs with it.
So, I don't really understand your obstinacy on this issue - you're usually pretty level headed and rational, even when you don't agree with other poster's point's of view. But I don't think you can deny that the game of attack politics over actual policy is being played extensively by both Trump and Clinton, and that both liberal and conservative media outlets are running with it. They're in it for the click-bait at this point.
Yes they are. And I'm not holding Trump blameless in any of this.I think you're probably playing semantics at this point, but allow me to clarify. Here is what Trump said:
"His father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald being, you know, shot. I mean the whole thing is ridiculous. What is this, right, prior to his being shot? And nobody even brings it up...What was he doing what was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before the death? Before the shooting? Its horrible."
So, did he outright say that Raphael Cruz killed Kennedy? No. But, he was insinuating such, and I believe the vast majority of people interpreted him as saying such. Perhaps I would have been better served to have written "insinuated" instead, but I think that you understood the jist to begin with. Regardless, the conservative media ran with it, and it became a big talking point during the run up to the Indiana primary, instead of Trump and Cruz's actual polices.True, but that isn't what we were originally arguing about. You originally stated, if I read you correctly, your disappointment that "not one of the news cycle eruptions from the Democrats and their Partners in the MSM have had anything to do with policies qualifications positions..." - a point that I have no problem conceding, since I too am disappointed in the same thing. But, I then pointed out that Trump pretty much does the same thing - making outlandish claims and vitriolic attacks against his Republican opponents and Clinton - and spends almost zero time on actual policy; and the conservative media runs with it.
So, I don't really understand your obstinacy on this issue - you're usually pretty level headed and rational, even when you don't agree with other poster's point's of view. But I don't think you can deny that the game of attack politics over actual policy is being played extensively by both Trump and Clinton, and that both liberal and conservative media outlets are running with it. They're in it for the click-bait at this point.
What I'm saying is that you should look at your three examples. Those are basically three throwaway lines by Trump not an entire campaign. And yes they all got attention in all media outlets. But exaggerated misleading and false attention if I may. You even admit that in your post.
And though none of the three are valid, all of the three have been turned into attack Trump issues. He never accused Ted Cruz father of Killing Kennedy but that's the spin for your side. He only pointed out the difference in the hot factor between his wife and Teds because Ted's Super PAC attacked Trump's wife. And pointed out that she worked for Goldman Sachs who seem to be the bogeyman these days. Right?
He didn't even attack everybody's precious Gold Star Family but made an offhand remark that these people who are giving speeches attacking him, are part of a culture his opponents should probably have serious issues with. Right? Of course I understand equality and women's rights mean nothing if you vote Democrat.
But at the end of all of this, unless you have some better examples, I think we have to admit that all the things people hate Donald Trump for have nothing to do with any policy he's put out.
I cant imagine you could disagree with that.
Beyond that I appreciate your kind words and feel primarily the same about you.
WSS
-
PS I don't really consider Fox Breitbart MSNBC or Salon or The Huffington Post or Drudge the mainstream media.
Even though they are as biased as anyone else most low-information voters here a minute or two a week from ABC NBC CBS plucked from the pages oh pseudo news mainstream rags the New York Times The Washington Post Etc.
WSS
-
Most veterans engender respect, not just because of their service, but because the military gave them the discipline to carry themselves in an intelligent and rational manner. They are deserving of respect in that regard.Shut up maggot. You couldn't walk in the shadow of someone who serves, now get back to your little cube pussy.
You, on the other hand, constantly comport yourself on here with nothing but an obnoxious, harassing and feeble minded attitude. You contribute nothing of meaning to debates on here, and then try to hide your blatant, child-like stupidity behind military service when others call you on your bullshit. So, frankly, your opinion means dick to me, and you can go fuck yourself.
Most veterans engender respect, not just because of their service, but because the military gave them the discipline to carry themselves in an intelligent and rational manner. They are deserving of respect in that regard.
You, on the other hand, constantly comport yourself on here with nothing but an obnoxious, harassing and feeble minded attitude. You contribute nothing of meaning to debates on here, and then try to hide your blatant, child-like stupidity behind military service when others call you on your bullshit. So, frankly, your opinion means dick to me, and you can go fuck yourself.
Ha ha ha ha ha. Fuck you pussy. You act like this means something. It's a fucking football board that attracts pussies like you all the time. You feel that you are in an environment where you can say anything you like without fear of getting your ass kicked.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Most veterans engender respect, not just because of their service, but because the military gave them the discipline to carry themselves in an intelligent and rational manner. They are deserving of respect in that regard.Shut up maggot. You couldn't walk in the shadow of someone who serves, now get back to your little cube pussy.
You, on the other hand, constantly comport yourself on here with nothing but an obnoxious, harassing and feeble minded attitude. You contribute nothing of meaning to debates on here, and then try to hide your blatant, child-like stupidity behind military service when others call you on your bullshit. So, frankly, your opinion means dick to me, and you can go fuck yourself.
Most veterans engender respect, not just because of their service, but because the military gave them the discipline to carry themselves in an intelligent and rational manner. They are deserving of respect in that regard.
You, on the other hand, constantly comport yourself on here with nothing but an obnoxious, harassing and feeble minded attitude. You contribute nothing of meaning to debates on here, and then try to hide your blatant, child-like stupidity behind military service when others call you on your bullshit. So, frankly, your opinion means dick to me, and you can go fuck yourself.
He doesn't understand any of those words
-
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
The worst part is that, when Trump loses, the Reps will think the reason why is because he wasn't conservative enough. They'll come back with a Cruz 2.0 candidate that will blabber on and on about Jesus and what not, instead of realizing why Trump actually lost. It was his moderate policies (some of them), it was because he's an ass. I think that would be setting them up for another loss in 4 years.
Bingo.
-
It's actually the Russians fault.
Right?
WSS
-
It's actually the Russians fault.
Right?
WSS
It's actually the Russians fault.
Right?
WSS
Depends if we are asking CNN or Fox news.
-
-
Most veterans engender respect, not just because of their service, but because the military gave them the discipline to carry themselves in an intelligent and rational manner. They are deserving of respect in that regard.
You, on the other hand, constantly comport yourself on here with nothing but an obnoxious, harassing and feeble minded attitude. You contribute nothing of meaning to debates on here, and then try to hide your blatant, child-like stupidity behind military service when others call you on your bullshit. So, frankly, your opinion means dick to me, and you can go fuck yourself.
He doesn't understand any of those words
He doesn't understand any of those words
Neither does jblew, and he can't spell any of them, either, without
looking up each one online.
-
Civilians should be seen and not heard fat boy.
Dude, you're not that different from a civilian at all: the only difference between you and a civilian worker is that after scrubbing shitters for years, you got VA benefits...
-
Careful jblu dh is fixin to go run to zombo to get u timedout. Which is ultimate tuff guy move. Act like a badass but when the pyssy gets hurt run to your ild buddy whi runs the board and get someone to'd.
-
Most veterans engender respect, not just because of their service, but because the military gave them the discipline to carry themselves in an intelligent and rational manner. They are deserving of respect in that regard.
You, on the other hand, constantly comport yourself on here with nothing but an obnoxious, harassing and feeble minded attitude. You contribute nothing of meaning to debates on here, and then try to hide your blatant, child-like stupidity behind military service when others call you on your bullshit. So, frankly, your opinion means dick to me, and you can go fuck yourself.
Ha ha ha ha ha. Fuck you pussy. You act like this means something. It's a fucking football board that attracts pussies like you all the time. You feel that you are in an environment where you can say anything you like without fear of getting your ass kicked.
You feel that you are in an environment where you can say anything you like without fear of getting your ass kicked.
That's not the USA?
-
You feel that you are in an environment where you can say anything you like without fear of getting your ass kicked.
That's not the USA?
-
The dems strategy was never for Clinton to run on her record (because it is bad) they had no hope of ever getting the public to fall in love with Clinton. Their strategy was to destroy Trump and they knew they could count on the MSM liberal allies to help do it. Trump couldn't control that. Trump also has high negatives even higher than Clintons according to the polls. His hope was not to destroy Clinton but to talk about the issues people care about. It is a change election. Most people think we are going in the wrong direction and Trump represents change. Newt Gingrich described Trump well as "little Trump" and "big Trump". Big Trump can win the election, little Trump no. Since Clinton could not defend her record her campaign would anger little Trump into doing the very thing he shouldn't be doing with twitter wars and fights that most voters don't care about. They want to know a couple of things about Trump, can he be presidential and what will he do for the country? Trump should spend as much time as he can laying out a vision for what he will do if elected in the next debate. Trying to tear down Clinton is a fool's errand because most already know how bad she is. It might be too late at this point. With a disciplined candidate who would have stayed on message since May he would be in a much better position now even with the 11 year old sex talk video but there has been too much little Trump in this campaign and not enough big Trump.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login