The True Story: Donald Trump Did Not Mock a Reporter’s Disability
-
The mainstream media is corrupt and is just an extension of the democratic party and Hillary Clinton campaign.
https://www.catholics4trump.com/the-true-story-donald-trump-did-not-mock-a-reporters-disability/
-
-
Because "Catholics 4 Trump" certainly would not have bias in their articles!
You guys are seriously the worst with this stuff. When all the factual, data-driven stuff for Hilldawg comes up it's biased but then you source this garbage. Get a grip people.
-
-
Because "Catholics 4 Trump" certainly would not have bias in their articles!
You guys are seriously the worst with this stuff. When all the factual, data-driven stuff for Hilldawg comes up it's biased but then you source this garbage. Get a grip people.
Because "Catholics 4 Trump" certainly would not have bias in their articles!
You guys are seriously the worst with this stuff. When all the factual, data-driven stuff for Hilldawg comes up it's biased but then you source this garbage. Get a grip people.
I could have used any number of sources besides Catholics 4 Trump (except the corrupted MSM who wikileaks have confirmed what we already know about their collusion with the Hillary Clinton campaign).
-
Why not? The Clinton campaign is still falsely using this against Trump.
Well, this is an article from July, when it happened - everyone has seen the video and drawn their conclusions, and pretty much everyone has come to the same conclusion, that that's exactly what he was doing, except 'catholics4trump' apparently. Can't imagine why...
-
Why not? The Clinton campaign is still falsely using this against Trump.
Well, this is an article from July, when it happened - everyone has seen the video and drawn their conclusions, and pretty much everyone has come to the same conclusion, that that's exactly what he was doing, except 'catholics4trump' apparently. Can't imagine why...
Well, this is an article from July, when it happened - everyone has seen the video and drawn their conclusions, and pretty much everyone has come to the same conclusion, that that's exactly what he was doing, except 'catholics4trump' apparently. Can't imagine why...
And the Clinton campaign is still running their false ads in late October about how horrible Trump is for mocking a disabled reporter when Trump says himself he wasn't mocking the reporters disability and all the evidence that supports Trump's denial that doesn't get reported.
-
Oh Trump says he wasn't? Well why didn't you say so?! Now that changes everything!
-
Catholics4trump have totally convinced me mine own eyes and hears hath dceived with the devils influence to see/hear that which didnt really happen.....praise be to jeeeezzuuss
-
Oh Trump says he wasn't? Well why didn't you say so?! Now that changes everything!
You conveniently left out the rest of what I posted about all the evidence that points to Trump's denial besides him saying he never was mocking the reporters disability...Here here let's get it right...
-
Catholics4trump have totally convinced me mine own eyes and hears hath dceived with the devils influence to see/hear that which didnt really happen.....praise be to jeeeezzuuss
Catholics4trump have totally convinced me mine own eyes and hears hath dceived with the devils influence to see/hear that which didnt really happen.....praise be to jeeeezzuuss
If that source is not acceptable then Google "Trump did not mock reporter's disability" and there are too many links for me to post...I went with Catholics 4 Trump just to hear you all squeal about it.
-
I did that before you said - they basically all link back to catholics4trump. "Did Donald Trump actually mock a disabled reporter? One trump support group thinks not..." etc
-
Look, let's be frank for a moment here. Suppose Trump didn't intend to mock the reporter's condition, for the sake of argument. He:
1) ...should have known damn well how that would look when he did it
2) ...shouldn't be mocking a reporter anyway (not exactly presidential)
3) ...has such a reputation as a colossal douche bag that it's not hard to see why people take it as he did
4) ...could have cleared it all up the next day, saying "I absolutely did not intend it in that way, but I can see now how it might have come across like that, I'm sorry for any offense caused" and it would have been dealt with. Instead, he doubles down on attacking the reporter, says he's "using his disability to grandstand" or something.
But he did not. Why? Because his whole thing is that he 'says what he thinks and doesn't care about anyone else' - and we're supposed to laud that as a quality in a person? Let alone in a president! Sorry, no.
-
I did that before you said - they basically all link back to catholics4trump. "Did Donald Trump actually mock a disabled reporter? One trump support group thinks not..." etc
I did that before you said - they basically all link back to catholics4trump. "Did Donald Trump actually mock a disabled reporter? One trump support group thinks not..." etc
Trump was mocking the reporter for backpeddling on a story he wrote. He was backpeddling because it helped vindicate what Trump had said about people in this country who were cheering and celebrating after 9/11. Trump has mocked others in the same fashion such as Ted Cruz but in this case a reporter had a disability that the media could claim he was making fun of his disability. What disability did Cruz have and others whom Trump made similar gestures about? As for mocking a reporter have you seen the media's negative ratings? They are viewed as the lowest on the totem pole and for good reason.
-
Trump is an equal opportunity mocker.
He mocked a white privileged man (Jeb Bush) harder than anybody.
-
Catholics4trump have totally convinced me mine own eyes and hears hath dceived with the devils influence to see/hear that which didnt really happen.....praise be to jeeeezzuuss
If that source is not acceptable then Google "Trump did not mock reporter's disability" and there are too many links for me to post...I went with Catholics 4 Trump just to hear you all squeal about it.
If that source is not acceptable then Google "Trump did not mock reporter's disability" and there are too many links for me to post...I went with Catholics 4 Trump just to hear you all squeal about it.
Yep, I'm totally sure that's the reason you picked it. Right....
-
So how do catholics4drumph explain away his rheetard arm movements?
-
So how do catholics4drumph explain away his rheetard arm movements?
So how do catholics4drumph explain away his rheetard arm movements?
The journalist that has the disability does not even have those type of arm movements...he is immobilized and his arm is in a fixed position..so the reported mocking of his disability doesn't even line up with his disability...Trump was mocking the reporter and not his disability..I believe his mocking was meant to be more of this reporter as being an exaggerated being flustered than to mock his disability.
-
So how do catholics4drumph explain away his rheetard arm movements?
The journalist that has the disability does not even have those type of arm movements...he is immobilized and his arm is in a fixed position..so the reported mocking of his disability doesn't even line up with his disability...Trump was mocking the reporter and not his disability..I believe his mocking was meant to be more of this reporter as being an exaggerated being flustered than to mock his disability.
The journalist that has the disability does not even have those type of arm movements...he is immobilized and his arm is in a fixed position..so the reported mocking of his disability doesn't even line up with his disability...Trump was mocking the reporter and not his disability..I believe his mocking was meant to be more of this reporter as being an exaggerated being flustered than to mock his disability.
...and the Donald, who had never heard of the guy before this interaction, knew all about the specific disability the guy had, for sure.
-
Let's put this a different way because it boils down to two scenarios.
1) He knew the guy had the disability and mocked him-making him a total piece of shit.
OR
2) He didn't intend for it to come off that way, but a 4 year old could tell you it would-making him a total fucking idiot.
...so you are supporting a complete idiot or a total piece of shit. Woo hoo? There's no winning this argument is the point.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login