The True Story: Donald Trump Did Not Mock a Reporter’s Disability
-
Theres the reporter he mocked, case closed
-
Wait, you believe he 'isn't' mocking the guy?!
You're fucking trolling us, correct?
-
-
He is mocking the reporter...he isn't mocking the reporter's disability. That is the difference.
Trololololol. Sure thing, boss.
-
He is mocking the reporter...he isn't mocking the reporter's disability. That is the difference.
He is most certainly mocking tne reporters disfigurement and associating him with downs syndrome or whayever, on his effort to discredit him. The undeniable proof has been posted nothing more to debate
-
He is mocking the reporter...he isn't mocking the reporter's disability. That is the difference.
He is most certainly mocking tne reporters disfigurement and associating him with downs syndrome or whayever, on his effort to discredit him. The undeniable proof has been posted nothing more to debate
He is most certainly mocking tne reporters disfigurement and associating him with downs syndrome or whayever, on his effort to discredit him. The undeniable proof has been posted nothing more to debate
No it hasn't Cleve.
I'm with you on some other things Trump has said and later said he was taken wrongly such as when he talked about the face of Carly Fiorina and later said he meant her "personna" which I don't buy at all. He didn't say that at a public rally though he said it off camera and some reporter ratted him out. Sure he made that comment "who would vote for that face" and then lamely said he meant her "personna" whatever that means.
That is different than this case where he has been shown to make the same arm motions in mocking others and it was in reference to showing them to be flustered and that is the same thing he is doing with the disabled journalist mocking him for being flustered and not remembering his own article he had written.
-
Let's set this to rest. He didn't mock the reporters disability. As usual the progressive fags try and make it into a racist/homo/against people with disabilities issue. Trump was being Trump, plain and simple.
-
Let's set this to rest. He didn't mock the reporters disability. As usual the progressive fags try and make it into a racist/homo/against people with disabilities issue. Trump was being Trump, plain and simple.
Let's set this to rest. He didn't mock the reporters disability. As usual the progressive fags try and make it into a racist/homo/against people with disabilities issue. Trump was being Trump, plain and simple.
Trump isn't the polished crooked corrupt politician Hillary Clinton is but I give him credit for that.
-
He is most certainly mocking tne reporters disfigurement and associating him with downs syndrome or whayever, on his effort to discredit him. The undeniable proof has been posted nothing more to debate
No it hasn't Cleve.
I'm with you on some other things Trump has said and later said he was taken wrongly such as when he talked about the face of Carly Fiorina and later said he meant her "personna" which I don't buy at all. He didn't say that at a public rally though he said it off camera and some reporter ratted him out. Sure he made that comment "who would vote for that face" and then lamely said he meant her "personna" whatever that means.
That is different than this case where he has been shown to make the same arm motions in mocking others and it was in reference to showing them to be flustered and that is the same thing he is doing with the disabled journalist mocking him for being flustered and not remembering his own article he had written.
No it hasn't Cleve.
.
Yes it has
-
BTW if people want a laugh, go back a year and look at the comments about Trump from his now-supporters.
-
Theres the reporter he mocked, case closed
And there's a reporter that lied, made a backtrack, now looks like a fucking idiot. Case closed.Theres the reporter he mocked, case closed
-
And there's a reporter that lied, made a backtrack, now looks like a fucking idiot. Case closed.Theres the reporter he mocked, case closed
And there's a reporter that lied, made a backtrack, now looks like a fucking idiot. Case closed.
That may be very well truei dont know the details of that. But i know trump mocked his disabiity, end of discussion. You can debate what if anything that says about him personally. But changing the narrative a year later is a no go
-
And there's a reporter that lied, made a backtrack, now looks like a fucking idiot. Case closed.
That may be very well truei dont know the details of that. But i know trump mocked his disabiity, end of discussion. You can debate what if anything that says about him personally. But changing the narrative a year later is a no go
Trump mocked others in the same fashion, so I don't know how you're certain he mocked his disability.That may be very well truei dont know the details of that. But i know trump mocked his disabiity, end of discussion. You can debate what if anything that says about him personally. But changing the narrative a year later is a no go
Sounds like you have the narrative in this case.
-
Trump mocked others in the same fashion, so I don't know how you're certain he mocked his disability.That may be very well truei dont know the details of that. But i know trump mocked his disabiity, end of discussion. You can debate what if anything that says about him personally. But changing the narrative a year later is a no go
Sounds like you have the narrative in this case.
Trump mocked others in the same fashion, so I don't know how you're certain he mocked his disability.
Sounds like you have the narrative in this case.
I posted the undeniable visual proof, thats why im certain
-
It's even the same hand for Christ fucking sake. How much of that Trump dick you slurpin?!?
-
It's even the same hand for Christ fucking sake. How much of that Trump dick you slurpin?!?
-
-
I understand both sides of the argument - don't think it's cut and dry.I expect you to be more objective but you're fully on the bandwagon and that is impressive.
The screen grab is not an accurate depiction of the event regardless.
And the whole thing a worthless issue - plenty of more important things to talk about.
-
-
"The 1-2% economic growth rate is because of congressional obstruction"
"The 1-2% economic growth rate is due to the failure of the Obama administration."
--
Irrelevant to the worthless topic at hand but it's funny how the parties do nothing but point fingers at each other.
I only bring that random bit up because I saw another major acquisition may happen (ATT acquiring Time Warner)
To me I think it's a consequence of the slow economic growth rate and the low interest rates which make these types of mergers appealing - but I don't think these major company consolidations/mergers are good for the people.
Just a more interesting topic to talk about than the one presented here.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login