Yo, this is some great stuff !
-
So because the sun is cooling, those of us who release more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the air thereby warming of the Earth's surface are actually doing our bit to save Humanity!
You're welcome.
WSS
-
-
You can your head into a wall only so many times.
-
no liberal objection?
The motion passes !
Why bother? The newspaper (with a long and storied history of perpetuating climate myths) you linked to is reposting results from a paper published two years ago, that you have linked to before I don't know how many times, each time a different outlet is regurgiating the same false conclusion.
So, again, why bother? You have repeatedly shown you have the memory of a goldfish, which fits neatly beside the intellectual capacity of one. It's not worth anyone's time to have the same conversation with you.
-
hahah. moron.
The first link is dated:
By SEAN MARTINPUBLISHED: 06:22, Sat, Oct 22, 2016| UPDATED: 13:49, Sun, Oct 23, 2016
this is 2016. Did little chrissy get all ahead of himself by a few months....?
the second link is dated:
By: Marc Morano - Climate Depot
October 21, 2016 7:11 PM with 698 comments
NOW,, Chrissysissypants - just because it refers to an older article.... the older article hasn't been
proven invalid in two years or whatever?
You never address the content - you just get po'd and go with the personal insult, and the old
"pay no attention to that man...um....behind...the mirror!" from the Wizard of Oz.
We non-liberals can read you liberals like a book -
"IT's FALSE !!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA "
"I DON'T LIKE THE LINK" WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
-
the Climate Depot article CLEARLY talks about the UN banning crtical of mmgw jounalists from an
upcoming event:
Marrakech Climate Change Conference - November 2016You remind me of higgardly clinton laughing and saying "der... what emails ? hahahahahahahahaha"
-
I can see I'm going too fast for you, so I'll walk you through it. You have posted links to various 'news' outlets before about this exact paper:
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=43772&page=1 - 15th August 2015 - from www.sciencealert.comhttp://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=38541 - 4th November 2015 - from the blaze this timeTo the express, here is *another* article about the same paper, this time from december 2015There are countless other articles out there, as various 'special interest driven' outlets - such as the blaze, inquisitor, constitution hill or whatever - each take it in turns to latch on to the story as an apparent 'golden bullet' to defeat the climate change myth once and for all, but I don't need to post them here; after all, you already have.Here is the original paper, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795...46SFinally, here is the lead author, Valentina Zharkova, discussing the results:“During the minimum, the intensity of solar radiation will be reduced dramatically. So we will have less heat coming into the atmosphere, which will reduce the temperature...the Sun buys us time to stop these carbon emissions"
So, why should you be treated as anything but the boy crying wolf, when you post the same stuff over and over again, have it debunked over and over again, and then swim once more around the goldfish bowl and post the same thing yet again? -
So because the sun is cooling, those of us who release more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the air thereby warming of the Earth's surface are actually doing our bit to save Humanity!
You're welcome.
WSS
So because the sun is cooling, those of us who release more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the air thereby warming of the Earth's surface are actually doing our bit to save Humanity!
You're welcome.
WSS
still the best answer and still laughing!!
-
I can see I'm going too fast for you, so I'll walk you through it. You have posted links to various 'news' outlets before about this exact paper:
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=43772&page=1 - 15th August 2015 - from www.sciencealert.comhttp://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=38541 - 4th November 2015 - from the blaze this timeTo the express, here is *another* article about the same paper, this time from december 2015There are countless other articles out there, as various 'special interest driven' outlets - such as the blaze, inquisitor, constitution hill or whatever - each take it in turns to latch on to the story as an apparent 'golden bullet' to defeat the climate change myth once and for all, but I don't need to post them here; after all, you already have.Here is the original paper, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795...46SFinally, here is the lead author, Valentina Zharkova, discussing the results:“During the minimum, the intensity of solar radiation will be reduced dramatically. So we will have less heat coming into the atmosphere, which will reduce the temperature...the Sun buys us time to stop these carbon emissions"
So, why should you be treated as anything but the boy crying wolf, when you post the same stuff over and over again, have it debunked over and over again, and then swim once more around the goldfish bowl and post the same thing yet again?I can see I'm going too fast for you, so I'll walk you through it. You have posted links to various 'news' outlets before about this exact paper:
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=43772&page=1 - 15th August 2015 - from www.sciencealert.comhttp://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=38541 - 4th November 2015 - from the blaze this timeTo the express, here is *another* article about the same paper, this time from december 2015There are countless other articles out there, as various 'special interest driven' outlets - such as the blaze, inquisitor, constitution hill or whatever - each take it in turns to latch on to the story as an apparent 'golden bullet' to defeat the climate change myth once and for all, but I don't need to post them here; after all, you already have.Here is the original paper, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795...46SFinally, here is the lead author, Valentina Zharkova, discussing the results:So, why should you be treated as anything but the boy crying wolf, when you post the same stuff over and over again, have it debunked over and over again, and then swim once more around the goldfish bowl and post the same thing yet again?because it is still true, and you are still refusing to admit it?
and your feeble, feigned objection is fraught with bitter, emotionalistic nonsense.
I'll walk you through it:
from dictionary.com:
"Note : To “cry wolf” means to issue a falsealarm."
You mmgw wonks are the ones issuing the false alarm. I, and others, are the ones claiming
you are issuing a false alarm over mmgw. You mmgw goofballs are the boys who cry wolf.
some of us aren't buying it, especially when we've heard it so often, and it's failed so often.
You hardcore libs are so emotionally set on acting like the russian communists:
you love to ascribe blame on others...when it's you who is doing what you are complaining about.
The commies do it for reverse psych warfare. You do it because you just aren't very smart...or
very dishonest and you compensate for it by knee jerking.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login