Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. I'm being entertained

I'm being entertained

The Browns Board
45 21 1.3k
  • MudflyM Mudfly

    @frenchie said:

    Injuries aside, the O just needs to upgrade the o-line and maybe add one more WR (unless one of our young players turn into one). On the D, pass rush and secondary are needed upgrades. QB is an obvious first round selection but Cody is showing us something with his skills

    Ok....so, next year we need to draft WR .....OL.....and Pass rushers? first.....plus a QB at the top.....??????

    Yet...last year our first 7 picks were 2 WR, 1 OL, 3 pass rushers and a QB....?

    NICE!

    so....we needed a WR and drafted 4....we needed a couple OL and drafted a couple.......we needed a QB and drafted 1 and signed 1......we needed OLB/edge rushers and drafted 3 and signed 3(or more).....

    And these are all still considered our primary need positions?......no opinion, just asking......cause my gears are grinding right now...

    @mudfly said:

    Ok....so, next year we need to draft WR .....OL.....and Pass rushers? first.....plus a QB at the top.....??????

    Yet...last year our first 7 picks were 2 WR, 1 OL, 3 pass rushers and a QB....?

    NICE!

    so....we needed a WR and drafted 4....we needed a couple OL and drafted a couple.......we needed a QB and drafted 1 and signed 1......we needed OLB/edge rushers and drafted 3 and signed 3(or more).....

    And these are all still considered our primary need positions?......no opinion, just asking......cause my gears are grinding right now...

    The Browns FO will get it right this time they promise

  • tackle schmackle. guard schmaurd.

    u meant what i knew. 😵 :wacko:

  • Obviously... 😉

    Have to admit I was less entertained today...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196

  • Ok - as the starter of this thread - I will say that today's game was NOT entertaining! Our relative lack of talent was obvious (as always) and not made up for with the fight in the Dawg. For the first time this season, the new Browns looked like the old Browns. The defensive front seven which I have defended were pushed aside like bowling pins. If I'm the Browns, next year, we need a draft and a lot of free agents to build a competitive team.

    hoortaH sydS 2 Replies

  • Wonder if all, most or just some of the 53 will give it 100% from here on out. It's gotta be brutal to be a Brown right about now when 0-16 is a real possibility.

  • F Frenchie

    Ok - as the starter of this thread - I will say that today's game was NOT entertaining! Our relative lack of talent was obvious (as always) and not made up for with the fight in the Dawg. For the first time this season, the new Browns looked like the old Browns. The defensive front seven which I have defended were pushed aside like bowling pins. If I'm the Browns, next year, we need a draft and a lot of free agents to build a competitive team.

    @frenchie said:

    Ok - as the starter of this thread - I will say that today's game was NOT entertaining! Our relative lack of talent was obvious (as always) and not made up for with the fight in the Dawg. For the first time this season, the new Browns looked like the old Browns. The defensive front seven which I have defended were pushed aside like bowling pins. If I'm the Browns, next year, we need a draft and a lot of free agents to build a competitive team.

    Let me translate Hue's post game comment "they're trying hard, giving everything they've got." We're just not good enough, and lacking in talent. Thanks loads Sashi. For the first time this year, it looks like they quit in the 4th quarter.

  • F Frenchie

    Ok - as the starter of this thread - I will say that today's game was NOT entertaining! Our relative lack of talent was obvious (as always) and not made up for with the fight in the Dawg. For the first time this season, the new Browns looked like the old Browns. The defensive front seven which I have defended were pushed aside like bowling pins. If I'm the Browns, next year, we need a draft and a lot of free agents to build a competitive team.

    @frenchie said:

    Ok - as the starter of this thread - I will say that today's game was NOT entertaining! Our relative lack of talent was obvious (as always) and not made up for with the fight in the Dawg. For the first time this season, the new Browns looked like the old Browns. The defensive front seven which I have defended were pushed aside like bowling pins. If I'm the Browns, next year, we need a draft and a lot of free agents to build a competitive team.

    or instead of fa"s wouldn't it be nice to draft some play makers

  • sydS syd

    @frenchie said:

    Ok - as the starter of this thread - I will say that today's game was NOT entertaining! Our relative lack of talent was obvious (as always) and not made up for with the fight in the Dawg. For the first time this season, the new Browns looked like the old Browns. The defensive front seven which I have defended were pushed aside like bowling pins. If I'm the Browns, next year, we need a draft and a lot of free agents to build a competitive team.

    or instead of fa"s wouldn't it be nice to draft some play makers

    @syd said:

    or instead of fa"s wouldn't it be nice to draft some play makers

    So if we call Pryor a playmaker, then who else? We've had a boatload of high draft picks....any playmakers amongst them? Lots of cap space and never made a stab at any. Imho, draft or fa, just get someone that's a ball hawk.

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug

    @syd said:

    or instead of fa"s wouldn't it be nice to draft some play makers

    So if we call Pryor a playmaker, then who else? We've had a boatload of high draft picks....any playmakers amongst them? Lots of cap space and never made a stab at any. Imho, draft or fa, just get someone that's a ball hawk.

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    So if we call Pryor a playmaker, then who else? We've had a boatload of high draft picks....any playmakers amongst them? Lots of cap space and never made a stab at any. Imho, draft or fa, just get someone that's a ball hawk.

    I was hoping that maybe someone would stand out and use are cap space for them but being that we let decent draft picks walk and hold on to shit FUCK it spend the money on some hot cheerleaders

  • sydS syd

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    So if we call Pryor a playmaker, then who else? We've had a boatload of high draft picks....any playmakers amongst them? Lots of cap space and never made a stab at any. Imho, draft or fa, just get someone that's a ball hawk.

    I was hoping that maybe someone would stand out and use are cap space for them but being that we let decent draft picks walk and hold on to shit FUCK it spend the money on some hot cheerleaders

    @syd said:

    I was hoping that maybe someone would stand out and use are cap space for them but being that we let decent draft picks walk and hold on to shit FUCK it spend the money on some hot cheerleaders

    Frisco tried that. But now they aren't allowed to sit down during games. It seems that their balls hang out.

  • thank god wer're not in sanfran then

Log in to reply