Skip to content

ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC : ISIS massacres 250 children by kneading them in bakery dough machine

Political Discussion
95 10 1.6k
  • Im always hesitant about these stories though. Isis are bad folk without outside narratives, but i do think theres some propaganda embellishing what they do....especially towards christians. Its not like they treat christians well, but some mexia outlets here have a narrative to pudh and embellush everything they do so as to keep our outrage fresh snd simmering.

  • Took a bit of digging but here is the video:

  • I need more verification of this than just one womans story. You dont know who that woman is nor if she's been coached.

  • I have no reason to suspect it is untrue but it would be good to get the translation and the source etc corroborated indeed.

  • Well theres people in the christian vommunity who want another full scale invasion of that region so there is absolutely motive to talk shit up. Isis may have shot a bunch of children but that isnt horrifying enough anymore, lets throw in some industrial equipment and now we got tje makings of a horror film.

    In case anyone hasnt noticed i dont trust a single uncorroborated word that cones from the mouth of a human. They can pinky swear i dont care. Ive just learned that humans are always selling their own narratives about everything.

  • learned that by watching the democratic nazi party, I take it?

  • https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/11/20/infographic-screening-process-refugee-entry-united-states

    I would again encourage you to review this. We as a country are arguably the hardest in the world to become a refugee in. If that process fails, we failed as a government.

    Let's flip this awful act on its head-If you were an Syrian person who witnessed this, would you want to leave and become a refugee yourself? I sure as shit bet so. Syria as of 2013 (most accurate) was a population of nearly 23 million people. Do you think all of these people are terrorists? So is your solution to say "NO" to all of these folks despite an already incredibly hard refugee application and let innocent kids be massacred? That's pretty unamerican and incredibly ethically dubious.

    @jrb12711 said:

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/11/20/infographic-screening-process-refugee-entry-united-states

    I would again encourage you to review this. We as a country are arguably the hardest in the world to become a refugee in. If that process fails, we failed as a government.

    Let's flip this awful act on its head-If you were an Syrian person who witnessed this, would you want to leave and become a refugee yourself? I sure as shit bet so. Syria as of 2013 (most accurate) was a population of nearly 23 million people. Do you think all of these people are terrorists? So is your solution to say "NO" to all of these folks despite an already incredibly hard refugee application and let innocent kids be massacred? That's pretty unamerican and incredibly ethically dubious.

    How about we say NO until we vett them to make sure they aren't a terrorist coming here, to commit crimes?

    Isis has been bragging that they easily infiltrated the mass exodus as "immigrants".

    The underlying motivation for you liberals, is to flood our country with dependent people who will be dependent

    on obamao/higgardly/liberal gov for their existence.

  • learned that by watching the democratic nazi party, I take it?

    @calfoxwc said:

    learned that by watching the democratic nazi party, I take it?

    You're jealous of Isis because they can afford to buy John Deer riding mowers.
  • @jrb12711 said:

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/11/20/infographic-screening-process-refugee-entry-united-states

    I would again encourage you to review this. We as a country are arguably the hardest in the world to become a refugee in. If that process fails, we failed as a government.

    Let's flip this awful act on its head-If you were an Syrian person who witnessed this, would you want to leave and become a refugee yourself? I sure as shit bet so. Syria as of 2013 (most accurate) was a population of nearly 23 million people. Do you think all of these people are terrorists? So is your solution to say "NO" to all of these folks despite an already incredibly hard refugee application and let innocent kids be massacred? That's pretty unamerican and incredibly ethically dubious.

    How about we say NO until we vett them to make sure they aren't a terrorist coming here, to commit crimes?

    Isis has been bragging that they easily infiltrated the mass exodus as "immigrants".

    The underlying motivation for you liberals, is to flood our country with dependent people who will be dependent

    on obamao/higgardly/liberal gov for their existence.

    @calfoxwc said:

    How about we say NO until we vett them to make sure they aren't a terrorist coming here, to commit crimes?

    Isis has been bragging that they easily infiltrated the mass exodus as "immigrants".

    The underlying motivation for you liberals, is to flood our country with dependent people who will be dependent

    on obamao/higgardly/liberal gov for their existence.

    BECAUSE WE ALREADY FUCKING DO THIS WITH AN OVERTLY EXTENSIVE PROCESS TO ADMIT REFUGEES INTO THE COUNTRY!

    I literally posted this in the dang comment you quoted-how incredibly thick skulled can one person be. Good grief.

  • @one-post said:

    ISIS is cool and you guys are jealous of their cool uniforms.

    ISIS-inDRAG.jpg

    ISIS fighters dress as women in desperate attempt to flee battlefield

  • @calfoxwc said:

    How about we say NO until we vett them to make sure they aren't a terrorist coming here, to commit crimes?

    Isis has been bragging that they easily infiltrated the mass exodus as "immigrants".

    The underlying motivation for you liberals, is to flood our country with dependent people who will be dependent

    on obamao/higgardly/liberal gov for their existence.

    BECAUSE WE ALREADY FUCKING DO THIS WITH AN OVERTLY EXTENSIVE PROCESS TO ADMIT REFUGEES INTO THE COUNTRY!

    I literally posted this in the dang comment you quoted-how incredibly thick skulled can one person be. Good grief.

    @jrb12711 said:

    BECAUSE WE ALREADY FUCKING DO THIS WITH AN OVERTLY EXTENSIVE PROCESS TO ADMIT REFUGEES INTO THE COUNTRY!

    I literally posted this in the dang comment you quoted-how incredibly thick skulled can one person be. Good grief.

    Like we really believe that article you posted about the so called vetting process. Give me a break. You do realize that there government is mostly destroyed. All levels of being able to find something out about someone are gone, or forged.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    BECAUSE WE ALREADY FUCKING DO THIS WITH AN OVERTLY EXTENSIVE PROCESS TO ADMIT REFUGEES INTO THE COUNTRY!

    I literally posted this in the dang comment you quoted-how incredibly thick skulled can one person be. Good grief.

    Like we really believe that article you posted about the so called vetting process. Give me a break. You do realize that there government is mostly destroyed. All levels of being able to find something out about someone are gone, or forged.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Like we really believe that article you posted about the so called vetting process. Give me a break. You do realize that there government is mostly destroyed. All levels of being able to find something out about someone are gone, or forged.

    The "article" I posted was literally from the United State government because that is what they do. It's not an article at all, that's the United States law in the form of an infographic. We are arguably the toughest 1st world nation in the world when it comes to taking in to refugees. That is quantifiable facts/

    Just when I think I'm amazed at how low the bar goes here sometimes, this brings it even lower.

  • We need to quit letting in the refugees all the time.

  • It's tough because they have to cross an ocean.

    But many people have said there's no real accurate way to vet the refugees - including Clinton people as revealed by wikileaks. Comey even said some will slip through the cracks because we can only query what's available. If they aren't in any criminal database that we can find is that good enough?

    It was also significantly easier for us to vet Iraqi refugees compared to Syrian refugees because we've had a pretty strong presence there for over 10 years now - enough time for us to have collected data and such.

  • We need to quit letting in the refugees all the time.

    @one-post said:

    We need to quit letting in the refugees all the time.

    As quoted directly in the article none of you people have read, less than 1% of all refugee applications get approved. That's not "letting them in all the time".

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Like we really believe that article you posted about the so called vetting process. Give me a break. You do realize that there government is mostly destroyed. All levels of being able to find something out about someone are gone, or forged.

    The "article" I posted was literally from the United State government because that is what they do. It's not an article at all, that's the United States law in the form of an infographic. We are arguably the toughest 1st world nation in the world when it comes to taking in to refugees. That is quantifiable facts/

    Just when I think I'm amazed at how low the bar goes here sometimes, this brings it even lower.

    @jrb12711 said:

    The "article" I posted was literally from the United State government because that is what they do. It's not an article at all, that's the United States law in the form of an infographic. We are arguably the toughest 1st world nation in the world when it comes to taking in to refugees. That is quantifiable facts/

    Just when I think I'm amazed at how low the bar goes here sometimes, this brings it even lower.

    The government says it so it has to be true? The government says it didn't pay ransom for the Iran hostages too but I'm not buying that one either.....

    Diehard is right and even the corrupt FBI director admitted it that these refugees cannot be fully vetted like the government claims because any records on these people most likely have been destroyed.

  • @one-post said:

    We need to quit letting in the refugees all the time.

    As quoted directly in the article none of you people have read, less than 1% of all refugee applications get approved. That's not "letting them in all the time".

    @jrb12711 said:

    As quoted directly in the article none of you people have read, less than 1% of all refugee applications get approved. That's not "letting them in all the time".

    Well good for you. Hey man I got an idea...why dont you let them live with you.
  • @jrb12711 said:

    As quoted directly in the article none of you people have read, less than 1% of all refugee applications get approved. That's not "letting them in all the time".

    Well good for you. Hey man I got an idea...why dont you let them live with you.

    @one-post said:

    Well good for you. Hey man I got an idea...why dont you let them live with you.

    Actually, the government doesn't let you do that by in large unless you have direct family ties. Instead, they often make refugees live in slum-like conditions which is still better than the war-torn hell they came away from.

    I gladly would though if it were allowed to let them get on their feet.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    The government says it so it has to be true? The government says it didn't pay ransom for the Iran hostages too but I'm not buying that one either.....

    Diehard is right and even the corrupt FBI director admitted it that these refugees cannot be fully vetted like the government claims because any records on these people most likely have been destroyed.

    Ah yes, when the preponderance of evidence proves you to be wrong yet again just use the tired excuse of "well the government is lying, wake up sheeple!"

  • @one-post said:

    Well good for you. Hey man I got an idea...why dont you let them live with you.

    Actually, the government doesn't let you do that by in large unless you have direct family ties. Instead, they often make refugees live in slum-like conditions which is still better than the war-torn hell they came away from.

    I gladly would though if it were allowed to let them get on their feet.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    The government says it so it has to be true? The government says it didn't pay ransom for the Iran hostages too but I'm not buying that one either.....

    Diehard is right and even the corrupt FBI director admitted it that these refugees cannot be fully vetted like the government claims because any records on these people most likely have been destroyed.

    Ah yes, when the preponderance of evidence proves you to be wrong yet again just use the tired excuse of "well the government is lying, wake up sheeple!"

    @jrb12711 said:

    Actually, the government doesn't let you do that by in large unless you have direct family ties. Instead, they often make refugees live in slum-like conditions which is still better than the war-torn hell they came away from.

    I gladly would though if it were allowed to let them get on their feet.

    Ah yes, when the preponderance of evidence proves you to be wrong yet again just use the tired excuse of "well the government is lying, wake up sheeple!"

    The preponderance of the evidence shows we have a government who lies to us way too often. The sheeple are those who believe everything because the government says so.

  • learned that by watching the democratic nazi party, I take it?

    @calfoxwc said:

    learned that by watching the democratic nazi party, I take it?

    Them too. Count yourself as part of that group though. Ive watched you for a year or two now obsessively twist the truth to suit your own narratives just like everyody else. No diff