mini survey

Westside Steve

Just getting a basic grip all the guys here on this board.

Checking to see who is voting for whom or would vote for if you are a citizen.

1 Donald Trump with enthusiasm because he's the best guy for the job.

2 Donald Trump with some severe reservations because Hillary is a lot worse.

3 Hillary Clinton with enthusiasm because she's the best person for the job.

4 Hillary Clinton with some severe reservations because Donald Trump is much worse.

5 Not voting or voting for Gary Johnson or Jill Stein or a joke vote ie Mickey Mouse Donald Duck etcetera

(I guess you can add Trump or Hillary with minor reservations but I thought that would just clutter up the survey)

WSS

OldBrownsFan

(2) Donald Trump with some severe reservations because Hillary is a lot worse.

bbedward

#1 with no reservations because his opponent is Clinton

I probably won't vote in the senate race since I have reservations against them both - polls show a Portman landslide though.

Judge Pat Fisher and Judge Cynthia Rice also for the OH supreme court

DieHardBrownsFan

The Donald with enthusiasm

OldBrownsFan

@bbedward said:

#1 with no reservations because his opponent is Clinton

I probably won't vote in the senate race since I have reservations against them both - polls show a Portman landslide though.

Judge Pat Fisher and Judge Cynthia Rice also for the OH supreme court

I thought Portman refusing to endorse or support Trump might hurt him...he got alot of people responding on his FB page saying they would no longer support him but it looks like his refusal to support the head of the ticket isn't going to hurt him.

bbedward

Portman is a pro-TPP shill like Kasich.

I'll likely vote Strickland

calfoxwc

Strickland is a meathead who is incompetent nutjob who can easily flip and go against our second amendment.

Portman changed his mind about not supporting gay "marriage" because his son came out as gay...

well, I hope his son doesn't decide to become a nazi.

Portman is a coward, but I'll still have to vote for him. blech.

tiamat63

@calfoxwc said:

Strickland is a meathead who is incompetent nutjob who can easily flip and go against our second amendment.

Portman changed his mind about not supporting gay "marriage" because his son came out as gay...

well, I hope his son doesn't decide to become a nazi.

Portman is a coward, but I'll still have to vote for him. blech.

This is literally your arguement for anything and everything isn't it? Do you have ANY concept of what this entails?

RE: The OP. No, no, no, nope, noper.

I can't in any capacity vote for either candidate so I'll let the rest of America ruin it instead. Washing my hands of this mess feels good.

Westside Steve

@bbedward said:

Portman is a pro-TPP shill like Kasich.

I'll likely vote Strickland

http://www.weeklystandard.com/ted-strickland-was-for-free-trade-with-china-before-he-was-against-it/article/2001754

FYI

WSS

bbedward

Portman it is then

calfoxwc

Strickland switches on gun rights | The Columbus Dispatch

www.dispatch.com/content/.../strickland-switches-on-gun-rights.html

Dec 21, 2015 - When asked to produce any statement Strickland made before this year about changing his views on gun control, the Strickland campaign cited ...

Ted Strickland, once an NRA favorite, now touting gun-control stance ...

www.cleveland.com/open/index.../ted_strickland_once_an_nra_fav.html

Oct 5, 2016 - Strickland, once prominently supported by gun-rights groups, is now calling for tougher gun-control measures as a U.S. Senate candidate.

DieHardBrownsFan

@bbedward said:

Portman is a pro-TPP shill like Kasich.

I'll likely vote Strickland

Portman is an asshole. I voted for Strickland.

calfoxwc

This is literally your arguement for anything and everything isn't it? Do you have ANY concept of what this entails?

sissy tiamsies

******************************************************************

A. What the hell are you wetting your pants about? My having the 2nd Amendment as a primary factor?

or complaining about Portman changing his stance on Real Marriage? Our 2nd Amendment IS a primary factor.

B. You are way too arrogant, pardon me, but your stupidity keeps slipping out, Tiamsies.

Tour2ma

3 Hillary Clinton with enthusiasm because she's the best person for the job.

I ended up more enthusiastic than I thought I'd be when I voted for HRC yesterday. Largely because in my final analysis she was the only one qualified for the job who is running to be President.

The irony is that Bill Weld might have created more of a dilemma for me. The more I heard the guy, the more his integrity showed through. Of course that would have been resolved when that morning he all but said to not vote for his ticket if your second choice was HRC.

tiamat63

@calfoxwc said:

This is literally your arguement for anything and everything isn't it? Do you have ANY concept of what this entails?

sissy tiamsies

******************************************************************

A. What the hell are you wetting your pants about? My having the 2nd Amendment as a primary factor?

or complaining about Portman changing his stance on Real Marriage? Our 2nd Amendment IS a primary factor.

B. You are way too arrogant, pardon me, but your stupidity keeps slipping out, Tiamsies.

Arrogant...yet you do the name calling.

Do you even read your own material? Hello?!?! Mcfly?!?!

Westside Steve

I'm voting for Donald Trump with at least some enthusiasm and very little reservation. That being said my favorite of all the candidates was and is Newt Gingrich.

Experience in the presidency means very little to me and didn't mean much to the Democrats eight years ago.

I believe for good or ill the country needs the enema.

WSS

calfoxwc

@tiamat63 said:

Arrogant...yet you do the name calling.

Do you even read your own material? Hello?!?! Mcfly?!?!

nope - your arrogance translates across the forum lines - especially

the football forum. I am not arrogant, I just have strong opinons.

Not about my brilliance, my opinions...etc...

there is a difference, and you don't get it. Oh yeah, you are too arrogant to learn anything.

One Post

2. But I inflect ....The Dems put Hillary in place because she's the only one with a chance to beat Trump. Anyone else would get beat easily. It's the liberal votes that determine elections anymore which leaves me out of the equation.

tiamat63

@calfoxwc said:

nope - your arrogance translates across the forum lines - especially

the football forum. I am not arrogant, I just have strong opinons.

Not about my brilliance, my opinions...etc...

there is a difference, and you don't get it. Oh yeah, you are too arrogant to learn anything.

Weren't you the one that said the Browns would 'flip the switch'on the running game and when asked to elaborate your response was along the lines of "see, when you flick a switch up it goes on"....

Don't mistake my questioning of your reasoning and conclusions as arrogance. Your attempts to explain your thought process in detail on the football side of things are every bit as cosmetic and hollow as they are on the poli side.

calfoxwc

Your determination that your football opinions are godly have made you look like

a fool more than once.

I often use the disclaimer that I never played the game, and I'm full of baloney, yet I

still have observed over many years certain aspects of thee game.

Flugels played the game - and he keeps saying I know a lot more than I give

myself credit for, and he things you are an arrogant twit.

have a nice day, Napoleon.