Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. FBI: New emails don't change conclusions about Clinton

FBI: New emails don't change conclusions about Clinton

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
42 Posts 14 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
    • 24k Posts
    • 1k Reputation
    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by Clevfan4life
    #4

    Inb4 cals/ed Oh wait fbi is saying what now? Its rigged its rigged....rigged i say!!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
      • 11k Posts
      • 3k Reputation
      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
      #5

      Fantastic job by the FBI to sift through all of 650,000 emails this quickly so they can inform us there will be no recommendation of charges against Clinton. What about this maid of Clinton's who was getting classified emails to print out? Oh yeah the FBI hasn't even interviewed her yet....Corruption at all levels of this government.

      REPORT: Clinton Maid Printed Out Sensitive Emails For Hillary, FBI Has Not Interviewed Her

      The New York Post is reporting that a maid for Hillary Clinton’s Washington, D.C. residence was regularly asked to print out emails for Clinton while Hillary was Secretary of State despite the maid lacking security clearance.

      http://www.mediaite.com/print/report-clinton-maid-printed-out-sensitive-emails-for-hillary-fbi-has-not-interviewed-her/

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Pumpkin Eater P
        • 4k Posts
        • 297 Reputation
        P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
        #6

        How did they go through so many emails in such a short time? They didn't

        :neutral_face:
        OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • P Pumpkin Eater

          How did they go through so many emails in such a short time? They didn't

          OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
          • 11k Posts
          • 3k Reputation
          OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @pumpkin-eater said:

          How did they go through so many emails in such a short time? They didn't

          I put that in pink to reflect my skepticism. There is NO way they reviewed all those 650,000 emails nor has the FBI even taken the time to interview Clinton's maid who printed out classified emails.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #8

            True. Comey is still their corrupt hack. They knew these emails were coming out, so he said he'd "reopen"...

            and then say "nope, nothin there either".

            Our gov is in corrupt hands.

            "you drop charges against her... because you don't want a visit from the...gestapo...."

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 9k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Took them 12 months to review 33,000

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                • 28k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                #10

                This was a setup from the get go. Obama is behind this you can bet, and I'm serious. But I think Trump has a real chance to win. I will love the melt down of the administration and the press.

                "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                1 Reply Last reply
                👍
                Quote Reply
                • LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 10k Posts
                  • 2k Reputation
                  LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  I knew jack shit would come of this. Hillary would have to write out exactly what she did and why she needs to be prosecuted before anything would happen to her.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                    • 24k Posts
                    • 1k Reputation
                    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Oh man, love this flip flopping

                    LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • C Clevfan4life

                      Oh man, love this flip flopping

                      LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 10k Posts
                      • 2k Reputation
                      LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @clevfan4life said:

                      Oh man, love this flip flopping

                      I consistently said jack shit would happen. Can't say the same for the rest of the gang.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                        • 64k Posts
                        • 8k Reputation
                        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
                        #14

                        I thought something would happen, but that was dumb. She already lied to the FBI, they admit she

                        had secret doc information in her emails...

                        they just don't care - that's why Comey is there in the first place.

                        The corrupt have to have cover -

                        Comey is dirty, imho.

                        http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/james-comey-fbi-accountability-214234

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                          • 28k Posts
                          • 6k Reputation
                          DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          hillary-2_1463579600_Content_Consumption

                          "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                            • 11k Posts
                            • 3k Reputation
                            OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            mrz092916_color.jpg

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                              • 28k Posts
                              • 6k Reputation
                              DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              This shit is so corrupt it boggles the mind.

                              "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                • 28k Posts
                                • 6k Reputation
                                DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                14908268_701924723296484_507676735158527

                                "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Pumpkin Eater P
                                  • 4k Posts
                                  • 297 Reputation
                                  P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  Puke

                                  :neutral_face:
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                    • 30k Posts
                                    • 6k Reputation
                                    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    FFS people... it's computer science not rocket science...

                                    Remember how this debacle started?

                                    It never was "650,000 Clinton emails" it was "emails". The 650,000 was a leaked, total number saved on the laptop. Weiner's and Huma's shared laptop. They were "discovered" by agents reviewing Weiner's emails in his latest sexting case. So we know his were on there.

                                    October 28, 2016

                                    Dear Messrs Chairmen:

                                    In previous congressional testimony, l referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony.

                                    In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

                                    Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony.

                                    Sincerely yours,
                                    James B. Comey
                                    Director

                                    Nonetheless the FBI electronically sifted through the 650k using IP addresses, dates and other meta data to cull the non-Clinton emails. Then they electronically compared Clinton related emails with their catalog of previously reviewed Clinton emails and culled duplicates. So emails that were neither State Department business or new were eliminated. The remainder, the new, Clinton related emails were reviewed expediciously.

                                    One senior law enforcement official said that as recently as Friday, it was not clear whether the review would be completed by Election Day. But after days of working in shifts around the clock, teams of counterintelligence agents and technology specialists at the bureau’s headquarters in Washington finished their examination of the thousands of emails. Officials had decided to make their decision public as soon as they had reached it, to avoid any suggestion they were suppressing information.

                                    According to the law enforcement official, many of the emails were personal messages or duplicates of ones that the bureau had previously examined during the original inquiry.

                                    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/us/politics/hilary-clinton-male-voters-donald-trump.html?_r=0


                                    And that is what the latest Comey letter says:

                                    (November 6, 2016)

                                    Dear Messrs. Chairmen:

                                    I write to supplement my October 28, 2016 letter that notified you the FBI would be taking additional investigative steps with respect to former Secretary of State Clinton's use of a personal email server. Since my letter, the FBI investigative team has been working around the clock to process and review a large volume of emails from a device obtained in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation. During that process, we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State.

                                    Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.

                                    I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short period of time.

                                    Sincerely yours,
                                    James B. Comey
                                    Director



                                    The conspiracy crowd, including those within the FBI, has had its week and a day...

                                    Sorry if the findings did not meet your predetermined conclusions.

                                    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                                      FFS people... it's computer science not rocket science...

                                      Remember how this debacle started?

                                      It never was "650,000 Clinton emails" it was "emails". The 650,000 was a leaked, total number saved on the laptop. Weiner's and Huma's shared laptop. They were "discovered" by agents reviewing Weiner's emails in his latest sexting case. So we know his were on there.

                                      October 28, 2016

                                      Dear Messrs Chairmen:

                                      In previous congressional testimony, l referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony.

                                      In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

                                      Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony.

                                      Sincerely yours,
                                      James B. Comey
                                      Director

                                      Nonetheless the FBI electronically sifted through the 650k using IP addresses, dates and other meta data to cull the non-Clinton emails. Then they electronically compared Clinton related emails with their catalog of previously reviewed Clinton emails and culled duplicates. So emails that were neither State Department business or new were eliminated. The remainder, the new, Clinton related emails were reviewed expediciously.

                                      One senior law enforcement official said that as recently as Friday, it was not clear whether the review would be completed by Election Day. But after days of working in shifts around the clock, teams of counterintelligence agents and technology specialists at the bureau’s headquarters in Washington finished their examination of the thousands of emails. Officials had decided to make their decision public as soon as they had reached it, to avoid any suggestion they were suppressing information.

                                      According to the law enforcement official, many of the emails were personal messages or duplicates of ones that the bureau had previously examined during the original inquiry.

                                      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/us/politics/hilary-clinton-male-voters-donald-trump.html?_r=0


                                      And that is what the latest Comey letter says:

                                      (November 6, 2016)

                                      Dear Messrs. Chairmen:

                                      I write to supplement my October 28, 2016 letter that notified you the FBI would be taking additional investigative steps with respect to former Secretary of State Clinton's use of a personal email server. Since my letter, the FBI investigative team has been working around the clock to process and review a large volume of emails from a device obtained in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation. During that process, we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State.

                                      Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.

                                      I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short period of time.

                                      Sincerely yours,
                                      James B. Comey
                                      Director



                                      The conspiracy crowd, including those within the FBI, has had its week and a day...

                                      Sorry if the findings did not meet your predetermined conclusions.

                                      FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                      • 4k Posts
                                      • 2k Reputation
                                      F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @tour2ma said:

                                      The conspiracy crowd, including those within the FBI, has had its week and a day...

                                      Sorry if the findings did not meet your predetermined conclusions.

                                      funny you mentioned that.....

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • Pumpkin Eater P
                                        • 4k Posts
                                        • 297 Reputation
                                        P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        yeah, sure. She ILLEGALLY SENT AND RECEIVED CLASSIFIED EMAILS ON A PRIVATE SERVER. SHE HAD CLASSIFIED EMAILS END UP ON A LAPTOP OF AN UNQUALIFIED ASSOCIATE. Do you really believe that she should not be charged? Really?

                                        What do you think would happen to you at work if you were so careless with trade secrets? What do you think would happen to you if you mishandled classified information? You certainly would not get a free pass. Let's not forget the $500K donation to the FBI guy's wife.

                                        :neutral_face:
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                          • 64k Posts
                                          • 8k Reputation
                                          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          except several legal experts say it's a travesty, and absolutely she

                                          should be charged.

                                          funny how that works. EXPERTS say they could definately get a conviction -

                                          this is just a mountain of bullhockey. A 4/5 star general is going to face five years in prison,

                                          for far, far, far, far less that she has.

                                          A navy guy took a pic of a sub inside... and he got a year.

                                          Let me tell you - in the AF, for a while, I started out in the post office. One day, a captain, a pilot,

                                          came in, picked up his mail, and left.

                                          He left behind a folder accidently. It was marked "Classified". I looked at it, and it was a bunch of stuff, first page

                                          was maintenance schedule for replacing bearings in B-52's.

                                          I hid it under the counter, and after several minutes, he came back, and he was scared as hell.

                                          He whispered "airman......did I leave a folder here?" I told him "Sir, I have your back", reached

                                          under the counter, and gave it to him. He looked around, and said, "Oh, my God...you just saved my life...ohhhhh God"

                                          And all higgardly has DONE? and the FBI admitted she lied again and again?

                                          come on. it's a good ole boys marxist network. nazis were never guilty of anything. But fail to say heil hitler and you

                                          could get shot outright.

                                          that's marxists, that is what it does. Total control mechanism. A lot like islamic terrorists.

                                          Oh, btw, want me to post about the nazi-islamic terrorist connection again?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate