Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. FBI: New emails don't change conclusions about Clinton

FBI: New emails don't change conclusions about Clinton

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
42 Posts 14 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
    • 30k Posts
    • 6k Reputation
    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #20

    FFS people... it's computer science not rocket science...

    Remember how this debacle started?

    It never was "650,000 Clinton emails" it was "emails". The 650,000 was a leaked, total number saved on the laptop. Weiner's and Huma's shared laptop. They were "discovered" by agents reviewing Weiner's emails in his latest sexting case. So we know his were on there.

    October 28, 2016

    Dear Messrs Chairmen:

    In previous congressional testimony, l referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony.

    In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

    Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony.

    Sincerely yours,
    James B. Comey
    Director

    Nonetheless the FBI electronically sifted through the 650k using IP addresses, dates and other meta data to cull the non-Clinton emails. Then they electronically compared Clinton related emails with their catalog of previously reviewed Clinton emails and culled duplicates. So emails that were neither State Department business or new were eliminated. The remainder, the new, Clinton related emails were reviewed expediciously.

    One senior law enforcement official said that as recently as Friday, it was not clear whether the review would be completed by Election Day. But after days of working in shifts around the clock, teams of counterintelligence agents and technology specialists at the bureau’s headquarters in Washington finished their examination of the thousands of emails. Officials had decided to make their decision public as soon as they had reached it, to avoid any suggestion they were suppressing information.

    According to the law enforcement official, many of the emails were personal messages or duplicates of ones that the bureau had previously examined during the original inquiry.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/us/politics/hilary-clinton-male-voters-donald-trump.html?_r=0


    And that is what the latest Comey letter says:

    (November 6, 2016)

    Dear Messrs. Chairmen:

    I write to supplement my October 28, 2016 letter that notified you the FBI would be taking additional investigative steps with respect to former Secretary of State Clinton's use of a personal email server. Since my letter, the FBI investigative team has been working around the clock to process and review a large volume of emails from a device obtained in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation. During that process, we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State.

    Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.

    I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short period of time.

    Sincerely yours,
    James B. Comey
    Director



    The conspiracy crowd, including those within the FBI, has had its week and a day...

    Sorry if the findings did not meet your predetermined conclusions.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    F 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Tour2maT Tour2ma

      FFS people... it's computer science not rocket science...

      Remember how this debacle started?

      It never was "650,000 Clinton emails" it was "emails". The 650,000 was a leaked, total number saved on the laptop. Weiner's and Huma's shared laptop. They were "discovered" by agents reviewing Weiner's emails in his latest sexting case. So we know his were on there.

      October 28, 2016

      Dear Messrs Chairmen:

      In previous congressional testimony, l referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony.

      In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

      Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony.

      Sincerely yours,
      James B. Comey
      Director

      Nonetheless the FBI electronically sifted through the 650k using IP addresses, dates and other meta data to cull the non-Clinton emails. Then they electronically compared Clinton related emails with their catalog of previously reviewed Clinton emails and culled duplicates. So emails that were neither State Department business or new were eliminated. The remainder, the new, Clinton related emails were reviewed expediciously.

      One senior law enforcement official said that as recently as Friday, it was not clear whether the review would be completed by Election Day. But after days of working in shifts around the clock, teams of counterintelligence agents and technology specialists at the bureau’s headquarters in Washington finished their examination of the thousands of emails. Officials had decided to make their decision public as soon as they had reached it, to avoid any suggestion they were suppressing information.

      According to the law enforcement official, many of the emails were personal messages or duplicates of ones that the bureau had previously examined during the original inquiry.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/07/us/politics/hilary-clinton-male-voters-donald-trump.html?_r=0


      And that is what the latest Comey letter says:

      (November 6, 2016)

      Dear Messrs. Chairmen:

      I write to supplement my October 28, 2016 letter that notified you the FBI would be taking additional investigative steps with respect to former Secretary of State Clinton's use of a personal email server. Since my letter, the FBI investigative team has been working around the clock to process and review a large volume of emails from a device obtained in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation. During that process, we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State.

      Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.

      I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short period of time.

      Sincerely yours,
      James B. Comey
      Director



      The conspiracy crowd, including those within the FBI, has had its week and a day...

      Sorry if the findings did not meet your predetermined conclusions.

      FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
      • 4k Posts
      • 2k Reputation
      F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
      #21

      @tour2ma said:

      The conspiracy crowd, including those within the FBI, has had its week and a day...

      Sorry if the findings did not meet your predetermined conclusions.

      funny you mentioned that.....

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Pumpkin Eater P
        • 4k Posts
        • 297 Reputation
        P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
        #22

        yeah, sure. She ILLEGALLY SENT AND RECEIVED CLASSIFIED EMAILS ON A PRIVATE SERVER. SHE HAD CLASSIFIED EMAILS END UP ON A LAPTOP OF AN UNQUALIFIED ASSOCIATE. Do you really believe that she should not be charged? Really?

        What do you think would happen to you at work if you were so careless with trade secrets? What do you think would happen to you if you mishandled classified information? You certainly would not get a free pass. Let's not forget the $500K donation to the FBI guy's wife.

        :neutral_face:
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
          • 64k Posts
          • 8k Reputation
          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
          #23

          except several legal experts say it's a travesty, and absolutely she

          should be charged.

          funny how that works. EXPERTS say they could definately get a conviction -

          this is just a mountain of bullhockey. A 4/5 star general is going to face five years in prison,

          for far, far, far, far less that she has.

          A navy guy took a pic of a sub inside... and he got a year.

          Let me tell you - in the AF, for a while, I started out in the post office. One day, a captain, a pilot,

          came in, picked up his mail, and left.

          He left behind a folder accidently. It was marked "Classified". I looked at it, and it was a bunch of stuff, first page

          was maintenance schedule for replacing bearings in B-52's.

          I hid it under the counter, and after several minutes, he came back, and he was scared as hell.

          He whispered "airman......did I leave a folder here?" I told him "Sir, I have your back", reached

          under the counter, and gave it to him. He looked around, and said, "Oh, my God...you just saved my life...ohhhhh God"

          And all higgardly has DONE? and the FBI admitted she lied again and again?

          come on. it's a good ole boys marxist network. nazis were never guilty of anything. But fail to say heil hitler and you

          could get shot outright.

          that's marxists, that is what it does. Total control mechanism. A lot like islamic terrorists.

          Oh, btw, want me to post about the nazi-islamic terrorist connection again?

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #24

            this pretty much explains why it's a mafia "innocent even though guilty" decision by Comey

            http://www.dickmorris.com/comey-announcement-not-credible-dick-morris-tv-special-alert/

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
              • 64k Posts
              • 8k Reputation
              C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
              #25

              http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/11/05/judge-pirro-clinton-foundation-is-an-organized-criminal-enterprise/

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                • 24k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                #26

                If Hillary actually had titties like that you old fockers would hit don't lie

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 5k Posts
                  • 306 Reputation
                  B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Breaking News Obama was born in Kenya and took his oath on the Koran 😎

                  Not much gets in or out of the bubble.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • StinkHole StinkHoleS One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 3k Posts
                    • 365 Reputation
                    StinkHoleS StinkHole wrote on last edited by StinkHole
                    #28

                    Stuart

                    What Comey said back in July reeks of some deal made on an airplane between Bill Clinton and that DOJ piece of shit Loretta Lynch.

                    Comey: Clinton Should Not Be Prosecuted for 'Gross Negligence,' Even Though She Was 'Extremely Careless'

                    Oh really Comey?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                      • 4k Posts
                      • 2k Reputation
                      F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                        • 4k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        soft coup or not - its easy to see that the corruption within the walls of gov are not gonna be accepted by the voters

                        at least there are members within the intelligence agencies that are not with Comey - let alone the the sham that is called

                        obama administration and lastly the clintons -

                        anyone think there will be a peaceful transition of power come wednesday and Trump will concede?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • gftChris gftChrisG
                          • 13k Posts
                          • 428 Reputation
                          gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          Just to clarify here

                          - Hillary was found innocent of any wrongdoing earlier in the year

                          - Some new source of dick pic emails supposedly linked to the case popped up

                          - FBI guy reopens the investigation two weeks before the election, sounds the alarm to everybody just as early voting starts, breaking protocol in multiple ways in the process

                          - Trump and fellow republicans jump all over it, "hillary's going to jail", "hillary to be indicted", "how can you vote for her now?" etc

                          - then the FBI closes it again with still no evidence of wrongdoing

                          And the FBI is corrupt in favour of Hillary? You've all seen for yourself the narrowing of the polls since the announcement was made a couple of weeks ago. Before that it was basically done, Trump's campaign was dead in the water, and this brought new life back in to it. And yet somehow, the FBI is in the pocket of the Clintons?

                          Seriously?

                          DieHardBrownsFanD W 2 Replies Last reply
                          👍
                          Quote Reply
                          • gftChrisG gftChris

                            Just to clarify here

                            - Hillary was found innocent of any wrongdoing earlier in the year

                            - Some new source of dick pic emails supposedly linked to the case popped up

                            - FBI guy reopens the investigation two weeks before the election, sounds the alarm to everybody just as early voting starts, breaking protocol in multiple ways in the process

                            - Trump and fellow republicans jump all over it, "hillary's going to jail", "hillary to be indicted", "how can you vote for her now?" etc

                            - then the FBI closes it again with still no evidence of wrongdoing

                            And the FBI is corrupt in favour of Hillary? You've all seen for yourself the narrowing of the polls since the announcement was made a couple of weeks ago. Before that it was basically done, Trump's campaign was dead in the water, and this brought new life back in to it. And yet somehow, the FBI is in the pocket of the Clintons?

                            Seriously?

                            DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                            • 28k Posts
                            • 6k Reputation
                            DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            @gftchris said:

                            Just to clarify here

                            - Hillary was found innocent of any wrongdoing earlier in the year

                            - Some new source of dick pic emails supposedly linked to the case popped up

                            - FBI guy reopens the investigation two weeks before the election, sounds the alarm to everybody just as early voting starts, breaking protocol in multiple ways in the process

                            - Trump and fellow republicans jump all over it, "hillary's going to jail", "hillary to be indicted", "how can you vote for her now?" etc

                            - then the FBI closes it again with still no evidence of wrongdoing

                            And the FBI is corrupt in favour of Hillary? You've all seen for yourself the narrowing of the polls since the announcement was made a couple of weeks ago. Before that it was basically done, Trump's campaign was dead in the water, and this brought new life back in to it. And yet somehow, the FBI is in the pocket of the Clintons?

                            Seriously?

                            Yes.

                            "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • gftChrisG gftChris

                              Just to clarify here

                              - Hillary was found innocent of any wrongdoing earlier in the year

                              - Some new source of dick pic emails supposedly linked to the case popped up

                              - FBI guy reopens the investigation two weeks before the election, sounds the alarm to everybody just as early voting starts, breaking protocol in multiple ways in the process

                              - Trump and fellow republicans jump all over it, "hillary's going to jail", "hillary to be indicted", "how can you vote for her now?" etc

                              - then the FBI closes it again with still no evidence of wrongdoing

                              And the FBI is corrupt in favour of Hillary? You've all seen for yourself the narrowing of the polls since the announcement was made a couple of weeks ago. Before that it was basically done, Trump's campaign was dead in the water, and this brought new life back in to it. And yet somehow, the FBI is in the pocket of the Clintons?

                              Seriously?

                              Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                              • 39k Posts
                              • 9k Reputation
                              W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
                              #33

                              @gftchris said:

                              Just to clarify here

                              - Hillary was found innocent of any wrongdoing earlier in the year

                              - Some new source of dick pic emails supposedly linked to the case popped up

                              - FBI guy reopens the investigation two weeks before the election, sounds the alarm to everybody just as early voting starts, breaking protocol in multiple ways in the process

                              - Trump and fellow republicans jump all over it, "hillary's going to jail", "hillary to be indicted", "how can you vote for her now?" etc

                              - then the FBI closes it again with still no evidence of wrongdoing

                              And the FBI is corrupt in favour of Hillary? You've all seen for yourself the narrowing of the polls since the announcement was made a couple of weeks ago. Before that it was basically done, Trump's campaign was dead in the water, and this brought new life back in to it. And yet somehow, the FBI is in the pocket of the Clintons?

                              Seriously?

                              Yes.

                              Whether director Comey is being blackmailed or bribes or is just a fellow Traveler.

                              And just to clarify the clarification she was not found innocent of Jack shit.

                              They didn't want to prosecute her even though she was worse than many people who they did want to prosecute. That includes Richard Nixon Martha Stewart scooter Libby etcetera etcetera all of which were persecuted for doing much less.

                              WSS

                              www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                • 28k Posts
                                • 6k Reputation
                                DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                #34

                                14900443_1775169262764335_75594598800091

                                "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                                  • 11k Posts
                                  • 3k Reputation
                                  OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
                                  #35

                                  Hillary Clinton was dead to rights guilty of negligent handling of classified material. Stone cold dead to rights guilty with the latest revelation she was having her housekeeper print out classified emails...........there is little doubt other countries hacked her unsecured server and she gave them classified information through her willful negligence.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Pumpkin Eater P
                                    • 4k Posts
                                    • 297 Reputation
                                    P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                                    #36

                                    She was not "found innocent"

                                    :neutral_face:
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • W Westside Steve

                                      @gftchris said:

                                      Just to clarify here

                                      - Hillary was found innocent of any wrongdoing earlier in the year

                                      - Some new source of dick pic emails supposedly linked to the case popped up

                                      - FBI guy reopens the investigation two weeks before the election, sounds the alarm to everybody just as early voting starts, breaking protocol in multiple ways in the process

                                      - Trump and fellow republicans jump all over it, "hillary's going to jail", "hillary to be indicted", "how can you vote for her now?" etc

                                      - then the FBI closes it again with still no evidence of wrongdoing

                                      And the FBI is corrupt in favour of Hillary? You've all seen for yourself the narrowing of the polls since the announcement was made a couple of weeks ago. Before that it was basically done, Trump's campaign was dead in the water, and this brought new life back in to it. And yet somehow, the FBI is in the pocket of the Clintons?

                                      Seriously?

                                      Yes.

                                      Whether director Comey is being blackmailed or bribes or is just a fellow Traveler.

                                      And just to clarify the clarification she was not found innocent of Jack shit.

                                      They didn't want to prosecute her even though she was worse than many people who they did want to prosecute. That includes Richard Nixon Martha Stewart scooter Libby etcetera etcetera all of which were persecuted for doing much less.

                                      WSS

                                      BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 5k Posts
                                      • 306 Reputation
                                      B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
                                      #37

                                      @westside-steve said:

                                      Yes.

                                      Whether director Comey is being blackmailed or bribes or is just a fellow Traveler.

                                      And just to clarify the clarification she was not found innocent of Jack shit.

                                      They didn't want to prosecute her even though she was worse than many people who they did want to prosecute. That includes Richard Nixon Martha Stewart scooter Libby etcetera etcetera all of which were persecuted for doing much less.

                                      WSS

                                      Don't forget all the others not prosecuted such as Reagan and W.

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • B BaconHound

                                        @westside-steve said:

                                        Yes.

                                        Whether director Comey is being blackmailed or bribes or is just a fellow Traveler.

                                        And just to clarify the clarification she was not found innocent of Jack shit.

                                        They didn't want to prosecute her even though she was worse than many people who they did want to prosecute. That includes Richard Nixon Martha Stewart scooter Libby etcetera etcetera all of which were persecuted for doing much less.

                                        WSS

                                        Don't forget all the others not prosecuted such as Reagan and W.

                                        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                        • 39k Posts
                                        • 9k Reputation
                                        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                                        #38

                                        @baconhound said:

                                        Don't forget all the others not prosecuted such as Reagan and W.

                                        And what would you have investigated them for?

                                        WSS

                                        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • W Westside Steve

                                          @baconhound said:

                                          Don't forget all the others not prosecuted such as Reagan and W.

                                          And what would you have investigated them for?

                                          WSS

                                          BaconHound B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 5k Posts
                                          • 306 Reputation
                                          B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
                                          #39

                                          @westside-steve said:

                                          And what would you have investigated them for?

                                          WSS

                                          I would have investigated Reagan for violation of the Boland Amendment and I would have investigated W for making a false case for the Iraq war.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate