Camp Trubisky
-
I'm in on Trubisky. Competition isn't everything. Manziel faced strong competition. Wentz didn't. Roethlisberger was from a small school. How many times do we have to get burned before we realize that you look at a QB's traits first and foremost. Can he make all the throws? Does he show the ability to process information quickly? Is he able to learn from his mistakes and does he eat/sleep/breathe football? Does he get the ball out quickly? If the answers to these questions is yes, than he's the guy.
The front office likes him. Their analytics are very high on him. He's big enough, with a good arm. He wants to play for the Browns, just like Kosar wanted to. This is an easy decision, provided he is still considered one of the top QBs in the draft.
What would stop him from being considered such? I mean, even if he ran a Kosar like 40...that would mean nothing. (and if you saw his highlights he looks like a cheetah compared to Kosar)
Film....what he does in games is the #1 factor. Workouts count, sure. But as has been said, he seems to have almost Marino like quick release. His throws come across as lasers (particularly compared to Kessler). It seems he can throw it 60 yards if he needs to. And from what I have seen....he is no Derek Anderson.....he actually has touch on his shorter passes.
So, to quote Dan Gilbert's kid: "What's not to like"? Or, what, in your view could reduce his evaluation?
What would stop him from being considered such? I mean, even if he ran a Kosar like 40...that would mean nothing. (and if you saw his highlights he looks like a cheetah compared to Kosar)
Film....what he does in games is the #1 factor. Workouts count, sure. But as has been said, he seems to have almost Marino like quick release. His throws come across as lasers (particularly compared to Kessler). It seems he can throw it 60 yards if he needs to. And from what I have seen....he is no Derek Anderson.....he actually has touch on his shorter passes.
So, to quote Dan Gilbert's kid: "What's not to like"? Or, what, in your view could reduce his evaluation?
Footwork falls apart under pressure from time to time. UNC's offensive system calls for plenty of short and intermediate passes, thereby inflating his accuracy numbers. Relies a little heavily on Switzer (30+ more receptions than the next receiver), despite the fact that Switzer is not a #1 WR and lines up all over the field, meaning that more often than not Switzer is just his #1 read regardless of play structure or defensive looks. He fumbles too much. He is Philip Rivers when the game is on the line - i.e. you have no idea what the fuck is going to happen.
He's not a perfect prospect.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
So I read through some scouting reports and watched bits and pieces of a couple of games last night.
The Good
The kid has got an arm on him. Solid accuracy too. Pocket presence was decent, not spectacular in what I saw but I think it's something he can easily improve.
The Bad
Has some mechanical issues which can effect his power and accuracy. Doesn't always step into his throws. Deep accuracy is decent at best.
Questions
I can't tell if he's getting the ball out early due to reads or the offensive call. He has solid weapons (I really like Switzer) and while that's not a knock, it's something you have to take into account.
The kid no doubt has potential but it's definitely going to be an adjustment. The only one year starting gives me some Sanchez vibes which scares the living hell out of me. Unless he absolutely kills it in the offseason, I can't imagine/wouldn't want him starting game 1 next year. If he's given at least half a year, if not a full one, adjusting to the game, and if we get the o line fixed up, he could be special. However, I still don't see a number 1 overall pick here.
-
Yeah Taco, that's pretty much how I feel too. Drafting a QB high, especially if it's actually NUMBER ONE, is absolutely terrifying. I mean, god FORBID Andrew Luck comes out in 2017, or someone like him. You honestly can't make this shit up.
I like Mitch, and I wouldn't be angry in the slightest if we took him. I wouldn't care if every analyst in the world gives us crap and we get an "F" grade. If we get the guy who we targeted, I'll be happy. What will REALLY piss me off is if we decide to get cute and trade out of the pick in the hopes of getting our guy later and getting picks. It would destroy us if we lose out on the guy we wanted because the QB's we have on our roster ain't exactly cutting the mustard. Not to mention, Cody is one concussion away from really being up the creek.
I can tell you this much, this upcoming draft is going to mean just about EVERYTHING. Hue might get a pass THIS year, but no matter what the owner or GM says, losing every game definitely rattles the faith. How long do you think Hue Jackson really has if we lose the first 6 games next year? We have to hit on this upcoming draft, and we have to find guys that can play RIGHT AWAY.
-
We can get Trubisky and Hooker, which I think is a perfect combo of BPA fitting need for us.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Yeah, maybe Mitch hasn't played the best competition, and that's one of the downsides of the guy. Like we said, he is far from a perfect prospect. He's only started one year, right? That can be good and bad. You don't want to draft a player solely on what's he's done, you want to also draft someone because of what they CAN become. So if Mitch has improved so much in one year of starting, can he CONTINUE to improve? That's probably the golden question, and not one easily answered.
I think it's impossible to ignore the fact that Mitch wants to play here. It might not sound like a huge deal, but the more I think about it, the more it actually seems to carry weight. The fans would be immediately drawn to the guy, and that would probably sell tickets. Even if we're a terrible team, the fact that we might FINALLY have "our guy" would lessen the pain of losing drastically.
The bigger issue, and one that is impossible to ignore, is our current team can't keep QB's healthy. So can we honestly draft a young QB in good faith knowing we can't keep him healthy? What adjustments do we have to make? Is it only personnel, or is there a bigger issue? Is there a center or other OL that we can draft or pursue in FA? We must have a plan to address the protection, otherwise drafting a QB makes no sense at all.
Absolutely agree about the Protection Plan. We need to call Northwest Mutual or State Farm or Nationwide to take out an insurance policy.
Remember what happened to Tim Couch....who WAS a good QB....until he began getting hammered.
The Browns will need to take at least one OL in the first/2d round. They should also get one as young veteran FA. Remember Eric Steinbach...that sort of thing. And the Shon Coleman's and Drango's need to vastly improve.
Absolutely agree about the Protection Plan. We need to call Northwest Mutual or State Farm or Nationwide to take out an insurance policy.
Remember what happened to Tim Couch....who WAS a good QB....until he began getting hammered.
The Browns will need to take at least one OL in the first/2d round. They should also get one as young veteran FA. Remember Eric Steinbach...that sort of thing. And the Shon Coleman's and Drango's need to vastly improve.
Not just Couch, David Carr got ruined too. Heck,if they're not confident in the o-line let R Glass & Kessler get beat up for most of 2017 before we throw Mitch to the wolves.
-
Two things Jiggins:
1) There isn't a Luck in this draft. If there was, I would've started the camp personally before the season started. Mitch isn't Luck. To even insinuate that he's on Luck's level as a prospect is batshit crazy.
2) If we need players to start and produce day 1, no way in hell we take Mitch at 1. He has potential but it is going to take time.
-
The ACC Atlantic has three teams ranked - Clemson, Louisville, FSU.
The Coastal - none.
& North Carolina beat FSU.I did post a link to their schedule, it's not like they've been playing a bunch of bums. That one point loss to Duke hurts, but Fer sure- they're going to get a bowl game.
-
Two things Jiggins:
1) There isn't a Luck in this draft. If there was, I would've started the camp personally before the season started. Mitch isn't Luck. To even insinuate that he's on Luck's level as a prospect is batshit crazy.
2) If we need players to start and produce day 1, no way in hell we take Mitch at 1. He has potential but it is going to take time.
Two things Jiggins:
1) There isn't a Luck in this draft. If there was, I would've started the camp personally before the season started. Mitch isn't Luck. To even insinuate that he's on Luck's level as a prospect is batshit crazy.
2) If we need players to start and produce day 1, no way in hell we take Mitch at 1. He has potential but it is going to take time.
Yeah, if only we could get a franchise level QB who's won a Super Bowl every single year he's been in the league - like Luck has. Sure was a lock.
Oh, wait....
-
What would stop him from being considered such? I mean, even if he ran a Kosar like 40...that would mean nothing. (and if you saw his highlights he looks like a cheetah compared to Kosar)
Film....what he does in games is the #1 factor. Workouts count, sure. But as has been said, he seems to have almost Marino like quick release. His throws come across as lasers (particularly compared to Kessler). It seems he can throw it 60 yards if he needs to. And from what I have seen....he is no Derek Anderson.....he actually has touch on his shorter passes.
So, to quote Dan Gilbert's kid: "What's not to like"? Or, what, in your view could reduce his evaluation?
Footwork falls apart under pressure from time to time. UNC's offensive system calls for plenty of short and intermediate passes, thereby inflating his accuracy numbers. Relies a little heavily on Switzer (30+ more receptions than the next receiver), despite the fact that Switzer is not a #1 WR and lines up all over the field, meaning that more often than not Switzer is just his #1 read regardless of play structure or defensive looks. He fumbles too much. He is Philip Rivers when the game is on the line - i.e. you have no idea what the fuck is going to happen.
He's not a perfect prospect.
Footwork falls apart under pressure from time to time. UNC's offensive system calls for plenty of short and intermediate passes, thereby inflating his accuracy numbers. Relies a little heavily on Switzer (30+ more receptions than the next receiver), despite the fact that Switzer is not a #1 WR and lines up all over the field, meaning that more often than not Switzer is just his #1 read regardless of play structure or defensive looks. He fumbles too much. He is Philip Rivers when the game is on the line - i.e. you have no idea what the fuck is going to happen.
He's not a perfect prospect.
No, he probably won't come with a John Elway/Peyton Manning/Andrew Luck Grade.....But I think he would have a better grade than a number of top QB picks. Take just those drafted in top 3 since 1999. I think he grades better than Goff/Wentz/Bortles/Griffin/Bradford/Russell/Young/Smith/David Carr/Harrington/Vick/Couch/Palmer.
I don't know that there are more than a half dozen QBs who have come out that may end up having been considered better prospects since 1999: Luck/Winston/Newton/ I think he will be up with Eli Ryan Stafford? Mariota? McNabb.
-
So I read through some scouting reports and watched bits and pieces of a couple of games last night.
The Good
The kid has got an arm on him. Solid accuracy too. Pocket presence was decent, not spectacular in what I saw but I think it's something he can easily improve.
The Bad
Has some mechanical issues which can effect his power and accuracy. Doesn't always step into his throws. Deep accuracy is decent at best.
Questions
I can't tell if he's getting the ball out early due to reads or the offensive call. He has solid weapons (I really like Switzer) and while that's not a knock, it's something you have to take into account.
The kid no doubt has potential but it's definitely going to be an adjustment. The only one year starting gives me some Sanchez vibes which scares the living hell out of me. Unless he absolutely kills it in the offseason, I can't imagine/wouldn't want him starting game 1 next year. If he's given at least half a year, if not a full one, adjusting to the game, and if we get the o line fixed up, he could be special. However, I still don't see a number 1 overall pick here.
So I read through some scouting reports and watched bits and pieces of a couple of games last night.
The Good
The kid has got an arm on him. Solid accuracy too. Pocket presence was decent, not spectacular in what I saw but I think it's something he can easily improve.
The Bad
Has some mechanical issues which can effect his power and accuracy. Doesn't always step into his throws. Deep accuracy is decent at best.
Questions
I can't tell if he's getting the ball out early due to reads or the offensive call. He has solid weapons (I really like Switzer) and while that's not a knock, it's something you have to take into account.
The kid no doubt has potential but it's definitely going to be an adjustment. The only one year starting gives me some Sanchez vibes which scares the living hell out of me. Unless he absolutely kills it in the offseason, I can't imagine/wouldn't want him starting game 1 next year. If he's given at least half a year, if not a full one, adjusting to the game, and if we get the o line fixed up, he could be special. However, I still don't see a number 1 overall pick here.
OK, give him the Goff treatment. Let RGIII play the first half while Trib sits. (we need a nickname for him). Then get him in their half way through. That may be best.
-
Yeah Taco, that's pretty much how I feel too. Drafting a QB high, especially if it's actually NUMBER ONE, is absolutely terrifying. I mean, god FORBID Andrew Luck comes out in 2017, or someone like him. You honestly can't make this shit up.
I like Mitch, and I wouldn't be angry in the slightest if we took him. I wouldn't care if every analyst in the world gives us crap and we get an "F" grade. If we get the guy who we targeted, I'll be happy. What will REALLY piss me off is if we decide to get cute and trade out of the pick in the hopes of getting our guy later and getting picks. It would destroy us if we lose out on the guy we wanted because the QB's we have on our roster ain't exactly cutting the mustard. Not to mention, Cody is one concussion away from really being up the creek.
I can tell you this much, this upcoming draft is going to mean just about EVERYTHING. Hue might get a pass THIS year, but no matter what the owner or GM says, losing every game definitely rattles the faith. How long do you think Hue Jackson really has if we lose the first 6 games next year? We have to hit on this upcoming draft, and we have to find guys that can play RIGHT AWAY.
Yeah Taco, that's pretty much how I feel too. Drafting a QB high, especially if it's actually NUMBER ONE, is absolutely terrifying. I mean, god FORBID Andrew Luck comes out in 2017, or someone like him. You honestly can't make this shit up.
I like Mitch, and I wouldn't be angry in the slightest if we took him. I wouldn't care if every analyst in the world gives us crap and we get an "F" grade. If we get the guy who we targeted, I'll be happy. What will REALLY piss me off is if we decide to get cute and trade out of the pick in the hopes of getting our guy later and getting picks. It would destroy us if we lose out on the guy we wanted because the QB's we have on our roster ain't exactly cutting the mustard. Not to mention, Cody is one concussion away from really being up the creek.
I can tell you this much, this upcoming draft is going to mean just about EVERYTHING. Hue might get a pass THIS year, but no matter what the owner or GM says, losing every game definitely rattles the faith. How long do you think Hue Jackson really has if we lose the first 6 games next year? We have to hit on this upcoming draft, and we have to find guys that can play RIGHT AWAY.
Yes....FUCK that trade down Bullshit. I think there would be a riot in Berea if they tried to do that again....especially if it is perceived that we have a local kid....viewed as the best QB coming out in a couple of years....a franchise QB potential....and they trade down to accumulate more picks?
Do the Berea police have riot gear in storage?
-
We can get Trubisky and Hooker, which I think is a perfect combo of BPA fitting need for us.
We can get Trubisky and Hooker, which I think is a perfect combo of BPA fitting need for us.
A man a plan... Panama!
-
Two things Jiggins:
1) There isn't a Luck in this draft. If there was, I would've started the camp personally before the season started. Mitch isn't Luck. To even insinuate that he's on Luck's level as a prospect is batshit crazy.
2) If we need players to start and produce day 1, no way in hell we take Mitch at 1. He has potential but it is going to take time.
Two things Jiggins:
1) There isn't a Luck in this draft. If there was, I would've started the camp personally before the season started. Mitch isn't Luck. To even insinuate that he's on Luck's level as a prospect is batshit crazy.
Probably...or...maybe not?
2) If we need players to start and produce day 1, no way in hell we take Mitch at 1. He has potential but it is going to take time.
Short sighted....and it does not appear that this FO is short sighted. If we need a guy to be a franchise QB for the next 6-10 years..then you do take him.
-
Footwork falls apart under pressure from time to time. UNC's offensive system calls for plenty of short and intermediate passes, thereby inflating his accuracy numbers. Relies a little heavily on Switzer (30+ more receptions than the next receiver), despite the fact that Switzer is not a #1 WR and lines up all over the field, meaning that more often than not Switzer is just his #1 read regardless of play structure or defensive looks. He fumbles too much. He is Philip Rivers when the game is on the line - i.e. you have no idea what the fuck is going to happen.
He's not a perfect prospect.
No, he probably won't come with a John Elway/Peyton Manning/Andrew Luck Grade.....But I think he would have a better grade than a number of top QB picks. Take just those drafted in top 3 since 1999. I think he grades better than Goff/Wentz/Bortles/Griffin/Bradford/Russell/Young/Smith/David Carr/Harrington/Vick/Couch/Palmer.
I don't know that there are more than a half dozen QBs who have come out that may end up having been considered better prospects since 1999: Luck/Winston/Newton/ I think he will be up with Eli Ryan Stafford? Mariota? McNabb.
No, he probably won't come with a John Elway/Peyton Manning/Andrew Luck Grade.....But I think he would have a better grade than a number of top QB picks. Take just those drafted in top 3 since 1999. I think he grades better than Goff/Wentz/Bortles/Griffin/Bradford/Russell/Young/Smith/David Carr/Harrington/Vick/Couch/Palmer.
I don't know that there are more than a half dozen QBs who have come out that may end up having been considered better prospects since 1999: Luck/Winston/Newton/ I think he will be up with Eli Ryan Stafford? Mariota? McNabb.
Goff, no.
Wentz, maybe.
Bortles, maybe.
Griffin, no.
Bradford, no.
Russell, no
Young, no.
Smith, no.
Carr, maybe but also probably no.
Harrington, yes.
Vick, no.
Couch, no.
Palmer, maybe.
Trubisky is not a fantastic prospect, he's just the best prospect in this class. Put on a scale against past first round talent, he's going to be closer to the bottom than the top because of his lack of playing time. Prospects like Vick and Griffin and Bradford were lock top QBs in their draft (Griffin just drew the short straw because he was in the same class as Luck). You put a Vick, Griffin, Bradford, Russell in this draft....he'd be the number one pick.
EDIT: Trubisky falls into the Bortles/Wentz range of prospects (roughly mid-6 on the NFL scouting grading scale). Chance to become a legitimate NFL starter.
RG3 was a 95, which I'm assuming translates down to a 9.5 on today's grading scale. That's where Vick would have been as well. Russell, probably close to an 8. These guys were untouchable in college and graded out FAR ahead of any of the other prospects solely because they possessed that superstar potential.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Two things Jiggins:
1) There isn't a Luck in this draft. If there was, I would've started the camp personally before the season started. Mitch isn't Luck. To even insinuate that he's on Luck's level as a prospect is batshit crazy.
2) If we need players to start and produce day 1, no way in hell we take Mitch at 1. He has potential but it is going to take time.
Yeah, if only we could get a franchise level QB who's won a Super Bowl every single year he's been in the league - like Luck has. Sure was a lock.
Oh, wait....
Yeah, if only we could get a franchise level QB who's won a Super Bowl every single year he's been in the league - like Luck has. Sure was a lock.
Oh, wait....
Notice I said prospect. Mitch very well might have a similar ceiling to Luck but the floor is vastly different.
I'm not sure why you're so down on Luck but to each his own.
-
The ACC Atlantic has three teams ranked - Clemson, Louisville, FSU.
The Coastal - none.
& North Carolina beat FSU.I did post a link to their schedule, it's not like they've been playing a bunch of bums. That one point loss to Duke hurts, but Fer sure- they're going to get a bowl game.
& North Carolina beat FSU.I did post a link to their schedule, it's not like they've been playing a bunch of bums. That one point loss to Duke hurts, but Fer sure- they're going to get a bowl game.
I've seen their schedule. It's not terrible by any means but I wouldn't use it as an argument for Mitch either.
-
Yeah, if only we could get a franchise level QB who's won a Super Bowl every single year he's been in the league - like Luck has. Sure was a lock.
Oh, wait....
Notice I said prospect. Mitch very well might have a similar ceiling to Luck but the floor is vastly different.
I'm not sure why you're so down on Luck but to each his own.
Notice I said prospect. Mitch very well might have a similar ceiling to Luck but the floor is vastly different.
I'm not sure why you're so down on Luck but to each his own.
Because he's been a disappointment and yet he's still referred to as the pinnacle for NFL QB prospects. The number of times I've heard "well, he's no Luck" is maddening.
-
No, he probably won't come with a John Elway/Peyton Manning/Andrew Luck Grade.....But I think he would have a better grade than a number of top QB picks. Take just those drafted in top 3 since 1999. I think he grades better than Goff/Wentz/Bortles/Griffin/Bradford/Russell/Young/Smith/David Carr/Harrington/Vick/Couch/Palmer.
I don't know that there are more than a half dozen QBs who have come out that may end up having been considered better prospects since 1999: Luck/Winston/Newton/ I think he will be up with Eli Ryan Stafford? Mariota? McNabb.
Goff, no.
Wentz, maybe.
Bortles, maybe.
Griffin, no.
Bradford, no.
Russell, no
Young, no.
Smith, no.
Carr, maybe but also probably no.
Harrington, yes.
Vick, no.
Couch, no.
Palmer, maybe.
Trubisky is not a fantastic prospect, he's just the best prospect in this class. Put on a scale against past first round talent, he's going to be closer to the bottom than the top because of his lack of playing time. Prospects like Vick and Griffin and Bradford were lock top QBs in their draft (Griffin just drew the short straw because he was in the same class as Luck). You put a Vick, Griffin, Bradford, Russell in this draft....he'd be the number one pick.
EDIT: Trubisky falls into the Bortles/Wentz range of prospects (roughly mid-6 on the NFL scouting grading scale). Chance to become a legitimate NFL starter.
RG3 was a 95, which I'm assuming translates down to a 9.5 on today's grading scale. That's where Vick would have been as well. Russell, probably close to an 8. These guys were untouchable in college and graded out FAR ahead of any of the other prospects solely because they possessed that superstar potential.
Goff, no.
Wentz, maybe.
Bortles, maybe.
Griffin, no.
Bradford, no.
Russell, no
Young, no.
Smith, no.
Carr, maybe but also probably no.
Harrington, yes.
Vick, no.
Couch, no.
Palmer, maybe.
Trubisky is not a fantastic prospect, he's just the best prospect in this class. Put on a scale against past first round talent, he's going to be closer to the bottom than the top because of his lack of playing time. Prospects like Vick and Griffin and Bradford were lock top QBs in their draft (Griffin just drew the short straw because he was in the same class as Luck). You put a Vick, Griffin, Bradford, Russell in this draft....he'd be the number one pick.
EDIT: Trubisky falls into the Bortles/Wentz range of prospects (roughly mid-6 on the NFL scouting grading scale). Chance to become a legitimate NFL starter.
RG3 was a 95, which I'm assuming translates down to a 9.5 on today's grading scale. That's where Vick would have been as well. Russell, probably close to an 8. These guys were untouchable in college and graded out FAR ahead of any of the other prospects solely because they possessed that superstar potential.
I think that when the final grades come out on him....he will grade out as superior project than just about any one of those.
Though... of course, a word of caution: of the ones you list above....probably the highest grades went to Vince Young and Russell...and we know what happened there.
-
& North Carolina beat FSU.I did post a link to their schedule, it's not like they've been playing a bunch of bums. That one point loss to Duke hurts, but Fer sure- they're going to get a bowl game.
I've seen their schedule. It's not terrible by any means but I wouldn't use it as an argument for Mitch either.
I've seen their schedule. It's not terrible by any means but I wouldn't use it as an argument for Mitch either.
Its an ACC schedule. A very good conference. (better this year than the SEC...
) And they played Georgia (lost) and Illinois (won) in their non-con schedule.Though...they did not play either Clemson or Louisville.
-
Goff, no.
Wentz, maybe.
Bortles, maybe.
Griffin, no.
Bradford, no.
Russell, no
Young, no.
Smith, no.
Carr, maybe but also probably no.
Harrington, yes.
Vick, no.
Couch, no.
Palmer, maybe.
Trubisky is not a fantastic prospect, he's just the best prospect in this class. Put on a scale against past first round talent, he's going to be closer to the bottom than the top because of his lack of playing time. Prospects like Vick and Griffin and Bradford were lock top QBs in their draft (Griffin just drew the short straw because he was in the same class as Luck). You put a Vick, Griffin, Bradford, Russell in this draft....he'd be the number one pick.
EDIT: Trubisky falls into the Bortles/Wentz range of prospects (roughly mid-6 on the NFL scouting grading scale). Chance to become a legitimate NFL starter.
RG3 was a 95, which I'm assuming translates down to a 9.5 on today's grading scale. That's where Vick would have been as well. Russell, probably close to an 8. These guys were untouchable in college and graded out FAR ahead of any of the other prospects solely because they possessed that superstar potential.
I think that when the final grades come out on him....he will grade out as superior project than just about any one of those.
Though... of course, a word of caution: of the ones you list above....probably the highest grades went to Vince Young and Russell...and we know what happened there.
I think that when the final grades come out on him....he will grade out as superior project than just about any one of those.
Though... of course, a word of caution: of the ones you list above....probably the highest grades went to Vince Young and Russell...and we know what happened there.
Actually, probably the highest grades went to RG3, Vick and Couch. RG3 was considered a generational level talent only a hair behind Luck, I think a lot of people forget that.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login